Collection › LCMS Convention Proceedings (St. Louis, Missouri) › 1932 · 35th Convention, Milwaukee › Page 114
LCMS Convention Proceedings St. Louis, Missouri — 1932, Page 114
Page 4
Page 5
Page 6
Page 7
Page 8
Page 9
Page 10
Page 11
Page 12
Page 13
Page 14
Page 15
Page 16
Page 17
Page 18
Page 19
Page 20
Page 21
Page 22
Page 23
Page 24
Page 25
Page 26
Page 27
Page 28
Page 29
Page 30
Page 31
Page 32
Page 33
Page 34
Page 35
Page 36
Page 37
Page 40
Page 41
Page 42
Page 43
Page 44
Page 45
Page 46
Page 47
Page 48
Page 49
Page 52
Page 53
Page 54
Page 55
Page 56
Page 57
Page 58
Page 59
Page 60
Page 61
Page 62
Page 63
Page 64
Page 66
Page 67
Page 68
Page 69
Page 70
Page 71
Page 72
Page 73
Page 74
Page 75
Page 76
Page 77
Page 78
Page 79
Page 80
Page 81
Page 82
Page 83
Page 84
Page 85
Page 86
Page 87
Page 88
Page 89
Page 90
Page 91
Page 92
Page 93
Page 94
Page 95
Page 96
Page 97
Page 98
Page 99
Page 100
Page 101
Page 102
Page 103
Page 104
Page 105
Page 106
Page 107
Page 108
Page 109
Page 110
Page 111
Page 112
Page 113
Page 114
Page 115
Page 116
Page 117
Page 118
Page 119
Page 120
Page 121
Page 122
Page 123
Page 124
Page 125
Page 126
Page 127
Page 128
Page 129
Page 130
Page 131
Page 132
Page 133
Page 134
Page 135
Page 136
Page 137
Page 138
Page 139
Page 140
Page 141
Page 142
Page 143
Page 144
Page 145
Page 146
Page 147
Page 148
Page 149
Page 150
Page 151
Page 152
Page 153
Page 154
Page 155
Page 156
Page 157
Page 158
Page 159
Page 160
Page 161
Page 162
Page 163
Page 236
Page 237
Page 238
Page 239
Page 240
Page 241
Page 242
Page 243
Page 244
Page 245
Page 246
Page 247
Page 248
Page 249
Page 250
Page 251
Page 252
Page 253
Page 254
Page 255
Page 256
Page 257
Page 258
Page 259
Page 260
Page 261
Page 262
Page 263
Page 264
Scan: The Lutheran Church—Missouri Synod
⤓ Download page image (full resolution)
Transcription machine transcription, uncorrected
154 Proceedings of Thirty-Fifth Regular Convention,
IV. CONSTITUTIONAL MATTERS.
Intersynodical Matters.
(Report of Committee 20.)
In reference to the Brief Statement of the Doctrinal Position of
the Missouri Synod.
These theses were drawn up by resolution of Synod (see Proceed-
ings of the 34th Regular Convention, p. 113) by a committee appointed
by Dr. Pfotenhauer and consisting of Dr. F. Pieper, Prof. W. Wenger
Secretary, Rev. E. A. Mayer, Rev. L. A. Heerboth, and Dr. Th.
Engelder. They were published in the Concordia Theological M onthly
of May, 1931, and in pamphlet form were mailed to all the pastors of
Synod. The pastors are to be commended for having studied this doe-
trinal statement, both at conferences and privately. Many changes
were suggested, but these suggestions dealt with widening the scope of
the theses, pointed out changes in phraseology, requested additional
proof-texts, etc., but none called into question the correctness of the
doctrine contained in the theses.
Your Committee carefully studied the theses and the suggested
changes submitted by pastoral conferences and individual pastors, but
did not feel called upon to widen the scope of the theses by adding
additional paragraphs nor to add additional proof-texts nor to make
unnecessary changes in phraseology. Your Committee confined itself
to proving the correctness (Scripturalness) of the doctrine and to
making only such changes in phraseology as were very evidently de-
sirable and to call attention to mistakes in printing.
Unprinted Memorial 56 of the Northwestern Conference of the
Brazil District (expressing surprise that the theses do not cover all
doctrines, neither refer to our practise).
Recommendations of Committee 20: Since the doctrinal state-
ment was drawn up by resolution of the synodical convention of 1929,
and since much time and labor have been expended upon the drawing
up of this statement and their consideration, therefore we recommend
that the request of the Northwestern Pastoral Conference of Brazil
be denied.
Unprinted Memorial 85 (asking that the English text of the theses
be also made the official text).
Your Committee recommends that Synod comply with the pe-
tition.
Requested Changes: —
In the event a reprint of the theses is made, your Committee rec-
ommends that in paragraph 8 of the theses, on Redemption, the words
“but without sin” be added after the words “into His divine person”
ee ner Ny ee ee —
<a neercerieatetinAResiceneeante- ———rnntttrenteneetaneretennnnt
1 . eae ArAecnvernererte
Ev. Luth. Synod of Missouri, Ohio, and Other States. 1932. 155
and in the German text after the words “uns gleiche’ the words be
added “doch suendlose.” It further recommends that in paragraph 8
the word “begotten” be used in the English translation instead of
“born.”
It also calls attention to the following typographical errors and
changes : —
1) In paragraph 9, in the German text, the comma is to be placed
not after “nicht,” but after “rechtfertigt.”
2) In paragraph 17, in the German text, the quotation is Rom. 3,
93. 24 instead of Rom. 5, 24.
3) The reference to the Samaritans in paragraph 26 should con-
form to the German text and therefore read Samaritans: Luke 17, 16.
4) Paragraph 28. Instead of the words in the English text “as the
real cause of the origin and continuance of divisions in the Church”
it should read “as causing divisions in the Church.”
5) Paragraph 31. The quotation is to be Eph. 6,4 instead of 6, 6.
6) Paragraph 34. The quotation is to be John 18, 11 instead of
John 8, 11.
7) Paragraph 38. The words in the German text: “den Rest,”
“das uebrige,” “die Wahl,” should be put in quotation-marks.
8) Paragraph 39. The quotation from the Triglotta should be
correctly quoted, thus: “diese Lehre nicht anders denn also, dass sie
uns dadurch zum Wort weist, Eph. 1; 1 Kor.1, zur Busse vermahnt,
2Twm. 8, zur Gottseligkeit anhaelt, Eph. 1; Joh. 15, den Glauben
staerkt und unserer Seligkeit uns vergewissert, Eph. 1; Joh. 10;
2 Thess. 2.” ; 2?
We recommend that the theses be adopted as a brief Scriptural
statement of the doctrinal position of the Missouri Synod.
We recommend that Synod adopt these theses. We recommend
the titl ain as it is. .
that the title remain A. ProTennaurr, Chairman.
W. E. Houenstuin, Secretary.
Synod adopted this report.
Report of Committee 20 on the Hanssen Case.
(Regarding a protest against several members of the former Intersynodical
Committee. )
Ihr Komitee hat den Protest des Herrn Pastor Theodor Hanssen
sorgfaeltig geprueft, findet aber, dass der Protest unberechtigt ist, und
empfiehlt deshalb der Ehrw. Synode, den Protest zurueckzuweisen.
Your Committee has carefully considered the protest of Pastor -
Theo. Hanssen, but finds that the protest is not justified and therefore
recommends to the Hon. Synod the rejection of the protest.
Synod adopted this report.