Collection › LCMS Convention Proceedings (St. Louis, Missouri) › 1932 · 35th Convention, Milwaukee › Page 93
LCMS Convention Proceedings St. Louis, Missouri — 1932, Page 93
Page 4
Page 5
Page 6
Page 7
Page 8
Page 9
Page 10
Page 11
Page 12
Page 13
Page 14
Page 15
Page 16
Page 17
Page 18
Page 19
Page 20
Page 21
Page 22
Page 23
Page 24
Page 25
Page 26
Page 27
Page 28
Page 29
Page 30
Page 31
Page 32
Page 33
Page 34
Page 35
Page 36
Page 37
Page 40
Page 41
Page 42
Page 43
Page 44
Page 45
Page 46
Page 47
Page 48
Page 49
Page 52
Page 53
Page 54
Page 55
Page 56
Page 57
Page 58
Page 59
Page 60
Page 61
Page 62
Page 63
Page 64
Page 66
Page 67
Page 68
Page 69
Page 70
Page 71
Page 72
Page 73
Page 74
Page 75
Page 76
Page 77
Page 78
Page 79
Page 80
Page 81
Page 82
Page 83
Page 84
Page 85
Page 86
Page 87
Page 88
Page 89
Page 90
Page 91
Page 92
Page 93
Page 94
Page 95
Page 96
Page 97
Page 98
Page 99
Page 100
Page 101
Page 102
Page 103
Page 104
Page 105
Page 106
Page 107
Page 108
Page 109
Page 110
Page 111
Page 112
Page 113
Page 114
Page 115
Page 116
Page 117
Page 118
Page 119
Page 120
Page 121
Page 122
Page 123
Page 124
Page 125
Page 126
Page 127
Page 128
Page 129
Page 130
Page 131
Page 132
Page 133
Page 134
Page 135
Page 136
Page 137
Page 138
Page 139
Page 140
Page 141
Page 142
Page 143
Page 144
Page 145
Page 146
Page 147
Page 148
Page 149
Page 150
Page 151
Page 152
Page 153
Page 154
Page 155
Page 156
Page 157
Page 158
Page 159
Page 160
Page 161
Page 162
Page 163
Page 236
Page 237
Page 238
Page 239
Page 240
Page 241
Page 242
Page 243
Page 244
Page 245
Page 246
Page 247
Page 248
Page 249
Page 250
Page 251
Page 252
Page 253
Page 254
Page 255
Page 256
Page 257
Page 258
Page 259
Page 260
Page 261
Page 262
Page 263
Page 264
Scan: The Lutheran Church—Missouri Synod
⤓ Download page image (full resolution)
Transcription machine transcription, uncorrected
‘112 Proceedings of Thirty-Fifth Regular Convention
Wuereas, The sy.
pected receipts; and
; Wueraasg, It appears illogical and unr
ing Districts first
to remit contribution
borrow them back; therefore
easonable for self-
Support.
Ss to the Board and vot
then to
That in future the Gen
from the synodical budget,
Wuerras, At present, the
. . endorsement of th istri i
and the District Church Ex he nant resident
tension Board or of the Distrj i
> ; stric i
Board 18 required before an application for a loan * Mission
“which makes them moral]
control; and
Wuerzas, Thorough
throughout Synod is diffeu
and can well be done by th
investigation in every
lt and cumbersome for th
e District officials; and
individual Case
e General Board
8 from the General Fund
tcts of Synod as specified in the “R .
the Board” (Proceedings, 1929, p. 80); and Seulations for
That the paragraph
“C. Loans to Congregations”
. ation:
lations” be stricken. oes °
in said “Regu-
GETHSEMANE Fy. Lu
F. A, Herrwic, Pastor.
Endorsed by Berutenex
TH. CHurcH, Dertrorr, Micu.
F. W. Ktewscamipr, Secretary.
Ev. Lurueran Conargcation,
Sacinaw, Micu.
The recommendation of the committ
I ee concerning th
of this memorial was adopted by Synod: Bane fist part
to reinstate it.
As to the second Proposal in Memori
the recommendation of the committee: —
Wuerras, Synod has resolved that the Board of Directors be em-
powered to elect a Secretary of Missi
al 608, it was resolved, upon
nodical budget should not Breatly exceeg
ex.
Ev. Luth. Synod of Missouri, Ohio, and Other States. 1932. 113
_ Resolved, That action on Memorial 608, 2, be deferred at this
time in order to give the Church Extension Board and such other
‘boards of Synod as may be affected the advantage of the survey which
has been made and will be made in the future.
Regarding the publications issued by the Board for Missions
among the Blind and Deaf, the report of the Board of Directors
(Memorial 601, B, 6) brought in certain recommendations, concern-
ing which the resolutions submitted by Committee 8 were adopted by
Synod : —
That all publications issued by, and in the interest of, Deaf-mute
and Blind Missions be subject to the same censorship as all our pub-
lications; and
That the Board of Directors, together with the Deaf-mute and
Blind Mission Board, study the size and distribution of these publi-
cations and see to it that such distribution is in full keeping with the
practise of our Church.
B. Various Missions.
Report of the Board of Home Missions in North America.
(Memorial 301.)
With deep gratitude to the Lord of the harvest the undersigned
submit to Synod their triennial report. All our missionaries engaged
in His service have not only been privileged to be His witnesses in
thousands of fields in our own country as well as in Canada, Alaska,
and Mexico, but in their labors they have also enjoyed His divine
blessing and His constant protection. Yea, what is more, our work
in the past three years has experienced a remarkable growth and
made noteworthy progress. Next to the grace of God, we believe this
to be due to two significant factors. In the first place, Synod several
years ago adopted a policy of expansion for missions, primarily Home
Missions. It instructed all the mission boards to devote themselves
more intensively to the quest for the unchurched in our country and
simultaneously granted to the numerically small and weak Districts
larger allowances. Two years ago this commendable measure was
followed by the so-called Call of the Hour. Upon the recommendation
and under the supervision of Synod’s Mission Committee a movement
was launched to make the Lenten season a missionary season, in
other words, to have pastors during this season stress the missionary
obligation of their members, to exhort them to a special Lenten thank-
offering, and to enlist their services in a canvass of the surrounding
territory for mission material.
Though approximately only fifty per cent. of our congregations
8