Collection › LCMS Convention Proceedings (St. Louis, Missouri) › 1932 · 35th Convention, Milwaukee › Page 93

LCMS Convention Proceedings St. Louis, Missouri — 1932, Page 93

Page 4 Page 5 Page 6 Page 7 Page 8 Page 9 Page 10 Page 11 Page 12 Page 13 Page 14 Page 15 Page 16 Page 17 Page 18 Page 19 Page 20 Page 21 Page 22 Page 23 Page 24 Page 25 Page 26 Page 27 Page 28 Page 29 Page 30 Page 31 Page 32 Page 33 Page 34 Page 35 Page 36 Page 37 Page 40 Page 41 Page 42 Page 43 Page 44 Page 45 Page 46 Page 47 Page 48 Page 49 Page 52 Page 53 Page 54 Page 55 Page 56 Page 57 Page 58 Page 59 Page 60 Page 61 Page 62 Page 63 Page 64 Page 66 Page 67 Page 68 Page 69 Page 70 Page 71 Page 72 Page 73 Page 74 Page 75 Page 76 Page 77 Page 78 Page 79 Page 80 Page 81 Page 82 Page 83 Page 84 Page 85 Page 86 Page 87 Page 88 Page 89 Page 90 Page 91 Page 92 Page 93 Page 94 Page 95 Page 96 Page 97 Page 98 Page 99 Page 100 Page 101 Page 102 Page 103 Page 104 Page 105 Page 106 Page 107 Page 108 Page 109 Page 110 Page 111 Page 112 Page 113 Page 114 Page 115 Page 116 Page 117 Page 118 Page 119 Page 120 Page 121 Page 122 Page 123 Page 124 Page 125 Page 126 Page 127 Page 128 Page 129 Page 130 Page 131 Page 132 Page 133 Page 134 Page 135 Page 136 Page 137 Page 138 Page 139 Page 140 Page 141 Page 142 Page 143 Page 144 Page 145 Page 146 Page 147 Page 148 Page 149 Page 150 Page 151 Page 152 Page 153 Page 154 Page 155 Page 156 Page 157 Page 158 Page 159 Page 160 Page 161 Page 162 Page 163 Page 236 Page 237 Page 238 Page 239 Page 240 Page 241 Page 242 Page 243 Page 244 Page 245 Page 246 Page 247 Page 248 Page 249 Page 250 Page 251 Page 252 Page 253 Page 254 Page 255 Page 256 Page 257 Page 258 Page 259 Page 260 Page 261 Page 262 Page 263 Page 264

Scan: The Lutheran Church—Missouri Synod

⤓ Download page image (full resolution)

Transcription machine transcription, uncorrected

⤓ Download .txt · copy text

‘112 Proceedings of Thirty-Fifth Regular Convention
Wuereas, The sy.

pected receipts; and

; Wueraasg, It appears illogical and unr

ing Districts first

to remit contribution
borrow them back; therefore

easonable for self-

Support.
Ss to the Board and vot

then to

That in future the Gen
from the synodical budget,

Wuerras, At present, the
. . endorsement of th istri i
and the District Church Ex he nant resident

tension Board or of the Distrj i
> ; stric i
Board 18 required before an application for a loan * Mission
“which makes them moral]

control; and

Wuerzas, Thorough
throughout Synod is diffeu
and can well be done by th

investigation in every
lt and cumbersome for th
e District officials; and

individual Case
e General Board

8 from the General Fund

tcts of Synod as specified in the “R .
the Board” (Proceedings, 1929, p. 80); and Seulations for

That the paragraph

“C. Loans to Congregations”
. ation:
lations” be stricken. oes °

in said “Regu-
GETHSEMANE Fy. Lu

F. A, Herrwic, Pastor.

Endorsed by Berutenex

TH. CHurcH, Dertrorr, Micu.
F. W. Ktewscamipr, Secretary.

Ev. Lurueran Conargcation,
Sacinaw, Micu.
The recommendation of the committ

I ee concerning th
of this memorial was adopted by Synod: Bane fist part

to reinstate it.

As to the second Proposal in Memori
the recommendation of the committee: —

Wuerras, Synod has resolved that the Board of Directors be em-
powered to elect a Secretary of Missi

al 608, it was resolved, upon

nodical budget should not Breatly exceeg
ex.

Ev. Luth. Synod of Missouri, Ohio, and Other States. 1932. 113

_ Resolved, That action on Memorial 608, 2, be deferred at this
time in order to give the Church Extension Board and such other
‘boards of Synod as may be affected the advantage of the survey which
has been made and will be made in the future.

Regarding the publications issued by the Board for Missions
among the Blind and Deaf, the report of the Board of Directors
(Memorial 601, B, 6) brought in certain recommendations, concern-
ing which the resolutions submitted by Committee 8 were adopted by
Synod : —

That all publications issued by, and in the interest of, Deaf-mute
and Blind Missions be subject to the same censorship as all our pub-
lications; and

That the Board of Directors, together with the Deaf-mute and
Blind Mission Board, study the size and distribution of these publi-
cations and see to it that such distribution is in full keeping with the
practise of our Church.

B. Various Missions.

Report of the Board of Home Missions in North America.
(Memorial 301.)

With deep gratitude to the Lord of the harvest the undersigned
submit to Synod their triennial report. All our missionaries engaged
in His service have not only been privileged to be His witnesses in
thousands of fields in our own country as well as in Canada, Alaska,
and Mexico, but in their labors they have also enjoyed His divine
blessing and His constant protection. Yea, what is more, our work
in the past three years has experienced a remarkable growth and
made noteworthy progress. Next to the grace of God, we believe this
to be due to two significant factors. In the first place, Synod several
years ago adopted a policy of expansion for missions, primarily Home
Missions. It instructed all the mission boards to devote themselves
more intensively to the quest for the unchurched in our country and
simultaneously granted to the numerically small and weak Districts
larger allowances. Two years ago this commendable measure was
followed by the so-called Call of the Hour. Upon the recommendation
and under the supervision of Synod’s Mission Committee a movement
was launched to make the Lenten season a missionary season, in
other words, to have pastors during this season stress the missionary
obligation of their members, to exhort them to a special Lenten thank-
offering, and to enlist their services in a canvass of the surrounding
territory for mission material.

Though approximately only fifty per cent. of our congregations
8