Collection › LCMS Convention Proceedings (St. Louis, Missouri) › 1932 · 35th Convention, Milwaukee › Page 72
LCMS Convention Proceedings St. Louis, Missouri — 1932, Page 72
Page 4
Page 5
Page 6
Page 7
Page 8
Page 9
Page 10
Page 11
Page 12
Page 13
Page 14
Page 15
Page 16
Page 17
Page 18
Page 19
Page 20
Page 21
Page 22
Page 23
Page 24
Page 25
Page 26
Page 27
Page 28
Page 29
Page 30
Page 31
Page 32
Page 33
Page 34
Page 35
Page 36
Page 37
Page 40
Page 41
Page 42
Page 43
Page 44
Page 45
Page 46
Page 47
Page 48
Page 49
Page 52
Page 53
Page 54
Page 55
Page 56
Page 57
Page 58
Page 59
Page 60
Page 61
Page 62
Page 63
Page 64
Page 66
Page 67
Page 68
Page 69
Page 70
Page 71
Page 72
Page 73
Page 74
Page 75
Page 76
Page 77
Page 78
Page 79
Page 80
Page 81
Page 82
Page 83
Page 84
Page 85
Page 86
Page 87
Page 88
Page 89
Page 90
Page 91
Page 92
Page 93
Page 94
Page 95
Page 96
Page 97
Page 98
Page 99
Page 100
Page 101
Page 102
Page 103
Page 104
Page 105
Page 106
Page 107
Page 108
Page 109
Page 110
Page 111
Page 112
Page 113
Page 114
Page 115
Page 116
Page 117
Page 118
Page 119
Page 120
Page 121
Page 122
Page 123
Page 124
Page 125
Page 126
Page 127
Page 128
Page 129
Page 130
Page 131
Page 132
Page 133
Page 134
Page 135
Page 136
Page 137
Page 138
Page 139
Page 140
Page 141
Page 142
Page 143
Page 144
Page 145
Page 146
Page 147
Page 148
Page 149
Page 150
Page 151
Page 152
Page 153
Page 154
Page 155
Page 156
Page 157
Page 158
Page 159
Page 160
Page 161
Page 162
Page 163
Page 236
Page 237
Page 238
Page 239
Page 240
Page 241
Page 242
Page 243
Page 244
Page 245
Page 246
Page 247
Page 248
Page 249
Page 250
Page 251
Page 252
Page 253
Page 254
Page 255
Page 256
Page 257
Page 258
Page 259
Page 260
Page 261
Page 262
Page 263
Page 264
Scan: The Lutheran Church—Missouri Synod
⤓ Download page image (full resolution)
Transcription machine transcription, uncorrected
72 Proceedings of Thirty-Fifth Regular Convention,
IV. The old argument that the plan is unique and untried cannot ,
be urged as a valid objection; for —
A. The plan to expand some of the existing institutions to eight
years is also unique and labors under the additional disadvantage of
having been tried in other circles, where it has failed. It
ne . wee i8 no
frowned upon by accrediting agencies, who insist in Such caseg io
complete separation between the high school and the College (pro-
fessora, libraries, laboratories).
B. Locating a senior college of two years at on
only with respect to the physical separation. Colleges and UNiversitieg
(Chicago University and Johns Hopkins University) make a sharp
distinction between the work of freshman and sophomore years, on
the one hand, and of junior and senior years, on the other hand.
Respectfully submitted by
THe Pastora CONFERENCE oF Fort Wayne
AND Vicintry.
Wo. E. Mott, Chairman,
Joun G, Sonn, Secretary,
printed Memorial 84, submitted by the St. Louis Faculty and Board
of Control together with the Board of Directors.
This matter belongs to those that were referred to the Committee
on Higher Education.
Lengthening Our College Course,
(Extracts from Memorial 126.)
Without any doubt the students at our preparatory schools should
receive training in accordance with the needs of our times before they
enter the theological seminary at St. Louis. It is just as important
provements in our college should not exceed the financial ability of
our people. Therefore we submit to Synod the following resolutions
for careful consideration and adoption : —
Resolved so to lengthen and arrange the scholastic year at our
colleges that through the addition of summer courses during the six
years at our preparatory schools the equivalent of at least one scho-
lastic year be gained. :
We consider this plan advantageous and altogether feasible for
the following reasons: —