Collection › LCMS Convention Proceedings (St. Louis, Missouri) › 1932 · 35th Convention, Milwaukee › Page 98

LCMS Convention Proceedings St. Louis, Missouri — 1932, Page 98

Page 4 Page 5 Page 6 Page 7 Page 8 Page 9 Page 10 Page 11 Page 12 Page 13 Page 14 Page 15 Page 16 Page 17 Page 18 Page 19 Page 20 Page 21 Page 22 Page 23 Page 24 Page 25 Page 26 Page 27 Page 28 Page 29 Page 30 Page 31 Page 32 Page 33 Page 34 Page 35 Page 36 Page 37 Page 40 Page 41 Page 42 Page 43 Page 44 Page 45 Page 46 Page 47 Page 48 Page 49 Page 52 Page 53 Page 54 Page 55 Page 56 Page 57 Page 58 Page 59 Page 60 Page 61 Page 62 Page 63 Page 64 Page 66 Page 67 Page 68 Page 69 Page 70 Page 71 Page 72 Page 73 Page 74 Page 75 Page 76 Page 77 Page 78 Page 79 Page 80 Page 81 Page 82 Page 83 Page 84 Page 85 Page 86 Page 87 Page 88 Page 89 Page 90 Page 91 Page 92 Page 93 Page 94 Page 95 Page 96 Page 97 Page 98 Page 99 Page 100 Page 101 Page 102 Page 103 Page 104 Page 105 Page 106 Page 107 Page 108 Page 109 Page 110 Page 111 Page 112 Page 113 Page 114 Page 115 Page 116 Page 117 Page 118 Page 119 Page 120 Page 121 Page 122 Page 123 Page 124 Page 125 Page 126 Page 127 Page 128 Page 129 Page 130 Page 131 Page 132 Page 133 Page 134 Page 135 Page 136 Page 137 Page 138 Page 139 Page 140 Page 141 Page 142 Page 143 Page 144 Page 145 Page 146 Page 147 Page 148 Page 149 Page 150 Page 151 Page 152 Page 153 Page 154 Page 155 Page 156 Page 157 Page 158 Page 159 Page 160 Page 161 Page 162 Page 163 Page 236 Page 237 Page 238 Page 239 Page 240 Page 241 Page 242 Page 243 Page 244 Page 245 Page 246 Page 247 Page 248 Page 249 Page 250 Page 251 Page 252 Page 253 Page 254 Page 255 Page 256 Page 257 Page 258 Page 259 Page 260 Page 261 Page 262 Page 263 Page 264

Scan: The Lutheran Church—Missouri Synod

⤓ Download page image (full resolution)

Transcription machine transcription, uncorrected

⤓ Download .txt · copy text

122 Proceedings of Thirty-Fifth Regular Convention
>

: 2. That Synod voice its hearty appreciation of the effici
in which the General Church Extension Board has carried
entrusted to it;

3.. That Synod approve the adopted policy of the General Qh
Extension Board whereby no loans are made to congregations for i
e

ent Manner
on the work

a. The moneys invested in this Building and Loan Fund shall be
rovt ina und entirely separate from the General Church Extension
Treasury, but are to be administered b
y the members
Church Extension Board. Of the Genera
b. Money shall be borrowed at a low rate of interest from members
of Synod and loaned to congregations at the current rate of interest
ce. The necessary regulations to govern this phase of activity on

Bernthal secretary-treasurer.
The Church’s work among the students attending non-synodical

While the Student Welfare Committee met as often as the work
demanded, only one conference of university pastors was held. An
annual conference had been resolved upon to be called during the
second week in Ni ovember; but due to the shortage of funds in Synod’s

treasury the conference was twice called off after consultation with
the Ven. President of Synod.

Ev. Luth. Synod of Missouri, Ohio, and Other States. 1932. 123

At the conference of university pastors which met at Chicago
November 12, 1929, pastoral work among students in its various phases

~ was discussed, and much helpful information was exchanged. A dis-

cussion on the status of the Student Welfare Committee led to the
drafting of the following resolution: —

Resolved, That all phases of Student Welfare Work should be
united in the hands of the Student Welfare Committee and be under
its sole guidance and control, except as otherwise provided by Synod.

Considerable time was devoted to the discussion of the publica-
tion of the Lutheran Student. No action was taken in the matter by
the conference. At a later meeting of the Student Welfare Committee,
however, this project was given extensive consideration. Your Com-
mittee was not inclined to sponsor the publication of a Synod-wide
student periodical, for these reasons: 1. The cost of publishing and
mailing such a publication would exceed $2,500 and thus go far be-
yond the annual appropriation given to Student Welfare Work by the
General Body. 2. The Student Welfare Committee believed that a
student periodical such as was contemplated would be read by com-
paratively few of our Lutheran students, as experience has shown,
and that therefore the publication would be practically ineffective.

The District mission boards were urged to assume the respon-
sibility for the spiritual care of students attending institutions of
higher learning within their respective Districts, particularly where
there is no regularly organized congregation to take charge of the
work,

The Student Welfare Committee feels that the Student Welfare
Work has not progressed as far as might have been expected, due
largely to the fact that the pastors engaged in student work are
scattered all over the country and the expenses of traveling to and
from university pastors’ conferences are so great that it is out of the
question to have the pastors pay their own transportation. Such items
ought to find place on the synodical budget.

The annual census taken under authorization of the Student Wel-
fare Committee did not reveal the total number of Lutheran students.
enrolled at universities and other secondary schools. The returns on
the questionnaire sent to all pastors of Synod were very unsatisfactory,
due perhaps to a misunderstanding of the purpose of the question-
naire. The figures of the census of 1931 follow: —

Total “out-of-town” students .:...................2.... 672
Total Valparaiso students .©.........0 00.0... cece cee eee 157
Total “local” students .........0.. 0.0 c ccc cece ececeee 1,153
Total of all students reported..................0000.005 1,982
Number of pastors to whom cards were mailed......... 2,650

Number of pastors returning student list............... 1,172