Collection › LCMS Convention Proceedings (St. Louis, Missouri) › 1932 · 35th Convention, Milwaukee › Page 47
LCMS Convention Proceedings St. Louis, Missouri — 1932, Page 47
Page 4
Page 5
Page 6
Page 7
Page 8
Page 9
Page 10
Page 11
Page 12
Page 13
Page 14
Page 15
Page 16
Page 17
Page 18
Page 19
Page 20
Page 21
Page 22
Page 23
Page 24
Page 25
Page 26
Page 27
Page 28
Page 29
Page 30
Page 31
Page 32
Page 33
Page 34
Page 35
Page 36
Page 37
Page 40
Page 41
Page 42
Page 43
Page 44
Page 45
Page 46
Page 47
Page 48
Page 49
Page 52
Page 53
Page 54
Page 55
Page 56
Page 57
Page 58
Page 59
Page 60
Page 61
Page 62
Page 63
Page 64
Page 66
Page 67
Page 68
Page 69
Page 70
Page 71
Page 72
Page 73
Page 74
Page 75
Page 76
Page 77
Page 78
Page 79
Page 80
Page 81
Page 82
Page 83
Page 84
Page 85
Page 86
Page 87
Page 88
Page 89
Page 90
Page 91
Page 92
Page 93
Page 94
Page 95
Page 96
Page 97
Page 98
Page 99
Page 100
Page 101
Page 102
Page 103
Page 104
Page 105
Page 106
Page 107
Page 108
Page 109
Page 110
Page 111
Page 112
Page 113
Page 114
Page 115
Page 116
Page 117
Page 118
Page 119
Page 120
Page 121
Page 122
Page 123
Page 124
Page 125
Page 126
Page 127
Page 128
Page 129
Page 130
Page 131
Page 132
Page 133
Page 134
Page 135
Page 136
Page 137
Page 138
Page 139
Page 140
Page 141
Page 142
Page 143
Page 144
Page 145
Page 146
Page 147
Page 148
Page 149
Page 150
Page 151
Page 152
Page 153
Page 154
Page 155
Page 156
Page 157
Page 158
Page 159
Page 160
Page 161
Page 162
Page 163
Page 236
Page 237
Page 238
Page 239
Page 240
Page 241
Page 242
Page 243
Page 244
Page 245
Page 246
Page 247
Page 248
Page 249
Page 250
Page 251
Page 252
Page 253
Page 254
Page 255
Page 256
Page 257
Page 258
Page 259
Page 260
Page 261
Page 262
Page 263
Page 264
Scan: The Lutheran Church—Missouri Synod
⤓ Download page image (full resolution)
Transcription machine transcription, uncorrected
Ev Luth. Synod of Missouri, Ohio, and Other States. 1932. AT
an known as Division B, made necessary because of our present
= ngition period, which very materially. affects this branch of study.
ey It has. pleased our Lord to take to His heavenly home the late
pees Hink, for many years a member of the local board of control.
Jp Bink died on the 28th of June, 1929, just a few days after he had
. in been reelected by Synod to serve another term. May the memory
¢ his faith and Christian virtues, of his modesty, energy, and faithful
° vice, stimulate us to continue steadfastly as faithful workers in the
reyard of our Lord! The vacancy thus caused was filled by the
weal board; with the sanction of the President of Synod it selected
Mr. L. Pinkepank of Emma, Mo., in whom we have found a val-
yable man.
The enrolment for the last three years was as follows: —
1929—1930 1930—19381 1931—1982
Totals ......... 160 163 163
Prima ......... 15 24 _ 26
Secunda ....... 28° 30 18
Tertia ......... 30 18 31
Quarta ........ 22 _ 30 28
Quinta ........ 29 . 24 32
Sexta ......... 35 37 . 28
Having duly made our report, we now come to you with our
requests for improvements and appropriations, which, we feel, are
needed at Concordia at this time.
Administration Building. — Once more we come before you with
our request for an administration building. We are firmly convinced
that the same reasons which we mentioned in our overture of 1926
and 1929 are as valid as ever, perhaps even more so to-day. 1) We
need more classrooms. 2) Most classrooms in the present administra-
tion building are without proper ventilation facilities and lack the
proper lighting, permitting the light to enter the classroom from two
sides. 3) The laboratory is inadequate. 4) Our library quarters are
crowded, making impossible the desired access to the many volumes on
hand. 5) The faculty-room is inadequate. 6) The chapel (aula) is
not large enough.
All these reasons made a new administration building very
desirable, while we candidly admitted that it could not thereby be
presented as an absolute necessity. Hence we gladly agreed to wait
another three years, seeing that Synod’s finances would not warrant
this improvement, especially in the faee of other, more urgent requests.
However, at this time we must add another reason to those men-
tioned above, which makes it imperative for Synod to grant our
request. The local Board of Control no longer wishes to carry the
responsibility placed upon it by a further use of this building. As.
already stated, it répeatedly became necessary during the past trien-
nium to make repdirs, but without permanent results. In the fall
of 1930 we called in experts, who advocated the removal of the but-