Collection › LCMS Convention Proceedings (St. Louis, Missouri) › 1932 · 35th Convention, Milwaukee › Page 91
LCMS Convention Proceedings St. Louis, Missouri — 1932, Page 91
Page 4
Page 5
Page 6
Page 7
Page 8
Page 9
Page 10
Page 11
Page 12
Page 13
Page 14
Page 15
Page 16
Page 17
Page 18
Page 19
Page 20
Page 21
Page 22
Page 23
Page 24
Page 25
Page 26
Page 27
Page 28
Page 29
Page 30
Page 31
Page 32
Page 33
Page 34
Page 35
Page 36
Page 37
Page 40
Page 41
Page 42
Page 43
Page 44
Page 45
Page 46
Page 47
Page 48
Page 49
Page 52
Page 53
Page 54
Page 55
Page 56
Page 57
Page 58
Page 59
Page 60
Page 61
Page 62
Page 63
Page 64
Page 66
Page 67
Page 68
Page 69
Page 70
Page 71
Page 72
Page 73
Page 74
Page 75
Page 76
Page 77
Page 78
Page 79
Page 80
Page 81
Page 82
Page 83
Page 84
Page 85
Page 86
Page 87
Page 88
Page 89
Page 90
Page 91
Page 92
Page 93
Page 94
Page 95
Page 96
Page 97
Page 98
Page 99
Page 100
Page 101
Page 102
Page 103
Page 104
Page 105
Page 106
Page 107
Page 108
Page 109
Page 110
Page 111
Page 112
Page 113
Page 114
Page 115
Page 116
Page 117
Page 118
Page 119
Page 120
Page 121
Page 122
Page 123
Page 124
Page 125
Page 126
Page 127
Page 128
Page 129
Page 130
Page 131
Page 132
Page 133
Page 134
Page 135
Page 136
Page 137
Page 138
Page 139
Page 140
Page 141
Page 142
Page 143
Page 144
Page 145
Page 146
Page 147
Page 148
Page 149
Page 150
Page 151
Page 152
Page 153
Page 154
Page 155
Page 156
Page 157
Page 158
Page 159
Page 160
Page 161
Page 162
Page 163
Page 236
Page 237
Page 238
Page 239
Page 240
Page 241
Page 242
Page 243
Page 244
Page 245
Page 246
Page 247
Page 248
Page 249
Page 250
Page 251
Page 252
Page 253
Page 254
Page 255
Page 256
Page 257
Page 258
Page 259
Page 260
Page 261
Page 262
Page 263
Page 264
Scan: The Lutheran Church—Missouri Synod
⤓ Download page image (full resolution)
Transcription machine transcription, uncorrected
108
Proceedings of Thirty-Fifth Regular Convention,
“ . . We have assumed to give leadership to unio
services, and in this, I believe, our practise must be revi:
must also avoid inviting the ministers of these churches [Missourj
Synod] to participate in union services. . Our understanding of
these principles and our strict adherence to such policies
a great amount of misunderstanding and offense to certain
religious bodies, which do not participate in union religious SErvices
on any occasion.... This correspondence. .. will undoubtedly be the
occasion of the development of literature on this subject in order that
the policies involved may be understood by all our executives.” (From
letter of Mr. Wyland to Scout executive regarding our opp
union Scout services. Carbon copy in BYPW files.)
“Our troop never participates in any general meetings of Scouts
which are of a religious or interdenominational nature.”
Synod pastor.)
Let it be said that all communications, especially forma] resolu-
tions, received adequate review and consideration. It is possible that
some of the opposition is due in part to a lack of information which
only we had in possession.
In view of the variety of opinions which the discussion has evoked
and on account of the genuine anxiety which troubles the mind of
conscientious pastors and other leaders, we are convinced that Synod
must eventually take final and decisive action in the matter.
If the junior organizations (Boy Scouts) are inherently so vicious
in purpose and program that membership warrants excommunication,
then the Boy Scouts should not be tolerated anywhere in the Missouri
Synod, and disciplinary action must be taken against those congrega-
tions in which troops are organized, maintained, or tolerated.
If the view prevails that Scout troops may be organized and con-
ducted with certain precautions and reservations (some even now ap-
proved by Boy Scout officials), then the matter can be left to the
decision of the local congregation, which is best qualified to judge its
own local and peculiar conditions.
In fairness to Scout officials at headquarters we beg leave to add
that they have consistently shown courtesy, understanding, and
willingness to make concessions.
With reference to the invitation of our boys to participate in
unionistic services, a willingness to meet our demands is voiced in the
correspondence quoted above. (In practise even the troops now exist-
ing in our congregations have only in exceptional cases had reason for
complaint on this score.) We have the assurance of the Scout author-
ities that the interpretation of the “oath” in our preliminary report
finds their approval. What remains is that the program of Scouting
be definitely cleared of specific religious objectives in order that the
objections be met which have been set forth in our report. (See also
n Protestant
sed.... Wy,
e
will save
exclusive
Osition to
(Missouri
Ev. Luth. Synod of Missouri, Ohio, and Other States. 1932. 109
g ore Empire, pp. 217—223.) At the time when this report was filed
for inclusion in the Reports and Memorials pamphlet, negotiations
e still pending.
wen The section of this report which deals with the Boy Scout matter
has been mailed to those conferences which sent us opinions dissenting
from OUTS: —_ Respectfully submitted,
Tue Boarp ror YouNG Peorxe’s Work.
M. J. Roscuxe, Secretary.
The report of Committee 7 regarding this memorial was adopted
by Synod in the following form: — ;
1. WHEREAS, The Board for Young People’s Work has held twenty-
seven meetings during the past three years and has established contact
with committees in nearly every District of Synod; therefore be it
Resolved, That we compliment the Board for its faithful and in-
telligent application to the duties imposed upon it by Synod; and be
it further
9, Resolved, That we concur in the principles and recommenda-
tions of the Board that — . ; _
a. A congregation should not delegate its responsibility toward its
young people to some other organization, constant vigilance on the
part of the congregation being necessary ;
b. The Christian day-school through its thorough indoctrination
is a powerful agency in keeping our youth with the Church ;
c. The regular reading of our church periodicals, particularly of
our official synodical organs, and of other wholesome literature by our
young people should be continuously encouraged ;
d. Christenlehre and the organizing of Bible classes for young
people are recommended. ;
3. WuHerEas, Young people’s work should be carried on with
great diligence and intelligent direction on account of its far-reach-
ing possibilities; and
Wuereas, The Walther League is a very helpful agency in the
advancement of this work in our Church; therefore be it ;
Resolved, That we earnestly urge all our congregations to organize
young people’s societies, if they have not already done so, and that we
reafirm Synod’s endorsement of the Walther League and its worthy
aims; and be it further
Resolved, That we commend the close and whole-hearted eoopera-
tion between the Synodical District Committees for Young People’s
Work and the respective Walther League district boards;. and be it
further ; ;
4, Resolved, That we commend the sponsoring of the Synod-wide
Roll-call and suggest that.a similar project be undertaken by the
Board for Young People’s Work every five years and covering a period
of ten years.