Collection › LCMS Convention Proceedings (St. Louis, Missouri) › 1932 · 35th Convention, Milwaukee › Page 130

LCMS Convention Proceedings St. Louis, Missouri — 1932, Page 130

Page 4 Page 5 Page 6 Page 7 Page 8 Page 9 Page 10 Page 11 Page 12 Page 13 Page 14 Page 15 Page 16 Page 17 Page 18 Page 19 Page 20 Page 21 Page 22 Page 23 Page 24 Page 25 Page 26 Page 27 Page 28 Page 29 Page 30 Page 31 Page 32 Page 33 Page 34 Page 35 Page 36 Page 37 Page 40 Page 41 Page 42 Page 43 Page 44 Page 45 Page 46 Page 47 Page 48 Page 49 Page 52 Page 53 Page 54 Page 55 Page 56 Page 57 Page 58 Page 59 Page 60 Page 61 Page 62 Page 63 Page 64 Page 66 Page 67 Page 68 Page 69 Page 70 Page 71 Page 72 Page 73 Page 74 Page 75 Page 76 Page 77 Page 78 Page 79 Page 80 Page 81 Page 82 Page 83 Page 84 Page 85 Page 86 Page 87 Page 88 Page 89 Page 90 Page 91 Page 92 Page 93 Page 94 Page 95 Page 96 Page 97 Page 98 Page 99 Page 100 Page 101 Page 102 Page 103 Page 104 Page 105 Page 106 Page 107 Page 108 Page 109 Page 110 Page 111 Page 112 Page 113 Page 114 Page 115 Page 116 Page 117 Page 118 Page 119 Page 120 Page 121 Page 122 Page 123 Page 124 Page 125 Page 126 Page 127 Page 128 Page 129 Page 130 Page 131 Page 132 Page 133 Page 134 Page 135 Page 136 Page 137 Page 138 Page 139 Page 140 Page 141 Page 142 Page 143 Page 144 Page 145 Page 146 Page 147 Page 148 Page 149 Page 150 Page 151 Page 152 Page 153 Page 154 Page 155 Page 156 Page 157 Page 158 Page 159 Page 160 Page 161 Page 162 Page 163 Page 236 Page 237 Page 238 Page 239 Page 240 Page 241 Page 242 Page 243 Page 244 Page 245 Page 246 Page 247 Page 248 Page 249 Page 250 Page 251 Page 252 Page 253 Page 254 Page 255 Page 256 Page 257 Page 258 Page 259 Page 260 Page 261 Page 262 Page 263 Page 264

Scan: The Lutheran Church—Missouri Synod

⤓ Download page image (full resolution)

Transcription machine transcription, uncorrected

⤓ Download .txt · copy text

186 Proceedings of Thirty-Fifth Regular Convention,

The accounts of Concordia Publishing House as submitted to oy
committee were found to be correct in every particular, a proof of the
fact that the administration of the institution is thoroughly busine :
like and efficient. a

This report was adopted by Synod.

As to the revision of the Catechism mentioned in the report of th
Publishing House the committee appointed by the President to make
a thorough study of our Synodical Catechism with a view to ite
eventual revision as well as to the grading of the Catechism material
(Proceedings, 1929, p. 131) submitted the following report : —

Report on Revision of the Catechism.
(Memorial 502.)

Your Committee met at River Forest, January 6, 1939, organized,
and not only adopted principles to govern the revision of the Cate.
chism, but also assigned portions of the Catechism to the individual
members, with the direction that each study especially the portion
assigned to him and send his suggestions of changes to be made to
the chairman, who, in conjunction with Prof. Ed. Koehler, was to con-
sider carefully the suggested changes and then submit their revision
to the other members of the committee. In this manner your Com-
mittee hoped to clear away much of the necessary preliminary work
without undue loss of time to the committee as a whole and without
unwarranted expense to Synod because of numerous and lengthy
meetings. The first draft of the revision has been sent to the chair-
man, and the second draft of the First Chief Part has been submitted
to the members of the committee and returned by them to the sub-
committee.

In our synodical periodicals we asked for suggestions from pas-
tors, teachers, and others interested in the revision and were pleased
to find such a wide and sincere interest taken in this matter. All the
suggestions submitted were taken into consideration by the revisers.
However, the nature of these suggestions varied to the greatest extent
possible. While some insisted that the present text be left unchanged
in all particulars, others demanded that changes, sometimes of quite
a radical nature, be made in the presentation, arrangement of subject-
matter, etc. Opinions on this matter seem to be fairly equally divided,
at least as far as we can judge from our correspondence. Due to the
proximity of Synod and the present depression we felt that it was
neither proper nor wise to go to the expense of calling a meeting of
the entire committee, which would perhaps but result in our arriving
at the same conclusion, namely, to ask Synod for more specific in-
structions with regard to the nature of the revision.

We therefore respectfully ask Synod to determine whether the
revision should be restricted to mere changes in the present English

Ev. Luth. Synod of Missouri, Ohio, and Other States. 1932. 187

text (use of idiomatic English; occasional division of long answers
into two or three answers; occasional addition or omission of an
answer, a proof-text or a Bible-story), permitting the revised text to
be used side by side in the classroom with the present text, the revision,
in other words, being governed by the principles followed in the re-
yision of our Kirchengesangbuch, or whether the changes should be
of a more far-reaching nature, involving practically a rewriting also
of the German text and making the classroom use of the present text,
together with the revised text, practically impossible.
Awaiting further instructions, we are,
With fraternal greetings,
Tue ComMITTEE ON REVISION OF THE CATECHISM.
Turo. Lartscu, Chairman.

Concerning this matter, Commtttee 17 submitted the following
resolution and recommendations : —

Resolved, That we restrict the changes in the new English Cat-
echism to more suitable memory verses, idiomatic English, simplifica-
tion of answers, additional questions, a few additional Bible-stories, etc.

We recommend that the committee and the Publishing House in-
dicate grades of the Catechism by different forms of print.

The recommendations of the committee do not refer to the Ger-
man version, since we feel that the present German Synodical Cat-
echism will serve the needs of our work also in the future.

Synod adopted this report.

District Synodical Reports.

Committee 17 reported : —

With regard to the reference {in the report of the Publishing
House] concerning the printing of the synodical reports, your Com-
mittee recommends that this be referred to the President and the
Vice-Presidents of Synod together with the Board of Directors for ad-
justment.

Synod adopted this recommendation.

Sermon Studies.
Regarding this matter, mentioned in the report of the Publishing
House, Committee 17 submitted the following resolution: —
Resolved, That Synod go on record as welcoming the publishing of ©

» the German sermon studies prepared by Dr. Fuerbringer and en-

courage the Publishing House in its capacity as agent for this publi-
cation. The hope is expressed that similar works will appear as soon
as feasible. ;

- Synod adopted this resolution.