Collection › LCMS Convention Proceedings (St. Louis, Missouri) › 1932 · 35th Convention, Milwaukee › Page 110

LCMS Convention Proceedings St. Louis, Missouri — 1932, Page 110

Page 4 Page 5 Page 6 Page 7 Page 8 Page 9 Page 10 Page 11 Page 12 Page 13 Page 14 Page 15 Page 16 Page 17 Page 18 Page 19 Page 20 Page 21 Page 22 Page 23 Page 24 Page 25 Page 26 Page 27 Page 28 Page 29 Page 30 Page 31 Page 32 Page 33 Page 34 Page 35 Page 36 Page 37 Page 40 Page 41 Page 42 Page 43 Page 44 Page 45 Page 46 Page 47 Page 48 Page 49 Page 52 Page 53 Page 54 Page 55 Page 56 Page 57 Page 58 Page 59 Page 60 Page 61 Page 62 Page 63 Page 64 Page 66 Page 67 Page 68 Page 69 Page 70 Page 71 Page 72 Page 73 Page 74 Page 75 Page 76 Page 77 Page 78 Page 79 Page 80 Page 81 Page 82 Page 83 Page 84 Page 85 Page 86 Page 87 Page 88 Page 89 Page 90 Page 91 Page 92 Page 93 Page 94 Page 95 Page 96 Page 97 Page 98 Page 99 Page 100 Page 101 Page 102 Page 103 Page 104 Page 105 Page 106 Page 107 Page 108 Page 109 Page 110 Page 111 Page 112 Page 113 Page 114 Page 115 Page 116 Page 117 Page 118 Page 119 Page 120 Page 121 Page 122 Page 123 Page 124 Page 125 Page 126 Page 127 Page 128 Page 129 Page 130 Page 131 Page 132 Page 133 Page 134 Page 135 Page 136 Page 137 Page 138 Page 139 Page 140 Page 141 Page 142 Page 143 Page 144 Page 145 Page 146 Page 147 Page 148 Page 149 Page 150 Page 151 Page 152 Page 153 Page 154 Page 155 Page 156 Page 157 Page 158 Page 159 Page 160 Page 161 Page 162 Page 163 Page 236 Page 237 Page 238 Page 239 Page 240 Page 241 Page 242 Page 243 Page 244 Page 245 Page 246 Page 247 Page 248 Page 249 Page 250 Page 251 Page 252 Page 253 Page 254 Page 255 Page 256 Page 257 Page 258 Page 259 Page 260 Page 261 Page 262 Page 263 Page 264

Scan: The Lutheran Church—Missouri Synod

⤓ Download page image (full resolution)

Transcription machine transcription, uncorrected

⤓ Download .txt · copy text

midst. May God grant us, the members of the Missouri §
Holy Spirit, to realize our solemn responsibilities!

Tue Boarp or Foretcan Missions.
W. Arnpr, Recording Secretary.

of Foreign Missions with its director, to Prof. M. S. Sommer and the
Rev. H. M. Zorn, who last year, as our representatives, visited the
Indian field 3 to all individuals and Societies, friends of missions, that
took special interest in our Foreign Mission, imploring them to con-
tinue in love for their Savior.

3. We recommend that Synod transmit, through its director of
Foreign Missions, encouraging greetings to all fellow-workers in

India and China, wishing them God’s grace and blessing in their ar-
duous work.

Ev. Luth. Synod of Missouri, Ohio, and Other States. 1932. 147

4. We recommend that Professor Sommer be given an opportunity
to address the convention on his recent mission-visit to India.

5. Whereas the primary purpose, in our opinion, is not to offer
promiscuous educational facilities to the heathen, we recommend that

‘in our higher educational endeavors in the foreign fields we concen-

trate on the training of native church-workers.

6. Due to the distressing situation that men who have been called
last year cannot be sent out and maintained and missionaries on fur-
lough will not be able to return to their respective fields unless funds
are made available, we recommend that Synod request the Board of
Directors to allow the Board for Foreign Missions sufficient sums to
maintain the present work as outlined by the Board in its report,
page 117, paragraph 3.

7. We recommend that the words “who live in St. Louis” and “two
members of the theological faculty” be stricken from the rules and
regulations in the Synodical Handbook governing the Board for
Foreign Missions.

8. We recommend that, if possible, a former well-tried, well-quali-
fied missionary of each field (India and China) be elected to member-
ship of the Board for Foreign Missions.

9. We recommend that Synod request the Board for Foreign
Missions to appoint executive committees from its own midst for the
missions in India and China; the Board to draft the necessary regu-
lations for these so constituted committees.

Action.
Synod adopted these recommendations.

The Term Question in Our China Missions.
(Memorial 313.) *

The Pastoral Conference of Greater Boston and Vicinity has
considered at length the action of the last Delegate Synod in sanc-
tioning the use of the Chinese idol name Shang-Di as a name for
the true God. (Cf. 1929 Bericht, p. 195; Proceedings, p. 196.) We
believe that this action was taken without sufficient consideration
of the question at issue ; and we respectfully ask that steps be taken
to insure a proper and thoroughgoing study of all the facts concerned,
the theological question as to whether the proper name of an idol
can be used as the proper name of the true God being decided by
the Word of God alone and the linguistic question as to the force
of the term Shang-Di or of other terms used for God being referred
to the missionaries, who have studied these questions for decision
on the basis of Chinese linguistic usage.

Wa ter A. Reunina, Secretary.