Collection › LCMS Convention Proceedings (St. Louis, Missouri) › 1932 · 35th Convention, Milwaukee › Page 110
LCMS Convention Proceedings St. Louis, Missouri — 1932, Page 110
Page 4
Page 5
Page 6
Page 7
Page 8
Page 9
Page 10
Page 11
Page 12
Page 13
Page 14
Page 15
Page 16
Page 17
Page 18
Page 19
Page 20
Page 21
Page 22
Page 23
Page 24
Page 25
Page 26
Page 27
Page 28
Page 29
Page 30
Page 31
Page 32
Page 33
Page 34
Page 35
Page 36
Page 37
Page 40
Page 41
Page 42
Page 43
Page 44
Page 45
Page 46
Page 47
Page 48
Page 49
Page 52
Page 53
Page 54
Page 55
Page 56
Page 57
Page 58
Page 59
Page 60
Page 61
Page 62
Page 63
Page 64
Page 66
Page 67
Page 68
Page 69
Page 70
Page 71
Page 72
Page 73
Page 74
Page 75
Page 76
Page 77
Page 78
Page 79
Page 80
Page 81
Page 82
Page 83
Page 84
Page 85
Page 86
Page 87
Page 88
Page 89
Page 90
Page 91
Page 92
Page 93
Page 94
Page 95
Page 96
Page 97
Page 98
Page 99
Page 100
Page 101
Page 102
Page 103
Page 104
Page 105
Page 106
Page 107
Page 108
Page 109
Page 110
Page 111
Page 112
Page 113
Page 114
Page 115
Page 116
Page 117
Page 118
Page 119
Page 120
Page 121
Page 122
Page 123
Page 124
Page 125
Page 126
Page 127
Page 128
Page 129
Page 130
Page 131
Page 132
Page 133
Page 134
Page 135
Page 136
Page 137
Page 138
Page 139
Page 140
Page 141
Page 142
Page 143
Page 144
Page 145
Page 146
Page 147
Page 148
Page 149
Page 150
Page 151
Page 152
Page 153
Page 154
Page 155
Page 156
Page 157
Page 158
Page 159
Page 160
Page 161
Page 162
Page 163
Page 236
Page 237
Page 238
Page 239
Page 240
Page 241
Page 242
Page 243
Page 244
Page 245
Page 246
Page 247
Page 248
Page 249
Page 250
Page 251
Page 252
Page 253
Page 254
Page 255
Page 256
Page 257
Page 258
Page 259
Page 260
Page 261
Page 262
Page 263
Page 264
Scan: The Lutheran Church—Missouri Synod
⤓ Download page image (full resolution)
Transcription machine transcription, uncorrected
midst. May God grant us, the members of the Missouri §
Holy Spirit, to realize our solemn responsibilities!
Tue Boarp or Foretcan Missions.
W. Arnpr, Recording Secretary.
of Foreign Missions with its director, to Prof. M. S. Sommer and the
Rev. H. M. Zorn, who last year, as our representatives, visited the
Indian field 3 to all individuals and Societies, friends of missions, that
took special interest in our Foreign Mission, imploring them to con-
tinue in love for their Savior.
3. We recommend that Synod transmit, through its director of
Foreign Missions, encouraging greetings to all fellow-workers in
India and China, wishing them God’s grace and blessing in their ar-
duous work.
Ev. Luth. Synod of Missouri, Ohio, and Other States. 1932. 147
4. We recommend that Professor Sommer be given an opportunity
to address the convention on his recent mission-visit to India.
5. Whereas the primary purpose, in our opinion, is not to offer
promiscuous educational facilities to the heathen, we recommend that
‘in our higher educational endeavors in the foreign fields we concen-
trate on the training of native church-workers.
6. Due to the distressing situation that men who have been called
last year cannot be sent out and maintained and missionaries on fur-
lough will not be able to return to their respective fields unless funds
are made available, we recommend that Synod request the Board of
Directors to allow the Board for Foreign Missions sufficient sums to
maintain the present work as outlined by the Board in its report,
page 117, paragraph 3.
7. We recommend that the words “who live in St. Louis” and “two
members of the theological faculty” be stricken from the rules and
regulations in the Synodical Handbook governing the Board for
Foreign Missions.
8. We recommend that, if possible, a former well-tried, well-quali-
fied missionary of each field (India and China) be elected to member-
ship of the Board for Foreign Missions.
9. We recommend that Synod request the Board for Foreign
Missions to appoint executive committees from its own midst for the
missions in India and China; the Board to draft the necessary regu-
lations for these so constituted committees.
Action.
Synod adopted these recommendations.
The Term Question in Our China Missions.
(Memorial 313.) *
The Pastoral Conference of Greater Boston and Vicinity has
considered at length the action of the last Delegate Synod in sanc-
tioning the use of the Chinese idol name Shang-Di as a name for
the true God. (Cf. 1929 Bericht, p. 195; Proceedings, p. 196.) We
believe that this action was taken without sufficient consideration
of the question at issue ; and we respectfully ask that steps be taken
to insure a proper and thoroughgoing study of all the facts concerned,
the theological question as to whether the proper name of an idol
can be used as the proper name of the true God being decided by
the Word of God alone and the linguistic question as to the force
of the term Shang-Di or of other terms used for God being referred
to the missionaries, who have studied these questions for decision
on the basis of Chinese linguistic usage.
Wa ter A. Reunina, Secretary.