Collection › LCMS Convention Proceedings (St. Louis, Missouri) › 1932 · 35th Convention, Milwaukee › Page 247

LCMS Convention Proceedings St. Louis, Missouri — 1932, Page 247

Page 4 Page 5 Page 6 Page 7 Page 8 Page 9 Page 10 Page 11 Page 12 Page 13 Page 14 Page 15 Page 16 Page 17 Page 18 Page 19 Page 20 Page 21 Page 22 Page 23 Page 24 Page 25 Page 26 Page 27 Page 28 Page 29 Page 30 Page 31 Page 32 Page 33 Page 34 Page 35 Page 36 Page 37 Page 40 Page 41 Page 42 Page 43 Page 44 Page 45 Page 46 Page 47 Page 48 Page 49 Page 52 Page 53 Page 54 Page 55 Page 56 Page 57 Page 58 Page 59 Page 60 Page 61 Page 62 Page 63 Page 64 Page 66 Page 67 Page 68 Page 69 Page 70 Page 71 Page 72 Page 73 Page 74 Page 75 Page 76 Page 77 Page 78 Page 79 Page 80 Page 81 Page 82 Page 83 Page 84 Page 85 Page 86 Page 87 Page 88 Page 89 Page 90 Page 91 Page 92 Page 93 Page 94 Page 95 Page 96 Page 97 Page 98 Page 99 Page 100 Page 101 Page 102 Page 103 Page 104 Page 105 Page 106 Page 107 Page 108 Page 109 Page 110 Page 111 Page 112 Page 113 Page 114 Page 115 Page 116 Page 117 Page 118 Page 119 Page 120 Page 121 Page 122 Page 123 Page 124 Page 125 Page 126 Page 127 Page 128 Page 129 Page 130 Page 131 Page 132 Page 133 Page 134 Page 135 Page 136 Page 137 Page 138 Page 139 Page 140 Page 141 Page 142 Page 143 Page 144 Page 145 Page 146 Page 147 Page 148 Page 149 Page 150 Page 151 Page 152 Page 153 Page 154 Page 155 Page 156 Page 157 Page 158 Page 159 Page 160 Page 161 Page 162 Page 163 Page 236 Page 237 Page 238 Page 239 Page 240 Page 241 Page 242 Page 243 Page 244 Page 245 Page 246 Page 247 Page 248 Page 249 Page 250 Page 251 Page 252 Page 253 Page 254 Page 255 Page 256 Page 257 Page 258 Page 259 Page 260 Page 261 Page 262 Page 263 Page 264

Scan: The Lutheran Church—Missouri Synod

⤓ Download page image (full resolution)

Transcription machine transcription, uncorrected

⤓ Download .txt · copy text

Ev. Luth. Synod of Missouri, Ohio, and Other States. 1932. 247

Report of Committee 28: —

1. In recognition of the worthy service of the Synodical Press
Committee in the past we earnestly recommend to Synod —

A. To encourage the work of this committee and to urge all Dis-
tricts of Synod to cooperate in the expansion of the wholesome and
valuable activities of said committee — :

B. By the appointment of subsidiary District press committees,
authorized in the synodical resolutions of 1926, and also to endorse and
recommend the request of the committee for the— -

C. Cooperation of al] official boards of Synod regularly to transmit
pertinent information in matters of general church interest for press
distribution. :

Synod adopted these recommendations.

2. We recommend to Synod to grant $1,000 annually and to allow
an emergency fund of an additional $2,000 should the need arise before
the next convention of Synod.

This request was referred to the Fiscal Conference.

Regarding interviews during the convention, Committee 98
brought in the following resolution im

Resolved, That Synod go on record as disapproving any personal
interviews with, or expressions of opinion by any individual to, the
representatives of the secular press, and that it is the wish of Synod
that all material for the press be handled by the Press Committee ex-
clusively. .

This was adopted by Synod.
Report on Station KFUO.

(Memorial 702.)
The members of the KFUO Radio Committee, which consists of
representatives of the Board of Control of Concordia Seminary, into
whose hands Synod has placed the control of the Station, and of repre-

station, are as follows: Prof. J. H. C. Fritz, D. D. ; Prof. W. A. Maier,
Ph. D.; Rev. L. J. Sieck; Messrs. A, G. Brauer, J. H. Kuechen-
' meister, Theo. Maetten, B. A. Schieferdecker, Henry Schulz (chair-
man), and L. F. Volkman.

While our equipment was modernized by the installation of a
Western Electric Crystal Modulation Panel in March, 1931, at a cost
of $7,000, our frequency has remained the same during the last three
years, also our power, 1,000 watts during the day, 500 watts at night.
At a hearing before the F ederal Radio Commission at Washington,
D.C., on April 29, 1931, we petitioned the Commission for authoriza-
tion of general use of full power; but the Federal body denied our
petition on the ground that general use of full power would cause

EEE