Collection › LCMS Convention Proceedings (St. Louis, Missouri) › 1932 · 35th Convention, Milwaukee › Page 83
LCMS Convention Proceedings St. Louis, Missouri — 1932, Page 83
Page 4
Page 5
Page 6
Page 7
Page 8
Page 9
Page 10
Page 11
Page 12
Page 13
Page 14
Page 15
Page 16
Page 17
Page 18
Page 19
Page 20
Page 21
Page 22
Page 23
Page 24
Page 25
Page 26
Page 27
Page 28
Page 29
Page 30
Page 31
Page 32
Page 33
Page 34
Page 35
Page 36
Page 37
Page 40
Page 41
Page 42
Page 43
Page 44
Page 45
Page 46
Page 47
Page 48
Page 49
Page 52
Page 53
Page 54
Page 55
Page 56
Page 57
Page 58
Page 59
Page 60
Page 61
Page 62
Page 63
Page 64
Page 66
Page 67
Page 68
Page 69
Page 70
Page 71
Page 72
Page 73
Page 74
Page 75
Page 76
Page 77
Page 78
Page 79
Page 80
Page 81
Page 82
Page 83
Page 84
Page 85
Page 86
Page 87
Page 88
Page 89
Page 90
Page 91
Page 92
Page 93
Page 94
Page 95
Page 96
Page 97
Page 98
Page 99
Page 100
Page 101
Page 102
Page 103
Page 104
Page 105
Page 106
Page 107
Page 108
Page 109
Page 110
Page 111
Page 112
Page 113
Page 114
Page 115
Page 116
Page 117
Page 118
Page 119
Page 120
Page 121
Page 122
Page 123
Page 124
Page 125
Page 126
Page 127
Page 128
Page 129
Page 130
Page 131
Page 132
Page 133
Page 134
Page 135
Page 136
Page 137
Page 138
Page 139
Page 140
Page 141
Page 142
Page 143
Page 144
Page 145
Page 146
Page 147
Page 148
Page 149
Page 150
Page 151
Page 152
Page 153
Page 154
Page 155
Page 156
Page 157
Page 158
Page 159
Page 160
Page 161
Page 162
Page 163
Page 236
Page 237
Page 238
Page 239
Page 240
Page 241
Page 242
Page 243
Page 244
Page 245
Page 246
Page 247
Page 248
Page 249
Page 250
Page 251
Page 252
Page 253
Page 254
Page 255
Page 256
Page 257
Page 258
Page 259
Page 260
Page 261
Page 262
Page 263
Page 264
Scan: The Lutheran Church—Missouri Synod
⤓ Download page image (full resolution)
Transcription machine transcription, uncorrected
92 Proceedings of Thirty-Fifth Regular Convention
?
In addition the Secretary
special duties: —
For the Committee on Missi
I ; ssionary Expansion he i
Mission-studies for Schools and Sunday-schools, in 981 a von
with an accompanying circular letter to the teachers 1988,
For the School Journal h ;
teachers.
For the Lutheran Witness h
ie
Sect conducts the
Continued work was done for
mittee.
He revised an article on
Occasional addresses and t
to speak had to be declined.
of Schools performed the following
€ writes a monthly message to the
“Children’s Study
the Synodical Catechism Com-
Lutheran schools in an encyclopedia
alks were frequent, but many requests
II. THE COMMITTEE ON SUNDAY-SCHOOLS.
The © _ A. The Work of the Committee.
e Committee on Sunday-schools was organi i
; i ganized in conform}
with the resolution of the Board in thig matter. Pastor Pau] Koonin
mas made chairman and Rev. Wm. Luke secretary. The other mem,
bers ore: We JM. Runge, Mr. Oscar Kunz, Dr. Theo Engelder
rol. W. 1. Behrens. Much work was don ; i
e by subcommitt
C Minutes and much correspondence were interchanged with ‘the
committee on Schools, while Professor Kuehnert, &@ member of that
mmittee and chairman of th
mmoeting the Board, attended almost all our
c Monthly meetings were held in the office of the secretary in
oncordia Publishing House. Special and routine reports were
mailed to all members in advance together with a prearranged pro-
gram, averaging 18 distinct items per meeting
Constant improvement of 0 ;
_ Cor ur Sunday-school Ji
major item of business. Teehoot Merature was the
i a 1911 Concordia Publishing House began to publish English
an German Sunday-school literature as a private venture appoint-
ng its own editors and committees. In 1990 Synod instructed its
resident to appoint a Sunday-school Committee; but the editor
ned an employee of Concordia Publishing House until 1926.
n 7 the editor, though salaried in part by Concordia Publishing
ouse, was called by, and made directly responsible to the official
board of Synod.
apa the efforts of Synod’s Sunday-school officials bore rich fruit
is evi ent from the rapid increase in the use and circulation of Con-
cordia Sunday-school literature, as seen from the following table: —
1910 1921 1926 19
Enrolment “+++ 53,343 120,625 170,722 ca. 290988"
iterature |... none 53,000 160,260 259,700
* All ages. Children of school age, 103,084 (1930).
Ev. Luth. Synod of Missouri, Ohio, and Other States. 1932. 93
:... Bven ten years ago less than half of the pupils received the
Concordia literature. However, the circulation increased steadily,
exceeding the enrolment in 1929 and leaving very few of our Sunday--
schools to-day that are not using the regularly censored material of
our own Synod.
There are other problems in which we have progressed consider-
ably toward solution. While there have been numerous instances of
underestimation as well as overestimation of the Sunday-school,
much progress has been made in putting the Sunday-schoo! in its
proper light. Other church-bodies in America have not produced an
institution which may be taken over by our Synod without changes.
Even other Lutheran church-bodies have in most instances developed
a Sunday-school that is different from ours. Since with us the
parochial school has ever been, and still is, the ideal solution of
elementary Christian educational problems, it has been the earnest
endeavor of our Committee on Sunday-schools to foster a Sunday-
school based on a Scriptural appreciation of responsibilities in Chris-
tian education and to enhance the progress of the parochial school
while at the same time facing the actual situation as we have it in
Synod to-day, which may be seen from the following table: —
1920 1925 1930
Congregations ............. 3,283 3,565 3,843
Schools ...........-....00. 1,310 1,338 1,339
Sunday-schools ..... Sle eeeee 1,587 2,297 2,849
In the 2,504 congregations not maintaining a Christian day-
school the principal agency, besides the regular service and confirma-
tion instruction, is the Sunday-school. It has been the endeavor to
develop the Sunday-school in such a way that the best possible in-
struction is given, while every effort is made to keep the blessings of
the Christian day-school also before the Sunday-school workers. With
this principle in mind, the Sunday-school is not limited to children
of school age. Much emphasis has been laid upon the preschool and
postschool ages.
That the Sunday-school is mistaken for a children’s church is
a difficulty still to be overcome. To consider the Sunday-school an
institution independent of the congregation is a serious mistake,
which has been generally overcome in our circles. It is gratifying to
note the increasing seriousness on the part of pastors, teachers, and
congregations in properly supervising and directing their Sunday-
schools. Considerable progress has been made by congregational
boards of education in evaluating the Sunday-school and developing
it to best advantage for their conditions. More serious attention is
being given to the proper housing, administration, and time of
Sunday-schools. Yet very much remains to be done in this particular
phase of Sunday-school development.
The sanest principles, the highest ideals, the most carefully pre-