Collection › LCMS Convention Proceedings (St. Louis, Missouri) › 1932 · 35th Convention, Milwaukee › Page 94

LCMS Convention Proceedings St. Louis, Missouri — 1932, Page 94

Page 4 Page 5 Page 6 Page 7 Page 8 Page 9 Page 10 Page 11 Page 12 Page 13 Page 14 Page 15 Page 16 Page 17 Page 18 Page 19 Page 20 Page 21 Page 22 Page 23 Page 24 Page 25 Page 26 Page 27 Page 28 Page 29 Page 30 Page 31 Page 32 Page 33 Page 34 Page 35 Page 36 Page 37 Page 40 Page 41 Page 42 Page 43 Page 44 Page 45 Page 46 Page 47 Page 48 Page 49 Page 52 Page 53 Page 54 Page 55 Page 56 Page 57 Page 58 Page 59 Page 60 Page 61 Page 62 Page 63 Page 64 Page 66 Page 67 Page 68 Page 69 Page 70 Page 71 Page 72 Page 73 Page 74 Page 75 Page 76 Page 77 Page 78 Page 79 Page 80 Page 81 Page 82 Page 83 Page 84 Page 85 Page 86 Page 87 Page 88 Page 89 Page 90 Page 91 Page 92 Page 93 Page 94 Page 95 Page 96 Page 97 Page 98 Page 99 Page 100 Page 101 Page 102 Page 103 Page 104 Page 105 Page 106 Page 107 Page 108 Page 109 Page 110 Page 111 Page 112 Page 113 Page 114 Page 115 Page 116 Page 117 Page 118 Page 119 Page 120 Page 121 Page 122 Page 123 Page 124 Page 125 Page 126 Page 127 Page 128 Page 129 Page 130 Page 131 Page 132 Page 133 Page 134 Page 135 Page 136 Page 137 Page 138 Page 139 Page 140 Page 141 Page 142 Page 143 Page 144 Page 145 Page 146 Page 147 Page 148 Page 149 Page 150 Page 151 Page 152 Page 153 Page 154 Page 155 Page 156 Page 157 Page 158 Page 159 Page 160 Page 161 Page 162 Page 163 Page 236 Page 237 Page 238 Page 239 Page 240 Page 241 Page 242 Page 243 Page 244 Page 245 Page 246 Page 247 Page 248 Page 249 Page 250 Page 251 Page 252 Page 253 Page 254 Page 255 Page 256 Page 257 Page 258 Page 259 Page 260 Page 261 Page 262 Page 263 Page 264

Scan: The Lutheran Church—Missouri Synod

⤓ Download page image (full resolution)

Transcription machine transcription, uncorrected

⤓ Download .txt · copy text

114 Proceedings of Thirty-Fifth Regular Convention,

participated in this movement, yet it proved a powerful incentive to
a united and consecrated effort in mission activity within many of
our congregations. Both pastors and parishioners were thereby in-
spired with new zeal for gaining the lost for the Kingdom. In rural
as well as in urban communities, especially in the large industrial cen-
ters of our country, 2 considerable number of new fields were explored,
jn many of which promising missions were begun, which were supplied
with the necessary men. In addition to the spiritual benefits accruing
from the Call of the Hour the sum of $200,000 was collected for
special missionary purposes. Also during the past Lenten season the
Qall of the Hour was again taken up and properly emphasized by
Synod’s officials and given due publicity in our synodical periodicals.
At the time of this writing it is not yet known what has been achieved
this year. Since the Call of the Hour has proved a strong factor for
creating and stimulating interest in missionary endeavors, we hold
that Synod would render the kingdom of God a distinct service if it
would recommend its adoption to all our congregations.

During the past triennium we have dispensed to the following
Districts and missions the subjoined sums: —

Alberta and British Columbia District ........-. $120,850.00

Atlantic District .......--2- 0. sete etre t ee 30,000.00
California and Nevada District .......--+--++-- 60,000.00
Colorado District. ......---+- eset eter rrr 57,700.00
Manitoba and Saskatchewan District ........-- 92,221.60
North Dakota and Montana District ........--- 54,000.00
Oklahoma District .....------++esreeterrrcte 29,000.00
Ontario District .....-...--.--ee eerste 11,625.00
Oregon and Washington District .........----- 73,000.00
Southern District .....----+-+eeee eect 56,000.00
Southern California District .....-------+-++++- 28,000.00
Texas District ......---.-ee reer cert 77,000.00
Alaska Mission ......------ cece teen eee eeeee 8,800.00
Cuba Mission ......--..eeee errr er eetrr 5,199.31
Mexico City Mission ......---+++seereererttrs 3,000.00
Expense of Board .....--.+-+-+-eerrrrsterctt 429.75

Total .. ccc cece eee ee tee tteeecererstt $706,825.66

This sum is $166,956.43 in excess of what our Board used for the
same purpose during the previous triennium. This shows that Synod
has realized the importance of Home Mission work. Conscious of the
fact that Home Missions are, and must remain, our first and foremost
concern and that only by a strong and well-established mother Chureh
at home we can fulfil our mission obligation to the teeming millions
of the lost in foreign lands, Synod’s Board of Directors raised our
Budget for the fiscal year 1932, granting us $40,000 more than in the
previous year, in all, the sum of $280,000. With this increased allow-

Ev. Luth. Synod of Missouri, Ohio, and Other States. 1932. 115

ance we had hoped to enlarge the place of our tents during the
current year.

However, in view of the adverse economic conditions throughout
our country and the tremendous deficit in our synodical treasury,
Synod’s Board of Directors resolved to cut the appropriations for
missions ten per cent., to take effect immediately. This, of course,
yitally affected our Board. Accordingly we informed all the chair-
men of mission boards dependent upon our Board for support that
beginning with the first day of April they would be obliged to accept
the proposed reduction from their annual allowance. To what extent
this will influence the progress of Home Missions, the opening of new
stations, and the calling of candidates we cannot compute at the
present time. It is the task of Synod to find ways and means to keep
this blessed work of the Lord in a flourishing condition.

We believe that Synod should do its utmost to prevent a curtail-
ing of Home Mission work. Though it must be conceded that Home
Mission work has no longer the bright prospects it had when Lu-
theran immigrants came to our country in great numbers from
abroad, yet even to-day we have abundance of mission material at
our very doors. Among the millions of unchurched in our country
there are still “many acres of diamonds,” if only we will go out in
search of them with prayerful hearts and devoted lives. Another
factor not to be ignored or underestimated is that, while in former
years there was in our Synod a great dearth of men to be sent into
the fields white unto harvest, the Lord, in His grace, has to-day
granted us a large force of well-trained and consecrated young men
ready to gather in the sheaves, if only they are sent and assigned
places in the Lord’s vineyard. What we pastors, teachers, and also
the lay members of our congregations need is the spirit of “Home
Mission-mindedness” in a larger measure. If we are what we profess
to be, living members of the body of our Lord, then we must prove
the genuineness of our faith by zealously and persistently seeking
the lost souls lying at our very doors, as our Master did in the days of
His flesh. As soon as this spirit has thoroughly permeated all the
members of our Synod, from the lowest to the highest, we shall be
able to use all the men whom our seminaries can furnish us.

For the future administration of our Board we kindly petition
Synod to sanction the following: —

1. That the annual budget for subsidized Districts shall no
longer, as in the past, be fixed by the Mission Conference, but by
Synod’s Board of Directors upon the basis of detailed reports fur-
nished it by the Board of Home Missions;

2. That the mission boards of subsidized Districts be required to
report on a submitted questionnaire to the Board of Home Missions