Collection › LCMS Convention Proceedings (St. Louis, Missouri) › 1932 · 35th Convention, Milwaukee › Page 99

LCMS Convention Proceedings St. Louis, Missouri — 1932, Page 99

Page 4 Page 5 Page 6 Page 7 Page 8 Page 9 Page 10 Page 11 Page 12 Page 13 Page 14 Page 15 Page 16 Page 17 Page 18 Page 19 Page 20 Page 21 Page 22 Page 23 Page 24 Page 25 Page 26 Page 27 Page 28 Page 29 Page 30 Page 31 Page 32 Page 33 Page 34 Page 35 Page 36 Page 37 Page 40 Page 41 Page 42 Page 43 Page 44 Page 45 Page 46 Page 47 Page 48 Page 49 Page 52 Page 53 Page 54 Page 55 Page 56 Page 57 Page 58 Page 59 Page 60 Page 61 Page 62 Page 63 Page 64 Page 66 Page 67 Page 68 Page 69 Page 70 Page 71 Page 72 Page 73 Page 74 Page 75 Page 76 Page 77 Page 78 Page 79 Page 80 Page 81 Page 82 Page 83 Page 84 Page 85 Page 86 Page 87 Page 88 Page 89 Page 90 Page 91 Page 92 Page 93 Page 94 Page 95 Page 96 Page 97 Page 98 Page 99 Page 100 Page 101 Page 102 Page 103 Page 104 Page 105 Page 106 Page 107 Page 108 Page 109 Page 110 Page 111 Page 112 Page 113 Page 114 Page 115 Page 116 Page 117 Page 118 Page 119 Page 120 Page 121 Page 122 Page 123 Page 124 Page 125 Page 126 Page 127 Page 128 Page 129 Page 130 Page 131 Page 132 Page 133 Page 134 Page 135 Page 136 Page 137 Page 138 Page 139 Page 140 Page 141 Page 142 Page 143 Page 144 Page 145 Page 146 Page 147 Page 148 Page 149 Page 150 Page 151 Page 152 Page 153 Page 154 Page 155 Page 156 Page 157 Page 158 Page 159 Page 160 Page 161 Page 162 Page 163 Page 236 Page 237 Page 238 Page 239 Page 240 Page 241 Page 242 Page 243 Page 244 Page 245 Page 246 Page 247 Page 248 Page 249 Page 250 Page 251 Page 252 Page 253 Page 254 Page 255 Page 256 Page 257 Page 258 Page 259 Page 260 Page 261 Page 262 Page 263 Page 264

Scan: The Lutheran Church—Missouri Synod

⤓ Download page image (full resolution)

Transcription machine transcription, uncorrected

⤓ Download .txt · copy text

124 Proceedings of Thirty-Fifth Regular Convention,

The names and addresses of all Lutheran students reported to your
Committee were sent to the university pastors and others in the im-
mediate neighborhood of the college town as well as to the mission
boards of Districts where the college town was located far from any
Lutheran church.

The Student Welfare Committee desires gratefully to acknow]-
edge the services of the Hospice Secretary of the Walther League,
Pastor J. H. Gockel, who placed the facilities of his office at the dis.
posal of your Committee in taking the annual student census.

By virtue of its office, created by the Church, the Student Welfare
Committee has the spiritual welfare of Lutheran students at heart
and holds that the first and foremost duty of every student welfare

Tue Srupent WELFARE Commirrtexr,
Pastor Paut G. Scumuwt, Chairman.
Epear J. Frrepricu.

Pastor Axper OQ. Berntuat, Secretary.

Regarding Student Welfare Work, Committee 9 brought in the
following report with its recommendations : —

1. That Synod gratefully recognize the work accomplished by the
Student Welfare Committee despite the handicap of a lack of suffi-
cient funds to carry through its intended program;

2. That Synod declare itself to the effect that the spiritual care
of our Lutheran students at colleges and universities is an extremely
vital part of the work of the Church in conserving her strength and
deserves the prayerful consideration and energetic support of our
entire membership, both lay and clergy;

8. That Synod acknowledge as her own opinion the resolution
recently adopted by the Student Welfare Committee and incorpo-
rated in the overture, namely, “that all phases of student welfare work
should be united in the hands of the Student Welfare Committee and
be under its sole guidance and control, except as otherwise provided
by Synod”;

4. That Synod enable its Student Welfare Committee to carry
out, in part at least, its duties by appropriating the sum of $1,000
annually during the next triennium;

5. That Synod ask her members to give to the Student Welfare
Committee to a greater degree than heretofore the cooperation which
is essential in obtaining the names of our Lutheran students and the
schools in which they have enrolled ; ;

>.

Ev. Luth. Synod of Missouri, Ohio, and Other States. 1932. 125

6. That Synod extend a vote of appreciation to the Hospice De-
‘partment of the Walther League for its services in connection with
taking the annual student census. .

Recommendations 1, 2, 5, and 6 were adopted by Synod, while
Recommendations 3 and 4 were rejected (the latter with the under-
standing that the present Synod had resolved to make no appropria-
tions, but that the Fiscal Conference has the power to fix the necessary
budget).

Synod also resolved that the Student Welfare Committee be in-
structed to use its influence to the end that all students under its care
may be led to make the best possible use of their talents or training’
in the interest of the work of the Church.

Report of Board of Home Missions in South America.
(Memorial 304.)

During the past three years your Board of Home Missions in
South America has had proof positive of the truth of the promises of
our Savior-King: “Lo, I am with you alway, even unto the end of the
world,” and: “Upon this rock I will build My Church, and the gates
of hell shall not prevail against it.” In spite of the uncertainty of
conditions the work in Argentina and Brazil has prospered and borne
fruit. By the grace of God perfect harmony prevailed among the
members of our Board. Much to the regret of the Board, Mr. Otto
Wieting, because of business conditions and lack of time, saw himself
obliged to resign as a member of your Board. In his place Mr. C. Ga.
Strieder was appointed by our venerable President, Dr. Pfotenhauer.

Regular meetings were held each month. Special meetings were
held as conditions demanded. Your Board was privileged to have the
valued counsel and advice of Dr. Pfotenhauer at several meetings.
Meetings were also held with those of our men who are on furlough.
Thus your Board received direct and oral reports of our work in South
America, which reports were of great value to us.

Pursuant to a resolution of Synod passed in 1929 your Board, in
conjunction with the Board of Directors, elected a new professor for
our college in Porto Alegre, viz., Prof. Carl Rupp. We beg leave to
report that the vacancy then existing in Buenos Aires has been filled.
The Rev. E. Jauck has been called to this large city and is working
there very successfully.*

How God has blessed and prospered our work in South America
becomes evident as we read the following detailed reports.

“"Re special representative and adviser for Brazil (ef. Proceedings
of 34th Reg. Conv., p. 85) we beg to state that this recommendation of
Synod was not carried out since all attempts to secure a man who was
to spend a greater length of\time there were unsuccessful. With the con-
sent of the Board of Directors no further attempts were made.