Collection › LCMS Convention Proceedings (St. Louis, Missouri) › 1932 · 35th Convention, Milwaukee › Page 99
LCMS Convention Proceedings St. Louis, Missouri — 1932, Page 99
Page 4
Page 5
Page 6
Page 7
Page 8
Page 9
Page 10
Page 11
Page 12
Page 13
Page 14
Page 15
Page 16
Page 17
Page 18
Page 19
Page 20
Page 21
Page 22
Page 23
Page 24
Page 25
Page 26
Page 27
Page 28
Page 29
Page 30
Page 31
Page 32
Page 33
Page 34
Page 35
Page 36
Page 37
Page 40
Page 41
Page 42
Page 43
Page 44
Page 45
Page 46
Page 47
Page 48
Page 49
Page 52
Page 53
Page 54
Page 55
Page 56
Page 57
Page 58
Page 59
Page 60
Page 61
Page 62
Page 63
Page 64
Page 66
Page 67
Page 68
Page 69
Page 70
Page 71
Page 72
Page 73
Page 74
Page 75
Page 76
Page 77
Page 78
Page 79
Page 80
Page 81
Page 82
Page 83
Page 84
Page 85
Page 86
Page 87
Page 88
Page 89
Page 90
Page 91
Page 92
Page 93
Page 94
Page 95
Page 96
Page 97
Page 98
Page 99
Page 100
Page 101
Page 102
Page 103
Page 104
Page 105
Page 106
Page 107
Page 108
Page 109
Page 110
Page 111
Page 112
Page 113
Page 114
Page 115
Page 116
Page 117
Page 118
Page 119
Page 120
Page 121
Page 122
Page 123
Page 124
Page 125
Page 126
Page 127
Page 128
Page 129
Page 130
Page 131
Page 132
Page 133
Page 134
Page 135
Page 136
Page 137
Page 138
Page 139
Page 140
Page 141
Page 142
Page 143
Page 144
Page 145
Page 146
Page 147
Page 148
Page 149
Page 150
Page 151
Page 152
Page 153
Page 154
Page 155
Page 156
Page 157
Page 158
Page 159
Page 160
Page 161
Page 162
Page 163
Page 236
Page 237
Page 238
Page 239
Page 240
Page 241
Page 242
Page 243
Page 244
Page 245
Page 246
Page 247
Page 248
Page 249
Page 250
Page 251
Page 252
Page 253
Page 254
Page 255
Page 256
Page 257
Page 258
Page 259
Page 260
Page 261
Page 262
Page 263
Page 264
Scan: The Lutheran Church—Missouri Synod
⤓ Download page image (full resolution)
Transcription machine transcription, uncorrected
124 Proceedings of Thirty-Fifth Regular Convention,
The names and addresses of all Lutheran students reported to your
Committee were sent to the university pastors and others in the im-
mediate neighborhood of the college town as well as to the mission
boards of Districts where the college town was located far from any
Lutheran church.
The Student Welfare Committee desires gratefully to acknow]-
edge the services of the Hospice Secretary of the Walther League,
Pastor J. H. Gockel, who placed the facilities of his office at the dis.
posal of your Committee in taking the annual student census.
By virtue of its office, created by the Church, the Student Welfare
Committee has the spiritual welfare of Lutheran students at heart
and holds that the first and foremost duty of every student welfare
Tue Srupent WELFARE Commirrtexr,
Pastor Paut G. Scumuwt, Chairman.
Epear J. Frrepricu.
Pastor Axper OQ. Berntuat, Secretary.
Regarding Student Welfare Work, Committee 9 brought in the
following report with its recommendations : —
1. That Synod gratefully recognize the work accomplished by the
Student Welfare Committee despite the handicap of a lack of suffi-
cient funds to carry through its intended program;
2. That Synod declare itself to the effect that the spiritual care
of our Lutheran students at colleges and universities is an extremely
vital part of the work of the Church in conserving her strength and
deserves the prayerful consideration and energetic support of our
entire membership, both lay and clergy;
8. That Synod acknowledge as her own opinion the resolution
recently adopted by the Student Welfare Committee and incorpo-
rated in the overture, namely, “that all phases of student welfare work
should be united in the hands of the Student Welfare Committee and
be under its sole guidance and control, except as otherwise provided
by Synod”;
4. That Synod enable its Student Welfare Committee to carry
out, in part at least, its duties by appropriating the sum of $1,000
annually during the next triennium;
5. That Synod ask her members to give to the Student Welfare
Committee to a greater degree than heretofore the cooperation which
is essential in obtaining the names of our Lutheran students and the
schools in which they have enrolled ; ;
>.
Ev. Luth. Synod of Missouri, Ohio, and Other States. 1932. 125
6. That Synod extend a vote of appreciation to the Hospice De-
‘partment of the Walther League for its services in connection with
taking the annual student census. .
Recommendations 1, 2, 5, and 6 were adopted by Synod, while
Recommendations 3 and 4 were rejected (the latter with the under-
standing that the present Synod had resolved to make no appropria-
tions, but that the Fiscal Conference has the power to fix the necessary
budget).
Synod also resolved that the Student Welfare Committee be in-
structed to use its influence to the end that all students under its care
may be led to make the best possible use of their talents or training’
in the interest of the work of the Church.
Report of Board of Home Missions in South America.
(Memorial 304.)
During the past three years your Board of Home Missions in
South America has had proof positive of the truth of the promises of
our Savior-King: “Lo, I am with you alway, even unto the end of the
world,” and: “Upon this rock I will build My Church, and the gates
of hell shall not prevail against it.” In spite of the uncertainty of
conditions the work in Argentina and Brazil has prospered and borne
fruit. By the grace of God perfect harmony prevailed among the
members of our Board. Much to the regret of the Board, Mr. Otto
Wieting, because of business conditions and lack of time, saw himself
obliged to resign as a member of your Board. In his place Mr. C. Ga.
Strieder was appointed by our venerable President, Dr. Pfotenhauer.
Regular meetings were held each month. Special meetings were
held as conditions demanded. Your Board was privileged to have the
valued counsel and advice of Dr. Pfotenhauer at several meetings.
Meetings were also held with those of our men who are on furlough.
Thus your Board received direct and oral reports of our work in South
America, which reports were of great value to us.
Pursuant to a resolution of Synod passed in 1929 your Board, in
conjunction with the Board of Directors, elected a new professor for
our college in Porto Alegre, viz., Prof. Carl Rupp. We beg leave to
report that the vacancy then existing in Buenos Aires has been filled.
The Rev. E. Jauck has been called to this large city and is working
there very successfully.*
How God has blessed and prospered our work in South America
becomes evident as we read the following detailed reports.
“"Re special representative and adviser for Brazil (ef. Proceedings
of 34th Reg. Conv., p. 85) we beg to state that this recommendation of
Synod was not carried out since all attempts to secure a man who was
to spend a greater length of\time there were unsuccessful. With the con-
sent of the Board of Directors no further attempts were made.