Collection › LCMS Convention Proceedings (St. Louis, Missouri) › 1932 · 35th Convention, Milwaukee › Page 111
LCMS Convention Proceedings St. Louis, Missouri — 1932, Page 111
Page 4
Page 5
Page 6
Page 7
Page 8
Page 9
Page 10
Page 11
Page 12
Page 13
Page 14
Page 15
Page 16
Page 17
Page 18
Page 19
Page 20
Page 21
Page 22
Page 23
Page 24
Page 25
Page 26
Page 27
Page 28
Page 29
Page 30
Page 31
Page 32
Page 33
Page 34
Page 35
Page 36
Page 37
Page 40
Page 41
Page 42
Page 43
Page 44
Page 45
Page 46
Page 47
Page 48
Page 49
Page 52
Page 53
Page 54
Page 55
Page 56
Page 57
Page 58
Page 59
Page 60
Page 61
Page 62
Page 63
Page 64
Page 66
Page 67
Page 68
Page 69
Page 70
Page 71
Page 72
Page 73
Page 74
Page 75
Page 76
Page 77
Page 78
Page 79
Page 80
Page 81
Page 82
Page 83
Page 84
Page 85
Page 86
Page 87
Page 88
Page 89
Page 90
Page 91
Page 92
Page 93
Page 94
Page 95
Page 96
Page 97
Page 98
Page 99
Page 100
Page 101
Page 102
Page 103
Page 104
Page 105
Page 106
Page 107
Page 108
Page 109
Page 110
Page 111
Page 112
Page 113
Page 114
Page 115
Page 116
Page 117
Page 118
Page 119
Page 120
Page 121
Page 122
Page 123
Page 124
Page 125
Page 126
Page 127
Page 128
Page 129
Page 130
Page 131
Page 132
Page 133
Page 134
Page 135
Page 136
Page 137
Page 138
Page 139
Page 140
Page 141
Page 142
Page 143
Page 144
Page 145
Page 146
Page 147
Page 148
Page 149
Page 150
Page 151
Page 152
Page 153
Page 154
Page 155
Page 156
Page 157
Page 158
Page 159
Page 160
Page 161
Page 162
Page 163
Page 236
Page 237
Page 238
Page 239
Page 240
Page 241
Page 242
Page 243
Page 244
Page 245
Page 246
Page 247
Page 248
Page 249
Page 250
Page 251
Page 252
Page 253
Page 254
Page 255
Page 256
Page 257
Page 258
Page 259
Page 260
Page 261
Page 262
Page 263
Page 264
Scan: The Lutheran Church—Missouri Synod
⤓ Download page image (full resolution)
Transcription machine transcription, uncorrected
148 Proceedings of Thirty-Fifth Regular Convention,
Regarding the question mentioned in this memorial, concerning
the following form: —
Wueregas, The controversial question in our China Mission re-
garding the term to be used for God is a highly complicated one, which
cannot be decided within the Space of a few days; and
Wuerras, Your Committee has Spent many convention hours
listening to the arguments of both sides, linguistic, theological, and
philosophical, without being able to arrive at a satisfactory solu-
tion; and
Wuereas, We consider the whole matter worthy of longer con-
secrated efforts toward ultimate solution; and
Wuenreas, Several of the protests include claims the correctness
or Incorrectness of which could be proved only by referring to minutes
reports, and correspondence which are not available to your Com.
mittee here at Synod; therefore be it
Resolved, That Synod elect at this session a commitee of five im-
partial men who have as yet not dealt with the question, and that this
committee work toward an ultimate blessed settlement of all points at
issue; and be it furthermore
Resolved, That during the interim in which this committee now
functions all further agitation of this matter be dropped.
At the close of the report, Prof. M. S. Sommer was given an op-
portunity to give a brief report on the visit to India made by himself
and Pastor H. M. Zorn.
Report on the Immigrant Mission of New York,
Upon the advice of the Hon. President of Synod, early in 1932,
that the Board for Immigrant Mission in New York consider the
question of abandoning the Immigrant Mission work in New York.
and we make recommendations to that end, we, the Board for Immi-
grant Mission in New York, after a thorough survey of the work, ex-
préssed as our opinion that the work should not be abandoned.
Our Synod has been engaged in Immigrant Mission work for more
than sixty years. During that time our work has adapted itself to
the ever-changing immigration policy of our Government. A change
has taken place in the immigration policy in the last triennium. This
change, however, while it has brought about a decrease in certain
phases of our work, has increased our activities in other directions.
The following figures, covering the years 1929, 1930, and 1931, indicate
both the scope of the work of the Immigrant Mission and the change
in our activities, as we adapted ourselves to present conditions.
At the piers (immigrants) a total of 374 ships and of 7,773 immi-
grants was met, and the latter were interviewed and served. This
Ev. Luth. Synod of Missouri, Ohio, and Other States. 1932. 149
"umber has decreased from 4,010 in 1929 to 599 in 1931, indicating
the manner in which the present restriction of immigration has af-
fected our work.
At Ellis Island (emigrants), 5,733 persons were served, this num-
ber increasing from 1,013 in 1929 to 2,443 in 1931, and actual pastoral
visits were made and spiritual interviews given, increasing from 467
in 1929 to 1,748 in 1931, indicating the manner in which our work has
jncreased due to present conditions. An average of from 250 to 350
attend the Sunday services at Ellis Island.
At the office (aliens) 2,177 called on us for help and advice, this
number increasing from 467 in 1929 to 913 in 1931. Office interviews
are given to serve a missionary purpose, and the opportunity is used
to give the appropriate comfort, admonition, and direction to our
churches.
Since immigration has been temporarily restricted to 10 per cent.
of the quota allowance and our missionary served a total of 599 immi-
grants at the piers in 1931, which is a fair gage of present immigration
conditions, the help of one female worker was dispensed with early in
1931. Since that time the missionary has carried on the pier work
without assistance. ;
Since the clerical work, bookkeeping, correspondence, averaging
4,500 letters received and sent a year, and other work in connection
with our mission-work: serving ‘Synod in missionary transportation
and money transfers; steamship-ticket sales, from which we derive an
income, etc., could not be done by the missionary in addition to his
actual mission-work, the help of the office assistant was retained.
Under present conditions our chief field of missionary activity is
on Ellis Island, which daily houses an average of 600 persons. Regular
services are held there. Week-day mission-work is similar to that
which was done among interned aliens during the World War. Our
Church met and welcomed immigrants who came to us in days of
prosperity, filled with hope. To-day our Church is on hand to comfort
emigrants and deportees who are broken in spirit and discouraged.
Many a one, humbled by misfortune, has been led back to the Savior.
Ellis Island has been a new field of opportunity for mission-work.
Thus, while not engaging in activities other than those set forth
in our constitution and charter, but adapting our work to changing
conditions, our mission continues to serve immigrants, emigrants, and
aliens, seeking to preach the Gospel, to admonish, and to comfort the
stranger within our gates.
Particularly with reference to Reports and Memorials for the
Twentieth Delegate Synod, assembled at Milwaukee in 1932, the Re-
port of the Board of Directors of Synod, B. § 4, page 174, we, the
Board for Immigrant Mission in New York, make the following ree-
ommendation : —