Collection › LCMS Convention Proceedings (St. Louis, Missouri) › 1932 · 35th Convention, Milwaukee › Page 118
LCMS Convention Proceedings St. Louis, Missouri — 1932, Page 118
Page 4
Page 5
Page 6
Page 7
Page 8
Page 9
Page 10
Page 11
Page 12
Page 13
Page 14
Page 15
Page 16
Page 17
Page 18
Page 19
Page 20
Page 21
Page 22
Page 23
Page 24
Page 25
Page 26
Page 27
Page 28
Page 29
Page 30
Page 31
Page 32
Page 33
Page 34
Page 35
Page 36
Page 37
Page 40
Page 41
Page 42
Page 43
Page 44
Page 45
Page 46
Page 47
Page 48
Page 49
Page 52
Page 53
Page 54
Page 55
Page 56
Page 57
Page 58
Page 59
Page 60
Page 61
Page 62
Page 63
Page 64
Page 66
Page 67
Page 68
Page 69
Page 70
Page 71
Page 72
Page 73
Page 74
Page 75
Page 76
Page 77
Page 78
Page 79
Page 80
Page 81
Page 82
Page 83
Page 84
Page 85
Page 86
Page 87
Page 88
Page 89
Page 90
Page 91
Page 92
Page 93
Page 94
Page 95
Page 96
Page 97
Page 98
Page 99
Page 100
Page 101
Page 102
Page 103
Page 104
Page 105
Page 106
Page 107
Page 108
Page 109
Page 110
Page 111
Page 112
Page 113
Page 114
Page 115
Page 116
Page 117
Page 118
Page 119
Page 120
Page 121
Page 122
Page 123
Page 124
Page 125
Page 126
Page 127
Page 128
Page 129
Page 130
Page 131
Page 132
Page 133
Page 134
Page 135
Page 136
Page 137
Page 138
Page 139
Page 140
Page 141
Page 142
Page 143
Page 144
Page 145
Page 146
Page 147
Page 148
Page 149
Page 150
Page 151
Page 152
Page 153
Page 154
Page 155
Page 156
Page 157
Page 158
Page 159
Page 160
Page 161
Page 162
Page 163
Page 236
Page 237
Page 238
Page 239
Page 240
Page 241
Page 242
Page 243
Page 244
Page 245
Page 246
Page 247
Page 248
Page 249
Page 250
Page 251
Page 252
Page 253
Page 254
Page 255
Page 256
Page 257
Page 258
Page 259
Page 260
Page 261
Page 262
Page 263
Page 264
Scan: The Lutheran Church—Missouri Synod
⤓ Download page image (full resolution)
Transcription machine transcription, uncorrected
162 Proceedings of Thirty-Fifth Regular Convention,
Regarding this memorial, Committee 15 submitted the following
resolution : —
Wuereas, It appears that there is a difference of opinion regard-
ing the true interpretation of Article VII of Synod’s Constitution con.
cerning the relation of the Synod to its members, especially in refer.
ence to the meaning and scope of the term “advisory body”; and
Wuereas, The Central Conference of Northern N. ebraska has pe-
titioned Synod for an opinion in this matter, requesting the Synod to
cause a brief interpretation of Article VII of-the Constitution to be
written; and
Wuereas, It appears desirable that such an interpretation be
given the widest possible publicity; therefore be it
Resolved, That the Synod request the standing Committee on
Constitutional Matters to publish an explanatory article concerning
the true meaning of Article VII in the official organs of the Synod,
the Lutheraner and the Lutheran Witness.
This resolution was adopted by Synod.
Amalgamation of the English District Congregations
with Other Districts of Synod.
(Memorial 407.)
The increased use of the English language throughout all Dis-
tricts of our Synod during the past decade has brought forth petitions
to Synod concerning the amalgamation of English District congrega-
tions with other Districts of Synod. The 1923 convention of Synod,
considering a petition from the Visitors of the Western District, held
that a proposal for amalgamation should come from the English
District and asked that District kindly to discuss this matter. Synod
adopted a similar resolution in 1926.
The English District has not yet proposed amalgamation of its
congregations with Districts in which they are geographically located,
although reasons for amalgamation are stronger to-day than they were
a decade ago.
Therefore the Northern Illinois District, in convention assembled
at River Forest, Ill., June 28 to July 3, 1931, presents the following
resolution : —
“That the Ev. Luth. Synod of Missouri, Ohio, and Other States be
requested to reconsider the resolutions according to which a move for
amalgamation must come from the English District and to take the
necessary steps to effect the amalgamation of the congregations and
pastors of the English District with the respective Districts of Synod
in whose territory they are located.”
; We urgently request Synod to give this matter most serious and
careful consideration for the following reasons: —
1. The English language is now the predominent language
Ev. Luth. Synod of Missouri, Ohio, and Other States. 1932. 163
‘throughout our Synod, and therefore the reasons which obtained
twenty or more years ago for a separate English District, scattered
over all parts of our vast country, do not obtain to-day.
2. Our bilingual congregations are doing mission-work adequately
and efficiently in the English language, and establishment of separate
and purely English missions is often a duplication of efforts and not
in the interest of economy.
3. Elimination of duplicate mission boards and missionary efforts
will forestall unbrotherly friction and rivalry in many parts of Synod.
4. Many of our circuits, congregations and laymen especially,
deplore the fact that congregations heavily burdened with the support
of their schools must contribute to mission subsidies and church ex-
tension funds from which competing churches without schools are
founded and supported.
5. Most of our bilingual Districts already have a number of purely
English congregations, which are in no way deprived of the benefits
of membership with Synod.
6. Amalgamation of our English District congregations and pas-
tors with other Districts will eliminate the offense given or taken in
mission-practise where there is competition for new fields.
Respectfully submitted by
Tue Nortuern Inunors District.
F. L. Genrs, Secretary.
Dissolution of the English District.
(Memorial 408.)
“WueErEas, Practically all the congregations of our Synod are now
bilingual and in consequence thereof an exclusively English District
is no longer needed for the promotion of English work in Synod; and
“Wuereas, An amalgamation of the congregations of the English
District with the respective synodical Districts in which they are
located would result in closer fraternal relations; and
“Wuereas, Such merger would make for a more unified policy in
the prosecution of the various endeavors of our church-work; and
“WHEREAS, The proposed amalgamation would obviate the in-
convenience to which the brethren of the English District are now
subjected in attending their District conference and board meetings
and would at the same time materially reduce their expenditures for
travel and the work of the various District boards; therefore be it
“Resolved, That we petition the Hon. Delegate Synod to approach
the English District with the request to consider seriously the question
whether the time has not come for the dissolution of its District.”
(See Report of South Wis. Dist., 1931, p. 76.)
Henry Grusser, President.
R. Scuroru, Secretary.