Collection › LCMS Convention Proceedings (St. Louis, Missouri) › 1932 · 35th Convention, Milwaukee › Page 75
LCMS Convention Proceedings St. Louis, Missouri — 1932, Page 75
Page 4
Page 5
Page 6
Page 7
Page 8
Page 9
Page 10
Page 11
Page 12
Page 13
Page 14
Page 15
Page 16
Page 17
Page 18
Page 19
Page 20
Page 21
Page 22
Page 23
Page 24
Page 25
Page 26
Page 27
Page 28
Page 29
Page 30
Page 31
Page 32
Page 33
Page 34
Page 35
Page 36
Page 37
Page 40
Page 41
Page 42
Page 43
Page 44
Page 45
Page 46
Page 47
Page 48
Page 49
Page 52
Page 53
Page 54
Page 55
Page 56
Page 57
Page 58
Page 59
Page 60
Page 61
Page 62
Page 63
Page 64
Page 66
Page 67
Page 68
Page 69
Page 70
Page 71
Page 72
Page 73
Page 74
Page 75
Page 76
Page 77
Page 78
Page 79
Page 80
Page 81
Page 82
Page 83
Page 84
Page 85
Page 86
Page 87
Page 88
Page 89
Page 90
Page 91
Page 92
Page 93
Page 94
Page 95
Page 96
Page 97
Page 98
Page 99
Page 100
Page 101
Page 102
Page 103
Page 104
Page 105
Page 106
Page 107
Page 108
Page 109
Page 110
Page 111
Page 112
Page 113
Page 114
Page 115
Page 116
Page 117
Page 118
Page 119
Page 120
Page 121
Page 122
Page 123
Page 124
Page 125
Page 126
Page 127
Page 128
Page 129
Page 130
Page 131
Page 132
Page 133
Page 134
Page 135
Page 136
Page 137
Page 138
Page 139
Page 140
Page 141
Page 142
Page 143
Page 144
Page 145
Page 146
Page 147
Page 148
Page 149
Page 150
Page 151
Page 152
Page 153
Page 154
Page 155
Page 156
Page 157
Page 158
Page 159
Page 160
Page 161
Page 162
Page 163
Page 236
Page 237
Page 238
Page 239
Page 240
Page 241
Page 242
Page 243
Page 244
Page 245
Page 246
Page 247
Page 248
Page 249
Page 250
Page 251
Page 252
Page 253
Page 254
Page 255
Page 256
Page 257
Page 258
Page 259
Page 260
Page 261
Page 262
Page 263
Page 264
Scan: The Lutheran Church—Missouri Synod
⤓ Download page image (full resolution)
Transcription machine transcription, uncorrected
76 Proceedings of Thirty-Fifth Regular Convention
tofore to the discussion of thj
Conventions and to urge the several Districts to
conventions.
Respectfully submitted by
r<3
Tue “Synoprcar Sunpay” Committee or THE Daven;
AND Rock Isnanp Circurrs, eNPoRr
H.F.C. WerzeL, Cha;
I aur:
H. J. Ettine, Secretary. ™
President Kreinhede i
T was given an opportunit i
the cause of Valparaiso University to Synod. y briefly to Present
Advisory Committee for Valparaiso,
Synod instructed the Board o
‘ f Directors to ; .
visory Committee for Valparaiso. *Ppont a Standing Aq.
Report of Committee on Support of Indi
(Memorial 606. )
, At its last convention Synod passed th
Resolved, That the venerable President of S
a committee of such men as are familiar with
gent Students,
>
such committee shall make its report and recommendation to Synod
a ve next (35th) regular convention.” (Proceedings, 1999 p63.)
e Ven. President of Synod appointed the undersigned com:
some cases also books, clothes, and other expenses) paid by Districts,
ee ee congregations, individuals, or out of the special indigent
udents’ funds held in trust by the various institutions. These sup-
oe
’for remunerative employment make it impossible for either all our ”
Ev. Luth. Synod of Missouri, Ohio, and Other States. 1932. 77
rted students your Committee believes are those whom Synod had
ind in its resolution.
. 8. Both the time required for study and the limited opportunity
students or even those who are being supported to make full return
in the way of work in consideration for the benefits received.
Your Committee recommends —
1) That Synod continue to grant free tuition and housing to
those of its students who are preparing for work in the Church (min-
isters and teachers), even as the State furnishes like free privileges
jn its grammar and high schools and its State universities.
2) Since parents should consider it a privilege if they have a son
whom they can dedicate to the Lord for His work in the Church, they
should, if their means permit it, consider it their duty to pay the
necessary expense, board, and other personal expenses, especially since
the Church supplies free tuition and housing.
3) Since many a boy or young man who is well qualified could
not be procured for work in our churches and schools if support would
not be granted to such parents as are not financially able to see their
son through college, the practise of supporting indigent students
should be continued.
4) Since many a poor boy would be eliminated by the rule that
support be withheld during the first year, boards for indigent students
should be advised against the adoption of such a regulation. Con-
tinued support, however, should be granted only upon the recom-
mendation of the respective faculty.
5) Since many of the students who have been enrolled at our
colleges did not finally enter the services ‘of the Church, and since
perhaps even some of those who did ought not to have been permitted
to do so, much greater care in the selection of all students should be
exercised, and all students who are not giving evidence of due dili-
gence in pursuing their studies, even though they are making passing
grades, or who lack the necessary personal qualifications (moral
integrity, consecration, health, alert mind, gift of speech) should not
be permitted to continue their studies, regardless of whether they are
being supported or not; and since all this, as a rule, can be definitely
known and determined before the student finishes his high-school
course and certainly before he enters the Seminary classes, the elimi-
nation of students should be made by the tespective faculties prior to
that time, it being understood that this be done only after ample op-
portunity has been given the student to prove himself worthy or
unworthy of the benefits which he is receiving from the Church or
any of its organizations.
6) Since all. our students receive free tuition and housing on the
part of Synod, ail students ought to be ready to do some manual or