Collection › LCMS Convention Proceedings (St. Louis, Missouri) › 1932 · 35th Convention, Milwaukee › Page 75

LCMS Convention Proceedings St. Louis, Missouri — 1932, Page 75

Page 4 Page 5 Page 6 Page 7 Page 8 Page 9 Page 10 Page 11 Page 12 Page 13 Page 14 Page 15 Page 16 Page 17 Page 18 Page 19 Page 20 Page 21 Page 22 Page 23 Page 24 Page 25 Page 26 Page 27 Page 28 Page 29 Page 30 Page 31 Page 32 Page 33 Page 34 Page 35 Page 36 Page 37 Page 40 Page 41 Page 42 Page 43 Page 44 Page 45 Page 46 Page 47 Page 48 Page 49 Page 52 Page 53 Page 54 Page 55 Page 56 Page 57 Page 58 Page 59 Page 60 Page 61 Page 62 Page 63 Page 64 Page 66 Page 67 Page 68 Page 69 Page 70 Page 71 Page 72 Page 73 Page 74 Page 75 Page 76 Page 77 Page 78 Page 79 Page 80 Page 81 Page 82 Page 83 Page 84 Page 85 Page 86 Page 87 Page 88 Page 89 Page 90 Page 91 Page 92 Page 93 Page 94 Page 95 Page 96 Page 97 Page 98 Page 99 Page 100 Page 101 Page 102 Page 103 Page 104 Page 105 Page 106 Page 107 Page 108 Page 109 Page 110 Page 111 Page 112 Page 113 Page 114 Page 115 Page 116 Page 117 Page 118 Page 119 Page 120 Page 121 Page 122 Page 123 Page 124 Page 125 Page 126 Page 127 Page 128 Page 129 Page 130 Page 131 Page 132 Page 133 Page 134 Page 135 Page 136 Page 137 Page 138 Page 139 Page 140 Page 141 Page 142 Page 143 Page 144 Page 145 Page 146 Page 147 Page 148 Page 149 Page 150 Page 151 Page 152 Page 153 Page 154 Page 155 Page 156 Page 157 Page 158 Page 159 Page 160 Page 161 Page 162 Page 163 Page 236 Page 237 Page 238 Page 239 Page 240 Page 241 Page 242 Page 243 Page 244 Page 245 Page 246 Page 247 Page 248 Page 249 Page 250 Page 251 Page 252 Page 253 Page 254 Page 255 Page 256 Page 257 Page 258 Page 259 Page 260 Page 261 Page 262 Page 263 Page 264

Scan: The Lutheran Church—Missouri Synod

⤓ Download page image (full resolution)

Transcription machine transcription, uncorrected

⤓ Download .txt · copy text

76 Proceedings of Thirty-Fifth Regular Convention

tofore to the discussion of thj

Conventions and to urge the several Districts to
conventions.

Respectfully submitted by
r<3
Tue “Synoprcar Sunpay” Committee or THE Daven;
AND Rock Isnanp Circurrs, eNPoRr

H.F.C. WerzeL, Cha;
I aur:
H. J. Ettine, Secretary. ™

President Kreinhede i
T was given an opportunit i
the cause of Valparaiso University to Synod. y briefly to Present

Advisory Committee for Valparaiso,
Synod instructed the Board o

‘ f Directors to ; .
visory Committee for Valparaiso. *Ppont a Standing Aq.

Report of Committee on Support of Indi
(Memorial 606. )

, At its last convention Synod passed th
Resolved, That the venerable President of S
a committee of such men as are familiar with

gent Students,

>

such committee shall make its report and recommendation to Synod
a ve next (35th) regular convention.” (Proceedings, 1999 p63.)
e Ven. President of Synod appointed the undersigned com:

some cases also books, clothes, and other expenses) paid by Districts,
ee ee congregations, individuals, or out of the special indigent
udents’ funds held in trust by the various institutions. These sup-

oe

’for remunerative employment make it impossible for either all our ”

Ev. Luth. Synod of Missouri, Ohio, and Other States. 1932. 77

rted students your Committee believes are those whom Synod had
ind in its resolution.
. 8. Both the time required for study and the limited opportunity

students or even those who are being supported to make full return
in the way of work in consideration for the benefits received.

Your Committee recommends —

1) That Synod continue to grant free tuition and housing to
those of its students who are preparing for work in the Church (min-
isters and teachers), even as the State furnishes like free privileges
jn its grammar and high schools and its State universities.

2) Since parents should consider it a privilege if they have a son
whom they can dedicate to the Lord for His work in the Church, they
should, if their means permit it, consider it their duty to pay the
necessary expense, board, and other personal expenses, especially since
the Church supplies free tuition and housing.

3) Since many a boy or young man who is well qualified could
not be procured for work in our churches and schools if support would
not be granted to such parents as are not financially able to see their
son through college, the practise of supporting indigent students
should be continued.

4) Since many a poor boy would be eliminated by the rule that
support be withheld during the first year, boards for indigent students
should be advised against the adoption of such a regulation. Con-
tinued support, however, should be granted only upon the recom-
mendation of the respective faculty.

5) Since many of the students who have been enrolled at our
colleges did not finally enter the services ‘of the Church, and since
perhaps even some of those who did ought not to have been permitted
to do so, much greater care in the selection of all students should be
exercised, and all students who are not giving evidence of due dili-
gence in pursuing their studies, even though they are making passing
grades, or who lack the necessary personal qualifications (moral
integrity, consecration, health, alert mind, gift of speech) should not
be permitted to continue their studies, regardless of whether they are
being supported or not; and since all this, as a rule, can be definitely
known and determined before the student finishes his high-school
course and certainly before he enters the Seminary classes, the elimi-
nation of students should be made by the tespective faculties prior to
that time, it being understood that this be done only after ample op-
portunity has been given the student to prove himself worthy or
unworthy of the benefits which he is receiving from the Church or
any of its organizations.

6) Since all. our students receive free tuition and housing on the
part of Synod, ail students ought to be ready to do some manual or