Collection › LCMS Convention Proceedings (St. Louis, Missouri) › 1932 · 35th Convention, Milwaukee › Page 242

LCMS Convention Proceedings St. Louis, Missouri — 1932, Page 242

Page 4 Page 5 Page 6 Page 7 Page 8 Page 9 Page 10 Page 11 Page 12 Page 13 Page 14 Page 15 Page 16 Page 17 Page 18 Page 19 Page 20 Page 21 Page 22 Page 23 Page 24 Page 25 Page 26 Page 27 Page 28 Page 29 Page 30 Page 31 Page 32 Page 33 Page 34 Page 35 Page 36 Page 37 Page 40 Page 41 Page 42 Page 43 Page 44 Page 45 Page 46 Page 47 Page 48 Page 49 Page 52 Page 53 Page 54 Page 55 Page 56 Page 57 Page 58 Page 59 Page 60 Page 61 Page 62 Page 63 Page 64 Page 66 Page 67 Page 68 Page 69 Page 70 Page 71 Page 72 Page 73 Page 74 Page 75 Page 76 Page 77 Page 78 Page 79 Page 80 Page 81 Page 82 Page 83 Page 84 Page 85 Page 86 Page 87 Page 88 Page 89 Page 90 Page 91 Page 92 Page 93 Page 94 Page 95 Page 96 Page 97 Page 98 Page 99 Page 100 Page 101 Page 102 Page 103 Page 104 Page 105 Page 106 Page 107 Page 108 Page 109 Page 110 Page 111 Page 112 Page 113 Page 114 Page 115 Page 116 Page 117 Page 118 Page 119 Page 120 Page 121 Page 122 Page 123 Page 124 Page 125 Page 126 Page 127 Page 128 Page 129 Page 130 Page 131 Page 132 Page 133 Page 134 Page 135 Page 136 Page 137 Page 138 Page 139 Page 140 Page 141 Page 142 Page 143 Page 144 Page 145 Page 146 Page 147 Page 148 Page 149 Page 150 Page 151 Page 152 Page 153 Page 154 Page 155 Page 156 Page 157 Page 158 Page 159 Page 160 Page 161 Page 162 Page 163 Page 236 Page 237 Page 238 Page 239 Page 240 Page 241 Page 242 Page 243 Page 244 Page 245 Page 246 Page 247 Page 248 Page 249 Page 250 Page 251 Page 252 Page 253 Page 254 Page 255 Page 256 Page 257 Page 258 Page 259 Page 260 Page 261 Page 262 Page 263 Page 264

Scan: The Lutheran Church—Missouri Synod

⤓ Download page image (full resolution)

Transcription machine transcription, uncorrected

⤓ Download .txt · copy text

“249, Proceedings of Thirty-Fifth Regular: Convention,

After careful deliberation your Committee has come to the con-
_clusion that the regulations of the Board of Support should not be
changed and that this Board should, as heretofore, serve to provide
help only for superannuated Veterans of the Cross and for those who
have resigned on account of illness and for their dependents or their
widows and orphans. Your Committee therefore recommends to
Synod : —

1. That all such cases of need as merit Synod’s assistance and yet
. do not specifically come within the scope and sphere of the operation of
the Board of Support or any other Board of Synod be referred to the
Board for General Relief;

That the rules and regulations for the Board of General Relief be
-hereby construed as applying to all such cases.

_ 2. Your Committee recommends that the income accruing to the
-Board of Support from the Endowment Fund should under no con-
sideration be withheld from this Board and that no part of it should
_be diverted to other causes and therefore recommends further that the
sum accruing from the Endowment Fund should not be included in
the budgeted receipts of Synod.

3. In respect to personal contributions your Committee would urge
the patsors, professors, and teachers to continue to make their personal
contributions to the Permanent Support Fund until some other plan
of support is put into operation.

4. We wish to call attention to the custom of memorial donations
and urge the use of memorial wreaths for the benefit of this treasury
in accord with the original idea of this custom.

Synod adopted these recommendations.

Obligation of Children of Pastors and Teachers
in Need of Support.
(Memorial 612.)

Wuereas, There appears to be a lack of clarity and unanimity
of opinion in the various Districts as to the proper interpretation of
the policy of Synod with regard to the obligation of adult children
of those in need of support; and

Wuereas, Such a condition may result in false expectations re-
garding future support; and

Wuereas, Scripture requires that such children as are able to
support their parents should be admonished to do so; therefore be it

“Resolved, That the Ontario District, in convention assembled at
Ottawa, July 7—12, 1931, memorialize the synodical convention as-
sembled at Milwaukee to define the obligation of adult children to
such parents as receive, or have applied for, support and to devise
effective means whereby the obligation can be impressed upon such
children. AuFreD Dasuner, Secretary.