Collection › LCMS Convention Proceedings (St. Louis, Missouri) › 1932 · 35th Convention, Milwaukee › Page 59

LCMS Convention Proceedings St. Louis, Missouri — 1932, Page 59

Page 4 Page 5 Page 6 Page 7 Page 8 Page 9 Page 10 Page 11 Page 12 Page 13 Page 14 Page 15 Page 16 Page 17 Page 18 Page 19 Page 20 Page 21 Page 22 Page 23 Page 24 Page 25 Page 26 Page 27 Page 28 Page 29 Page 30 Page 31 Page 32 Page 33 Page 34 Page 35 Page 36 Page 37 Page 40 Page 41 Page 42 Page 43 Page 44 Page 45 Page 46 Page 47 Page 48 Page 49 Page 52 Page 53 Page 54 Page 55 Page 56 Page 57 Page 58 Page 59 Page 60 Page 61 Page 62 Page 63 Page 64 Page 66 Page 67 Page 68 Page 69 Page 70 Page 71 Page 72 Page 73 Page 74 Page 75 Page 76 Page 77 Page 78 Page 79 Page 80 Page 81 Page 82 Page 83 Page 84 Page 85 Page 86 Page 87 Page 88 Page 89 Page 90 Page 91 Page 92 Page 93 Page 94 Page 95 Page 96 Page 97 Page 98 Page 99 Page 100 Page 101 Page 102 Page 103 Page 104 Page 105 Page 106 Page 107 Page 108 Page 109 Page 110 Page 111 Page 112 Page 113 Page 114 Page 115 Page 116 Page 117 Page 118 Page 119 Page 120 Page 121 Page 122 Page 123 Page 124 Page 125 Page 126 Page 127 Page 128 Page 129 Page 130 Page 131 Page 132 Page 133 Page 134 Page 135 Page 136 Page 137 Page 138 Page 139 Page 140 Page 141 Page 142 Page 143 Page 144 Page 145 Page 146 Page 147 Page 148 Page 149 Page 150 Page 151 Page 152 Page 153 Page 154 Page 155 Page 156 Page 157 Page 158 Page 159 Page 160 Page 161 Page 162 Page 163 Page 236 Page 237 Page 238 Page 239 Page 240 Page 241 Page 242 Page 243 Page 244 Page 245 Page 246 Page 247 Page 248 Page 249 Page 250 Page 251 Page 252 Page 253 Page 254 Page 255 Page 256 Page 257 Page 258 Page 259 Page 260 Page 261 Page 262 Page 263 Page 264

Scan: The Lutheran Church—Missouri Synod

⤓ Download page image (full resolution)

Transcription machine transcription, uncorrected

⤓ Download .txt · copy text

Ev. Luth. Synod of Missouri, Ohio, and Other States. 1932. 59

seem Very unfavorable to the undertaking of building programs of
‘any kind; but consider the following; —
- Our present building, of the very cheapest construction, it having
cost but $6,000 at the time it was built, has served us for twenty-five
ears and ought now to be replaced by one more serviceable. Be-
sides being old and worn, it is pitifully lacking in room and facilities.
It is utterly incapable of caring for more than thirty-five students,
and that would mean putting six boys into rooms of ten by thirteen
feet each. It has no storage facilities whatever, no room for bedsteads
or desks not in use. The laboratory is in one corner of the basement
in a dark and very small room, and the equipment is very primitive.
The sick-room is poorly furnished, if indeed it can be said to be
furnished at all. The toilets are not adjacent to it, but in the base-
ment, while the sick-room is on the second floor, and the dormitory
ig in the attic! Imagine a boy getting sick in the night and having
to go to Our very faithful and efficient stewards, a couple with
two children of school age, have to live in the building in very
crowded quarters.

Surely the need of a new building is quite apparent. And now
consider the following: —

While the present business and industrial depression is very
unfavorable in one way to the undertaking of building operations, in
another way it is very favorable. The cost of a new building should
be much lower now than it would have been in 1926 or in 1929.
Material is decidedly cheaper, and labor is coming down for the
time being.

The Call of the Hour is for missionary expansion. Give us this
new building and see what an impetus it will give to missionary
expansion in the great Pacific Northwest. Many a boy whom we
could otherwise have had, has been denied us on account of our
present poor facilities, though at that the average attendance during,
the last three years has been thirty. But give us a new and suitable
building, and we shall no longer be denied the boys we should have
and both our college and our mission-work will expand. Pn

In the name of the Board of Control, mo
’ J. A.Rimpacn, Chairman.
Ricnarp Kuunav, Secretary. —

}

Action.

Upon recommendation of Committee 1 Synod declined the request
for a new building under present conditions.

The recommendation of the Survey Committee to discontinue the
college at Portland was met with a memorial of the Oregon and Wash-
ington District (Memorial 134) petitioning Synod not to discontinue
the school. This matter will be considered by the new Committee on
Higher Education.