Collection › Synodical Conference Convention Proceedings (St. Louis, Missouri) › 1958 · 45th Convention, Lakewood › Page 34

Synodical Conference Convention Proceedings St. Louis, Missouri — 1958, Page 34

front matter 1 front matter 2 Page 1 Page 2 Page 3 Page 4 Page 5 Page 6 Page 7 Page 8 Page 9 Page 10 Page 11 Page 12 Page 13 Page 14 Page 15 Page 16 Page 17 Page 18 Page 19 Page 20 Page 21 Page 22 Page 23 Page 24 Page 25 Page 26 Page 27 Page 28 Page 29 Page 30 Page 31 Page 32 Page 33 Page 34 Page 35 Page 36 Page 37 Page 38 Page 39 Page 40 Page 41 Page 42 Page 43 Page 44 Page 46 Page 47 Page 48 Page 49 Page 50 Page 51 Page 52 Page 53 Page 54 Page 55 Page 56 Page 57 Page 58 Page 59 Page 60 Page 61 Page 62 Page 63 Page 64 Page 65 Page 66 Page 67 Page 68 Page 69 Page 70 Page 71 Page 72 Page 73 Page 74 Page 75 Page 76 Page 77 Page 78 Page 79 Page 80 Page 81 Page 82 Page 83 Page 84 Page 85 Page 86 Page 87 Page 88 Page 89 Page 90 Page 91 Page 92 Page 93 Page 94 Page 95 Page 96 Page 97 Page 98 Page 99 Page 100 Page 101 Page 102 Page 103 Page 104 Page 105 Page 106 Page 107 Page 108 Page 109 Page 110 Page 111 Page 112 Page 113 Page 114 Page 115 Page 116 Page 117 Page 118 Page 119 Page 120 Page 121 Page 122 Page 123 Page 124 Page 125 Page 126 Page 127 Page 128 Page 129 Page 130 Page 131 Page 132 Page 133 Page 134 Page 135 Page 136 Page 137 Page 138 Page 139

Scan from Albert Collver's files (LCMS President's Office / CCM)

⤓ Download page image (full resolution)

Transcription machine transcription, uncorrected

⤓ Download .txt · copy text

34 Proceedings of the Forty-fifth Convention

‘I think we are all pretty well agreed on Lutheran practice
concerning the burial of those who were not church members or
those who were deliberate suicides. Yet there are heartbreaking
cases dreadfully difficult to judge, and the same goes for remarry-
ing divorced persons. Tensions, sometimes severe ones, arise over
the use — even the occasional use — of the Revised Standard Ver-
sion of the Bible in the church, over the wearing of clerical vest-
ments, over musical or liturgical innovations, even though they
are introduced by those who know what good music and good
liturgical practice should be. A minor tension arose in a church in
which I recently was vacancy preacher when a retired pastor, called
in to officiate at a wedding, asked the congregation to decide
whether he was right in refusing the couple’s request to have pic-
tures taken in the church during the ceremony.

Questions like the following have received different answers
in our church; Ought a Lutheran pastor preach a baccalaureate
sermon, even if he has charge of the whole service, knowing that
the next year it will be another minister’s turn? Ought he then
to counsel his young graduates not to take part in the service?
What about speaking at a patriotic celebration or becoming a mem-
ber of a service club? Should a pastor take part in local govern-
ment, by becoming councilman or mayor, for instance, or offer his
services as mediator in a strike? Should a pastor coach a local
football or basketball team if he is qualified? Should he ever
work to eke out his salary? Should he solicit ads for his paper
or approach non-Lutheran secular organizations for contributions
to. his church?

Perhaps we think that we are all in agreement on the position
of women in the church. Has not Paul spoken plainly on that
subject? Yet there have been subtle changes in attitude and
practice in our churches. Thirty-five years ago a woman who
would have gone to Communion with her hair bobbed and without
a hat might have been turned away from the Communion rail —
or should one say altar, since communion rails were unusual at
that time. Today she would hardly be noticed. How much of the
pastoral work of a congregation could be taken over by an efficient
deaconess or pastor’s secretary during the absence or illness of the
pastor? After writing these sentences I received the announcement
of a new book entitled Woman in the Church by a pastor of the
Synodical Conference. According to the flier, a “veteran of the
Cross,” presumably a pastor, wrote the author: “I agree fully with
your conclusion that there is nothing in the Scripture forbidding
a woman to ‘desire the office of a bishop.’” Even more contro-
versial is the question of desegregation in the churches, at least in
certain areas of the country.

There are even differences of opinion about parochial schools,
to say nothing of such lesser congregational items as bazaars and
bake sales, social, athletic, or cultural programs, and organizations
or clubs for every age group.

Any one of you, I am sure, could add more tension items to
the list. I have purposely refrained from mentioning those that
have threatened to smash the tie that still binds our synods in
the Synodical Conference. Serious, able, and consecrated men on
both sides have been and still are working hard to reconcile the