Collection › Synodical Conference Convention Proceedings (St. Louis, Missouri) › 1958 · 45th Convention, Lakewood › Page 27
Synodical Conference Convention Proceedings St. Louis, Missouri — 1958, Page 27
front matter 1
front matter 2
Page 1
Page 2
Page 3
Page 4
Page 5
Page 6
Page 7
Page 8
Page 9
Page 10
Page 11
Page 12
Page 13
Page 14
Page 15
Page 16
Page 17
Page 18
Page 19
Page 20
Page 21
Page 22
Page 23
Page 24
Page 25
Page 26
Page 27
Page 28
Page 29
Page 30
Page 31
Page 32
Page 33
Page 34
Page 35
Page 36
Page 37
Page 38
Page 39
Page 40
Page 41
Page 42
Page 43
Page 44
Page 46
Page 47
Page 48
Page 49
Page 50
Page 51
Page 52
Page 53
Page 54
Page 55
Page 56
Page 57
Page 58
Page 59
Page 60
Page 61
Page 62
Page 63
Page 64
Page 65
Page 66
Page 67
Page 68
Page 69
Page 70
Page 71
Page 72
Page 73
Page 74
Page 75
Page 76
Page 77
Page 78
Page 79
Page 80
Page 81
Page 82
Page 83
Page 84
Page 85
Page 86
Page 87
Page 88
Page 89
Page 90
Page 91
Page 92
Page 93
Page 94
Page 95
Page 96
Page 97
Page 98
Page 99
Page 100
Page 101
Page 102
Page 103
Page 104
Page 105
Page 106
Page 107
Page 108
Page 109
Page 110
Page 111
Page 112
Page 113
Page 114
Page 115
Page 116
Page 117
Page 118
Page 119
Page 120
Page 121
Page 122
Page 123
Page 124
Page 125
Page 126
Page 127
Page 128
Page 129
Page 130
Page 131
Page 132
Page 133
Page 134
Page 135
Page 136
Page 137
Page 138
Page 139
Scan from Albert Collver's files (LCMS President's Office / CCM)
⤓ Download page image (full resolution)
Transcription machine transcription, uncorrected
Lutheran Synodical Conference, 1958 27
monial law —from wearing phylacteries to the washing of feet,
from public prayers and fasting to a rigid observance of the dietary
laws. You have this sort of activism whenever the church goes
through a moribund age, when Christians become hollow men
who repeat the formulas and go through the motions, perhaps
relying on the pure Word and doctrine that they have been taught
but doing little to make it a power in their lives. Activists of the
kind I described overemphasize the divine side of the church, as
it were, and are willing to let God do it all, while they lose them-
selves in outward works that usually have no social value whatever
except perhaps to keep people occupied and out of mischief.
Now let me give you an illustration of the very opposite kind
of activism. One of the phenomena of the last decade has been
the building of suburban areas far away from old congregations
in the cities. During the New Deal model towns were even built
on the sites of former slums or in Greenbelt areas near metrop-
olises. Now let us imagine one of these areas suddenly appearing
on the outskirts of a city. There are hundreds of homes and a
business section but no church. We will suppose that most of the
larger Protestant denominations are represented among the people
who move in but that there are not enough people of any one
denomination to support a church.
A meeting is called to discuss the subject. It is finally decided
by a majority vote to build a church, just one—a community
church, It is also decided by majority vote that there shall be a
well-balanced religious program but no creed. Everyone is agreed
that children are to be a prime concern of the congregation. They
should be taught good morals, citizenship, and their duty to God,
home, and country. The church must offer entertainments,
good educational and athletic programs to keep young people off
the streets and away from taverns. The Bible will naturally be
the chief textbook but not necessarily the only one. There are
many other good books, and these are to be discussed too, especially
if they deal with topics of current significance and interest.
In short, the stress will be on whatever is good and wholesome for
the community. Religion will set the atmosphere and the mood
but never become intrusive. I will not go on to describe how this
church, created by majority vote, calls a minister after its taste,
erects a building, and begins its work. The idea behind it is the
very opposite of the preceding one. This church is a one-sidedly
human, natural, nonreligious, moral organization. It has virtually
abandoned any faith in salvation or eternal life. Christ will be the
good example but not the Savior.
An article in the Reader’s Digest some years ago, offering
reasons why one should go to church, would tie in very well with
the program just described. Attending service on a Sunday
morning, the author wrote, is a much more profitable occupation
than staying in bed or reading the Sunday comics. It is good
discipline and shows that you are responsible and well adjusted.
The best people go to church, and they will honor you the more
if you go. Some religious advantages were listed, but the emphasis
was mainly on human values. I need hardly tell you that this kind
of advice, valuable as it is to a certain extent, does not harmonize