Collection › Synodical Conference Convention Proceedings (St. Louis, Missouri) › 1958 · 45th Convention, Lakewood › Page 27

Synodical Conference Convention Proceedings St. Louis, Missouri — 1958, Page 27

front matter 1 front matter 2 Page 1 Page 2 Page 3 Page 4 Page 5 Page 6 Page 7 Page 8 Page 9 Page 10 Page 11 Page 12 Page 13 Page 14 Page 15 Page 16 Page 17 Page 18 Page 19 Page 20 Page 21 Page 22 Page 23 Page 24 Page 25 Page 26 Page 27 Page 28 Page 29 Page 30 Page 31 Page 32 Page 33 Page 34 Page 35 Page 36 Page 37 Page 38 Page 39 Page 40 Page 41 Page 42 Page 43 Page 44 Page 46 Page 47 Page 48 Page 49 Page 50 Page 51 Page 52 Page 53 Page 54 Page 55 Page 56 Page 57 Page 58 Page 59 Page 60 Page 61 Page 62 Page 63 Page 64 Page 65 Page 66 Page 67 Page 68 Page 69 Page 70 Page 71 Page 72 Page 73 Page 74 Page 75 Page 76 Page 77 Page 78 Page 79 Page 80 Page 81 Page 82 Page 83 Page 84 Page 85 Page 86 Page 87 Page 88 Page 89 Page 90 Page 91 Page 92 Page 93 Page 94 Page 95 Page 96 Page 97 Page 98 Page 99 Page 100 Page 101 Page 102 Page 103 Page 104 Page 105 Page 106 Page 107 Page 108 Page 109 Page 110 Page 111 Page 112 Page 113 Page 114 Page 115 Page 116 Page 117 Page 118 Page 119 Page 120 Page 121 Page 122 Page 123 Page 124 Page 125 Page 126 Page 127 Page 128 Page 129 Page 130 Page 131 Page 132 Page 133 Page 134 Page 135 Page 136 Page 137 Page 138 Page 139

Scan from Albert Collver's files (LCMS President's Office / CCM)

⤓ Download page image (full resolution)

Transcription machine transcription, uncorrected

⤓ Download .txt · copy text

Lutheran Synodical Conference, 1958 27

monial law —from wearing phylacteries to the washing of feet,
from public prayers and fasting to a rigid observance of the dietary
laws. You have this sort of activism whenever the church goes
through a moribund age, when Christians become hollow men
who repeat the formulas and go through the motions, perhaps
relying on the pure Word and doctrine that they have been taught
but doing little to make it a power in their lives. Activists of the
kind I described overemphasize the divine side of the church, as
it were, and are willing to let God do it all, while they lose them-
selves in outward works that usually have no social value whatever
except perhaps to keep people occupied and out of mischief.

Now let me give you an illustration of the very opposite kind
of activism. One of the phenomena of the last decade has been
the building of suburban areas far away from old congregations
in the cities. During the New Deal model towns were even built
on the sites of former slums or in Greenbelt areas near metrop-
olises. Now let us imagine one of these areas suddenly appearing
on the outskirts of a city. There are hundreds of homes and a
business section but no church. We will suppose that most of the
larger Protestant denominations are represented among the people
who move in but that there are not enough people of any one
denomination to support a church.

A meeting is called to discuss the subject. It is finally decided
by a majority vote to build a church, just one—a community
church, It is also decided by majority vote that there shall be a
well-balanced religious program but no creed. Everyone is agreed
that children are to be a prime concern of the congregation. They
should be taught good morals, citizenship, and their duty to God,
home, and country. The church must offer entertainments,
good educational and athletic programs to keep young people off
the streets and away from taverns. The Bible will naturally be
the chief textbook but not necessarily the only one. There are
many other good books, and these are to be discussed too, especially
if they deal with topics of current significance and interest.
In short, the stress will be on whatever is good and wholesome for
the community. Religion will set the atmosphere and the mood
but never become intrusive. I will not go on to describe how this
church, created by majority vote, calls a minister after its taste,
erects a building, and begins its work. The idea behind it is the
very opposite of the preceding one. This church is a one-sidedly
human, natural, nonreligious, moral organization. It has virtually
abandoned any faith in salvation or eternal life. Christ will be the
good example but not the Savior.

An article in the Reader’s Digest some years ago, offering
reasons why one should go to church, would tie in very well with
the program just described. Attending service on a Sunday
morning, the author wrote, is a much more profitable occupation
than staying in bed or reading the Sunday comics. It is good
discipline and shows that you are responsible and well adjusted.
The best people go to church, and they will honor you the more
if you go. Some religious advantages were listed, but the emphasis
was mainly on human values. I need hardly tell you that this kind
of advice, valuable as it is to a certain extent, does not harmonize