Collection › Synodical Conference Convention Proceedings (St. Louis, Missouri) › 1958 · 45th Convention, Lakewood › Page 31

Synodical Conference Convention Proceedings St. Louis, Missouri — 1958, Page 31

front matter 1 front matter 2 Page 1 Page 2 Page 3 Page 4 Page 5 Page 6 Page 7 Page 8 Page 9 Page 10 Page 11 Page 12 Page 13 Page 14 Page 15 Page 16 Page 17 Page 18 Page 19 Page 20 Page 21 Page 22 Page 23 Page 24 Page 25 Page 26 Page 27 Page 28 Page 29 Page 30 Page 31 Page 32 Page 33 Page 34 Page 35 Page 36 Page 37 Page 38 Page 39 Page 40 Page 41 Page 42 Page 43 Page 44 Page 46 Page 47 Page 48 Page 49 Page 50 Page 51 Page 52 Page 53 Page 54 Page 55 Page 56 Page 57 Page 58 Page 59 Page 60 Page 61 Page 62 Page 63 Page 64 Page 65 Page 66 Page 67 Page 68 Page 69 Page 70 Page 71 Page 72 Page 73 Page 74 Page 75 Page 76 Page 77 Page 78 Page 79 Page 80 Page 81 Page 82 Page 83 Page 84 Page 85 Page 86 Page 87 Page 88 Page 89 Page 90 Page 91 Page 92 Page 93 Page 94 Page 95 Page 96 Page 97 Page 98 Page 99 Page 100 Page 101 Page 102 Page 103 Page 104 Page 105 Page 106 Page 107 Page 108 Page 109 Page 110 Page 111 Page 112 Page 113 Page 114 Page 115 Page 116 Page 117 Page 118 Page 119 Page 120 Page 121 Page 122 Page 123 Page 124 Page 125 Page 126 Page 127 Page 128 Page 129 Page 130 Page 131 Page 132 Page 133 Page 134 Page 135 Page 136 Page 137 Page 138 Page 139

Scan from Albert Collver's files (LCMS President's Office / CCM)

⤓ Download page image (full resolution)

Transcription machine transcription, uncorrected

⤓ Download .txt · copy text

Lutheran Synodical Conference, 1958 81

I
THE COMPOSITE MODE OF LIFE

We now come to the third and last of Augustine’s categories,
the composite mode of Christian living, in which practice is linked
with precept, but in a creative, not a mechanical way. The com-
posite mode results when the spiritual insights gained by con-
templation determine the course of our actions. This definition
sounds simple, but the composite mode is actually complex and
difficult. At least four considerations show it to be so.

First of all, our insights are not always clear or complete.
“Now we see in part,” says Paul. Sometimes this inadequate
knowledge is the result of our own laziness, crotchetiness, or lack
of talent; sometimes it lies in the nature of the problem. There
are many problems which cannot be solved at the present because
we do not yet know enough about them.

But suppose our insight is clear and complete and correct.
It usually takes tact, will power, and again talent to put it into
effect, and these qualities are often lacking wholly or in part in
ourselves. We can all tell what is wrong: with a sermon, for
instance, and perhaps give the rules for making a good one, but
to make that good sermon is another thing. .

But let us say that the insight is everything it should be and
the requisite tact and talent and will power are also there. We may
still be thwarted in our purpose because our insights do not
harmonize with those of other people. That, alas, is only too true
in the theological field. How many times two different persons or
groups contemplating the same Scripture passage, both approach-
ing it humbly and with the desire to let God speak, come up with
almost exactly opposite conclusions, the one saying, “This is so
plain a child can understand it. God is speaking about our par-
ticular problem and telling us exactly what to do about it,” while
others say, “The passage does not apply to this problem at all but
to something quite different.”

Now suppose that all the insights agree and all the wills are
forceful and ready to act and the. problem is thoroughly under-
stood. A fourth difficulty will arise if the problem is of such
a stubborn nature that it perennially resists our best efforts to
solve it. Our sinful human nature is such a problem. “The good
that I would I do not.” We are all agreed, I think, that Christians
should attend church service every Sunday. We have the will to
persuade them to attend and we spend endless effort in trying
to achieve such a desirable course of action. Yet who has ever
completely succeeded in attaining this particular goal? Yes, the
composite life is complex and difficult. No wonder it gives rise
to tensions.

Fortunately we all agree on the great fundamentals, the neces-
sity of preaching the Gospel of Jesus Christ in season and out
of season to all men everywhere. There is no quarrel about aims
here, but there often is about methods. Have you ever heard the
criticism that the preaching in our Lutheran pulpits is becoming
too Calvinistic? Since I doubt that some of the critics have ever
read any of Calvin’s sermons, I take it they mean to say that our
Lutheran sermons are approximating the style of preaching found
in many other Protestant churches, especially the liberal ones.