Collection › LCMS Convention Workbook (St. Louis, Missouri) › 1981 · 54th Convention › Page 405

LCMS Convention Workbook St. Louis, Missouri — 1981, Page 405

front matter 1 front matter 2 front matter 3 front matter 4 front matter 5 front matter 6 front matter 7 front matter 8 front matter 9 front matter 10 front matter 11 front matter 12 front matter 13 front matter 14 front matter 15 front matter 16 Page 1 Page 2 Page 3 Page 4 Page 5 Page 6 Page 7 Page 8 Page 9 Page 10 Page 11 Page 12 Page 13 Page 14 Page 15 Page 16 Page 17 Page 18 Page 19 Page 20 Page 21 Page 22 Page 23 Page 24 Page 25 Page 26 Page 27 Page 28 Page 29 Page 30 Page 31 Page 32 Page 33 Page 34 Page 35 Page 36 Page 37 Page 38 Page 39 Page 40 Page 42 Page 43 Page 44 Page 45 Page 46 Page 47 Page 48 Page 49 Page 50 Page 51 Page 52 Page 53 Page 54 Page 55 Page 56 Page 57 Page 58 Page 59 Page 60 Page 61 Page 62 Page 63 Page 64 Page 65 Page 66 Page 67 Page 68 Page 69 Page 70 Page 71 Page 72 Page 73 Page 74 Page 75 Page 76 Page 77 Page 78 Page 79 Page 80 Page 81 Page 82 Page 83 Page 86 Page 87 Page 88 Page 89 Page 90 Page 91 Page 92 Page 93 Page 94 Page 95 Page 96 Page 97 Page 98 Page 99 Page 100 Page 101 Page 102 Page 103 Page 104 Page 105 Page 106 Page 107 Page 108 Page 109 Page 110 Page 111 Page 112 Page 113 Page 114 Page 115 Page 116 Page 117 Page 118 Page 119 Page 120 Page 121 Page 122 Page 123 Page 124 Page 125 Page 126 Page 127 Page 128 Page 129 Page 130 Page 131 Page 132 Page 133 Page 134 Page 135 Page 136 Page 137 Page 138 Page 139 Page 140 Page 141 Page 142 Page 143 Page 144 Page 145 Page 146 Page 147 Page 148 Page 149 Page 150 Page 151 Page 152 Page 153 Page 154 Page 155 Page 156 Page 157 Page 158 Page 159 Page 160 Page 161 Page 162 Page 163 Page 164 Page 165 Page 166 Page 167 Page 168 Page 169 Page 170 Page 171 Page 172 Page 173 Page 174 Page 175 Page 176 Page 177 Page 178 Page 179 Page 180 Page 181 Page 182 Page 185 Page 186 Page 187 Page 188 Page 189 Page 190 Page 191 Page 192 Page 193 Page 194 Page 195 Page 194 Page 195 Page 196 Page 197 Page 198 Page 199 Page 200 Page 201 Page 202 Sheet 216 Page 204 Page 205 Page 206 Page 207 Page 208 Page 209 Page 210 Page 211 Page 212 Page 213 Page 214 Page 215 Page 216 Page 217 Sheet 231 Sheet 232 Sheet 233 Sheet 234 Sheet 235 Sheet 236 Sheet 237 Page 6 Page 228 Page 229 Page 230 Page 231 Page 232 Page 233 Page 234 Page 235 Page 236 Page 237 Page 238 Page 239 Page 240 Page 241 Page 242 Page 243 Page 244 Page 245 Page 246 Page 247 Page 248 Page 249 Page 250 Page 251 Page 252 Page 253 Page 254 Page 255 Page 256 Page 257 Page 258 Page 259 Page 260 Page 261 Page 262 Page 263 Page 264 Page 265 Page 266 Page 267 Page 268 Page 269 Page 270 Page 271 Page 272 Page 273 Page 274 Page 276 Page 277 Page 278 Page 279 Page 280 Page 281 Page 282 Page 285 Page 286 Page 287 Page 288 Page 289 Page 290 Page 291 Page 292 Page 293 Page 294 Page 295 Page 296 Page 297 Page 298 Page 299 Page 300 Page 301 Page 302 Page 303 Page 304 Page 305 Page 306 Page 307 Page 308 Page 309 Page 310 Page 311 Page 312 Page 313 Page 314 Page 315 Page 316 Page 316 Sheet 326 Sheet 327 Sheet 328 Sheet 329 Sheet 330 Sheet 331 Sheet 332 Page 324 Sheet 334 Page 326 Sheet 336 Page 328 Sheet 338 Page 330 Sheet 340 Page 332 Sheet 342 Page 334 Sheet 344 Page 336 Sheet 346 Page 338 Sheet 348 Page 340 Sheet 350 Page 342 Sheet 352 Page 344 Sheet 354 Page 346 Sheet 356 Page 348 Sheet 358 Page 350 Sheet 360 Sheet 361 Sheet 362 Sheet 363 Sheet 364 Sheet 365 Sheet 366 Sheet 367 Sheet 368 Sheet 369 Sheet 370 Sheet 371 Sheet 372 Page 364 Sheet 374 Page 366 Sheet 376 Sheet 377 Sheet 378 Sheet 379 Sheet 380 Sheet 381 Sheet 382 Sheet 383 Sheet 384 Sheet 385 Sheet 386 Sheet 387 Page 379 Page 380 Page 381 Page 382 Page 383 Page 384 Page 385 Page 386 Page 387 Page 388 Page 389 Page 390 Page 391 Page 392 Page 393 Page 394 Sheet 404 Page 396 Page 397 Page 398 Sheet 408 Page 400 Page 401 Page 402 Page 403 Page 404 Page 405 Page 406 Page 407 Page 408 Page 409 Sheet 419 Sheet 420 Page 1 Page 414 Sheet 423 Page 416 Sheet 425 Page 432 Sheet 427 Sheet 428 Sheet 429 Sheet 430 Sheet 431 Sheet 432 Sheet 433 Sheet 434 Sheet 435 Sheet 436 Page 124 Sheet 438 Sheet 439 Sheet 440 Sheet 441 Sheet 442 Sheet 443 Sheet 444 Page 2 Sheet 446 Page 2 Page 3 Page 4 Page 5 Page 6 Page 2 Sheet 453 Sheet 454 Sheet 455

Scan: The Lutheran Church—Missouri Synod

⤓ Download page image (full resolution)

Transcription machine transcription, uncorrected

⤓ Download .txt · copy text

THEOLOGICAL DOCUMENTS

the contemporary and necessary attempts to redefine death, therefore, will be
considered after some general statements on life have been set forth.
a. Life

There is a sense in which life, partly because it is God’s creation, defies
definition. There are dimensions and depths to lving that can never be
captured in any verbai formulation. Yet, in a study of this kind, certain defi-
nitions need to be set forth, if for no other reason than that they help to
provide some general guidance for persons who deal in matters of life and
death.

Life, for example, has been described as vitality. It is a state of existence
characterized by active metabolism. Vegetive life, by way of distinction, is the
simple metabolic and reproductive activity of a human being apart from the
exercise of conscious mental or psychic processes.

Usually it is the fear of existing in a state of vegetive life that moves people to
think of euthanasia as a way of abruptly ending a state of being devoid of
conscious mental or psychic processes. In the fall of 1976 the State of Cali-
fomia enacted legislation known as ‘The Living WilL”’ This is a written, docu-
mented and witnessed instruction to the family or heirs of an individual that no
extraordinary efforts be used to resuscitate or reestablish his or her respiration
or heartbeat in case he or she is afflicted with an apparently fatal and terminal
disease. Such a document, certified at a time when the person involved is
presumed to be of sound mind, does not request destruction or killing
Instead, it constitutes a request that good medical judgment be exercised. It
does not abjure the use of compassionate care and treatment. Euthanasia is
not at issue in such cases, for no deliberate atternpt to hasten death is
involved. It is a matter of providing instruction not to undertake heroic or
extraordinary measures in order to sustain some semblance of life.

It is not only a privilege but a duty for Christians to render every possible
measure of care and compassion. It need not be extraordinary care, for heroic
therapy can also kill despite the good will that may be manifested in such
efforts. The medical profession is committed to precise and sensible care
based on sound principles and on the considered judgment of the physicians
handling a particular case. The patient cannot, asa rule, be consulted because
of the great confusion and disorientation resulting from the effects of both the
disease and the medication. The relatives need to be informed, but the
request of the physician must always be that the patient be given the oppor-
tunity to receive that measure of care which, in the doctor's judgment, will give
comfort and may provide a cure without jeopardy or the application of heroic
efforts.

In order to provide a glimpse into the mysterious dimensions of life and in
order to illustrate the kinds of considerations which persons involved in the
administration of medical care must give, it may be helpful to look at a few
examples of patients in various age groups and with different medical prob-
lems.

12

of a 10 percent probability, to “give it a try" under careful monitoring in an
attempt to achieve relief and to restore a functioning individual?

Let us assume that therapy is administered. Blood may be given to strengthen
the patient. Fhuids can be added to combat the thirst and dry membranes of
the mouth and nose, nutrition may be offered and every effort will be made to
sustain kidney function, which is one of the systems which must be kept alive
for a person to live. Monitoring indicates that the therapy (chemotherapy,
cobalt or radium) has had detrimental effects on the bone marrow as weil as
on the blood formation and upon the general physical status of the patient and
that there has been no progressive reduction in the growth of the cancer. It
needs to be rernembered that this patient has been inoperable from the
outset.

{s it necessary to give a detailed explanation of the hopelessness and the
hazard of the continuation of this therapy to the patient? The bone marrow
and, therefore, the blood, has been depressed not only by the disease but also
by the drug Therapy, if continued, would kill the person. Blood cannot acti-
vate and rebuild the bone marrow because of Its destruction by disease and by
drugs. Therefore medical judgment indicates that therapy must be stopped.
Where possible the physician may obtain from the patient a cooperative deci-
sion that such therapy should be initiated which will be best for him, but it will
not be in the category of ‘above and beyond the call of duty.” It will be given
for compassionate care and for patient comfort. Fluids will be administered to
make the patient more comfortable and to alleviate suffering. Oxygen may be
given, not in order to add to the length of the Efe, but to give the patient
comtort in his seriously tragic plight. If the patient has no control of the bowels,
nursing care will see to it that he or she is kept clean and does not have the
unfortunate, painful experience of bed sores or 8 soiled bed. The patient ts
moved from side to side.

In sucha situation medication ts given for comfort, not for killing. Medication is
administered to reduce pain and to permit the patient to sleep. The physician's
approach must be based upon the knowledge of the patient and the desire to
give accurate and compassionate care. The removal of certain drugs is not a
Thatter of encouraging what some want to call passive euthanasia. Instead, it
emphasizes the care given an individual as a result of sound judgment and
medical experience.

iv. Brain Damage. A patient who has suffered brain damage but who possesses a
spontaneously beating heart, active circulation, active respirations, and who
produces urinary output must be sustained and observed caretully while
monitoring determines whether other systems are involved or become
involved with the consequence that total death ensues. Anyone who has been
a physician long enough will have had the experience of seeing a patient,
comatose and morbid on admission to the hospital, being discharged in a
wheelchair, mentally alert with a smile on his or her face, waving good-bye,
and invoking God's blessing. The processes of life and living are that myste-
nous.

b. Death

The usual dictionaries, including Dorland’s Medica! Dictionary, define
death as: (1) “the cessation of life”; (2) “‘the cessation of all vital functions
without capability of resuscitation, either in animals or plants."’ The American

14

i. Start Birth. An infant is born with an APGAR rating of 2 (a rating of 10 indi-
cates that an infant is fully responsive, with all systems functioning and consid-
ered normal). The figure 2 indicates difficulty with breathing. abnormal color
because of lack of oxygen. flaccid muscles, limpness, and lack of movement.
In such a situation the attending physician is faced with the problem of resus-
citation: the administration of oxygen. stimulation and the clearing of the
airways. Generally speaking such a baby. if these steps of resuscitation are
taken and if the infant is at term. will respond and cry.

Will this baby be normal? Will it be retarded? These are questions that the
physician faces. What should the reaction of the physician be? A heart is
beating. There are gasps of respiration. There is some evidence of life in most
systems but not in all. The life that is present is not strong. Some of these
infants have developed into exceptionally brilliant individuals. Less than 1
percent have a stigma attached by such an experience at birth. but it is also
possible that paralysis or mental retardation may result

After a careful and complete evaluation of the infant, is it the doctor's obliga-
tion to discuss with the mother. if she is not anesthetized. or with the father. the
matter of making a decision as to whether he ought to withhold assistance
from this baby or make every attempt to provide the best possible medical
care to keep the baby alive? It should certainly be the latter. since in the
strange ways of God the baby concemed may become a useful member of
society or, by failing to develop fully. provide the occasion for others to exhibit
and bestow the kind of care which God's creatures deserve

i. Spina Bifida. This is a defect caused by the failure of the spinal column to form
normally. In a large number of such cases there is neurological damage which
may extend not only to the lower extremities but also affect the head and brain
with hydrocephalic conditions. Since a permanent incapacity could result. is
the proper procedure one of evaluating this infant and making the decision
that it be permitted to die? In an actual case. to have permitted such an infant
to die would have resulted in a great loss to the community. At delivery both
the pediatrician and the neurologist indicated that great hazards were involved
in performing corrective surgery. An infant who was hydrocephalic or para-
lyzed could have been the result. It was a case which might have resulted in
exciting rewards or serious regrets. In this particular case however. corrective
measures were taken and complete recovery occurred. This person, now a
college graduate and fully functional. has been of great assistance to many
people. Since many spina bifida babies will not be as greatly benefited by
treatment as in this specific case, it is important to remember that decisions
regarding procedures to be followed in such situations must always be based
on what appropriate care for the infant requires, not merely on what the
results of such treatment might be.

iii, Advanced Malignancy. What is the decision that should be made concerning a
patient with an extensive, far-reaching malignancy such as a carcinoma of the
ovary with metastases to the lung. the diaphragm and intestines? Let us
assume that this condition is found at the time of an operative evaluation. We
know that at times cancer will respond to modem chemotherapeutic agents.
but it is aiso rue that chemotherapy may be very reactive and difficult for the
patent to tolerate. This is also tue of radiological, cobalt or radium therapy.
Should the decision be not to attempt this additional! therapy or. on the basis

13

Medical Association says that ‘‘death shall be determined by the clinical judg-
ment of the physician using the necessary available and currently accepted
ctiteria.””

In this connection it should be noted that in some circles a new criterion for
death is being used in medicine today. It is called irreversible coma or brain
death and is determined by the following criteria: (1) unreceptivity and unre-
sponsitivity, (2) no movements or breathing, (3) no reflexes; and (4) flat elec-
troencephalogram (brain-wave test). However, even in the case of the appli-
cation of these criteria, tt is not possible to be fully certain at all times that a
patient is dead. Their validity, for example, is dependent on the excfusion of
the following two conditions: hypothermia (that is, temperature below 90
degrees Fahrenheit, or 32.2 degrees Centigrade) and central nervous systems
depressants such as barbituates.

It is clear that euthanasia as the practice of deliberately ending life where
some small possibility for continued existence still remains is killing, for total
destruction is imposed from without on all body systems. These include the
brain, the cerebral and neurological systems, the heart, the circulatory systern,
the kidneys, the excretory system, the liver, the detoxification system, and
thus the entire metabolic system. In many instances recovery and rehabilita-
tion can take place as a result of the administration of ordinary care, given for
comfort and cleanliness.

3. Ordinary and Extraordinary Means

Some attention must be given to the distinction currently made between
ordinary and extraordinary (or heroic) means of preserving life, for the differ-
ence between them throws some helpful light on very difficult aspects of the
issue known as euthanasia.

Ordinary means are usually described as those measures which can be
taken on the basis of the judgment that there is a demonstrable or recogniz-
able proportion between the good effect sought and the degree of hurt or
hardship involved in their use. They comprise all the help a patient can obtain
and undergo without imposing an excessive burden on himself and others.
They are considered to be imperative for the sustaining of life and are not,
therefore, refusable.

By way of distinction, extraordinary treatment refers to the use of artificial
means to prolong a patient's life once his vital processes have ceased their
spontaneous functions. Furthermore, this term also embraces those measures
which are very dangerous, difficult, painful or even costly, whose good effects
are not deemed to be proportionate to the difficulty and inconvenience
involved. They may, therefore, be refused. There are four major factors to be
taken into consideration in extraordinary cases:

(a) When irreversibility is established by more than one physician;

(b) When a moment in the process of dying has been reached where noth-

ing remains for medical scence to do except to offer proper care;

15

405