Collection › LCMS Convention Workbook (St. Louis, Missouri) › 1981 · 54th Convention › Page 3

LCMS Convention Workbook St. Louis, Missouri — 1981, Page 3

front matter 1 front matter 2 front matter 3 front matter 4 front matter 5 front matter 6 front matter 7 front matter 8 front matter 9 front matter 10 front matter 11 front matter 12 front matter 13 front matter 14 front matter 15 front matter 16 Page 1 Page 2 Page 3 Page 4 Page 5 Page 6 Page 7 Page 8 Page 9 Page 10 Page 11 Page 12 Page 13 Page 14 Page 15 Page 16 Page 17 Page 18 Page 19 Page 20 Page 21 Page 22 Page 23 Page 24 Page 25 Page 26 Page 27 Page 28 Page 29 Page 30 Page 31 Page 32 Page 33 Page 34 Page 35 Page 36 Page 37 Page 38 Page 39 Page 40 Page 42 Page 43 Page 44 Page 45 Page 46 Page 47 Page 48 Page 49 Page 50 Page 51 Page 52 Page 53 Page 54 Page 55 Page 56 Page 57 Page 58 Page 59 Page 60 Page 61 Page 62 Page 63 Page 64 Page 65 Page 66 Page 67 Page 68 Page 69 Page 70 Page 71 Page 72 Page 73 Page 74 Page 75 Page 76 Page 77 Page 78 Page 79 Page 80 Page 81 Page 82 Page 83 Page 86 Page 87 Page 88 Page 89 Page 90 Page 91 Page 92 Page 93 Page 94 Page 95 Page 96 Page 97 Page 98 Page 99 Page 100 Page 101 Page 102 Page 103 Page 104 Page 105 Page 106 Page 107 Page 108 Page 109 Page 110 Page 111 Page 112 Page 113 Page 114 Page 115 Page 116 Page 117 Page 118 Page 119 Page 120 Page 121 Page 122 Page 123 Page 124 Page 125 Page 126 Page 127 Page 128 Page 129 Page 130 Page 131 Page 132 Page 133 Page 134 Page 135 Page 136 Page 137 Page 138 Page 139 Page 140 Page 141 Page 142 Page 143 Page 144 Page 145 Page 146 Page 147 Page 148 Page 149 Page 150 Page 151 Page 152 Page 153 Page 154 Page 155 Page 156 Page 157 Page 158 Page 159 Page 160 Page 161 Page 162 Page 163 Page 164 Page 165 Page 166 Page 167 Page 168 Page 169 Page 170 Page 171 Page 172 Page 173 Page 174 Page 175 Page 176 Page 177 Page 178 Page 179 Page 180 Page 181 Page 182 Page 185 Page 186 Page 187 Page 188 Page 189 Page 190 Page 191 Page 192 Page 193 Page 194 Page 195 Page 194 Page 195 Page 196 Page 197 Page 198 Page 199 Page 200 Page 201 Page 202 Sheet 216 Page 204 Page 205 Page 206 Page 207 Page 208 Page 209 Page 210 Page 211 Page 212 Page 213 Page 214 Page 215 Page 216 Page 217 Sheet 231 Sheet 232 Sheet 233 Sheet 234 Sheet 235 Sheet 236 Sheet 237 Page 6 Page 228 Page 229 Page 230 Page 231 Page 232 Page 233 Page 234 Page 235 Page 236 Page 237 Page 238 Page 239 Page 240 Page 241 Page 242 Page 243 Page 244 Page 245 Page 246 Page 247 Page 248 Page 249 Page 250 Page 251 Page 252 Page 253 Page 254 Page 255 Page 256 Page 257 Page 258 Page 259 Page 260 Page 261 Page 262 Page 263 Page 264 Page 265 Page 266 Page 267 Page 268 Page 269 Page 270 Page 271 Page 272 Page 273 Page 274 Page 276 Page 277 Page 278 Page 279 Page 280 Page 281 Page 282 Page 285 Page 286 Page 287 Page 288 Page 289 Page 290 Page 291 Page 292 Page 293 Page 294 Page 295 Page 296 Page 297 Page 298 Page 299 Page 300 Page 301 Page 302 Page 303 Page 304 Page 305 Page 306 Page 307 Page 308 Page 309 Page 310 Page 311 Page 312 Page 313 Page 314 Page 315 Page 316 Page 316 Sheet 326 Sheet 327 Sheet 328 Sheet 329 Sheet 330 Sheet 331 Sheet 332 Page 324 Sheet 334 Page 326 Sheet 336 Page 328 Sheet 338 Page 330 Sheet 340 Page 332 Sheet 342 Page 334 Sheet 344 Page 336 Sheet 346 Page 338 Sheet 348 Page 340 Sheet 350 Page 342 Sheet 352 Page 344 Sheet 354 Page 346 Sheet 356 Page 348 Sheet 358 Page 350 Sheet 360 Sheet 361 Sheet 362 Sheet 363 Sheet 364 Sheet 365 Sheet 366 Sheet 367 Sheet 368 Sheet 369 Sheet 370 Sheet 371 Sheet 372 Page 364 Sheet 374 Page 366 Sheet 376 Sheet 377 Sheet 378 Sheet 379 Sheet 380 Sheet 381 Sheet 382 Sheet 383 Sheet 384 Sheet 385 Sheet 386 Sheet 387 Page 379 Page 380 Page 381 Page 382 Page 383 Page 384 Page 385 Page 386 Page 387 Page 388 Page 389 Page 390 Page 391 Page 392 Page 393 Page 394 Sheet 404 Page 396 Page 397 Page 398 Sheet 408 Page 400 Page 401 Page 402 Page 403 Page 404 Page 405 Page 406 Page 407 Page 408 Page 409 Sheet 419 Sheet 420 Page 1 Page 414 Sheet 423 Page 416 Sheet 425 Page 432 Sheet 427 Sheet 428 Sheet 429 Sheet 430 Sheet 431 Sheet 432 Sheet 433 Sheet 434 Sheet 435 Sheet 436 Page 124 Sheet 438 Sheet 439 Sheet 440 Sheet 441 Sheet 442 Sheet 443 Sheet 444 Page 2 Sheet 446 Page 2 Page 3 Page 4 Page 5 Page 6 Page 2 Sheet 453 Sheet 454 Sheet 455

Scan: The Lutheran Church—Missouri Synod

⤓ Download page image (full resolution)

Transcription machine transcription, uncorrected

⤓ Download .txt · copy text

MISSIONS 3

students enrolled at CTC during these years have come from
the Crow and Northern Cheyenne Indian reservations in
Montana. Eleven Indian students were enrolled during the
1980—81 school year.

While the CIMS program seeks to attract Lutheran Indian
young people for full-time service in the church, it is more
specifically a unique effort designed to recruit and support
non-Lutheran Indian students interested in obtaining a quality
education, while at the same examining the Lutheran faith
and tradition, and, hopefully, considering full-time work for
the church among Indian people. Mr. Alfred Ebel is the acting
director of the program. Rev. Donald W. Johnson of Neah Bay,
Wash., whois the only native American pastor in the LCMS, is
the pastoral adviser.

At the present time there are 496 Indian reservations
throughout the country. LCMS Indian ministries are located in
Neah Bay and La Push, Wash.; in Navajo and Crownpoint, N.
Mex.; in Fort Washakie and Crowheart, Wyo., and in Oneida,
Bowler, Red Springs, and Morgan Siding, Wis.

A campus ministry program is supported by the Kansas
District at Haskell Indian Junior College in Lawrence, Kans.
Wiley and Caryn Scott initiated the program, and Caryn is
now employed as a lay staff person for this ministry to Indian
students. A house has been purchased adjacent to the campus
for use as a student center and has been named “The LIGHT
House” (Lutheran Indians Gathering and Helping Together).

While the American Indian Advisory Council is advisory to
the Board for Missions, it also serves as adviser to the Board for
Social Ministry and World Relief with reference to that board’s
program of social ministry among Indian people. The Board
for Social Ministry and World Relief relies on the National
Indian Lutheran Board, an agency related to the Lutheran
Council U.S.A., for suggestions concerning consideration of
self-help, hunger, educational, and related projects. Approx-
imately $70,000 per year is provided through the Board of
Social Ministry and World Relief for these social ministry
projects among Indian people. In addition, that board annually
provides one-third of the support ($33,000) for the Indian Desk
of LCUSA, Mr. Eugene Crawford, executive director.

In response to Res. 1-14A of the 1979 convention of the
Synod, the American Indian Advisory Council submitted to
the January 1981 meeting of the Board for Missions its report
and recommendations concerning the future of LCMS ministry
among American Indians (see Appendix I). After careful
consideration the Board for Missions accepted the report and
adopted the recommendations (see Appendix II). These were
forwarded to the Board of Directors. For the Board of Directors’
action see their report.

The report and recommendations of the American Indian
Advisory Council and the Board for Missions reflect a commit-
ment to achieve the stated goal, adopted by the Synod in Res.
1-14A: ‘“‘More American Indian people believing in Jesus
Christ as Lord and Savior’ through a meaningful proclamation
of Jesus Christ complemented by a concern for and a ministry
to the whole person.” (1979 Convention Proceedings, p. 93).

The American Indian Advisory Council reminds the Synod
that the biggest challenge for American Indian ministry in the
’80s is the recruitment of workers.

Forward in Campus Ministry

Resolved, That the LCMS accept the mission challenge for the
80s to establish 20 new LCMS campus ministries.

This resolution (mission challenge) was adopted by the 1979
synodical convention in behalf of campus ministry. It is a
resolution that calls for renewed commitment on the part of the
church to an aggressive campus ministry program on the
nation’s secular college campuses.

A survey of the Districts of the Synod reveals that the
commitment to this vital ministry is still very evident. Except
for subsidies allocated to mission congregations, campus
ministry continues to be the recipient of more mission dollars
in our Districts than any other subsidized ministry. After
working through the societal upheaval of the late 60s and
early ’70s, the nation’s campuses appear to be more receptive to
the Christian message than ever before. In addition to the
thousands of young people from our own country (11.5 million
students were enrolled during 1980—81 at more than 3,000
two-year and four-year institutions, both public and private),

there are almost 300,000 international students studying in our
country. More than ever before our Lutheran young people,
together with their campus ministers, see themselves as a
“point of Christian contact” for people of diverse life-styles,
languages, and cultures.

During the District conventions of 1980, two Districts
resolved to establish new full-time ministries. The Missouri
District resolved to establish full-time campus ministries at
Southwest Missouri State University, Springfield, and at the
Univeristy of Missouri— Kansas City (a project including also
other schools in the Kansas City metropolitan area). The
English District resolved to initiate a full-time ministry at the
University of Toronto, Toronto, Ont., in consultation with the
Lutheran Church in Canada. Thus three new full-time min-
istries are to be initiated during this biennium.

The administration of campus ministry, program planning
and development, and financial support are the responsibility
of each District. The Synod’s Office of Campus Ministry serves
in an advisory and coordinative capacity to each District. The
coordinator of campus ministry in the Synod is the secretary
for campus ministry and special ministries of the Board for
Missions. His counterpart in each District is the District
campus ministry coordinator, usually appointed by the District
President.

“Word and Sacrament” continue to be key words in campus
ministry as opposed to an issue-oriented approach. Current
reports from campus ministers indicate a high degree of
Christian commitment among many of today’s students.
Campus congregations report increasing attendance at wor-
ship, renewed interest in Bible study, and a lively interest in
personal witnessing. Almost 400 students are confirmed
annually through the campus ministry of the Synod.

In addition to the above-mentioned activities, a growing
number of our young people desire to become involved in some
form of volunteer ministry for their Lord and their church. The
requests for information are increasing as young people seek
out opportunities for a year or two of Christian service before
“settling in” to their secular careers. The church must provide
such service opportunities and make every effort to utilize the
talents and abilities of these enthusiastic young Christians.
The Board for Missions is continuing to give attention to this
subject as directed by the 1979 convention Res. 1-26, “To
Encourage Identification and Training of Lay Expatriates for
Effective Witness.”

Campus ministry also provides a fertile recruiting ground
for our synodical colleges and seminaries. A significant
number of students at the two seminaries of the Synod are
products of our campus ministry program. As an example,
during the 1980—81 school year, 14 graduates of the University
of Wisconsin, Madison, members of Calvary University
Lutheran Chapel (Rev. James Knuth and Rev. Carl Selle,
pastors), were enrolled in seminary training.

At the present time there are 84 full-time campus ministries
in the Synod. In addition, there are almost 500 “contact”
campus congregations. A contact campus congregation has
been defined as “a congregation [and pastor] desirous of
assuming responsibility for ministry to a nearby college,
university, or vocational school, and for including that min-
istry as an important aspect of its total parish program. Such
congregations are officially designated for this purpose by the
synodical District in which they hold membership and become
officially committed [by congregational decision] to this respon-
sibility as prescribed by the District.”

In some instances, campus programs become so significant
by reason of the local situation that the term ‘“‘town gown” is
used to identify a particular congregation. Of the 500 contact
congregations, more than 60 have been identified by their
Districts in this category, namely, parishes that are doing
significant work in campus ministry in addition to usual
parish programming.

To assist “town gown” congregations and to better equip
their pastors and other staff persons for campus ministry, a
special “town gown” campus ministry conference was held in
St. Louis in May 1980.

The Synod needs congregations committed to the “doing”
of campus ministry and is determined to provide all the
assistance possible to help, equip, interpret, and initiate modest
parish-based programs in behalf of this important ministry.