Collection › LCMS Convention Workbook (St. Louis, Missouri) › 1981 · 54th Convention › Page 255

LCMS Convention Workbook St. Louis, Missouri — 1981, Page 255

front matter 1 front matter 2 front matter 3 front matter 4 front matter 5 front matter 6 front matter 7 front matter 8 front matter 9 front matter 10 front matter 11 front matter 12 front matter 13 front matter 14 front matter 15 front matter 16 Page 1 Page 2 Page 3 Page 4 Page 5 Page 6 Page 7 Page 8 Page 9 Page 10 Page 11 Page 12 Page 13 Page 14 Page 15 Page 16 Page 17 Page 18 Page 19 Page 20 Page 21 Page 22 Page 23 Page 24 Page 25 Page 26 Page 27 Page 28 Page 29 Page 30 Page 31 Page 32 Page 33 Page 34 Page 35 Page 36 Page 37 Page 38 Page 39 Page 40 Page 42 Page 43 Page 44 Page 45 Page 46 Page 47 Page 48 Page 49 Page 50 Page 51 Page 52 Page 53 Page 54 Page 55 Page 56 Page 57 Page 58 Page 59 Page 60 Page 61 Page 62 Page 63 Page 64 Page 65 Page 66 Page 67 Page 68 Page 69 Page 70 Page 71 Page 72 Page 73 Page 74 Page 75 Page 76 Page 77 Page 78 Page 79 Page 80 Page 81 Page 82 Page 83 Page 86 Page 87 Page 88 Page 89 Page 90 Page 91 Page 92 Page 93 Page 94 Page 95 Page 96 Page 97 Page 98 Page 99 Page 100 Page 101 Page 102 Page 103 Page 104 Page 105 Page 106 Page 107 Page 108 Page 109 Page 110 Page 111 Page 112 Page 113 Page 114 Page 115 Page 116 Page 117 Page 118 Page 119 Page 120 Page 121 Page 122 Page 123 Page 124 Page 125 Page 126 Page 127 Page 128 Page 129 Page 130 Page 131 Page 132 Page 133 Page 134 Page 135 Page 136 Page 137 Page 138 Page 139 Page 140 Page 141 Page 142 Page 143 Page 144 Page 145 Page 146 Page 147 Page 148 Page 149 Page 150 Page 151 Page 152 Page 153 Page 154 Page 155 Page 156 Page 157 Page 158 Page 159 Page 160 Page 161 Page 162 Page 163 Page 164 Page 165 Page 166 Page 167 Page 168 Page 169 Page 170 Page 171 Page 172 Page 173 Page 174 Page 175 Page 176 Page 177 Page 178 Page 179 Page 180 Page 181 Page 182 Page 185 Page 186 Page 187 Page 188 Page 189 Page 190 Page 191 Page 192 Page 193 Page 194 Page 195 Page 194 Page 195 Page 196 Page 197 Page 198 Page 199 Page 200 Page 201 Page 202 Sheet 216 Page 204 Page 205 Page 206 Page 207 Page 208 Page 209 Page 210 Page 211 Page 212 Page 213 Page 214 Page 215 Page 216 Page 217 Sheet 231 Sheet 232 Sheet 233 Sheet 234 Sheet 235 Sheet 236 Sheet 237 Page 6 Page 228 Page 229 Page 230 Page 231 Page 232 Page 233 Page 234 Page 235 Page 236 Page 237 Page 238 Page 239 Page 240 Page 241 Page 242 Page 243 Page 244 Page 245 Page 246 Page 247 Page 248 Page 249 Page 250 Page 251 Page 252 Page 253 Page 254 Page 255 Page 256 Page 257 Page 258 Page 259 Page 260 Page 261 Page 262 Page 263 Page 264 Page 265 Page 266 Page 267 Page 268 Page 269 Page 270 Page 271 Page 272 Page 273 Page 274 Page 276 Page 277 Page 278 Page 279 Page 280 Page 281 Page 282 Page 285 Page 286 Page 287 Page 288 Page 289 Page 290 Page 291 Page 292 Page 293 Page 294 Page 295 Page 296 Page 297 Page 298 Page 299 Page 300 Page 301 Page 302 Page 303 Page 304 Page 305 Page 306 Page 307 Page 308 Page 309 Page 310 Page 311 Page 312 Page 313 Page 314 Page 315 Page 316 Page 316 Sheet 326 Sheet 327 Sheet 328 Sheet 329 Sheet 330 Sheet 331 Sheet 332 Page 324 Sheet 334 Page 326 Sheet 336 Page 328 Sheet 338 Page 330 Sheet 340 Page 332 Sheet 342 Page 334 Sheet 344 Page 336 Sheet 346 Page 338 Sheet 348 Page 340 Sheet 350 Page 342 Sheet 352 Page 344 Sheet 354 Page 346 Sheet 356 Page 348 Sheet 358 Page 350 Sheet 360 Sheet 361 Sheet 362 Sheet 363 Sheet 364 Sheet 365 Sheet 366 Sheet 367 Sheet 368 Sheet 369 Sheet 370 Sheet 371 Sheet 372 Page 364 Sheet 374 Page 366 Sheet 376 Sheet 377 Sheet 378 Sheet 379 Sheet 380 Sheet 381 Sheet 382 Sheet 383 Sheet 384 Sheet 385 Sheet 386 Sheet 387 Page 379 Page 380 Page 381 Page 382 Page 383 Page 384 Page 385 Page 386 Page 387 Page 388 Page 389 Page 390 Page 391 Page 392 Page 393 Page 394 Sheet 404 Page 396 Page 397 Page 398 Sheet 408 Page 400 Page 401 Page 402 Page 403 Page 404 Page 405 Page 406 Page 407 Page 408 Page 409 Sheet 419 Sheet 420 Page 1 Page 414 Sheet 423 Page 416 Sheet 425 Page 432 Sheet 427 Sheet 428 Sheet 429 Sheet 430 Sheet 431 Sheet 432 Sheet 433 Sheet 434 Sheet 435 Sheet 436 Page 124 Sheet 438 Sheet 439 Sheet 440 Sheet 441 Sheet 442 Sheet 443 Sheet 444 Page 2 Sheet 446 Page 2 Page 3 Page 4 Page 5 Page 6 Page 2 Sheet 453 Sheet 454 Sheet 455

Scan: The Lutheran Church—Missouri Synod

⤓ Download page image (full resolution)

Transcription machine transcription, uncorrected

⤓ Download .txt · copy text

HIGHER EDUCATION 255

Winfield maintains a level and quality of life that is highly
conducive to the character of education the Synod sponsors
through the college. Winfield provides quality public services
(fire, police, health care) that are essential for the well-being of
the college community. Winfield is a safe and secure setting for
the college’s students, staff, and faculty and their families and
is less subject than many urban centers to social problems such
as crime and violence, racial tensions, malicious destruction of
property, and drug abuse.

The Winfield community, through its churches, colleges,
schools, and professional and artistic organizations, offers a
level of life that demonstrates cultural sensitivity and sophis-
tication. Winfield is located in a region of moderate climate and
is situated in an area that is energy-efficient.

The Winfield community has land available at reasonable
cost for future campus expansion, should such expansion be
considered desirable.

Financial Assistance for Students

St. John’s College has adequate financial-assistance re
sources to help students with demonstrated financial need,
although the resource pool must expand proportionately with
increases in the student population and with costs to students
for tuition, room, board, and other expenses.

St. John’s College students benefit from a variety of
financial-aid sources: federal government loans and grants;
state of Kansas scholarships and grants; college grant, scholar-
ship, and part-time employment plans; synodical District
grants and scholarship; synodically affiliated auxiliary agency
grants and scholarships; St. John’s Alumni Association grants
and scholarships; St. John’s College Association of Lutheran
Congregation scholarships; federal government benefit pro-
grams (Social Security and Veteran’s Administration benefits,
for example); and a number of scholarships and grants pro-
vided by service organizations, professional groups, and
individuals.

St. John’s College students with demonstrated financial
need apply for and receive financial assistance that, according
to standard need analysis practices, is adequate to meet the
cost of attending the college.

Approximately 70 percent of the college’s total student
population complete the formal financial-assistance process to
apply for the financial-aid resources administered and awarded
by the college. About 70 percent of those students completing
the financial-assistance application process receive campus-
awarded funds on the basis of financial need.

Approximately 85—90 percent of all students attending St.
John’s College receive financial assistance through grants,
scholarships, or loans from all sources, college-based and
otherwise.

At the present time the college receives less than its
“national fair share” of financial-assistance resources pro-
vided by the federal government. Accordingly, the college is
eligible to receive increased federal funding from such pro-
grams as the Supplemental Educational Opportunity Grant
Program, the College Work-Study Program, and the National
Direct Student Loan Program as the student population
increases.

Kansas Tuition Grant Program

The Kansas Tuition Grant Program, a state-funded
financial-assistance plan offering annual grants of $1,200 to
Kansas-resident students attending a Kansas private college,
is a significant source of financial assistance for Kansas
residents who are full-time students with demonstrated finan-
cial need and is a major factor in attracting and retaining
Kansas students.

Approximately 90 percent of the Kansas students attending
St. John’s and applying for the Kansas Tuition Grant Program
qualify for a grant.

During the past six years the Kansas Tuition Grant
Program has provided annually an average of $52,140 to
students attending St. John’s College.

The Kansas Tuition Grant Program reduces the amount of
the college’s own funds and resources that must be budgeted to
provide financial assistance to students demonstrating finan-
cial need.

The Kansas Tuition Grant Program provides students a
freer choice in the selection of a college to attend when they
compare the lower costs at a tax-supported college or university
with the higher costs at St. John’s. Under the Kansas Tuition
Grant Program the average difference of $1,500 in annual costs
between public colleges and St. John’s is reduced to about $300.

Many students from middle and upper-middle income
families (annual income up to $30,000 have need and will
qualify to receive a Kansas Tuition Grant.

As the college moves toward the status of a four-year
college, the anticipated increase in enrollments from Kansas
will also increase the total dollar amount of assistance from the
Kansas Tuition Grant Program.

The college retains more than 70 percent of those students
receiving a Kansas Tuition Grant and continuing in a higher
education as students at the college.

Research conducted by the Kansas State Board of Regents,
which administers the Kansas Tuition Grant Program, indi-
cates that 30 percent of the students enrolling at St. John’s and
receiving a Kansas Tuition Grant would not have chosen to
attend St. John’s if they would not have had the benefit of the
Tuition Grant Program.

As we look to the future, we are optimistic because God
promises to sustain us as we seek to do His will.

Gordon W. Beckler, President

6-16
Report re Bylaws for St. Catharines

The 1979 synodical convention instructed the Commission
on Constitutional Matters to submit Bylaws to the 1981
convention for the election of a Board of Control to govern the
seminary in St. Catharines, Ont.

The commission has discovered that St. Catharines Semi-
nary incorporated itself under Ontario law and that there is no
way in which the Synod can exercise control over a Canadian
corporation through the election in convention of a Board of
Control. The Synod is therefore faced with a decision as to the
future ownership and operation of St. Catharines.

The following are among the alternatives:

1. Return St. Catharines to the status of an extension
campus of Concordia Theological Seminary, Fort Wayne;

2. Enter into a contractual relationship with the Canadian
corporation which might be summarized in Bylaw 6.23 as
follows:

c. The St. Catharines Seminary, being a corpora-
tion incorported under the laws of the Province of
Ontario, Canada, having a Board of Directors elected
or appointed in accordance with such laws, shall not
have a Board of Control, and as a condition of
continuing support and recognition by the Synod, the
St. Catharines Seminary shall enter into such agree-
ment with the Board for Higher Education as the
Board for Higher Education may consider necessary
or advisable to permit the board to carry out it duties
as set forth in paragraph 6.05 in so far as such duties
relate to the St. Catharines Seminary.

3. As in the case of Concordia College, Edmonton, turn the
ownership and operation of St. Catharines over either to the
Ontario District of the Synod or to the Lutheran Church—
Canada, which consists of the three synodical Districts in
Canada plus several congregations of the Minnesota North,
English, and SELC Districts;

4. Continue the present temporary arrangement under
which the Board for Higher Education is performing many of
the functions of a Board of Control.

Commisison on Constitutional Matters
Herbert Mueller, Secretary

6-17

To Increase Prerequisites for Teacher
Applicants for Pastoral Colloquy

WHEREAS, The existing regulations of the Synod (Handbook,