Collection › LCMS Convention Workbook (St. Louis, Missouri) › 1981 · 54th Convention › Page 239
LCMS Convention Workbook St. Louis, Missouri — 1981, Page 239
front matter 1
front matter 2
front matter 3
front matter 4
front matter 5
front matter 6
front matter 7
front matter 8
front matter 9
front matter 10
front matter 11
front matter 12
front matter 13
front matter 14
front matter 15
front matter 16
Page 1
Page 2
Page 3
Page 4
Page 5
Page 6
Page 7
Page 8
Page 9
Page 10
Page 11
Page 12
Page 13
Page 14
Page 15
Page 16
Page 17
Page 18
Page 19
Page 20
Page 21
Page 22
Page 23
Page 24
Page 25
Page 26
Page 27
Page 28
Page 29
Page 30
Page 31
Page 32
Page 33
Page 34
Page 35
Page 36
Page 37
Page 38
Page 39
Page 40
Page 42
Page 43
Page 44
Page 45
Page 46
Page 47
Page 48
Page 49
Page 50
Page 51
Page 52
Page 53
Page 54
Page 55
Page 56
Page 57
Page 58
Page 59
Page 60
Page 61
Page 62
Page 63
Page 64
Page 65
Page 66
Page 67
Page 68
Page 69
Page 70
Page 71
Page 72
Page 73
Page 74
Page 75
Page 76
Page 77
Page 78
Page 79
Page 80
Page 81
Page 82
Page 83
Page 86
Page 87
Page 88
Page 89
Page 90
Page 91
Page 92
Page 93
Page 94
Page 95
Page 96
Page 97
Page 98
Page 99
Page 100
Page 101
Page 102
Page 103
Page 104
Page 105
Page 106
Page 107
Page 108
Page 109
Page 110
Page 111
Page 112
Page 113
Page 114
Page 115
Page 116
Page 117
Page 118
Page 119
Page 120
Page 121
Page 122
Page 123
Page 124
Page 125
Page 126
Page 127
Page 128
Page 129
Page 130
Page 131
Page 132
Page 133
Page 134
Page 135
Page 136
Page 137
Page 138
Page 139
Page 140
Page 141
Page 142
Page 143
Page 144
Page 145
Page 146
Page 147
Page 148
Page 149
Page 150
Page 151
Page 152
Page 153
Page 154
Page 155
Page 156
Page 157
Page 158
Page 159
Page 160
Page 161
Page 162
Page 163
Page 164
Page 165
Page 166
Page 167
Page 168
Page 169
Page 170
Page 171
Page 172
Page 173
Page 174
Page 175
Page 176
Page 177
Page 178
Page 179
Page 180
Page 181
Page 182
Page 185
Page 186
Page 187
Page 188
Page 189
Page 190
Page 191
Page 192
Page 193
Page 194
Page 195
Page 194
Page 195
Page 196
Page 197
Page 198
Page 199
Page 200
Page 201
Page 202
Sheet 216
Page 204
Page 205
Page 206
Page 207
Page 208
Page 209
Page 210
Page 211
Page 212
Page 213
Page 214
Page 215
Page 216
Page 217
Sheet 231
Sheet 232
Sheet 233
Sheet 234
Sheet 235
Sheet 236
Sheet 237
Page 6
Page 228
Page 229
Page 230
Page 231
Page 232
Page 233
Page 234
Page 235
Page 236
Page 237
Page 238
Page 239
Page 240
Page 241
Page 242
Page 243
Page 244
Page 245
Page 246
Page 247
Page 248
Page 249
Page 250
Page 251
Page 252
Page 253
Page 254
Page 255
Page 256
Page 257
Page 258
Page 259
Page 260
Page 261
Page 262
Page 263
Page 264
Page 265
Page 266
Page 267
Page 268
Page 269
Page 270
Page 271
Page 272
Page 273
Page 274
Page 276
Page 277
Page 278
Page 279
Page 280
Page 281
Page 282
Page 285
Page 286
Page 287
Page 288
Page 289
Page 290
Page 291
Page 292
Page 293
Page 294
Page 295
Page 296
Page 297
Page 298
Page 299
Page 300
Page 301
Page 302
Page 303
Page 304
Page 305
Page 306
Page 307
Page 308
Page 309
Page 310
Page 311
Page 312
Page 313
Page 314
Page 315
Page 316
Page 316
Sheet 326
Sheet 327
Sheet 328
Sheet 329
Sheet 330
Sheet 331
Sheet 332
Page 324
Sheet 334
Page 326
Sheet 336
Page 328
Sheet 338
Page 330
Sheet 340
Page 332
Sheet 342
Page 334
Sheet 344
Page 336
Sheet 346
Page 338
Sheet 348
Page 340
Sheet 350
Page 342
Sheet 352
Page 344
Sheet 354
Page 346
Sheet 356
Page 348
Sheet 358
Page 350
Sheet 360
Sheet 361
Sheet 362
Sheet 363
Sheet 364
Sheet 365
Sheet 366
Sheet 367
Sheet 368
Sheet 369
Sheet 370
Sheet 371
Sheet 372
Page 364
Sheet 374
Page 366
Sheet 376
Sheet 377
Sheet 378
Sheet 379
Sheet 380
Sheet 381
Sheet 382
Sheet 383
Sheet 384
Sheet 385
Sheet 386
Sheet 387
Page 379
Page 380
Page 381
Page 382
Page 383
Page 384
Page 385
Page 386
Page 387
Page 388
Page 389
Page 390
Page 391
Page 392
Page 393
Page 394
Sheet 404
Page 396
Page 397
Page 398
Sheet 408
Page 400
Page 401
Page 402
Page 403
Page 404
Page 405
Page 406
Page 407
Page 408
Page 409
Sheet 419
Sheet 420
Page 1
Page 414
Sheet 423
Page 416
Sheet 425
Page 432
Sheet 427
Sheet 428
Sheet 429
Sheet 430
Sheet 431
Sheet 432
Sheet 433
Sheet 434
Sheet 435
Sheet 436
Page 124
Sheet 438
Sheet 439
Sheet 440
Sheet 441
Sheet 442
Sheet 443
Sheet 444
Page 2
Sheet 446
Page 2
Page 3
Page 4
Page 5
Page 6
Page 2
Sheet 453
Sheet 454
Sheet 455
Scan: The Lutheran Church—Missouri Synod
⤓ Download page image (full resolution)
Transcription machine transcription, uncorrected
HIGHER EDUCATION 239
both elementary and secondary, is before the Michigan State
Board of Education. We hope and pray that the state board will
approve our excellent program proposal. Perhaps by the time
of the synodical convention, or shortly thereafter, we shall
have their decision. Reports from the area which Ann Arbor
primarily serves indicate strong support for this kind of quality
program at Concordia, Ann Arbor.
Our parish assistant program is making exciting progress.
Over 30 students, men and women, are in the program
presently. Many inquiries keep coming from prospective
students of all ages, in addition to those normally about to
enter college. It is the request of Concordia College, Ann Arbor,
as well as that of the Michigan District, that the parish
assistant program be given “church worker” status at the 1981
synodical convention. The quality of the program merits such
synodical stature.
We recently established a Career Counseling Center staffed
by a professional career counselor. This service is being used
extensively and profitably by many students. Those who are
undecided as to their vocational future find helpful guidance
through the efforts of the career center.
Just recently, the faculty and the Board of Control have
granted Concordia, Ann Arbor, the opportunity to add an
experimental minor in business administration. This business
program is to be carefully monitored and evaluated at the end
of two years. At that time a decision will be made as to its
continuance and/or expansion to a major and appropriate
approval sought.
In analyzing the future of Concordia, Ann Arbor, profes-
sional help was secured by employing Samborn, Steketee, Otis
and Evans of Toledo, Ohio, as architects/consultants. Sub-
stantial progress has already been made. Mr. Lackney, an
officer in this well-known firm, is a fine Christian who
understands Concordia’s purpose in the church and makes his
studies and surveys accordingly. His work is aided by seven
program planning committees on which faculty members
volunteered to serve. They have been working on new ways in
which Concordia, Ann Arbor, might serve the church and its
constituency more efficiently and completely. From these
studies have come continuing-education programs off-campus
and an Elderhostel program. Other possibilities are pending.
This is an exciting period for Concordia, Ann Arbor.
Inflation continues to be a real problem; the cost of
maintenance, repairs, and other basics rises while the synod-
ical subsidy remains static or decreases. Nevertheless, Con-
cordia Ann Arbor, is working toward expansion as it serves the
church.
New members of our Board of Control, elected to replace
Rev. John C. Streit and Ernest C. Laetz, who reached the
maximum years of service as per the synodical Handbook, are
Richard Korthals and Rev. James Nickel. Further, the resigna-
tion of Edwin A. Benz, who served faithfully for many years,
brought about the appointment of Charles E. Bosma to fill that
unexpired term.
During the past biennium, because some faculty and staff
accepted positions elsewhere, and because of internal growth,
the following additions were made: Kurt Amolsch, Robert
DeWerff, E. David Dolak, Kathleen Foster, Herbert Geisler,
Paul Germeroth, Clark Gross, E. Edward Hackmann, Brian
Heinemann, Roy Kronsbein, John Major, Lloyd Probasco,
Paul Raabe, Gilbert Sernett, and Timothy Winter. Dr. Paul G.
Meyer, Dr. Wilbert H. Rusch, and Prof. Theodore P. Klammer
have retired and were given professor emeritus status.
Concordia, Ann Arbor, long has been noted as a very
spirtually oriented campus. Through our Spiritual Life Com-
mittee and its adviser, the spiritual emphasis on our campus
remains strong, and this is reflected in the attitude of students
and faculty alike. We feel that our motto, ‘Christ, first in
everything,” should be a reality on campus. This is our goal in
all campus activities and is noted in our excellent daily chapel
attendance.
Concordia College, Ann Arbor, continues in its efforts to
serve and meet the needs of The Lutheran Church—Missouri
Synod. Therefore we bespeak the prayers of the members of
Synod.
Board of Control
M.S. Pohl, Executive Officer
6-06
Concordia College Bronxville, N.Y.
Year of Jubilee
This is a year of jubilee for Concordia College, celebrating
100 years of blessings as a school and 70 years at its present
location in Bronxville. Concordia treasures its friends of the
past: founders who responded to the Synod’s need for church
workers on the eastern seaboard; alumni who have given
distinguished service and leadership to church and country;
friends and sponsors who have responded throughout the
years in so many ways to the school’s challenges and oppor-
tunities. Concordia thanks God for these blessings.
The mission of Concordia has not changed. Pastors and
teachers, deaconesses and social workers, directors of Chris-
tian education, youth work and evangelism, lay leaders in local
parishes are needed as urgently in 1981 as in 1881 when the
sainted Pastor John Sieker founded Concordia with a class of
12 boys committed to studying for the ministry. Since 1921
Concordia has welcomed general education students also; they
not only provide the needed additional financial support, but
these students represent both a great resource and a great
opportunity. They add a vitality and diversity to the student
population that is important to the development of a meaning-
ful, life-related education process, and they promise new
impetus and inspiration for creating a strong sense of mission
and vocation in contemporary Christian congregations. To
fulfill its mission today, Concordia seeks to enlist an ever-
widening circle of friends and associates.
“Reach for Tomorrow.” Concordia’s action plan of the
future is expressed in this slogan, coined by its students during
its 100th year. Rooted in present realities, but not arrested
there, Concordia is still eager to explore new avenues and
approaches in its continuing quest for academic excellence for
its students and in its dedicated service to the church. While
reflecting Concordia’s current situation, this report reaches for
tomorrow where we see enrollment building toward 500 to 600
students, a consistently larger proportion of them enrolled in
church vocation courses; an increasing measure of financial
support from eastern seaboard Districts and congregations,
and from the Synod, which accepted Concordia as a gift from
east coast Lutherans in 1899; and finally, a growing awareness
by the church and by the surrounding community that Con-
cordia “lives” to serve.
Three Studies
Three major studies have engaged the attention of the
administration and the faculty over the past two years. The
implementation of recommendations from all three will chart
Concordia’s movement into the future—a movement from
vision to reality.
The management firm of Anderson/Roethle, Inc., was
engaged to assist with an in-depth review of the college’s
strategy in three areas: recruitment, development, and finan-
cial management. This intensive study resulted in a manual
for action for the next five years. The eight-pronged statement
of function for carrying out the mission and purpose of the
college in serving the church received the wholehearted
endorsement of the faculty. Recommendations for initiating,
cultivating, and maintaining closer ties with those Districts
and congregations of the Synod which traditionally have
looked to Concordia for service resulted in the establishment of
the ‘“‘Concordia Ambassadors Plan.” The study also led to
significant changes both in personnel and methodology for the
fiscal management of the school.
Secondly, the reorganization of the faculty involved most of
its membership in the fall semester of the 1979—80 school year
and led to the present arrangement of five faculty divisions as
follows (chairpersons in parentheses):
Division of Behavior & Applied Science (Kenneth Doka)
Division of Education (Violet Wade)
Division of History & Religion (Alan Steinberg)
Division of Literature & Music (James Brauer)
Division of Science & Mathematics (Clifford Peterson)
Thirdly, a review of the interim program, an integral part of
Concordia’s academic history since 1972, was the topic of a