Collection › LCMS Convention Workbook (St. Louis, Missouri) › 1981 · 54th Convention › Page 249

LCMS Convention Workbook St. Louis, Missouri — 1981, Page 249

front matter 1 front matter 2 front matter 3 front matter 4 front matter 5 front matter 6 front matter 7 front matter 8 front matter 9 front matter 10 front matter 11 front matter 12 front matter 13 front matter 14 front matter 15 front matter 16 Page 1 Page 2 Page 3 Page 4 Page 5 Page 6 Page 7 Page 8 Page 9 Page 10 Page 11 Page 12 Page 13 Page 14 Page 15 Page 16 Page 17 Page 18 Page 19 Page 20 Page 21 Page 22 Page 23 Page 24 Page 25 Page 26 Page 27 Page 28 Page 29 Page 30 Page 31 Page 32 Page 33 Page 34 Page 35 Page 36 Page 37 Page 38 Page 39 Page 40 Page 42 Page 43 Page 44 Page 45 Page 46 Page 47 Page 48 Page 49 Page 50 Page 51 Page 52 Page 53 Page 54 Page 55 Page 56 Page 57 Page 58 Page 59 Page 60 Page 61 Page 62 Page 63 Page 64 Page 65 Page 66 Page 67 Page 68 Page 69 Page 70 Page 71 Page 72 Page 73 Page 74 Page 75 Page 76 Page 77 Page 78 Page 79 Page 80 Page 81 Page 82 Page 83 Page 86 Page 87 Page 88 Page 89 Page 90 Page 91 Page 92 Page 93 Page 94 Page 95 Page 96 Page 97 Page 98 Page 99 Page 100 Page 101 Page 102 Page 103 Page 104 Page 105 Page 106 Page 107 Page 108 Page 109 Page 110 Page 111 Page 112 Page 113 Page 114 Page 115 Page 116 Page 117 Page 118 Page 119 Page 120 Page 121 Page 122 Page 123 Page 124 Page 125 Page 126 Page 127 Page 128 Page 129 Page 130 Page 131 Page 132 Page 133 Page 134 Page 135 Page 136 Page 137 Page 138 Page 139 Page 140 Page 141 Page 142 Page 143 Page 144 Page 145 Page 146 Page 147 Page 148 Page 149 Page 150 Page 151 Page 152 Page 153 Page 154 Page 155 Page 156 Page 157 Page 158 Page 159 Page 160 Page 161 Page 162 Page 163 Page 164 Page 165 Page 166 Page 167 Page 168 Page 169 Page 170 Page 171 Page 172 Page 173 Page 174 Page 175 Page 176 Page 177 Page 178 Page 179 Page 180 Page 181 Page 182 Page 185 Page 186 Page 187 Page 188 Page 189 Page 190 Page 191 Page 192 Page 193 Page 194 Page 195 Page 194 Page 195 Page 196 Page 197 Page 198 Page 199 Page 200 Page 201 Page 202 Sheet 216 Page 204 Page 205 Page 206 Page 207 Page 208 Page 209 Page 210 Page 211 Page 212 Page 213 Page 214 Page 215 Page 216 Page 217 Sheet 231 Sheet 232 Sheet 233 Sheet 234 Sheet 235 Sheet 236 Sheet 237 Page 6 Page 228 Page 229 Page 230 Page 231 Page 232 Page 233 Page 234 Page 235 Page 236 Page 237 Page 238 Page 239 Page 240 Page 241 Page 242 Page 243 Page 244 Page 245 Page 246 Page 247 Page 248 Page 249 Page 250 Page 251 Page 252 Page 253 Page 254 Page 255 Page 256 Page 257 Page 258 Page 259 Page 260 Page 261 Page 262 Page 263 Page 264 Page 265 Page 266 Page 267 Page 268 Page 269 Page 270 Page 271 Page 272 Page 273 Page 274 Page 276 Page 277 Page 278 Page 279 Page 280 Page 281 Page 282 Page 285 Page 286 Page 287 Page 288 Page 289 Page 290 Page 291 Page 292 Page 293 Page 294 Page 295 Page 296 Page 297 Page 298 Page 299 Page 300 Page 301 Page 302 Page 303 Page 304 Page 305 Page 306 Page 307 Page 308 Page 309 Page 310 Page 311 Page 312 Page 313 Page 314 Page 315 Page 316 Page 316 Sheet 326 Sheet 327 Sheet 328 Sheet 329 Sheet 330 Sheet 331 Sheet 332 Page 324 Sheet 334 Page 326 Sheet 336 Page 328 Sheet 338 Page 330 Sheet 340 Page 332 Sheet 342 Page 334 Sheet 344 Page 336 Sheet 346 Page 338 Sheet 348 Page 340 Sheet 350 Page 342 Sheet 352 Page 344 Sheet 354 Page 346 Sheet 356 Page 348 Sheet 358 Page 350 Sheet 360 Sheet 361 Sheet 362 Sheet 363 Sheet 364 Sheet 365 Sheet 366 Sheet 367 Sheet 368 Sheet 369 Sheet 370 Sheet 371 Sheet 372 Page 364 Sheet 374 Page 366 Sheet 376 Sheet 377 Sheet 378 Sheet 379 Sheet 380 Sheet 381 Sheet 382 Sheet 383 Sheet 384 Sheet 385 Sheet 386 Sheet 387 Page 379 Page 380 Page 381 Page 382 Page 383 Page 384 Page 385 Page 386 Page 387 Page 388 Page 389 Page 390 Page 391 Page 392 Page 393 Page 394 Sheet 404 Page 396 Page 397 Page 398 Sheet 408 Page 400 Page 401 Page 402 Page 403 Page 404 Page 405 Page 406 Page 407 Page 408 Page 409 Sheet 419 Sheet 420 Page 1 Page 414 Sheet 423 Page 416 Sheet 425 Page 432 Sheet 427 Sheet 428 Sheet 429 Sheet 430 Sheet 431 Sheet 432 Sheet 433 Sheet 434 Sheet 435 Sheet 436 Page 124 Sheet 438 Sheet 439 Sheet 440 Sheet 441 Sheet 442 Sheet 443 Sheet 444 Page 2 Sheet 446 Page 2 Page 3 Page 4 Page 5 Page 6 Page 2 Sheet 453 Sheet 454 Sheet 455

Scan: The Lutheran Church—Missouri Synod

⤓ Download page image (full resolution)

Transcription machine transcription, uncorrected

⤓ Download .txt · copy text

HIGHER EDUCATION 249

6-15
St. John’s College, Winfield, Kans.

St. John’s College, Winfield, Kans., submits this report with
gratitude to a magnificent God, who continues to shower us
with His blessings, and to The Lutheran Church—Missouri
Synod, which sponsors and supports us in providing a quality
education that is centered in Christ.

During the past biennium, St. John’s College has spent a
great deal of energy pursuing our goal: to become a four-year,
baccalaureate-degree-granting institution of The Lutheran
Church—Missouri Synod. God willing, this pursuit will
culminate during this convention with the passage of the
synodical resolution granting this request.

In order to provide the delegates with the necessary infor-
mation to make a God-pleasing decision, the following ration-
ale, prepared by a special faculty committee of St. John’s
College, is submitted. In essence, the report contains all the
supporting data that persuaded the faculty and the Board of
Control of SJC to bring this memorial to the Synod.

Synodical Stance

The stance of the Synod with respect to growth and
advancement in higher education is one of positive support for
the full utilization and development of the colleges that the
Synod maintains; such development is to be fostered according
to the principles of stewardship, the needs for educational
services by the membership of the Synod, and the potential of
the colleges to assume broader roles in Christian higher
education for the Synod’s benefit.

The Synod has stated (St. Louis, 1979, Res. 6-01A), in
adopting ‘planning principles” (see ‘“‘Postulates,” Convention
Workbook 1979, p. 165) for its system of colleges and semi-
naries, that

—schools of the Synod “are gifts from God”’; ‘‘are involved
in a great and joyful work that is vital to the life and
future of the church”; and “need to be used to capacity”;

—‘‘Luther’s definition of vocation and occupation provides
insight and direction in determining the purposes for
synodical schools”;

—each school is “a unique institution living in its own
distinct environment”;

—local faculty and administration should be “deeply in-
volved in giving direction to the future of the institution”;

—capacity use may provide “the opportunities for the
introduction of creative programs not only in the church-
worker category but also for the Lutheran laity, those of
college age and beyond”,

—“‘some junior colleges must become four-year institutions
if they are to remain viable educational choices for our
young people”;

—providing Christian higher education for all its young
people is ‘an appropriate purpose for the synodical
schools.”

—The Synod repeatedly has taken a position of strong
support for the recruitment of students for the pastoral and
teaching ministries.

—The Synod has encouraged the Board for Higher Educa-
tion to make available through the schools of the Synod a
variety of educational programs for the church’s professional
workers, for early childhood education, for elementary educa-
tion, for continuing education of the laity, and for the Christian
education of all its young people.

The Synod has adopted church growth goals for the 80s that
will increase the need for trained professional workers and the
support personnel to serve this increased number of profes-
sional workers. The “‘Challenge for the 80s” sets goals calling
for

—ten new overseas mission stations to be opened;

—six hundred new Lutheran Church—Missouri Synod
expatriate missionaries to be serving partner churches
and mission stations;

—thirty percent growth in the number of new churches to be
planted; and fifty percent increase in the baptized
membership of the Synod so that ‘“‘our needs for profes-

sional church workers may increase dramatically by
1990.”

Pioneer in Education

St. John’s College has been a pioneer among the colleges of
The Lutheran Church—Missouri Synod in coeducation and
vocational education for both church-vocation students and
laymen.

St. John’s College was founded in 1893 by John Peter
Baden, a successful Lutheran businessman in Winfield, Kans.,
to ‘provide for the training of ministers and to offer opportuni-
ties for young people to secure a higher education under
Christian influence.” Although programs and courses have
undergone changes, they remain consistent with these original
objectives.

From the time of its founding, the college has been a pioneer
within the educational system of the Synod. Examples of
innovation include coeducation; the use of English as the
medium of instruction; general education, business, and secre-
tarial programs; the Parish Worker Program; the Teacher
Education Program for women; the Associate Degree Nursing
Program; and a successful alumni organization. The Parish
Worker Program was the first course of study offered at a
college of the Synod to prepare women for positions of full-time
service in the Synod. The Associate Degree Nursing Program
is the first such program to be offered at any Lutheran college
in the United States.

The Consortium Arrangement

The college has benefited directly from a successful con-
sortium arrangement with Southwestern College in Winfield
and will continue to benefit from this program of cooperation
in education. The arrangement with Southwestern, an
accredited four-year, liberal arts private collége located five
blocks from St. John’s, has been in effect since the 1972—73
academic year.

St. John’s students cross-register at Southwestern College
for selected advanced and specialized courses not offered at St.
John’s. This cross-registration privilege provides a broader
diversity of course offerings on both campuses without the
overhead costs normally associated with such diversity.

The college’s students have the advantage of a rich selection
of liberal arts course offerings for their academic programs; at
the same time, the relationship within the consortium readily
permits that the doctrinal and theological courses required for
church-worker programs are taught at St. John’s, so the
integrity of the heritage of The Lutheran Church—Missoun
Synod is maintained and fostered.

The college reimburses Southwestern College about $12,000
a year for the courses for which St. John’s students cross-
register at Southwestern. At the same time, the college cannot
employ one instructor for the same amount that it pays to
Southwestern for this educational service. The benefit of a
richer variety of course offerings for the college’s students more
than offsets the cost to the college in cross-registration fees.
(Currently St. John’s College students enroll for about 150
semester hours of academic credit at Southwestern for each
term.)

The college also cross-registers students from Southwestern
College on its campus, and from this practice receives revenues
that offset to some extent the cost to the college for its students
to cross-register at Southwestern.

The college has benefited in the consortium arrangements
by being eligible for federal government funds awarded to the
colleges jointly under the provisions of the Title III, ‘“Strength-
ening Developing Institutions Program.” Since the initiation
of the consortium arrangement, the colleges have been
awarded grants totaling $1,358,000, of which $520,234 has
been designated for use at St. John’s College. Such funding for
professional services, equipment, supplies, support for teach-
ing fellows, and other related purposes would not be available
to the college were they not offered through such programs as
those provided under Title III.

The college has realized a savings of its own financial
resources by the processes of pooling funds for meeting certain
institutional administrative needs—for example, equipment