Collection › LCMS Convention Workbook (St. Louis, Missouri) › 1981 · 54th Convention › Page 249
LCMS Convention Workbook St. Louis, Missouri — 1981, Page 249
front matter 1
front matter 2
front matter 3
front matter 4
front matter 5
front matter 6
front matter 7
front matter 8
front matter 9
front matter 10
front matter 11
front matter 12
front matter 13
front matter 14
front matter 15
front matter 16
Page 1
Page 2
Page 3
Page 4
Page 5
Page 6
Page 7
Page 8
Page 9
Page 10
Page 11
Page 12
Page 13
Page 14
Page 15
Page 16
Page 17
Page 18
Page 19
Page 20
Page 21
Page 22
Page 23
Page 24
Page 25
Page 26
Page 27
Page 28
Page 29
Page 30
Page 31
Page 32
Page 33
Page 34
Page 35
Page 36
Page 37
Page 38
Page 39
Page 40
Page 42
Page 43
Page 44
Page 45
Page 46
Page 47
Page 48
Page 49
Page 50
Page 51
Page 52
Page 53
Page 54
Page 55
Page 56
Page 57
Page 58
Page 59
Page 60
Page 61
Page 62
Page 63
Page 64
Page 65
Page 66
Page 67
Page 68
Page 69
Page 70
Page 71
Page 72
Page 73
Page 74
Page 75
Page 76
Page 77
Page 78
Page 79
Page 80
Page 81
Page 82
Page 83
Page 86
Page 87
Page 88
Page 89
Page 90
Page 91
Page 92
Page 93
Page 94
Page 95
Page 96
Page 97
Page 98
Page 99
Page 100
Page 101
Page 102
Page 103
Page 104
Page 105
Page 106
Page 107
Page 108
Page 109
Page 110
Page 111
Page 112
Page 113
Page 114
Page 115
Page 116
Page 117
Page 118
Page 119
Page 120
Page 121
Page 122
Page 123
Page 124
Page 125
Page 126
Page 127
Page 128
Page 129
Page 130
Page 131
Page 132
Page 133
Page 134
Page 135
Page 136
Page 137
Page 138
Page 139
Page 140
Page 141
Page 142
Page 143
Page 144
Page 145
Page 146
Page 147
Page 148
Page 149
Page 150
Page 151
Page 152
Page 153
Page 154
Page 155
Page 156
Page 157
Page 158
Page 159
Page 160
Page 161
Page 162
Page 163
Page 164
Page 165
Page 166
Page 167
Page 168
Page 169
Page 170
Page 171
Page 172
Page 173
Page 174
Page 175
Page 176
Page 177
Page 178
Page 179
Page 180
Page 181
Page 182
Page 185
Page 186
Page 187
Page 188
Page 189
Page 190
Page 191
Page 192
Page 193
Page 194
Page 195
Page 194
Page 195
Page 196
Page 197
Page 198
Page 199
Page 200
Page 201
Page 202
Sheet 216
Page 204
Page 205
Page 206
Page 207
Page 208
Page 209
Page 210
Page 211
Page 212
Page 213
Page 214
Page 215
Page 216
Page 217
Sheet 231
Sheet 232
Sheet 233
Sheet 234
Sheet 235
Sheet 236
Sheet 237
Page 6
Page 228
Page 229
Page 230
Page 231
Page 232
Page 233
Page 234
Page 235
Page 236
Page 237
Page 238
Page 239
Page 240
Page 241
Page 242
Page 243
Page 244
Page 245
Page 246
Page 247
Page 248
Page 249
Page 250
Page 251
Page 252
Page 253
Page 254
Page 255
Page 256
Page 257
Page 258
Page 259
Page 260
Page 261
Page 262
Page 263
Page 264
Page 265
Page 266
Page 267
Page 268
Page 269
Page 270
Page 271
Page 272
Page 273
Page 274
Page 276
Page 277
Page 278
Page 279
Page 280
Page 281
Page 282
Page 285
Page 286
Page 287
Page 288
Page 289
Page 290
Page 291
Page 292
Page 293
Page 294
Page 295
Page 296
Page 297
Page 298
Page 299
Page 300
Page 301
Page 302
Page 303
Page 304
Page 305
Page 306
Page 307
Page 308
Page 309
Page 310
Page 311
Page 312
Page 313
Page 314
Page 315
Page 316
Page 316
Sheet 326
Sheet 327
Sheet 328
Sheet 329
Sheet 330
Sheet 331
Sheet 332
Page 324
Sheet 334
Page 326
Sheet 336
Page 328
Sheet 338
Page 330
Sheet 340
Page 332
Sheet 342
Page 334
Sheet 344
Page 336
Sheet 346
Page 338
Sheet 348
Page 340
Sheet 350
Page 342
Sheet 352
Page 344
Sheet 354
Page 346
Sheet 356
Page 348
Sheet 358
Page 350
Sheet 360
Sheet 361
Sheet 362
Sheet 363
Sheet 364
Sheet 365
Sheet 366
Sheet 367
Sheet 368
Sheet 369
Sheet 370
Sheet 371
Sheet 372
Page 364
Sheet 374
Page 366
Sheet 376
Sheet 377
Sheet 378
Sheet 379
Sheet 380
Sheet 381
Sheet 382
Sheet 383
Sheet 384
Sheet 385
Sheet 386
Sheet 387
Page 379
Page 380
Page 381
Page 382
Page 383
Page 384
Page 385
Page 386
Page 387
Page 388
Page 389
Page 390
Page 391
Page 392
Page 393
Page 394
Sheet 404
Page 396
Page 397
Page 398
Sheet 408
Page 400
Page 401
Page 402
Page 403
Page 404
Page 405
Page 406
Page 407
Page 408
Page 409
Sheet 419
Sheet 420
Page 1
Page 414
Sheet 423
Page 416
Sheet 425
Page 432
Sheet 427
Sheet 428
Sheet 429
Sheet 430
Sheet 431
Sheet 432
Sheet 433
Sheet 434
Sheet 435
Sheet 436
Page 124
Sheet 438
Sheet 439
Sheet 440
Sheet 441
Sheet 442
Sheet 443
Sheet 444
Page 2
Sheet 446
Page 2
Page 3
Page 4
Page 5
Page 6
Page 2
Sheet 453
Sheet 454
Sheet 455
Scan: The Lutheran Church—Missouri Synod
⤓ Download page image (full resolution)
Transcription machine transcription, uncorrected
HIGHER EDUCATION 249
6-15
St. John’s College, Winfield, Kans.
St. John’s College, Winfield, Kans., submits this report with
gratitude to a magnificent God, who continues to shower us
with His blessings, and to The Lutheran Church—Missouri
Synod, which sponsors and supports us in providing a quality
education that is centered in Christ.
During the past biennium, St. John’s College has spent a
great deal of energy pursuing our goal: to become a four-year,
baccalaureate-degree-granting institution of The Lutheran
Church—Missouri Synod. God willing, this pursuit will
culminate during this convention with the passage of the
synodical resolution granting this request.
In order to provide the delegates with the necessary infor-
mation to make a God-pleasing decision, the following ration-
ale, prepared by a special faculty committee of St. John’s
College, is submitted. In essence, the report contains all the
supporting data that persuaded the faculty and the Board of
Control of SJC to bring this memorial to the Synod.
Synodical Stance
The stance of the Synod with respect to growth and
advancement in higher education is one of positive support for
the full utilization and development of the colleges that the
Synod maintains; such development is to be fostered according
to the principles of stewardship, the needs for educational
services by the membership of the Synod, and the potential of
the colleges to assume broader roles in Christian higher
education for the Synod’s benefit.
The Synod has stated (St. Louis, 1979, Res. 6-01A), in
adopting ‘planning principles” (see ‘“‘Postulates,” Convention
Workbook 1979, p. 165) for its system of colleges and semi-
naries, that
—schools of the Synod “are gifts from God”’; ‘‘are involved
in a great and joyful work that is vital to the life and
future of the church”; and “need to be used to capacity”;
—‘‘Luther’s definition of vocation and occupation provides
insight and direction in determining the purposes for
synodical schools”;
—each school is “a unique institution living in its own
distinct environment”;
—local faculty and administration should be “deeply in-
volved in giving direction to the future of the institution”;
—capacity use may provide “the opportunities for the
introduction of creative programs not only in the church-
worker category but also for the Lutheran laity, those of
college age and beyond”,
—“‘some junior colleges must become four-year institutions
if they are to remain viable educational choices for our
young people”;
—providing Christian higher education for all its young
people is ‘an appropriate purpose for the synodical
schools.”
—The Synod repeatedly has taken a position of strong
support for the recruitment of students for the pastoral and
teaching ministries.
—The Synod has encouraged the Board for Higher Educa-
tion to make available through the schools of the Synod a
variety of educational programs for the church’s professional
workers, for early childhood education, for elementary educa-
tion, for continuing education of the laity, and for the Christian
education of all its young people.
The Synod has adopted church growth goals for the 80s that
will increase the need for trained professional workers and the
support personnel to serve this increased number of profes-
sional workers. The “‘Challenge for the 80s” sets goals calling
for
—ten new overseas mission stations to be opened;
—six hundred new Lutheran Church—Missouri Synod
expatriate missionaries to be serving partner churches
and mission stations;
—thirty percent growth in the number of new churches to be
planted; and fifty percent increase in the baptized
membership of the Synod so that ‘“‘our needs for profes-
sional church workers may increase dramatically by
1990.”
Pioneer in Education
St. John’s College has been a pioneer among the colleges of
The Lutheran Church—Missouri Synod in coeducation and
vocational education for both church-vocation students and
laymen.
St. John’s College was founded in 1893 by John Peter
Baden, a successful Lutheran businessman in Winfield, Kans.,
to ‘provide for the training of ministers and to offer opportuni-
ties for young people to secure a higher education under
Christian influence.” Although programs and courses have
undergone changes, they remain consistent with these original
objectives.
From the time of its founding, the college has been a pioneer
within the educational system of the Synod. Examples of
innovation include coeducation; the use of English as the
medium of instruction; general education, business, and secre-
tarial programs; the Parish Worker Program; the Teacher
Education Program for women; the Associate Degree Nursing
Program; and a successful alumni organization. The Parish
Worker Program was the first course of study offered at a
college of the Synod to prepare women for positions of full-time
service in the Synod. The Associate Degree Nursing Program
is the first such program to be offered at any Lutheran college
in the United States.
The Consortium Arrangement
The college has benefited directly from a successful con-
sortium arrangement with Southwestern College in Winfield
and will continue to benefit from this program of cooperation
in education. The arrangement with Southwestern, an
accredited four-year, liberal arts private collége located five
blocks from St. John’s, has been in effect since the 1972—73
academic year.
St. John’s students cross-register at Southwestern College
for selected advanced and specialized courses not offered at St.
John’s. This cross-registration privilege provides a broader
diversity of course offerings on both campuses without the
overhead costs normally associated with such diversity.
The college’s students have the advantage of a rich selection
of liberal arts course offerings for their academic programs; at
the same time, the relationship within the consortium readily
permits that the doctrinal and theological courses required for
church-worker programs are taught at St. John’s, so the
integrity of the heritage of The Lutheran Church—Missoun
Synod is maintained and fostered.
The college reimburses Southwestern College about $12,000
a year for the courses for which St. John’s students cross-
register at Southwestern. At the same time, the college cannot
employ one instructor for the same amount that it pays to
Southwestern for this educational service. The benefit of a
richer variety of course offerings for the college’s students more
than offsets the cost to the college in cross-registration fees.
(Currently St. John’s College students enroll for about 150
semester hours of academic credit at Southwestern for each
term.)
The college also cross-registers students from Southwestern
College on its campus, and from this practice receives revenues
that offset to some extent the cost to the college for its students
to cross-register at Southwestern.
The college has benefited in the consortium arrangements
by being eligible for federal government funds awarded to the
colleges jointly under the provisions of the Title III, ‘“Strength-
ening Developing Institutions Program.” Since the initiation
of the consortium arrangement, the colleges have been
awarded grants totaling $1,358,000, of which $520,234 has
been designated for use at St. John’s College. Such funding for
professional services, equipment, supplies, support for teach-
ing fellows, and other related purposes would not be available
to the college were they not offered through such programs as
those provided under Title III.
The college has realized a savings of its own financial
resources by the processes of pooling funds for meeting certain
institutional administrative needs—for example, equipment