Collection › LCMS Convention Workbook (St. Louis, Missouri) › 1981 · 54th Convention › Page 242
LCMS Convention Workbook St. Louis, Missouri — 1981, Page 242
front matter 1
front matter 2
front matter 3
front matter 4
front matter 5
front matter 6
front matter 7
front matter 8
front matter 9
front matter 10
front matter 11
front matter 12
front matter 13
front matter 14
front matter 15
front matter 16
Page 1
Page 2
Page 3
Page 4
Page 5
Page 6
Page 7
Page 8
Page 9
Page 10
Page 11
Page 12
Page 13
Page 14
Page 15
Page 16
Page 17
Page 18
Page 19
Page 20
Page 21
Page 22
Page 23
Page 24
Page 25
Page 26
Page 27
Page 28
Page 29
Page 30
Page 31
Page 32
Page 33
Page 34
Page 35
Page 36
Page 37
Page 38
Page 39
Page 40
Page 42
Page 43
Page 44
Page 45
Page 46
Page 47
Page 48
Page 49
Page 50
Page 51
Page 52
Page 53
Page 54
Page 55
Page 56
Page 57
Page 58
Page 59
Page 60
Page 61
Page 62
Page 63
Page 64
Page 65
Page 66
Page 67
Page 68
Page 69
Page 70
Page 71
Page 72
Page 73
Page 74
Page 75
Page 76
Page 77
Page 78
Page 79
Page 80
Page 81
Page 82
Page 83
Page 86
Page 87
Page 88
Page 89
Page 90
Page 91
Page 92
Page 93
Page 94
Page 95
Page 96
Page 97
Page 98
Page 99
Page 100
Page 101
Page 102
Page 103
Page 104
Page 105
Page 106
Page 107
Page 108
Page 109
Page 110
Page 111
Page 112
Page 113
Page 114
Page 115
Page 116
Page 117
Page 118
Page 119
Page 120
Page 121
Page 122
Page 123
Page 124
Page 125
Page 126
Page 127
Page 128
Page 129
Page 130
Page 131
Page 132
Page 133
Page 134
Page 135
Page 136
Page 137
Page 138
Page 139
Page 140
Page 141
Page 142
Page 143
Page 144
Page 145
Page 146
Page 147
Page 148
Page 149
Page 150
Page 151
Page 152
Page 153
Page 154
Page 155
Page 156
Page 157
Page 158
Page 159
Page 160
Page 161
Page 162
Page 163
Page 164
Page 165
Page 166
Page 167
Page 168
Page 169
Page 170
Page 171
Page 172
Page 173
Page 174
Page 175
Page 176
Page 177
Page 178
Page 179
Page 180
Page 181
Page 182
Page 185
Page 186
Page 187
Page 188
Page 189
Page 190
Page 191
Page 192
Page 193
Page 194
Page 195
Page 194
Page 195
Page 196
Page 197
Page 198
Page 199
Page 200
Page 201
Page 202
Sheet 216
Page 204
Page 205
Page 206
Page 207
Page 208
Page 209
Page 210
Page 211
Page 212
Page 213
Page 214
Page 215
Page 216
Page 217
Sheet 231
Sheet 232
Sheet 233
Sheet 234
Sheet 235
Sheet 236
Sheet 237
Page 6
Page 228
Page 229
Page 230
Page 231
Page 232
Page 233
Page 234
Page 235
Page 236
Page 237
Page 238
Page 239
Page 240
Page 241
Page 242
Page 243
Page 244
Page 245
Page 246
Page 247
Page 248
Page 249
Page 250
Page 251
Page 252
Page 253
Page 254
Page 255
Page 256
Page 257
Page 258
Page 259
Page 260
Page 261
Page 262
Page 263
Page 264
Page 265
Page 266
Page 267
Page 268
Page 269
Page 270
Page 271
Page 272
Page 273
Page 274
Page 276
Page 277
Page 278
Page 279
Page 280
Page 281
Page 282
Page 285
Page 286
Page 287
Page 288
Page 289
Page 290
Page 291
Page 292
Page 293
Page 294
Page 295
Page 296
Page 297
Page 298
Page 299
Page 300
Page 301
Page 302
Page 303
Page 304
Page 305
Page 306
Page 307
Page 308
Page 309
Page 310
Page 311
Page 312
Page 313
Page 314
Page 315
Page 316
Page 316
Sheet 326
Sheet 327
Sheet 328
Sheet 329
Sheet 330
Sheet 331
Sheet 332
Page 324
Sheet 334
Page 326
Sheet 336
Page 328
Sheet 338
Page 330
Sheet 340
Page 332
Sheet 342
Page 334
Sheet 344
Page 336
Sheet 346
Page 338
Sheet 348
Page 340
Sheet 350
Page 342
Sheet 352
Page 344
Sheet 354
Page 346
Sheet 356
Page 348
Sheet 358
Page 350
Sheet 360
Sheet 361
Sheet 362
Sheet 363
Sheet 364
Sheet 365
Sheet 366
Sheet 367
Sheet 368
Sheet 369
Sheet 370
Sheet 371
Sheet 372
Page 364
Sheet 374
Page 366
Sheet 376
Sheet 377
Sheet 378
Sheet 379
Sheet 380
Sheet 381
Sheet 382
Sheet 383
Sheet 384
Sheet 385
Sheet 386
Sheet 387
Page 379
Page 380
Page 381
Page 382
Page 383
Page 384
Page 385
Page 386
Page 387
Page 388
Page 389
Page 390
Page 391
Page 392
Page 393
Page 394
Sheet 404
Page 396
Page 397
Page 398
Sheet 408
Page 400
Page 401
Page 402
Page 403
Page 404
Page 405
Page 406
Page 407
Page 408
Page 409
Sheet 419
Sheet 420
Page 1
Page 414
Sheet 423
Page 416
Sheet 425
Page 432
Sheet 427
Sheet 428
Sheet 429
Sheet 430
Sheet 431
Sheet 432
Sheet 433
Sheet 434
Sheet 435
Sheet 436
Page 124
Sheet 438
Sheet 439
Sheet 440
Sheet 441
Sheet 442
Sheet 443
Sheet 444
Page 2
Sheet 446
Page 2
Page 3
Page 4
Page 5
Page 6
Page 2
Sheet 453
Sheet 454
Sheet 455
Scan: The Lutheran Church—Missouri Synod
⤓ Download page image (full resolution)
Transcription machine transcription, uncorrected
242 HIGHER EDUCATION
for its generous support of higher education, the percentage of
its contribution to Concordia, Portland’s budget is gradually
becoming less, from a high of 77 percent in 1967 to 34 percent in
1979 and 23 percent in 1980. Since dollars and control generally
—‘march side by side, the church would do well to examine its
fiscal policies. Concordia, Portland, for many reasons deeply
cherishes its strong relationships with a strong institutional
church, not the least of which is the assurance of a strong,
mutual commitment to Jesus Christ, both Lord and Savior.
Short-Range Plans
Concordia, Portland’s immediate concerns are the
following:
1. Careful monitoring of the educational function as the
college continues to move from a two- to four-year educa-
tional operation.
2. Remodeling of the space vacated by the Library Resource
Center, which will be moved to the new structure, as well as
complying with government regulations to accommodate
the handicapped.
3. Concentrating and improving admissions and development
functions, both of which are absolutely essential for growth
or at worst survival.
4. Adding instructors in education, responsible for the director
of Christian education program; in theology, with speciali-
zations in Old Testament and Hebrew; and in business.
5. Praying our faithful God that His Spirit may enrich the
entire community in Jesus Christ as Concordia strives for
excellency in teaching and learning.
Conclusion
Concordia has learned much from its past 75 years. Con-
cordia courageously faces a more productive future. But this
only because its past and future are in the hands of a present,
living God, who not only rules the world, but serves it and His
people with both His Law and His Gospel.
Board of Control
E. P. Weber, Executive
6-09
Concordia College, River Forest, Ill.
Concordia College, River Forest, Il., has served The
Lutheran Church--Missouri Synod for 117 years. During these
many years the college has educated thousands of consecrated
teachers who by their faithful service have been a great
blessing to the kingdom of God. The college remains dedicated
to that high purpose also today. However, along with the other
colleges of The Lutheran Church—Missouri Synod, Concordia,
River Forest, has broadened the scope of its offerings. This
expansion in offerings has received major emphasis first with
regard to church professions. Concordia now also educates
young men in the four years of their preseminary education. In
addition, the Synod has assigned to the college the deaconess
program of the Synod. Beyond this there is a strong program
for the training of social workers who will be engaged in the
church’s social agencies. The liberal arts program of the college
also continues to grow steadily in response to the interest of
young men and women in coming to a Christian college. The
liberal arts offerings of the college are limited to those things
which the college can do well and which may be linked with
Concordia’s liberal arts approach to the teacher education
program. It is possible for young people to come to Concordia
and to do work in many fields of study, including prelaw,
premedical, business administration, and computer science.
The college operates a large computer science center that
serves many areas outside the college and that provides an
exceptionally strong laboratory experience for young men and
women who are interested in computer science.
The college is dedicated to service both of the church and of
the nation. It recognizes an obligation to those objectives that
were in the minds of the founding fathers, as well as the
broader area of service that comes from the needs of the
changing community and the varied interests of those who
come to Concordia because it is a Christian college. For
example, the educational offerings have an appeal not only for
future parish school teachers but also for those individuals
who are interested in public school work. This is particularly
true at the level of the master’s degree program where the
college is widely recognized in the Chicago area as providing
excellent master’s degree programs in the areas related to
teacher education and church music.
Concordia, River Forest, is best described as a mature
college with a size and capability large enough to provide
in-depth studies for the students who come to the college. Its
programs are well grounded in sound educational policy. Its
teacher training program particularly is one which is broad,
spreading over a wide spectrum of preparation for teacher
education that starts with the early childhood major and
ranges through the various age groups up through teaching at
the secondary level. Administration also is an important part
of the offerings. Strong departments in music and psychology
are allies in this endeavor. Thus Concordia provides a wide
range of educational experience, which appeals to the student
who realizes that teacher education today is a highly special-
ized field.
The college continues to remember its Lutheran heritage
and is committed unswervingly to remaining a thoroughly
confessional Lutheran school, loyal to God and to the work
that He has given us to do for the church and for our nation.
Physical Plant
Concordia is well located in a lovely suburban area west of
Chicago with ready access both to arterial highways and to
local transportation. The 23 buildings provide superb facilities
for the student body. In May 1980 the physical plant was
supplemented at no expense to the Synod with the addition of
The Chapel of Our Lord and The Clara and Spencer Werner
Auditorium. This multipurpose building is used for student
worship services, as well as dramatic and musical productions.
The facility is also equipped with a fine concert and teaching
organ. The cost of the structure was covered with a major
amount collected by the Lutherans of the Northern Illinois
District in the early sixties at the time of the centennial
celebration of the college and a major gift in 1979 from the
Clara and Spencer Werner Foundation. The Schoknecht
Foundation of Libby, Mont., contributed the chapel organ.
Many other donors contributed to the chapel windows, pews,
chancel furnishings, etc. It is appropriate that at this conven-
tion the Synod take formal recognition of this fact and by
resolution thank the donors. Without the support of these many
dedicated Christians the college would be without this splendid
facility which contributes so much to student life and worship.
Some older buildings on the campus go back to 1913 when
the college was moved from Addison, Il. They are sound
structurally, but are in many instances in need of renovation,
remodeling, and provision for energy conservation. The funds
requested by the college from the ‘‘“Forward in Remembrance”
thankoffering are calculated to put these buildings also into
superb condition and represent sound investment in preventive
maintenance.
Finance
The Synod needs to pay earnest attention to the financial
plight of all of its colleges and seminaries. This need is evident
also at Concordia, River Forest, where professors and staff
serve at salaries which are sacrificial. The St. Louis convention
of 1979 took some recognition of this fact. However, cuts in
synodical subsidy experienced by the college in the last two
years have more than nullified any positive effect and have
placed an increasing burden upon the staff and faculty.
Various corporations, foundations, and private individuals ~
have assisted the college in striving to maintain financial
stability. However, it is clearly evident that within a few years
the level of synodical participation in support of this institution
will be at the 15 percent level if present trends persist. Thisisa
dangerous situation in which Concordia, as well as other
institutions of the Synod, may well go the way of other church-
related colleges in this country which, because of neglect,
eventually became entirely independent. This is in our opinion
a crisis situation which calls for the Synod to take immediate
and vigorous action to reestablish its commitment of support of
its colleges and seminaries. Continuing neglect will produce -
irretrievable damage to the entire system of schools and will