Collection › LCMS Convention Workbook (St. Louis, Missouri) › 1981 · 54th Convention › Page 148
LCMS Convention Workbook St. Louis, Missouri — 1981, Page 148
front matter 1
front matter 2
front matter 3
front matter 4
front matter 5
front matter 6
front matter 7
front matter 8
front matter 9
front matter 10
front matter 11
front matter 12
front matter 13
front matter 14
front matter 15
front matter 16
Page 1
Page 2
Page 3
Page 4
Page 5
Page 6
Page 7
Page 8
Page 9
Page 10
Page 11
Page 12
Page 13
Page 14
Page 15
Page 16
Page 17
Page 18
Page 19
Page 20
Page 21
Page 22
Page 23
Page 24
Page 25
Page 26
Page 27
Page 28
Page 29
Page 30
Page 31
Page 32
Page 33
Page 34
Page 35
Page 36
Page 37
Page 38
Page 39
Page 40
Page 42
Page 43
Page 44
Page 45
Page 46
Page 47
Page 48
Page 49
Page 50
Page 51
Page 52
Page 53
Page 54
Page 55
Page 56
Page 57
Page 58
Page 59
Page 60
Page 61
Page 62
Page 63
Page 64
Page 65
Page 66
Page 67
Page 68
Page 69
Page 70
Page 71
Page 72
Page 73
Page 74
Page 75
Page 76
Page 77
Page 78
Page 79
Page 80
Page 81
Page 82
Page 83
Page 86
Page 87
Page 88
Page 89
Page 90
Page 91
Page 92
Page 93
Page 94
Page 95
Page 96
Page 97
Page 98
Page 99
Page 100
Page 101
Page 102
Page 103
Page 104
Page 105
Page 106
Page 107
Page 108
Page 109
Page 110
Page 111
Page 112
Page 113
Page 114
Page 115
Page 116
Page 117
Page 118
Page 119
Page 120
Page 121
Page 122
Page 123
Page 124
Page 125
Page 126
Page 127
Page 128
Page 129
Page 130
Page 131
Page 132
Page 133
Page 134
Page 135
Page 136
Page 137
Page 138
Page 139
Page 140
Page 141
Page 142
Page 143
Page 144
Page 145
Page 146
Page 147
Page 148
Page 149
Page 150
Page 151
Page 152
Page 153
Page 154
Page 155
Page 156
Page 157
Page 158
Page 159
Page 160
Page 161
Page 162
Page 163
Page 164
Page 165
Page 166
Page 167
Page 168
Page 169
Page 170
Page 171
Page 172
Page 173
Page 174
Page 175
Page 176
Page 177
Page 178
Page 179
Page 180
Page 181
Page 182
Page 185
Page 186
Page 187
Page 188
Page 189
Page 190
Page 191
Page 192
Page 193
Page 194
Page 195
Page 194
Page 195
Page 196
Page 197
Page 198
Page 199
Page 200
Page 201
Page 202
Sheet 216
Page 204
Page 205
Page 206
Page 207
Page 208
Page 209
Page 210
Page 211
Page 212
Page 213
Page 214
Page 215
Page 216
Page 217
Sheet 231
Sheet 232
Sheet 233
Sheet 234
Sheet 235
Sheet 236
Sheet 237
Page 6
Page 228
Page 229
Page 230
Page 231
Page 232
Page 233
Page 234
Page 235
Page 236
Page 237
Page 238
Page 239
Page 240
Page 241
Page 242
Page 243
Page 244
Page 245
Page 246
Page 247
Page 248
Page 249
Page 250
Page 251
Page 252
Page 253
Page 254
Page 255
Page 256
Page 257
Page 258
Page 259
Page 260
Page 261
Page 262
Page 263
Page 264
Page 265
Page 266
Page 267
Page 268
Page 269
Page 270
Page 271
Page 272
Page 273
Page 274
Page 276
Page 277
Page 278
Page 279
Page 280
Page 281
Page 282
Page 285
Page 286
Page 287
Page 288
Page 289
Page 290
Page 291
Page 292
Page 293
Page 294
Page 295
Page 296
Page 297
Page 298
Page 299
Page 300
Page 301
Page 302
Page 303
Page 304
Page 305
Page 306
Page 307
Page 308
Page 309
Page 310
Page 311
Page 312
Page 313
Page 314
Page 315
Page 316
Page 316
Sheet 326
Sheet 327
Sheet 328
Sheet 329
Sheet 330
Sheet 331
Sheet 332
Page 324
Sheet 334
Page 326
Sheet 336
Page 328
Sheet 338
Page 330
Sheet 340
Page 332
Sheet 342
Page 334
Sheet 344
Page 336
Sheet 346
Page 338
Sheet 348
Page 340
Sheet 350
Page 342
Sheet 352
Page 344
Sheet 354
Page 346
Sheet 356
Page 348
Sheet 358
Page 350
Sheet 360
Sheet 361
Sheet 362
Sheet 363
Sheet 364
Sheet 365
Sheet 366
Sheet 367
Sheet 368
Sheet 369
Sheet 370
Sheet 371
Sheet 372
Page 364
Sheet 374
Page 366
Sheet 376
Sheet 377
Sheet 378
Sheet 379
Sheet 380
Sheet 381
Sheet 382
Sheet 383
Sheet 384
Sheet 385
Sheet 386
Sheet 387
Page 379
Page 380
Page 381
Page 382
Page 383
Page 384
Page 385
Page 386
Page 387
Page 388
Page 389
Page 390
Page 391
Page 392
Page 393
Page 394
Sheet 404
Page 396
Page 397
Page 398
Sheet 408
Page 400
Page 401
Page 402
Page 403
Page 404
Page 405
Page 406
Page 407
Page 408
Page 409
Sheet 419
Sheet 420
Page 1
Page 414
Sheet 423
Page 416
Sheet 425
Page 432
Sheet 427
Sheet 428
Sheet 429
Sheet 430
Sheet 431
Sheet 432
Sheet 433
Sheet 434
Sheet 435
Sheet 436
Page 124
Sheet 438
Sheet 439
Sheet 440
Sheet 441
Sheet 442
Sheet 443
Sheet 444
Page 2
Sheet 446
Page 2
Page 3
Page 4
Page 5
Page 6
Page 2
Sheet 453
Sheet 454
Sheet 455
Scan: The Lutheran Church—Missouri Synod
⤓ Download page image (full resolution)
Transcription machine transcription, uncorrected
148 THEOLOGY AND CHURCH RELATIONS
commission's Social Concerns Committee is included in
Appendix III of this Workbook.
3. Critique of the 1960 Catechism
Following the 1971 convention of the Synod, the Board of
Directors referred Res. 2-35, which was not acted on because of
lack of time, to the CTCR. This resolution called for the
inclusion of the word “true” in the new translation of Luther’s
Small Catechism after the question “‘What is the Lord’s
Supper?” (“It is the true body and blood of our Lord Jesus
Christ’). After the 1973 convention failed to act on a resolution
submitted by the CTCR in response to the referral of 1971 Res.
2-35, the CTCR reviewed the matter and decided to continue its
study. Having examined the 1960 version of The Small Cate-
chism by Martin Luther in Contemporary English, the CTCR
reported to the 1979 convention of the Synod that this cate-
chism is not an accurate translation of Luther’s German
Catechism and recommended to the Synod that it ‘“undertakea
revised translation of Luther’s Small Catechism as soon as
possible.” In response to this report and recommendation the
Synod asked the CTCR to ‘‘make available to all congregations
and schools by July 1980 a brief critique of The Small
Catechism in Contemporary English and any cautionary
notes as to its use” (Res. 7-04A “To Deal with Concerns
Regarding Translations of Luther’s Small Catechism"). The
commission has completed this assignment and is herewith
making it available to the members of the Synod. See Appendix
A of this report for the commission’s “Critique of the 1960
Catechism.”
4. ACDC Summary
In March 1976, Dr. Preus forwarded the report of the
President’s Advisory Committee on Doctrine and Conciliation
(*ACDC Report’) to the CTCR with the request that the
commission evaluate the report and ‘“‘give every consideration
to the more specific proposals dealing with the issues which
were suggested by the moderate and conservative caucuses as
you coordinate the preparation of a series of Bible studies and
as you carry out your responsibilities for ongoing theological
education as called for in 1975 Resolution 3-01 ‘To Seek Unity.”
The commission has conducted a careful review of the
“ACDC Report” and has informed the President that this
atudy 38 useful in understanding the recent controversy in the
ynod.
5. Evaluation of Effectiveness Training
for Lutherans Program
The 1979 convention of the Synod referred Res. 4-22 (“‘To
Provide Future Funding for ‘Effectiveness Training for Lu-
therans’ [ETL] for Parents, Teachers, and Pastors’’) to the
CTCR “for doctrinal review of the theological philosophy of
ETL” (with the accompanying request that the BPE ‘‘ask the
Board of Directors for their approval before any moneys are
appropriated by the BPE.”). The commission has completed its
review of this program and in Appendix B of this report
presents its conclusions. The commission wishes to note
especially that the Board of Parish Education has made
available a very helpful volume titled You Can Have a Family
Where Everybody Wins, which, from a Christian perspective,
makes use of Scripture in approaching the whole area of
parent-child relationships.
B. Studies in Progress
1. The Ministry: Call, Ordination, and Installation—
Procedures and Nomenclature
The commission’s report on the “ministry” was undertaken
in September 1974 in response to requests from the Board of
Control of Concordia Seminary, St. Louis, the President of the
Synod, and the Board of Directors of the Northwest District. In
these requests the need was expressed for a theological study of
proper ‘‘call” nomenclature and procedures, particularly as
these apply to the varied offices of the church. Recognizing the
sensitive nature of this study and its implications for the
workers of the Synod, the commission discussed preliminary
drafts with agencies and personnel of the Synod most directly
involved in this matter (seminary faculties, representatives
from teacher-training colleges, synodical department heads,
the Council of Presidents, Synod’s legal counsel, Task Force I
on Constitution, Bylaws, and Structure). At the time of this
report the commission has not yet adopted this report.
2. Human Sexuality: A Theological Perspective
The need for a study on the issue of human sexuality was
expressed in a resolution placed before the 1973 convention of
the Synod. Since this resolution (2-34, “‘To Study the Issues of
Human Sexuality”) was not acted on because of lack of time, it
was referred to the Commission on Theology and Church
Relations by the Board of Directors. In response to this referral
the CTCR asked its Social Concerns Committee to study the
issue of human sexuality. The commission is completing its
work on this report and hopes to distribute it to the members of
the Synod later this year.
3. Communion Practices Report
The 1977 convention of the Synod, noting a 1971 request
that a report on Communion practices be prepared (1971 Res.
2-13), asked the CTCR, after consultation with the Commission
on Worship, “‘to complete the Communion Practices Report as
soon as possible, giving special attention to the matters of
Communion practices on synodical campuses and open and
close Communion” (Res. 3-12 “To Encourage CTCR to Com-
plete Its Report on Communion Practices”). The responses to
the CTCR’s “Bible Study on Fellowship” have indicated that
pastors and congregations consider Communion practices as
the primary area in their pastoral ministry where it is neces-
sary for them to apply the Biblical principles on fellowship.
Recognizing that the principles formulated in its report on
fellowship have important implications for Communion prac-
tices and that the members of the Synod are urgently seeking
guidance on this matter, the commission intends to give high
priority to the completion of this assignment in the coming
biennium.
4. Studies on the Scripture
During this biennium the commission has been continuing
its work on two studies related to the doctrine of Scripture. In
1973 the convention of the Synod adopted a resolution pre-
sented from the floor requesting the CTCR “to conduct an
intensive study of the doctrine of inerrancy and also of the
traditional interpretation of Genesis 1—3 and the interpreta-
tion of the Book of Jonah” (1973 Proceedings, p. 46). The
commission itself, noting 1975 Overture 3-126 (“To Publish
Theses and Antitheses on the Term ‘The Word of God,’” 1975
Workbook pp. 100—101), initiated a study of the ‘Word of God”
in 1975. Since questions pertaining to the inerrancy of Holy
Scripture and Scripture as Word of God continue to be matters
of discussion and debate in theological circles throughout the
world, the commission desires to complete these assignments
as soon as possible. The commission again wishes to call
attention to the reports which it has already prepared on the
doctrine of Scripture:
a. “A Lutheran Stance Toward Contemporary Biblical
Studies” (1966)
b. “The Witness of Jesus and Old Testament Authorship”
(1966)
c. ‘‘Answers to Questions Raised Regarding the Document
‘A Lutheran Stance Toward Contemporary Biblical
Studies” (1967)
d. ‘“‘A Response to Questions on ‘The Witness of Jesus and
Old Testament Authorship’”’(1968)
. “Seven Theses on Reformation Hermeneutics” (1969)
. “Gospel and Scripture” (1972)
‘A Comparative Study of Varying Contemporary
Approaches to Biblical Interpretation” (1973)
. “The Inspiration of Scripture” (1975)
TFT Ryo
5. Conscience and the Third Use of the Law
The commission’s study of conscience and the third use of
the Law was begun in response to a suggestion made by the
President of the Synod in his January 1975 report to the CTCR.
The commission’s Standing Committee on Biblical Studies has
been given responsibility for this assignment and has been
working toward the completion of its study on this issue.