Collection › LCMS Convention Workbook (St. Louis, Missouri) › 1981 · 54th Convention › Page 288

LCMS Convention Workbook St. Louis, Missouri — 1981, Page 288

front matter 1 front matter 2 front matter 3 front matter 4 front matter 5 front matter 6 front matter 7 front matter 8 front matter 9 front matter 10 front matter 11 front matter 12 front matter 13 front matter 14 front matter 15 front matter 16 Page 1 Page 2 Page 3 Page 4 Page 5 Page 6 Page 7 Page 8 Page 9 Page 10 Page 11 Page 12 Page 13 Page 14 Page 15 Page 16 Page 17 Page 18 Page 19 Page 20 Page 21 Page 22 Page 23 Page 24 Page 25 Page 26 Page 27 Page 28 Page 29 Page 30 Page 31 Page 32 Page 33 Page 34 Page 35 Page 36 Page 37 Page 38 Page 39 Page 40 Page 42 Page 43 Page 44 Page 45 Page 46 Page 47 Page 48 Page 49 Page 50 Page 51 Page 52 Page 53 Page 54 Page 55 Page 56 Page 57 Page 58 Page 59 Page 60 Page 61 Page 62 Page 63 Page 64 Page 65 Page 66 Page 67 Page 68 Page 69 Page 70 Page 71 Page 72 Page 73 Page 74 Page 75 Page 76 Page 77 Page 78 Page 79 Page 80 Page 81 Page 82 Page 83 Page 86 Page 87 Page 88 Page 89 Page 90 Page 91 Page 92 Page 93 Page 94 Page 95 Page 96 Page 97 Page 98 Page 99 Page 100 Page 101 Page 102 Page 103 Page 104 Page 105 Page 106 Page 107 Page 108 Page 109 Page 110 Page 111 Page 112 Page 113 Page 114 Page 115 Page 116 Page 117 Page 118 Page 119 Page 120 Page 121 Page 122 Page 123 Page 124 Page 125 Page 126 Page 127 Page 128 Page 129 Page 130 Page 131 Page 132 Page 133 Page 134 Page 135 Page 136 Page 137 Page 138 Page 139 Page 140 Page 141 Page 142 Page 143 Page 144 Page 145 Page 146 Page 147 Page 148 Page 149 Page 150 Page 151 Page 152 Page 153 Page 154 Page 155 Page 156 Page 157 Page 158 Page 159 Page 160 Page 161 Page 162 Page 163 Page 164 Page 165 Page 166 Page 167 Page 168 Page 169 Page 170 Page 171 Page 172 Page 173 Page 174 Page 175 Page 176 Page 177 Page 178 Page 179 Page 180 Page 181 Page 182 Page 185 Page 186 Page 187 Page 188 Page 189 Page 190 Page 191 Page 192 Page 193 Page 194 Page 195 Page 194 Page 195 Page 196 Page 197 Page 198 Page 199 Page 200 Page 201 Page 202 Sheet 216 Page 204 Page 205 Page 206 Page 207 Page 208 Page 209 Page 210 Page 211 Page 212 Page 213 Page 214 Page 215 Page 216 Page 217 Sheet 231 Sheet 232 Sheet 233 Sheet 234 Sheet 235 Sheet 236 Sheet 237 Page 6 Page 228 Page 229 Page 230 Page 231 Page 232 Page 233 Page 234 Page 235 Page 236 Page 237 Page 238 Page 239 Page 240 Page 241 Page 242 Page 243 Page 244 Page 245 Page 246 Page 247 Page 248 Page 249 Page 250 Page 251 Page 252 Page 253 Page 254 Page 255 Page 256 Page 257 Page 258 Page 259 Page 260 Page 261 Page 262 Page 263 Page 264 Page 265 Page 266 Page 267 Page 268 Page 269 Page 270 Page 271 Page 272 Page 273 Page 274 Page 276 Page 277 Page 278 Page 279 Page 280 Page 281 Page 282 Page 285 Page 286 Page 287 Page 288 Page 289 Page 290 Page 291 Page 292 Page 293 Page 294 Page 295 Page 296 Page 297 Page 298 Page 299 Page 300 Page 301 Page 302 Page 303 Page 304 Page 305 Page 306 Page 307 Page 308 Page 309 Page 310 Page 311 Page 312 Page 313 Page 314 Page 315 Page 316 Page 316 Sheet 326 Sheet 327 Sheet 328 Sheet 329 Sheet 330 Sheet 331 Sheet 332 Page 324 Sheet 334 Page 326 Sheet 336 Page 328 Sheet 338 Page 330 Sheet 340 Page 332 Sheet 342 Page 334 Sheet 344 Page 336 Sheet 346 Page 338 Sheet 348 Page 340 Sheet 350 Page 342 Sheet 352 Page 344 Sheet 354 Page 346 Sheet 356 Page 348 Sheet 358 Page 350 Sheet 360 Sheet 361 Sheet 362 Sheet 363 Sheet 364 Sheet 365 Sheet 366 Sheet 367 Sheet 368 Sheet 369 Sheet 370 Sheet 371 Sheet 372 Page 364 Sheet 374 Page 366 Sheet 376 Sheet 377 Sheet 378 Sheet 379 Sheet 380 Sheet 381 Sheet 382 Sheet 383 Sheet 384 Sheet 385 Sheet 386 Sheet 387 Page 379 Page 380 Page 381 Page 382 Page 383 Page 384 Page 385 Page 386 Page 387 Page 388 Page 389 Page 390 Page 391 Page 392 Page 393 Page 394 Sheet 404 Page 396 Page 397 Page 398 Sheet 408 Page 400 Page 401 Page 402 Page 403 Page 404 Page 405 Page 406 Page 407 Page 408 Page 409 Sheet 419 Sheet 420 Page 1 Page 414 Sheet 423 Page 416 Sheet 425 Page 432 Sheet 427 Sheet 428 Sheet 429 Sheet 430 Sheet 431 Sheet 432 Sheet 433 Sheet 434 Sheet 435 Sheet 436 Page 124 Sheet 438 Sheet 439 Sheet 440 Sheet 441 Sheet 442 Sheet 443 Sheet 444 Page 2 Sheet 446 Page 2 Page 3 Page 4 Page 5 Page 6 Page 2 Sheet 453 Sheet 454 Sheet 455

Scan: The Lutheran Church—Missouri Synod

⤓ Download page image (full resolution)

Transcription machine transcription, uncorrected

⤓ Download .txt · copy text

288 PARISH SERVICES

youth gathering could attend because of space limitations;
therefore be it

Resolved, That the Synod strongly support the 1983 youth
gathering being planned by encouraging young people to
attend.

Youth Voice in the Church:

WHEREAs, Young people are the church of today as well as
the church of tomorrow; and

WHEREAS, God has blessed young people with gifts in the
same way that He has blessed adults; and

WHEREAS, The church is God's people, youth and adults, in
ministry together; therefore be it

Resolved, That congregations, Districts, and the Synod be
strongly encouraged to involve young people in decision-
making processes in order that their voice can be heard and
that their gifts can be used for the glory and honor of Christ
Jesus; and be it further

Resolved, That the Board of Youth Ministry continue to
develop models and structures to enable parishes, Districts,
and the Synod to involve youth in meaningful ministries along
with adults.

Rich Bimler, Executive Secretary
Jack Baumgarn, Chairman

7-03

Report of Commission for Services
to the Mentally Retarded

Forward in Remembrance

The Comission for Services to the Mentally Retarded by any
other name will strive to move forward in service to persons
with mental retardation and their families. In remembrance of
things past the commission is motivated to move forward,
knowing where it has been in service to the church today while
keeping in touch with changes in its ministry since its begin-
nings in 1962.

When one contemplates its coincidental beginnings with
President Kennedy’s Panel on Mental Retardation in 1962, our
members can be impressed with the leadership shown by the
Synod in the vanguard of ministry and awareness of the plight
of retarded people wherever they resided, the low status of
education for school-age children, and the isolation of families.
Surely the church needed to speak out and to work to alleviate
the lack of services experienced by this invisible population.

The excellent booklet produced by commission members,
their handling of voluminous correspondence in those early
years, initiation of the publication quarterly, the Star, the
inception of the institute training sessions in various parts of
the country—these thoughtful beginnings served the church
well.

And not to be forgotten is the early planning and creation of
Sunday school Bible Lessons for Special Classes, produced
through the foresight of the Board for Parish Education follow-
ing the St. Paul convention in 1956. All of which brings us up to
the present and this 1981 convention.

Two significant events occurred since the last convention.
The first was an exploratory meeting requested by the commis-
sion and convened by the Lutheran Council in the U.S.A.
(LCUSA) Social Ministry Committee of the Division of Mission
and Ministry. For a long time the commission had felt that
there might be an opportunity, an opportune occasion, for
witnessing together intersynodically on this subject of mental
retardation. At that meeting it was determined that possibili-
ties existed for this cooperation and especially for coordination
because one of the factors that emerged was the need for better
and more complete communication—for us to know among
ourselves and among our own church bodies just what was
being done and what we could use for families with retardation.
The councilin 1980 approved such a body—the Commission on
Ministry to Handicapped Persons.

The second event of the year was the decision by various
church boards, particularly the Board of Social Ministry and
World Relief and the commission, along with the Synod-
affiliated residential centers, that it might be timely to calla

Synodwide conference on mental retardation. The initial meet-
ing, which called together various representatives from the
Synod’s agencies, parish pastors, and lay people, as well as
agency and residential-facility people, was really a planning
meeting prior to the actual conference. It was found that a
conference would be beneficial and that it should be inter-
synodical so that all Lutherans would be speaking together
about this critical area of ministry. The Lutheran Social
Services System (L/S3) in Minneapolis, Minn., with the help of
several others in the planning group was able to obtain a grant
from the members of the Aid Association for Lutherans for
such a gathering. It was held in May 1980 in Madison, Wis.
About 150 representatives were invited, principally from the
three large synods, but actually there were representatives
from six Lutheran synods present.

The major finding to come out of that meeting was the call
for more church involvement and awareness regarding the
entire subject of mental retardation. Another decision included
the new commission, which was brought about by LCUSA
approval. A third finding was the need for additional teaching
materials and coordination and cooperation from our various
elementary, secondary, and higher education agencies.

During this interim between conventions, it was learned
that the curriculum for religious instruction that had been
provided by the National Council of Churches was drawn off
the market and would no longer be available. Once again our
Synod finds itself as the only provider of a curriculum for
children with mental retardation and another for those who
are preparing forconfirmation-Communion. Reference is made
to Series III and to Series II, respectively, of Bible Lessons for
Special Classes, available from Concordia Publishing House.
An ongoing responsibility, therefore, of the Committee of
Religious Education of the Mentally Retarded, which is
appointed by the commission, is to design new curriculum
material and to seek the funding for the production of that
material. It appears that it’s time for our church itself, through
the commission's budget, to provide funding for this purpose.
Such funding then would be adjunct financing of curriculum
provided the church by the Board of Parish Education.

The Parish Advocacy Program, which had been an ongoing
project of the commission during the past three years or more,
has now ended in the Kansas and Michigan Districts. The
parish advocates appointed and trained and are now active in
their parishes and are attempting to bring the families with
retardation back into the fold of the parish to be participants in
parish activities as they should be. The key to the design for the
project is that these families tend to stay away from church
and thus become part of the ‘‘backdoor losses” about which our
church is so concerned. Requests to extend the project to two
additional Districts (Central Illinois and Nebraska) has been
funded. Three additional Districts have shown an interest in
this type of ministry. A new “How To” booklet is now available
to those who are interested.

The commission continues to be represented at the Lutheran
Women’s Missionary League or the Lutheran Laymen’s
League conventions. During this period also, each year, infor-
mation and material is provided to graduating seminarians
through the “Synod Resources Days’ conducted on each
seminary campus.

Visits by the executive secretary to the various residential
facilities/campuses have continued. These visitations are
important for the commission, enabling it, through its publica-
tion the Star and by its correspondence, to reassure the
synodical membership that programs and activities are God
pleasing for the residents living there and that continuing
cooperation will goon. Reference is made to Bethesda Lutheran
Home, Good Shepherd Lutheran Home of the West, Good
Samaritan Lutheran Home in Cypress, Tex., and Cedar Lake
Lodge in La Grange, Ky. Another aspect of the services
provided by these homes is that they are branching out into
group-home living arrangements for the more able residents of
those homes. Such decentralization is good for these people as
they grow in independence within the community and in
service to the community. They might become members of the
Lutheran Church near their group home and/or community
facility.

The Star, with its open mailing list, which includes all of our
pastors, continues to be published and to serve the church by