Collection › LCMS Convention Workbook (St. Louis, Missouri) › 1981 · 54th Convention › Page 288
LCMS Convention Workbook St. Louis, Missouri — 1981, Page 288
front matter 1
front matter 2
front matter 3
front matter 4
front matter 5
front matter 6
front matter 7
front matter 8
front matter 9
front matter 10
front matter 11
front matter 12
front matter 13
front matter 14
front matter 15
front matter 16
Page 1
Page 2
Page 3
Page 4
Page 5
Page 6
Page 7
Page 8
Page 9
Page 10
Page 11
Page 12
Page 13
Page 14
Page 15
Page 16
Page 17
Page 18
Page 19
Page 20
Page 21
Page 22
Page 23
Page 24
Page 25
Page 26
Page 27
Page 28
Page 29
Page 30
Page 31
Page 32
Page 33
Page 34
Page 35
Page 36
Page 37
Page 38
Page 39
Page 40
Page 42
Page 43
Page 44
Page 45
Page 46
Page 47
Page 48
Page 49
Page 50
Page 51
Page 52
Page 53
Page 54
Page 55
Page 56
Page 57
Page 58
Page 59
Page 60
Page 61
Page 62
Page 63
Page 64
Page 65
Page 66
Page 67
Page 68
Page 69
Page 70
Page 71
Page 72
Page 73
Page 74
Page 75
Page 76
Page 77
Page 78
Page 79
Page 80
Page 81
Page 82
Page 83
Page 86
Page 87
Page 88
Page 89
Page 90
Page 91
Page 92
Page 93
Page 94
Page 95
Page 96
Page 97
Page 98
Page 99
Page 100
Page 101
Page 102
Page 103
Page 104
Page 105
Page 106
Page 107
Page 108
Page 109
Page 110
Page 111
Page 112
Page 113
Page 114
Page 115
Page 116
Page 117
Page 118
Page 119
Page 120
Page 121
Page 122
Page 123
Page 124
Page 125
Page 126
Page 127
Page 128
Page 129
Page 130
Page 131
Page 132
Page 133
Page 134
Page 135
Page 136
Page 137
Page 138
Page 139
Page 140
Page 141
Page 142
Page 143
Page 144
Page 145
Page 146
Page 147
Page 148
Page 149
Page 150
Page 151
Page 152
Page 153
Page 154
Page 155
Page 156
Page 157
Page 158
Page 159
Page 160
Page 161
Page 162
Page 163
Page 164
Page 165
Page 166
Page 167
Page 168
Page 169
Page 170
Page 171
Page 172
Page 173
Page 174
Page 175
Page 176
Page 177
Page 178
Page 179
Page 180
Page 181
Page 182
Page 185
Page 186
Page 187
Page 188
Page 189
Page 190
Page 191
Page 192
Page 193
Page 194
Page 195
Page 194
Page 195
Page 196
Page 197
Page 198
Page 199
Page 200
Page 201
Page 202
Sheet 216
Page 204
Page 205
Page 206
Page 207
Page 208
Page 209
Page 210
Page 211
Page 212
Page 213
Page 214
Page 215
Page 216
Page 217
Sheet 231
Sheet 232
Sheet 233
Sheet 234
Sheet 235
Sheet 236
Sheet 237
Page 6
Page 228
Page 229
Page 230
Page 231
Page 232
Page 233
Page 234
Page 235
Page 236
Page 237
Page 238
Page 239
Page 240
Page 241
Page 242
Page 243
Page 244
Page 245
Page 246
Page 247
Page 248
Page 249
Page 250
Page 251
Page 252
Page 253
Page 254
Page 255
Page 256
Page 257
Page 258
Page 259
Page 260
Page 261
Page 262
Page 263
Page 264
Page 265
Page 266
Page 267
Page 268
Page 269
Page 270
Page 271
Page 272
Page 273
Page 274
Page 276
Page 277
Page 278
Page 279
Page 280
Page 281
Page 282
Page 285
Page 286
Page 287
Page 288
Page 289
Page 290
Page 291
Page 292
Page 293
Page 294
Page 295
Page 296
Page 297
Page 298
Page 299
Page 300
Page 301
Page 302
Page 303
Page 304
Page 305
Page 306
Page 307
Page 308
Page 309
Page 310
Page 311
Page 312
Page 313
Page 314
Page 315
Page 316
Page 316
Sheet 326
Sheet 327
Sheet 328
Sheet 329
Sheet 330
Sheet 331
Sheet 332
Page 324
Sheet 334
Page 326
Sheet 336
Page 328
Sheet 338
Page 330
Sheet 340
Page 332
Sheet 342
Page 334
Sheet 344
Page 336
Sheet 346
Page 338
Sheet 348
Page 340
Sheet 350
Page 342
Sheet 352
Page 344
Sheet 354
Page 346
Sheet 356
Page 348
Sheet 358
Page 350
Sheet 360
Sheet 361
Sheet 362
Sheet 363
Sheet 364
Sheet 365
Sheet 366
Sheet 367
Sheet 368
Sheet 369
Sheet 370
Sheet 371
Sheet 372
Page 364
Sheet 374
Page 366
Sheet 376
Sheet 377
Sheet 378
Sheet 379
Sheet 380
Sheet 381
Sheet 382
Sheet 383
Sheet 384
Sheet 385
Sheet 386
Sheet 387
Page 379
Page 380
Page 381
Page 382
Page 383
Page 384
Page 385
Page 386
Page 387
Page 388
Page 389
Page 390
Page 391
Page 392
Page 393
Page 394
Sheet 404
Page 396
Page 397
Page 398
Sheet 408
Page 400
Page 401
Page 402
Page 403
Page 404
Page 405
Page 406
Page 407
Page 408
Page 409
Sheet 419
Sheet 420
Page 1
Page 414
Sheet 423
Page 416
Sheet 425
Page 432
Sheet 427
Sheet 428
Sheet 429
Sheet 430
Sheet 431
Sheet 432
Sheet 433
Sheet 434
Sheet 435
Sheet 436
Page 124
Sheet 438
Sheet 439
Sheet 440
Sheet 441
Sheet 442
Sheet 443
Sheet 444
Page 2
Sheet 446
Page 2
Page 3
Page 4
Page 5
Page 6
Page 2
Sheet 453
Sheet 454
Sheet 455
Scan: The Lutheran Church—Missouri Synod
⤓ Download page image (full resolution)
Transcription machine transcription, uncorrected
288 PARISH SERVICES
youth gathering could attend because of space limitations;
therefore be it
Resolved, That the Synod strongly support the 1983 youth
gathering being planned by encouraging young people to
attend.
Youth Voice in the Church:
WHEREAs, Young people are the church of today as well as
the church of tomorrow; and
WHEREAS, God has blessed young people with gifts in the
same way that He has blessed adults; and
WHEREAS, The church is God's people, youth and adults, in
ministry together; therefore be it
Resolved, That congregations, Districts, and the Synod be
strongly encouraged to involve young people in decision-
making processes in order that their voice can be heard and
that their gifts can be used for the glory and honor of Christ
Jesus; and be it further
Resolved, That the Board of Youth Ministry continue to
develop models and structures to enable parishes, Districts,
and the Synod to involve youth in meaningful ministries along
with adults.
Rich Bimler, Executive Secretary
Jack Baumgarn, Chairman
7-03
Report of Commission for Services
to the Mentally Retarded
Forward in Remembrance
The Comission for Services to the Mentally Retarded by any
other name will strive to move forward in service to persons
with mental retardation and their families. In remembrance of
things past the commission is motivated to move forward,
knowing where it has been in service to the church today while
keeping in touch with changes in its ministry since its begin-
nings in 1962.
When one contemplates its coincidental beginnings with
President Kennedy’s Panel on Mental Retardation in 1962, our
members can be impressed with the leadership shown by the
Synod in the vanguard of ministry and awareness of the plight
of retarded people wherever they resided, the low status of
education for school-age children, and the isolation of families.
Surely the church needed to speak out and to work to alleviate
the lack of services experienced by this invisible population.
The excellent booklet produced by commission members,
their handling of voluminous correspondence in those early
years, initiation of the publication quarterly, the Star, the
inception of the institute training sessions in various parts of
the country—these thoughtful beginnings served the church
well.
And not to be forgotten is the early planning and creation of
Sunday school Bible Lessons for Special Classes, produced
through the foresight of the Board for Parish Education follow-
ing the St. Paul convention in 1956. All of which brings us up to
the present and this 1981 convention.
Two significant events occurred since the last convention.
The first was an exploratory meeting requested by the commis-
sion and convened by the Lutheran Council in the U.S.A.
(LCUSA) Social Ministry Committee of the Division of Mission
and Ministry. For a long time the commission had felt that
there might be an opportunity, an opportune occasion, for
witnessing together intersynodically on this subject of mental
retardation. At that meeting it was determined that possibili-
ties existed for this cooperation and especially for coordination
because one of the factors that emerged was the need for better
and more complete communication—for us to know among
ourselves and among our own church bodies just what was
being done and what we could use for families with retardation.
The councilin 1980 approved such a body—the Commission on
Ministry to Handicapped Persons.
The second event of the year was the decision by various
church boards, particularly the Board of Social Ministry and
World Relief and the commission, along with the Synod-
affiliated residential centers, that it might be timely to calla
Synodwide conference on mental retardation. The initial meet-
ing, which called together various representatives from the
Synod’s agencies, parish pastors, and lay people, as well as
agency and residential-facility people, was really a planning
meeting prior to the actual conference. It was found that a
conference would be beneficial and that it should be inter-
synodical so that all Lutherans would be speaking together
about this critical area of ministry. The Lutheran Social
Services System (L/S3) in Minneapolis, Minn., with the help of
several others in the planning group was able to obtain a grant
from the members of the Aid Association for Lutherans for
such a gathering. It was held in May 1980 in Madison, Wis.
About 150 representatives were invited, principally from the
three large synods, but actually there were representatives
from six Lutheran synods present.
The major finding to come out of that meeting was the call
for more church involvement and awareness regarding the
entire subject of mental retardation. Another decision included
the new commission, which was brought about by LCUSA
approval. A third finding was the need for additional teaching
materials and coordination and cooperation from our various
elementary, secondary, and higher education agencies.
During this interim between conventions, it was learned
that the curriculum for religious instruction that had been
provided by the National Council of Churches was drawn off
the market and would no longer be available. Once again our
Synod finds itself as the only provider of a curriculum for
children with mental retardation and another for those who
are preparing forconfirmation-Communion. Reference is made
to Series III and to Series II, respectively, of Bible Lessons for
Special Classes, available from Concordia Publishing House.
An ongoing responsibility, therefore, of the Committee of
Religious Education of the Mentally Retarded, which is
appointed by the commission, is to design new curriculum
material and to seek the funding for the production of that
material. It appears that it’s time for our church itself, through
the commission's budget, to provide funding for this purpose.
Such funding then would be adjunct financing of curriculum
provided the church by the Board of Parish Education.
The Parish Advocacy Program, which had been an ongoing
project of the commission during the past three years or more,
has now ended in the Kansas and Michigan Districts. The
parish advocates appointed and trained and are now active in
their parishes and are attempting to bring the families with
retardation back into the fold of the parish to be participants in
parish activities as they should be. The key to the design for the
project is that these families tend to stay away from church
and thus become part of the ‘‘backdoor losses” about which our
church is so concerned. Requests to extend the project to two
additional Districts (Central Illinois and Nebraska) has been
funded. Three additional Districts have shown an interest in
this type of ministry. A new “How To” booklet is now available
to those who are interested.
The commission continues to be represented at the Lutheran
Women’s Missionary League or the Lutheran Laymen’s
League conventions. During this period also, each year, infor-
mation and material is provided to graduating seminarians
through the “Synod Resources Days’ conducted on each
seminary campus.
Visits by the executive secretary to the various residential
facilities/campuses have continued. These visitations are
important for the commission, enabling it, through its publica-
tion the Star and by its correspondence, to reassure the
synodical membership that programs and activities are God
pleasing for the residents living there and that continuing
cooperation will goon. Reference is made to Bethesda Lutheran
Home, Good Shepherd Lutheran Home of the West, Good
Samaritan Lutheran Home in Cypress, Tex., and Cedar Lake
Lodge in La Grange, Ky. Another aspect of the services
provided by these homes is that they are branching out into
group-home living arrangements for the more able residents of
those homes. Such decentralization is good for these people as
they grow in independence within the community and in
service to the community. They might become members of the
Lutheran Church near their group home and/or community
facility.
The Star, with its open mailing list, which includes all of our
pastors, continues to be published and to serve the church by