Collection › LCMS Convention Workbook (St. Louis, Missouri) › 2010 · 64th Convention, Houston › Page 196
LCMS Convention Workbook St. Louis, Missouri — 2010, Page 196
front matter 1
front matter 2
front matter 3
front matter 4
front matter 5
front matter 6
front matter 7
front matter 8
front matter 9
front matter 10
front matter 11
front matter 12
front matter 13
front matter 14
front matter 15
front matter 16
front matter 17
front matter 18
front matter 19
front matter 20
Page 1
Page 2
Page 3
Page 4
Page 5
Page 6
Page 7
Page 8
Page 9
Page 10
Page 11
Page 12
Page 13
Page 14
Page 15
Page 16
Page 17
Page 18
Page 19
Page 20
Page 21
Page 22
Page 23
Page 24
Page 25
Page 26
Page 27
Page 28
Page 29
Page 30
Page 31
Page 32
Page 33
Page 34
Page 35
Page 36
Page 37
Page 38
Page 39
Page 40
Page 41
Page 42
Page 43
Page 44
Page 45
Page 46
Page 47
Page 48
Page 49
Page 50
Page 51
Page 52
Page 53
Page 54
Page 55
Page 56
Page 57
Page 58
Page 59
Page 60
Page 61
Page 62
Page 63
Page 64
Page 65
Page 66
Page 67
Page 68
Page 69
Page 70
Page 71
Page 72
Page 73
Page 74
Page 75
Page 76
Page 77
Page 78
Page 79
Page 80
Page 81
Page 82
Page 83
Page 84
Page 85
Page 86
Page 87
Page 88
Page 89
Page 90
Page 91
Page 92
Page 93
Page 94
Page 95
Page 96
Page 97
Page 98
Page 99
Page 100
Page 101
Page 102
Page 103
Page 104
Page 105
Page 106
Page 107
Page 108
Page 109
Page 110
Page 111
Page 112
Page 113
Page 114
Page 115
Page 116
Page 117
Page 118
Page 119
Page 120
Page 121
Page 122
Page 123
Page 124
Page 125
Page 126
Page 127
Page 128
Page 129
Page 130
Page 131
Page 132
Page 133
Page 134
Page 135
Page 136
Page 137
Page 138
Page 139
Page 140
Page 141
Page 142
Page 143
Page 144
Page 145
Page 146
Page 147
Page 148
Page 149
Page 150
Page 151
Page 152
Page 153
Page 154
Page 155
Page 156
Page 157
Page 158
Page 159
Page 160
Page 161
Page 162
Page 163
Page 164
Page 165
Page 166
Page 167
Page 168
Page 169
Page 170
Page 171
Page 172
Page 173
Page 174
Page 175
Page 176
Page 177
Page 178
Page 179
Page 180
Page 181
Page 182
Page 183
Page 184
Page 185
Page 186
Page 187
Page 188
Page 189
Page 190
Page 191
Page 192
Page 193
Page 194
Page 195
Page 196
Page 197
Page 198
Page 199
Page 200
Page 201
Page 202
Page 203
Page 204
Page 205
Page 206
Page 207
Page 208
Page 209
Page 210
Page 211
Page 212
Page 213
Page 214
Page 215
Page 216
Page 217
Page 218
Page 219
Page 220
Page 221
Page 222
Page 223
Page 224
Page 225
Page 226
Page 227
Page 228
Page 229
Page 230
Page 231
Page 232
Page 233
Page 234
Page 235
Page 236
Page 237
Page 238
Page 239
Page 240
Page 241
Page 242
Page 243
Page 244
Page 245
Page 246
Page 247
Page 248
Page 249
Page 250
Page 251
Page 252
Page 253
Page 254
Page 255
Page 256
Page 257
Page 258
Page 259
Page 260
Page 261
Page 262
Page 263
Page 264
Page 265
Page 266
Page 267
Page 268
Page 269
Page 270
Page 271
Page 272
Page 273
Page 274
Page 275
Page 276
Page 277
Page 278
Page 279
Page 280
Page 281
Page 282
Page 283
Page 284
Page 285
Page 286
Page 287
Page 288
Page 289
Page 290
Page 291
Page 292
Page 293
Page 294
Page 295
Page 296
Page 297
Page 298
Page 299
Page 300
Page 301
Page 302
Page 303
Page 304
Page 305
Page 306
Page 307
Page 308
Page 309
Page 310
Page 311
Page 312
Page 313
Page 314
Page 315
Page 316
Page 317
Page 318
Page 319
Page 320
Page 321
Page 322
Page 323
Page 324
Page 325
Page 326
Page 327
Page 328
Page 329
Page 330
Page 331
Page 332
Page 333
Page 334
Scan: The Lutheran Church—Missouri Synod
⤓ Download page image (full resolution)
Transcription machine transcription, uncorrected
196
Seminary and University Education
5-22
To Direct President to Clarify Teaching of Six-Day
Creation in Synod Schools
Whereas, Unconditional subscription to the authority of the Old
and New Testaments requires that we confess and teach a 6-day creation; and
Whereas, Much of Christendom has fallen into the error of accommodating the clear teachings of Scripture with the lie of evolution; and
Whereas, The Synod owes students the best education it can
provide, including the ability to recognize and critically analyze the
faulty and non-scientific assumptions of evolutionary theory; and
Whereas, Any failure in the Synod’s schools regarding the truth
of a 6-day creation and the error of evolutionary theory will directly
impact the faith and confession of elementary and high school students in LCMS parochial schools; and
Whereas, The Synod has previously in convention stated that it
will review the teaching of creation and evolution in its colleges, universities, and seminaries; therefore be it
Resolved, That the Montana District of the LCMS in convention memorialize the 2010 Synod convention to direct the President
of the Synod to take direct and definite action to clarify what is and
what is not being taught regarding evolutionary theory as fact in the
Concordia University System during the next triennium and to report
findings to the 2013 convention; and be it further
Resolved, That the Montana District of the LCMS memorialize
the Synod make good use of ecclesiastical supervision.
Montana District
5-23
To Oppose Evolution and Commend Creation
Research Society and Creation Museum
Whereas, During 2009, the “Year of Darwin,” most major
Protestant denominations, the Roman Catholic Church, and the
Orthodox Church did not oppose the antiscriptural evolutionary theories held by Charles Darwin; and
Whereas, More than 11,000 clergymen, including over 1,400
Lutheran clergy, signed a statement supporting the views of Charles
Darwin and praising him1; and
Whereas, the 2,112-page Lutheran Study Bible, published by the
Evangelical Lutheran Church in America in 2009, supports evolution (p. 50)2; and
Whereas, Storms over Genesis—Biblical Battleground in
America’s Wars of Religion, published by ELCA’s Fortress Press in
2007, promotes evolution and says that the term “myth” is appropriate for the Genesis account of creation;3 and
Whereas, The ELCA evolutionist who wrote Storms over Genesis
writes, “Our analysis of Genesis in this chapter would be acceptable in
the mainline Protestant denominations—Methodist, ELCA Lutheran,
Presbyterian, Episcopal, American Baptist, United Church of Christ,
and others” (pp. 21–22); and
Whereas, The theory of evolution, the notion that man and the
universe gradually evolved from primary substances, is taught as fact
in many schools, publications, and churches; and
Whereas, The Creation Research Society, an organization of
several hundred scientists with graduate degrees in various fields of
science, says in its statement of belief:
1. The Bible is the written Word of God and because it is inspired
throughout, all its assertions are historically and scientifically
true in all the original autographs. To the student of nature
this means that the account of origins in Genesis is a factual
presentation of simple historical truths.
2. All basic types of living things, including man, were made by
direct creative acts of God during the creation week described
in Genesis. Whatever biological changes have occurred since
the creation week have accomplished only changes within the
original created kinds.
3. The great Flood described in Genesis, commonly referred to
as the Noachian Flood, was a historic event worldwide in its
extent and effect.
4. We are an organization of Christian men of science who
accept Jesus Christ as our Lord and Savior. The account of the
special creation of Adam and Eve as one man and woman and
their subsequent fall into sin is the basis for our belief in the
necessity of a Savior for all mankind. Therefore, salvation can
come only through accepting Jesus Christ as our Savior.
and
Whereas, Such members of LCMS congregations as Dr. Walter
Larmmerts, Dr. John Klotz, Dr. Paul Zimmerman, Dr. David
Kaufmann, Dr. Wilbert Rusch, Dr. John Grebe, Dr. Raymond
Surburg, and others were either instrumental in the formation of this
statement of belief of the Creation Research Society or have expressed
agreement with it; and
Whereas, In Search of the Genesis World—Debunking the
Evolution Myth, by Erich A. Von Fange and published by Concordia
Publishing House in 2006, ably defends the scriptural account of creation and opposes evolution; and
Whereas, The Creation Museum of Answers in Genesis, in
Petersburg, Kentucky, marvelously defends the scriptural account of
creation and opposes evolution as antiscriptural and unscientific; and
Whereas, The Creation Museum, which has an exhibit on Martin
Luther, defends Luther’s position on creation (as expressed in his
eight volumes on Genesis in the 55-volume American Edition of
Luther’s Works) in the library of Answers in Genesis; and
Whereas, Dr. David Menton, who was a teacher of the year at
Washington University, St. Louis, MO, and is a key speaker on the
staff of Answers in Genesis, is an orthodox Lutheran;4 and
Whereas, Almost all major Protestant denominations and the
Roman Catholic Church allow their clergymen and professors to
promote evolution, and none have expressed agreement with the statement of belief of the Creation Research Society; and
Whereas, The Bible (Matt. 19:4; Gen. 1:24–27; Ex. 20:11; Ps.
33:6, 9; Rom. 5:12–17; 1 Cor. 15:39) affirms the doctrine of creation
and the historicity of the Genesis account of creation and leaves no
room for evolution; and
Whereas, The LCMS “Brief Statement” declares:
Of Creation
We teach that God has created heaven and earth, and that in
the manner and in the space of time recorded in the Holy
Scriptures, especially Gen. 1 and 2, namely by His almighty
creative word, and in six days. We reject every doctrine which
denies or limits the work of creation as taught in Scripture. In
our days it is denied or limited by those who assert, ostensibly
in deference to science, that the world came into existence
through a process of evolution; that is, that it has, in immense
periods of time, developed more or less out of itself. Since
no man was present when it pleased God to create the world,
we must look for a reliable account of creation to God’s own
record, found in God’s own book, the Bible. We accept God’s
own record with full confidence and confess with Luther’s
Catechism: “I believe that God has made me and all creatures”;
therefore be it
2010 Convention Workbook
2010 Convention.indb 196
4/15/10 2:39 PM