Collection › LCMS Convention Workbook (St. Louis, Missouri) › 2010 · 64th Convention, Houston › Page 240
LCMS Convention Workbook St. Louis, Missouri — 2010, Page 240
front matter 1
front matter 2
front matter 3
front matter 4
front matter 5
front matter 6
front matter 7
front matter 8
front matter 9
front matter 10
front matter 11
front matter 12
front matter 13
front matter 14
front matter 15
front matter 16
front matter 17
front matter 18
front matter 19
front matter 20
Page 1
Page 2
Page 3
Page 4
Page 5
Page 6
Page 7
Page 8
Page 9
Page 10
Page 11
Page 12
Page 13
Page 14
Page 15
Page 16
Page 17
Page 18
Page 19
Page 20
Page 21
Page 22
Page 23
Page 24
Page 25
Page 26
Page 27
Page 28
Page 29
Page 30
Page 31
Page 32
Page 33
Page 34
Page 35
Page 36
Page 37
Page 38
Page 39
Page 40
Page 41
Page 42
Page 43
Page 44
Page 45
Page 46
Page 47
Page 48
Page 49
Page 50
Page 51
Page 52
Page 53
Page 54
Page 55
Page 56
Page 57
Page 58
Page 59
Page 60
Page 61
Page 62
Page 63
Page 64
Page 65
Page 66
Page 67
Page 68
Page 69
Page 70
Page 71
Page 72
Page 73
Page 74
Page 75
Page 76
Page 77
Page 78
Page 79
Page 80
Page 81
Page 82
Page 83
Page 84
Page 85
Page 86
Page 87
Page 88
Page 89
Page 90
Page 91
Page 92
Page 93
Page 94
Page 95
Page 96
Page 97
Page 98
Page 99
Page 100
Page 101
Page 102
Page 103
Page 104
Page 105
Page 106
Page 107
Page 108
Page 109
Page 110
Page 111
Page 112
Page 113
Page 114
Page 115
Page 116
Page 117
Page 118
Page 119
Page 120
Page 121
Page 122
Page 123
Page 124
Page 125
Page 126
Page 127
Page 128
Page 129
Page 130
Page 131
Page 132
Page 133
Page 134
Page 135
Page 136
Page 137
Page 138
Page 139
Page 140
Page 141
Page 142
Page 143
Page 144
Page 145
Page 146
Page 147
Page 148
Page 149
Page 150
Page 151
Page 152
Page 153
Page 154
Page 155
Page 156
Page 157
Page 158
Page 159
Page 160
Page 161
Page 162
Page 163
Page 164
Page 165
Page 166
Page 167
Page 168
Page 169
Page 170
Page 171
Page 172
Page 173
Page 174
Page 175
Page 176
Page 177
Page 178
Page 179
Page 180
Page 181
Page 182
Page 183
Page 184
Page 185
Page 186
Page 187
Page 188
Page 189
Page 190
Page 191
Page 192
Page 193
Page 194
Page 195
Page 196
Page 197
Page 198
Page 199
Page 200
Page 201
Page 202
Page 203
Page 204
Page 205
Page 206
Page 207
Page 208
Page 209
Page 210
Page 211
Page 212
Page 213
Page 214
Page 215
Page 216
Page 217
Page 218
Page 219
Page 220
Page 221
Page 222
Page 223
Page 224
Page 225
Page 226
Page 227
Page 228
Page 229
Page 230
Page 231
Page 232
Page 233
Page 234
Page 235
Page 236
Page 237
Page 238
Page 239
Page 240
Page 241
Page 242
Page 243
Page 244
Page 245
Page 246
Page 247
Page 248
Page 249
Page 250
Page 251
Page 252
Page 253
Page 254
Page 255
Page 256
Page 257
Page 258
Page 259
Page 260
Page 261
Page 262
Page 263
Page 264
Page 265
Page 266
Page 267
Page 268
Page 269
Page 270
Page 271
Page 272
Page 273
Page 274
Page 275
Page 276
Page 277
Page 278
Page 279
Page 280
Page 281
Page 282
Page 283
Page 284
Page 285
Page 286
Page 287
Page 288
Page 289
Page 290
Page 291
Page 292
Page 293
Page 294
Page 295
Page 296
Page 297
Page 298
Page 299
Page 300
Page 301
Page 302
Page 303
Page 304
Page 305
Page 306
Page 307
Page 308
Page 309
Page 310
Page 311
Page 312
Page 313
Page 314
Page 315
Page 316
Page 317
Page 318
Page 319
Page 320
Page 321
Page 322
Page 323
Page 324
Page 325
Page 326
Page 327
Page 328
Page 329
Page 330
Page 331
Page 332
Page 333
Page 334
Scan: The Lutheran Church—Missouri Synod
⤓ Download page image (full resolution)
Transcription machine transcription, uncorrected
240
Synod Structure and Governance
Resolved, That the English District encourage the Synod to adopt
a policy that if dissolution of the English District ever becomes a viable course of action, the idea must originate from within the English
District itself at such time as a majority of members of the English
District deem its mission to have been fulfilled.
English District
8-53
To Retain Present District Structure
Whereas, The Blue Ribbon Task Force on Synod Structure and
Governance (BRTFSSG) has raised the possibility of significantly
increasing or significantly decreasing the number of districts; and
Whereas, The BRTFSSG has presented little detailed analysis of
the strong points and the weak points of each suggestion; and
Whereas, The geographical diversity of the Synod makes establishing a single pattern which would function best everywhere
impossible; and
Whereas, The suggestion to do this restructuring has not come
from the congregations of the districts themselves; therefore be it
Resolved, That the Southern Illinois District in convention request
the BRTFSSG to leave the current number of districts as they are;
and be it further
Resolved, That if the BRTFSSG is convinced that a change to district structure is necessary, that it present a detailed analysis of the
strong and weak points of the proposed change.
Southern Illinois District
8-54
To Retain Current District Alignment
Whereas, There are concerns at the national level of our Synod
about continued viability of smaller districts; and
Whereas, The Wyoming District rejoices that there is fundamental
agreement in matters of doctrine and practice among the congregations and pastors of the district; and
Whereas, Any realignment or amalgamation of districts that
would divide or dissolve the Wyoming District would hurt the already
existing unity we share; and
Whereas, The first objective of the Synod is to “Conserve and
promote the unity of the true faith (Eph. 4:3–6; 1 Cor. 1:10), work
through its official structure toward fellowship with other Christian
church bodies, and provide a united defense against schism, sectarianism (Rom. 16:17), and heresy” (Constitution, Art. III 1); and
Whereas, The Wyoming District as it now exists is fulfilling this
objective; therefore be it
Resolved, That the congregations of the Wyoming District
gathered in convention encourage the Synod to retain the current
alignment of the Wyoming District.
Wyoming District
8-55
To Retain or Increase Number of Districts
Whereas, The wisdom of our world is impressed with numbers
and size, while often denigrating that which is small and insignificant
in worldly eyes as being less “effective” or “efficient”; and
Whereas, We learn from the wisdom of our world that things that
are bigger are by nature more efficient and effective, so that worldly
wisdom teaches us of such things as “efficiencies of scale” and “economies of size”; and
Whereas, The Blue Ribbon Task Force on Synod Structure and
Governance (BRTFSSG) speaks of our current district configuration
as being “a problem or deficiency” (slide 63 of the presentation format, “Walking Together”); and
Whereas, The BRTFSSG recommends that we “configure districts that are most effectively and efficiently sized,” even reducing
to 15 to 25 districts (slides 62–64); yet
Whereas, Even in the world, large size does not necessarily lead
to any effectiveness or efficiency but more often to ineffectiveness
and deficiency, so that anyone can see how, for instance, China or
Russia (the larger parties) are not more effective and efficient than,
say, Taiwan or Germany (the smaller parties), or how Citigroup or
AIG (the larger) are not more effective and efficient than, say, the
little bank in town that keeps personal contact with its investors; and
Whereas, Not only in the world but also in church history large
size does not necessarily lead to any effectiveness or efficiency, so
that anyone can see how, for instance, Egypt or Babylon (the larger
parties) are not more effective and efficient than, say, Israel, or how
the large church of the Pope in Rome is not more effective and efficient than a small church in, say, Wittenberg, even as something
greater would not be expected to come out of Greece than, say, out
of Nazareth; and
Whereas, Making districts larger and more able to support larger
bureaucracies will not necessarily make our districts more effective
or efficient or conducive than beneficial and supportive personal conversation among district pastors and congregations and with district
servants; and
Whereas, The Church rejoices in the promise of the Gospel and
in the gifts brought to us “through the mutual conversation and consolation of brethren” (Smalcald Articles, IV), so that personal contact
and conversation is beneficial and should be encouraged in our districts; therefore be it
Resolved, That we retain at least the current amount of districts;
and be it further
Resolved, That we increase the amount of districts in order to be
of better support and foster personal (as opposed to less personal
and more bureaucratic) conversations of support and encouragement
among our pastors, congregations, and district servants, rejoicing in
“the mutual conversation and consolation of brethren.”
North and South Sandia Circuit Forum
Rocky Mountain District
8-56
To Amend Bylaws re Formation of Circuits
Whereas, Bylaw 3.1.2 allows the Synod President the authority to grant exceptions to circuits for electing delegates to national
Synod conventions; and
Whereas, The irregularity for circuit exceptions has caused problems that have resulted in suspicion, mistrust, and even lawsuits; and
Whereas, Such problems besmirch the reputation of the church
and are unfitting for the Body of Christ; and
Whereas, It would be of great benefit to the Synod and her
President if there were further guidance and more specific regulations regarding the formation of circuits; therefore be it
Resolved, That Bylaws 3.1.2 (b) , 5.1.1 (a) and 5.1.1 (b) all be
eliminated; and be it further
Resolved, That Bylaw 3.1.2 (a) be changed to read
2010 Convention Workbook
2010 Convention.indb 240
4/15/10 2:40 PM