Collection › LCMS Convention Workbook (St. Louis, Missouri) › 2010 · 64th Convention, Houston › Page 240

LCMS Convention Workbook St. Louis, Missouri — 2010, Page 240

front matter 1 front matter 2 front matter 3 front matter 4 front matter 5 front matter 6 front matter 7 front matter 8 front matter 9 front matter 10 front matter 11 front matter 12 front matter 13 front matter 14 front matter 15 front matter 16 front matter 17 front matter 18 front matter 19 front matter 20 Page 1 Page 2 Page 3 Page 4 Page 5 Page 6 Page 7 Page 8 Page 9 Page 10 Page 11 Page 12 Page 13 Page 14 Page 15 Page 16 Page 17 Page 18 Page 19 Page 20 Page 21 Page 22 Page 23 Page 24 Page 25 Page 26 Page 27 Page 28 Page 29 Page 30 Page 31 Page 32 Page 33 Page 34 Page 35 Page 36 Page 37 Page 38 Page 39 Page 40 Page 41 Page 42 Page 43 Page 44 Page 45 Page 46 Page 47 Page 48 Page 49 Page 50 Page 51 Page 52 Page 53 Page 54 Page 55 Page 56 Page 57 Page 58 Page 59 Page 60 Page 61 Page 62 Page 63 Page 64 Page 65 Page 66 Page 67 Page 68 Page 69 Page 70 Page 71 Page 72 Page 73 Page 74 Page 75 Page 76 Page 77 Page 78 Page 79 Page 80 Page 81 Page 82 Page 83 Page 84 Page 85 Page 86 Page 87 Page 88 Page 89 Page 90 Page 91 Page 92 Page 93 Page 94 Page 95 Page 96 Page 97 Page 98 Page 99 Page 100 Page 101 Page 102 Page 103 Page 104 Page 105 Page 106 Page 107 Page 108 Page 109 Page 110 Page 111 Page 112 Page 113 Page 114 Page 115 Page 116 Page 117 Page 118 Page 119 Page 120 Page 121 Page 122 Page 123 Page 124 Page 125 Page 126 Page 127 Page 128 Page 129 Page 130 Page 131 Page 132 Page 133 Page 134 Page 135 Page 136 Page 137 Page 138 Page 139 Page 140 Page 141 Page 142 Page 143 Page 144 Page 145 Page 146 Page 147 Page 148 Page 149 Page 150 Page 151 Page 152 Page 153 Page 154 Page 155 Page 156 Page 157 Page 158 Page 159 Page 160 Page 161 Page 162 Page 163 Page 164 Page 165 Page 166 Page 167 Page 168 Page 169 Page 170 Page 171 Page 172 Page 173 Page 174 Page 175 Page 176 Page 177 Page 178 Page 179 Page 180 Page 181 Page 182 Page 183 Page 184 Page 185 Page 186 Page 187 Page 188 Page 189 Page 190 Page 191 Page 192 Page 193 Page 194 Page 195 Page 196 Page 197 Page 198 Page 199 Page 200 Page 201 Page 202 Page 203 Page 204 Page 205 Page 206 Page 207 Page 208 Page 209 Page 210 Page 211 Page 212 Page 213 Page 214 Page 215 Page 216 Page 217 Page 218 Page 219 Page 220 Page 221 Page 222 Page 223 Page 224 Page 225 Page 226 Page 227 Page 228 Page 229 Page 230 Page 231 Page 232 Page 233 Page 234 Page 235 Page 236 Page 237 Page 238 Page 239 Page 240 Page 241 Page 242 Page 243 Page 244 Page 245 Page 246 Page 247 Page 248 Page 249 Page 250 Page 251 Page 252 Page 253 Page 254 Page 255 Page 256 Page 257 Page 258 Page 259 Page 260 Page 261 Page 262 Page 263 Page 264 Page 265 Page 266 Page 267 Page 268 Page 269 Page 270 Page 271 Page 272 Page 273 Page 274 Page 275 Page 276 Page 277 Page 278 Page 279 Page 280 Page 281 Page 282 Page 283 Page 284 Page 285 Page 286 Page 287 Page 288 Page 289 Page 290 Page 291 Page 292 Page 293 Page 294 Page 295 Page 296 Page 297 Page 298 Page 299 Page 300 Page 301 Page 302 Page 303 Page 304 Page 305 Page 306 Page 307 Page 308 Page 309 Page 310 Page 311 Page 312 Page 313 Page 314 Page 315 Page 316 Page 317 Page 318 Page 319 Page 320 Page 321 Page 322 Page 323 Page 324 Page 325 Page 326 Page 327 Page 328 Page 329 Page 330 Page 331 Page 332 Page 333 Page 334

Scan: The Lutheran Church—Missouri Synod

⤓ Download page image (full resolution)

Transcription machine transcription, uncorrected

⤓ Download .txt · copy text

240

Synod Structure and Governance

Resolved, That the English District encourage the Synod to adopt
a policy that if dissolution of the English District ever becomes a viable course of action, the idea must originate from within the English
District itself at such time as a majority of members of the English
District deem its mission to have been fulfilled.
English District
8-53

To Retain Present District Structure
Whereas, The Blue Ribbon Task Force on Synod Structure and
Governance (BRTFSSG) has raised the possibility of significantly
increasing or significantly decreasing the number of districts; and
Whereas, The BRTFSSG has presented little detailed analysis of
the strong points and the weak points of each suggestion; and
Whereas, The geographical diversity of the Synod makes establishing a single pattern which would function best everywhere
impossible; and
Whereas, The suggestion to do this restructuring has not come
from the congregations of the districts themselves; therefore be it
Resolved, That the Southern Illinois District in convention request
the BRTFSSG to leave the current number of districts as they are;
and be it further
Resolved, That if the BRTFSSG is convinced that a change to district structure is necessary, that it present a detailed analysis of the
strong and weak points of the proposed change.
Southern Illinois District
8-54

To Retain Current District Alignment
Whereas, There are concerns at the national level of our Synod
about continued viability of smaller districts; and
Whereas, The Wyoming District rejoices that there is fundamental
agreement in matters of doctrine and practice among the congregations and pastors of the district; and
Whereas, Any realignment or amalgamation of districts that
would divide or dissolve the Wyoming District would hurt the already
existing unity we share; and
Whereas, The first objective of the Synod is to “Conserve and
promote the unity of the true faith (Eph. 4:3–6; 1 Cor. 1:10), work
through its official structure toward fellowship with other Christian
church bodies, and provide a united defense against schism, sectarianism (Rom. 16:17), and heresy” (Constitution, Art. III 1); and
Whereas, The Wyoming District as it now exists is fulfilling this
objective; therefore be it
Resolved, That the congregations of the Wyoming District
gathered in convention encourage the Synod to retain the current
alignment of the Wyoming District.
Wyoming District
8-55

To Retain or Increase Number of Districts
Whereas, The wisdom of our world is impressed with numbers
and size, while often denigrating that which is small and insignificant
in worldly eyes as being less “effective” or “efficient”; and
Whereas, We learn from the wisdom of our world that things that
are bigger are by nature more efficient and effective, so that worldly

wisdom teaches us of such things as “efficiencies of scale” and “economies of size”; and
Whereas, The Blue Ribbon Task Force on Synod Structure and
Governance (BRTFSSG) speaks of our current district configuration
as being “a problem or deficiency” (slide 63 of the presentation format, “Walking Together”); and
Whereas, The BRTFSSG recommends that we “configure districts that are most effectively and efficiently sized,” even reducing
to 15 to 25 districts (slides 62–64); yet
Whereas, Even in the world, large size does not necessarily lead
to any effectiveness or efficiency but more often to ineffectiveness
and deficiency, so that anyone can see how, for instance, China or
Russia (the larger parties) are not more effective and efficient than,
say, Taiwan or Germany (the smaller parties), or how Citigroup or
AIG (the larger) are not more effective and efficient than, say, the
little bank in town that keeps personal contact with its investors; and
Whereas, Not only in the world but also in church history large
size does not necessarily lead to any effectiveness or efficiency, so
that anyone can see how, for instance, Egypt or Babylon (the larger
parties) are not more effective and efficient than, say, Israel, or how
the large church of the Pope in Rome is not more effective and efficient than a small church in, say, Wittenberg, even as something
greater would not be expected to come out of Greece than, say, out
of Nazareth; and
Whereas, Making districts larger and more able to support larger
bureaucracies will not necessarily make our districts more effective
or efficient or conducive than beneficial and supportive personal conversation among district pastors and congregations and with district
servants; and
Whereas, The Church rejoices in the promise of the Gospel and
in the gifts brought to us “through the mutual conversation and consolation of brethren” (Smalcald Articles, IV), so that personal contact
and conversation is beneficial and should be encouraged in our districts; therefore be it
Resolved, That we retain at least the current amount of districts;
and be it further
Resolved, That we increase the amount of districts in order to be
of better support and foster personal (as opposed to less personal
and more bureaucratic) conversations of support and encouragement
among our pastors, congregations, and district servants, rejoicing in
“the mutual conversation and consolation of brethren.”
North and South Sandia Circuit Forum
Rocky Mountain District
8-56

To Amend Bylaws re Formation of Circuits
Whereas, Bylaw 3.1.2 allows the Synod President the authority to grant exceptions to circuits for electing delegates to national
Synod conventions; and
Whereas, The irregularity for circuit exceptions has caused problems that have resulted in suspicion, mistrust, and even lawsuits; and
Whereas, Such problems besmirch the reputation of the church
and are unfitting for the Body of Christ; and
Whereas, It would be of great benefit to the Synod and her
President if there were further guidance and more specific regulations regarding the formation of circuits; therefore be it
Resolved, That Bylaws 3.1.2 (b) , 5.1.1 (a) and 5.1.1 (b) all be
eliminated; and be it further
Resolved, That Bylaw 3.1.2 (a) be changed to read

2010 Convention Workbook

2010 Convention.indb 240

4/15/10 2:40 PM