Collection › LCMS Convention Workbook (St. Louis, Missouri) › 2010 · 64th Convention, Houston › Page 296

LCMS Convention Workbook St. Louis, Missouri — 2010, Page 296

front matter 1 front matter 2 front matter 3 front matter 4 front matter 5 front matter 6 front matter 7 front matter 8 front matter 9 front matter 10 front matter 11 front matter 12 front matter 13 front matter 14 front matter 15 front matter 16 front matter 17 front matter 18 front matter 19 front matter 20 Page 1 Page 2 Page 3 Page 4 Page 5 Page 6 Page 7 Page 8 Page 9 Page 10 Page 11 Page 12 Page 13 Page 14 Page 15 Page 16 Page 17 Page 18 Page 19 Page 20 Page 21 Page 22 Page 23 Page 24 Page 25 Page 26 Page 27 Page 28 Page 29 Page 30 Page 31 Page 32 Page 33 Page 34 Page 35 Page 36 Page 37 Page 38 Page 39 Page 40 Page 41 Page 42 Page 43 Page 44 Page 45 Page 46 Page 47 Page 48 Page 49 Page 50 Page 51 Page 52 Page 53 Page 54 Page 55 Page 56 Page 57 Page 58 Page 59 Page 60 Page 61 Page 62 Page 63 Page 64 Page 65 Page 66 Page 67 Page 68 Page 69 Page 70 Page 71 Page 72 Page 73 Page 74 Page 75 Page 76 Page 77 Page 78 Page 79 Page 80 Page 81 Page 82 Page 83 Page 84 Page 85 Page 86 Page 87 Page 88 Page 89 Page 90 Page 91 Page 92 Page 93 Page 94 Page 95 Page 96 Page 97 Page 98 Page 99 Page 100 Page 101 Page 102 Page 103 Page 104 Page 105 Page 106 Page 107 Page 108 Page 109 Page 110 Page 111 Page 112 Page 113 Page 114 Page 115 Page 116 Page 117 Page 118 Page 119 Page 120 Page 121 Page 122 Page 123 Page 124 Page 125 Page 126 Page 127 Page 128 Page 129 Page 130 Page 131 Page 132 Page 133 Page 134 Page 135 Page 136 Page 137 Page 138 Page 139 Page 140 Page 141 Page 142 Page 143 Page 144 Page 145 Page 146 Page 147 Page 148 Page 149 Page 150 Page 151 Page 152 Page 153 Page 154 Page 155 Page 156 Page 157 Page 158 Page 159 Page 160 Page 161 Page 162 Page 163 Page 164 Page 165 Page 166 Page 167 Page 168 Page 169 Page 170 Page 171 Page 172 Page 173 Page 174 Page 175 Page 176 Page 177 Page 178 Page 179 Page 180 Page 181 Page 182 Page 183 Page 184 Page 185 Page 186 Page 187 Page 188 Page 189 Page 190 Page 191 Page 192 Page 193 Page 194 Page 195 Page 196 Page 197 Page 198 Page 199 Page 200 Page 201 Page 202 Page 203 Page 204 Page 205 Page 206 Page 207 Page 208 Page 209 Page 210 Page 211 Page 212 Page 213 Page 214 Page 215 Page 216 Page 217 Page 218 Page 219 Page 220 Page 221 Page 222 Page 223 Page 224 Page 225 Page 226 Page 227 Page 228 Page 229 Page 230 Page 231 Page 232 Page 233 Page 234 Page 235 Page 236 Page 237 Page 238 Page 239 Page 240 Page 241 Page 242 Page 243 Page 244 Page 245 Page 246 Page 247 Page 248 Page 249 Page 250 Page 251 Page 252 Page 253 Page 254 Page 255 Page 256 Page 257 Page 258 Page 259 Page 260 Page 261 Page 262 Page 263 Page 264 Page 265 Page 266 Page 267 Page 268 Page 269 Page 270 Page 271 Page 272 Page 273 Page 274 Page 275 Page 276 Page 277 Page 278 Page 279 Page 280 Page 281 Page 282 Page 283 Page 284 Page 285 Page 286 Page 287 Page 288 Page 289 Page 290 Page 291 Page 292 Page 293 Page 294 Page 295 Page 296 Page 297 Page 298 Page 299 Page 300 Page 301 Page 302 Page 303 Page 304 Page 305 Page 306 Page 307 Page 308 Page 309 Page 310 Page 311 Page 312 Page 313 Page 314 Page 315 Page 316 Page 317 Page 318 Page 319 Page 320 Page 321 Page 322 Page 323 Page 324 Page 325 Page 326 Page 327 Page 328 Page 329 Page 330 Page 331 Page 332 Page 333 Page 334

Scan: The Lutheran Church—Missouri Synod

⤓ Download page image (full resolution)

Transcription machine transcription, uncorrected

⤓ Download .txt · copy text

296

THEOLOGICAL DOCUMENTS­­—COMMISSION ON THEOLOGY AND CHURCH RELATIONS

tions. The synodical bylaw previously quoted indicates that it is
the duty of every pastor to “properly to instruct his people” on the
basis of the Scriptures and Lutheran Confessions concerning the
conflict that membership in lodge and fraternal organizations creates for congregation members. A pastoral approach to this issue
should begin with a patient and loving discussion that seeks to
inform congregation members or prospective members regarding
the implications of lodge membership. Since a Christian has been
called “to live for Christ” and to confess the Savior in all actions,
associations, and relationships, the integrity the Christian’s confession will be seriously compromised by membership in fraternal
organizations adhering to tenets that are contrary to the scriptural
Gospel. The pastoral approach urged by the Synod is in keeping
with the approach of C. F. W. Walther who advises great patience
and pastoral care in dealing with individual cases.24
Those who wish to study in more detail the scriptural and confessional basis for the Synod’s position on membership in fraternal
organizations as presented in this document may wish to make use
of a study titled “Christians and Their Affiliations” (available from
the CTCR’s office). An especially helpful section of this resource
provides questions for a Christian to consider when contemplating
membership, or evaluating membership currently held, in a fraternal organization. These questions include:
• Does the organization require any kind of religious subscription or
make any religious pronouncements? (See 1 Jn 4:1–3; 2 Pet 2:1)
• Does it teach or imply that all religions offer a way of salvation
which are equally valid before God? (See Gal 1:6–9; Acts 4:10–12)
• Does it teach or imply that the one true God can be worshipped
under any name or concept of God? (See 1 Ki 18:21; Gal 4:8–9)
• Does it promise or imply eternal rewards for observing the virtues
or principles extolled by the organization? (See Eph 2:8–9; Rom
8:7–8)
• Does the organization teach or imply some kind of universal salvation for all who believe that there is a God? (See Jn 3:36; James
2:19)
• Does it speak in terms of heaven being an advanced lodge or as an
eternal re-assembly of the brotherhood (sisterhood)? (See Jn 17:3;
Rom 6:23)
These questions and others are intended to help the Christian
determine whether membership in an organization will allow a
person “to give witness to the exclusive and distinctive character
of the Christian faith.”25 Pastors will likely find it necessary, from
their personal study and preparation and in their particular context,
to expand such material as they seek faithfully and pastorally to
deal with the problems that arise in this area.
In cases involving lodges whose religious rituals play a less
prominent role than in Freemasonry, other factors may be involved.
Local practices and the degree to which prospective lodge members
are exposed to the official teaching and rituals of the lodge may
vary. Because these organizations continue to be unwilling to share
publicly information about their rituals and practices, it is difficult
to determine if changes in their official positions have occurred. In
many cases it appears that lodges are less rigid in the enforcement
of their membership requirements. Some local lodges may allow
what are in effect “social” memberships to be issued to those who
do not wish to participate in initiation rites or in other rituals. In
addition, in recent times individuals tend to be less conscientious
about examining the specific beliefs and practices of organizations they join. Therefore, the pastor should try to meet with those
involved in the situation, as well as with local lodge officials, to
determine the extent to which the local lodge adheres to the organization’s official standards and practices. In this way the pastor, as

he seeks to provide appropriate counsel, can also determine what
requirements of a religious nature are being placed upon members.
What is crucial here is that no Christian should participate in any
ritual or ceremony that is contradictory to the Gospel. Christians
need seriously to consider the public witness they give by belonging to such an organization.
Education and discussion will perhaps need to continue for a
lengthy period of time, especially where lodge membership has already been established. It is hoped that when a person is led to see
how seriously one’s confession of Christ is to be taken (“to suffer
all, even death, rather than fall away from it”26) he will want to
separate himself from association with religious rituals that compromise that confession. Pastoral care will need to be exercised patiently yet firmly in asserting the need for Christians “to honor the
Son even as they honor the Father” (Jn 5:23).
Eventually it will be necessary to establish a timetable and the
minimal action that will need to be taken with regard to congregation members who have chosen to unite with a fraternal organization whose rituals and services include direct or implied teachings
that contradict the fundamental teaching of the Christian faith. If
deemed necessary, the administration of Holy Communion to those
so involved may temporarily need to be suspended until a final
resolution is achieved.
One of the goals of pastoral instruction and guidance regarding
membership in certain fraternal organizations is to help the Christian to be faithful to the principle established by St. Paul in Romans
16: “watch out for those who cause divisions and create obstacles
contrary to the doctrine that you have been taught” (16:17). Here,
too, we need to honor our God and His Word concerning those who
have a form of godliness but deny its power (2 Tim. 3:5). At the
same time, pastors must always take care to speak the truth in love
(Eph. 4:15), and to present and defend the truth of God’s Word
“with gentleness and respect” (1 Peter 3:16). Such loving concern
on the part of the pastor will strengthen the sheep of his flock to “be
faithful, even to the point of death” so that they might receive from
the Good Shepherd His gift of “the crown of life” (Rev 2:10).27
Adopted by the CTCR
April 25, 2009

Notes
1. See page 4 of the CTCR’s evaluation of the Loyal Order of the
Moose, which is available online at http://www.lcms.org?2150 together
with evaluations of The Lodge in general (focusing on Masonic Lodge organizations), the Fraternal Order of the Eagles, and the Benevolent and Protective Order of the Elks. The CTCR commends the continuing use of these
resources in conjunction with the present document. Also recommended is
How to Respond to the Lodge by L. James Rongstad (St. Louis: Concordia
Publishing House, 1995; order number 12-6003 [www.cph.org]).
2. This document grows out of a request from the 2006 convention of
the Nebraska District (Res. 1.05) that the CTCR prepare a “study on the
issue of ‘Secret Society’ or Lodge membership, including but not limited to
information pertaining to possible changes in teaching and practice in the
last 50 years and also the differences between the wide varieties of these
organizations” and “that the CTCR study include practical guidelines” for
pastors and congregations to follow when dealing with this issue.
3. The confessional citations here are taken from The Book of Concord, Robert Kolb and Timothy J. Wengert, eds. (Minneapolis: Fortress
Press, 2000).
4. 2007 Handbook, 176 (Bylaw 3.9.6.3.1 [a]).
5. 2001 Res. 7-27A “To Combine Commission on Organizations and
Commission on Theology and Church Relations and Revise CTCR Bylaws”
(2001 Convention Proceedings, 174–75).
6. 2007 Handbook, 176 (Bylaw 3.9.6.4.1 [a]).

2010 Convention Workbook

2010 Convention.indb 296

4/15/10 2:40 PM