Collection › LCMS Convention Workbook (St. Louis, Missouri) › 2010 · 64th Convention, Houston › Page 296
LCMS Convention Workbook St. Louis, Missouri — 2010, Page 296
front matter 1
front matter 2
front matter 3
front matter 4
front matter 5
front matter 6
front matter 7
front matter 8
front matter 9
front matter 10
front matter 11
front matter 12
front matter 13
front matter 14
front matter 15
front matter 16
front matter 17
front matter 18
front matter 19
front matter 20
Page 1
Page 2
Page 3
Page 4
Page 5
Page 6
Page 7
Page 8
Page 9
Page 10
Page 11
Page 12
Page 13
Page 14
Page 15
Page 16
Page 17
Page 18
Page 19
Page 20
Page 21
Page 22
Page 23
Page 24
Page 25
Page 26
Page 27
Page 28
Page 29
Page 30
Page 31
Page 32
Page 33
Page 34
Page 35
Page 36
Page 37
Page 38
Page 39
Page 40
Page 41
Page 42
Page 43
Page 44
Page 45
Page 46
Page 47
Page 48
Page 49
Page 50
Page 51
Page 52
Page 53
Page 54
Page 55
Page 56
Page 57
Page 58
Page 59
Page 60
Page 61
Page 62
Page 63
Page 64
Page 65
Page 66
Page 67
Page 68
Page 69
Page 70
Page 71
Page 72
Page 73
Page 74
Page 75
Page 76
Page 77
Page 78
Page 79
Page 80
Page 81
Page 82
Page 83
Page 84
Page 85
Page 86
Page 87
Page 88
Page 89
Page 90
Page 91
Page 92
Page 93
Page 94
Page 95
Page 96
Page 97
Page 98
Page 99
Page 100
Page 101
Page 102
Page 103
Page 104
Page 105
Page 106
Page 107
Page 108
Page 109
Page 110
Page 111
Page 112
Page 113
Page 114
Page 115
Page 116
Page 117
Page 118
Page 119
Page 120
Page 121
Page 122
Page 123
Page 124
Page 125
Page 126
Page 127
Page 128
Page 129
Page 130
Page 131
Page 132
Page 133
Page 134
Page 135
Page 136
Page 137
Page 138
Page 139
Page 140
Page 141
Page 142
Page 143
Page 144
Page 145
Page 146
Page 147
Page 148
Page 149
Page 150
Page 151
Page 152
Page 153
Page 154
Page 155
Page 156
Page 157
Page 158
Page 159
Page 160
Page 161
Page 162
Page 163
Page 164
Page 165
Page 166
Page 167
Page 168
Page 169
Page 170
Page 171
Page 172
Page 173
Page 174
Page 175
Page 176
Page 177
Page 178
Page 179
Page 180
Page 181
Page 182
Page 183
Page 184
Page 185
Page 186
Page 187
Page 188
Page 189
Page 190
Page 191
Page 192
Page 193
Page 194
Page 195
Page 196
Page 197
Page 198
Page 199
Page 200
Page 201
Page 202
Page 203
Page 204
Page 205
Page 206
Page 207
Page 208
Page 209
Page 210
Page 211
Page 212
Page 213
Page 214
Page 215
Page 216
Page 217
Page 218
Page 219
Page 220
Page 221
Page 222
Page 223
Page 224
Page 225
Page 226
Page 227
Page 228
Page 229
Page 230
Page 231
Page 232
Page 233
Page 234
Page 235
Page 236
Page 237
Page 238
Page 239
Page 240
Page 241
Page 242
Page 243
Page 244
Page 245
Page 246
Page 247
Page 248
Page 249
Page 250
Page 251
Page 252
Page 253
Page 254
Page 255
Page 256
Page 257
Page 258
Page 259
Page 260
Page 261
Page 262
Page 263
Page 264
Page 265
Page 266
Page 267
Page 268
Page 269
Page 270
Page 271
Page 272
Page 273
Page 274
Page 275
Page 276
Page 277
Page 278
Page 279
Page 280
Page 281
Page 282
Page 283
Page 284
Page 285
Page 286
Page 287
Page 288
Page 289
Page 290
Page 291
Page 292
Page 293
Page 294
Page 295
Page 296
Page 297
Page 298
Page 299
Page 300
Page 301
Page 302
Page 303
Page 304
Page 305
Page 306
Page 307
Page 308
Page 309
Page 310
Page 311
Page 312
Page 313
Page 314
Page 315
Page 316
Page 317
Page 318
Page 319
Page 320
Page 321
Page 322
Page 323
Page 324
Page 325
Page 326
Page 327
Page 328
Page 329
Page 330
Page 331
Page 332
Page 333
Page 334
Scan: The Lutheran Church—Missouri Synod
⤓ Download page image (full resolution)
Transcription machine transcription, uncorrected
296
THEOLOGICAL DOCUMENTS—COMMISSION ON THEOLOGY AND CHURCH RELATIONS
tions. The synodical bylaw previously quoted indicates that it is
the duty of every pastor to “properly to instruct his people” on the
basis of the Scriptures and Lutheran Confessions concerning the
conflict that membership in lodge and fraternal organizations creates for congregation members. A pastoral approach to this issue
should begin with a patient and loving discussion that seeks to
inform congregation members or prospective members regarding
the implications of lodge membership. Since a Christian has been
called “to live for Christ” and to confess the Savior in all actions,
associations, and relationships, the integrity the Christian’s confession will be seriously compromised by membership in fraternal
organizations adhering to tenets that are contrary to the scriptural
Gospel. The pastoral approach urged by the Synod is in keeping
with the approach of C. F. W. Walther who advises great patience
and pastoral care in dealing with individual cases.24
Those who wish to study in more detail the scriptural and confessional basis for the Synod’s position on membership in fraternal
organizations as presented in this document may wish to make use
of a study titled “Christians and Their Affiliations” (available from
the CTCR’s office). An especially helpful section of this resource
provides questions for a Christian to consider when contemplating
membership, or evaluating membership currently held, in a fraternal organization. These questions include:
• Does the organization require any kind of religious subscription or
make any religious pronouncements? (See 1 Jn 4:1–3; 2 Pet 2:1)
• Does it teach or imply that all religions offer a way of salvation
which are equally valid before God? (See Gal 1:6–9; Acts 4:10–12)
• Does it teach or imply that the one true God can be worshipped
under any name or concept of God? (See 1 Ki 18:21; Gal 4:8–9)
• Does it promise or imply eternal rewards for observing the virtues
or principles extolled by the organization? (See Eph 2:8–9; Rom
8:7–8)
• Does the organization teach or imply some kind of universal salvation for all who believe that there is a God? (See Jn 3:36; James
2:19)
• Does it speak in terms of heaven being an advanced lodge or as an
eternal re-assembly of the brotherhood (sisterhood)? (See Jn 17:3;
Rom 6:23)
These questions and others are intended to help the Christian
determine whether membership in an organization will allow a
person “to give witness to the exclusive and distinctive character
of the Christian faith.”25 Pastors will likely find it necessary, from
their personal study and preparation and in their particular context,
to expand such material as they seek faithfully and pastorally to
deal with the problems that arise in this area.
In cases involving lodges whose religious rituals play a less
prominent role than in Freemasonry, other factors may be involved.
Local practices and the degree to which prospective lodge members
are exposed to the official teaching and rituals of the lodge may
vary. Because these organizations continue to be unwilling to share
publicly information about their rituals and practices, it is difficult
to determine if changes in their official positions have occurred. In
many cases it appears that lodges are less rigid in the enforcement
of their membership requirements. Some local lodges may allow
what are in effect “social” memberships to be issued to those who
do not wish to participate in initiation rites or in other rituals. In
addition, in recent times individuals tend to be less conscientious
about examining the specific beliefs and practices of organizations they join. Therefore, the pastor should try to meet with those
involved in the situation, as well as with local lodge officials, to
determine the extent to which the local lodge adheres to the organization’s official standards and practices. In this way the pastor, as
he seeks to provide appropriate counsel, can also determine what
requirements of a religious nature are being placed upon members.
What is crucial here is that no Christian should participate in any
ritual or ceremony that is contradictory to the Gospel. Christians
need seriously to consider the public witness they give by belonging to such an organization.
Education and discussion will perhaps need to continue for a
lengthy period of time, especially where lodge membership has already been established. It is hoped that when a person is led to see
how seriously one’s confession of Christ is to be taken (“to suffer
all, even death, rather than fall away from it”26) he will want to
separate himself from association with religious rituals that compromise that confession. Pastoral care will need to be exercised patiently yet firmly in asserting the need for Christians “to honor the
Son even as they honor the Father” (Jn 5:23).
Eventually it will be necessary to establish a timetable and the
minimal action that will need to be taken with regard to congregation members who have chosen to unite with a fraternal organization whose rituals and services include direct or implied teachings
that contradict the fundamental teaching of the Christian faith. If
deemed necessary, the administration of Holy Communion to those
so involved may temporarily need to be suspended until a final
resolution is achieved.
One of the goals of pastoral instruction and guidance regarding
membership in certain fraternal organizations is to help the Christian to be faithful to the principle established by St. Paul in Romans
16: “watch out for those who cause divisions and create obstacles
contrary to the doctrine that you have been taught” (16:17). Here,
too, we need to honor our God and His Word concerning those who
have a form of godliness but deny its power (2 Tim. 3:5). At the
same time, pastors must always take care to speak the truth in love
(Eph. 4:15), and to present and defend the truth of God’s Word
“with gentleness and respect” (1 Peter 3:16). Such loving concern
on the part of the pastor will strengthen the sheep of his flock to “be
faithful, even to the point of death” so that they might receive from
the Good Shepherd His gift of “the crown of life” (Rev 2:10).27
Adopted by the CTCR
April 25, 2009
Notes
1. See page 4 of the CTCR’s evaluation of the Loyal Order of the
Moose, which is available online at http://www.lcms.org?2150 together
with evaluations of The Lodge in general (focusing on Masonic Lodge organizations), the Fraternal Order of the Eagles, and the Benevolent and Protective Order of the Elks. The CTCR commends the continuing use of these
resources in conjunction with the present document. Also recommended is
How to Respond to the Lodge by L. James Rongstad (St. Louis: Concordia
Publishing House, 1995; order number 12-6003 [www.cph.org]).
2. This document grows out of a request from the 2006 convention of
the Nebraska District (Res. 1.05) that the CTCR prepare a “study on the
issue of ‘Secret Society’ or Lodge membership, including but not limited to
information pertaining to possible changes in teaching and practice in the
last 50 years and also the differences between the wide varieties of these
organizations” and “that the CTCR study include practical guidelines” for
pastors and congregations to follow when dealing with this issue.
3. The confessional citations here are taken from The Book of Concord, Robert Kolb and Timothy J. Wengert, eds. (Minneapolis: Fortress
Press, 2000).
4. 2007 Handbook, 176 (Bylaw 3.9.6.3.1 [a]).
5. 2001 Res. 7-27A “To Combine Commission on Organizations and
Commission on Theology and Church Relations and Revise CTCR Bylaws”
(2001 Convention Proceedings, 174–75).
6. 2007 Handbook, 176 (Bylaw 3.9.6.4.1 [a]).
2010 Convention Workbook
2010 Convention.indb 296
4/15/10 2:40 PM