Collection › LCMS Convention Workbook (St. Louis, Missouri) › 2010 · 64th Convention, Houston › Page 103

LCMS Convention Workbook St. Louis, Missouri — 2010, Page 103

front matter 1 front matter 2 front matter 3 front matter 4 front matter 5 front matter 6 front matter 7 front matter 8 front matter 9 front matter 10 front matter 11 front matter 12 front matter 13 front matter 14 front matter 15 front matter 16 front matter 17 front matter 18 front matter 19 front matter 20 Page 1 Page 2 Page 3 Page 4 Page 5 Page 6 Page 7 Page 8 Page 9 Page 10 Page 11 Page 12 Page 13 Page 14 Page 15 Page 16 Page 17 Page 18 Page 19 Page 20 Page 21 Page 22 Page 23 Page 24 Page 25 Page 26 Page 27 Page 28 Page 29 Page 30 Page 31 Page 32 Page 33 Page 34 Page 35 Page 36 Page 37 Page 38 Page 39 Page 40 Page 41 Page 42 Page 43 Page 44 Page 45 Page 46 Page 47 Page 48 Page 49 Page 50 Page 51 Page 52 Page 53 Page 54 Page 55 Page 56 Page 57 Page 58 Page 59 Page 60 Page 61 Page 62 Page 63 Page 64 Page 65 Page 66 Page 67 Page 68 Page 69 Page 70 Page 71 Page 72 Page 73 Page 74 Page 75 Page 76 Page 77 Page 78 Page 79 Page 80 Page 81 Page 82 Page 83 Page 84 Page 85 Page 86 Page 87 Page 88 Page 89 Page 90 Page 91 Page 92 Page 93 Page 94 Page 95 Page 96 Page 97 Page 98 Page 99 Page 100 Page 101 Page 102 Page 103 Page 104 Page 105 Page 106 Page 107 Page 108 Page 109 Page 110 Page 111 Page 112 Page 113 Page 114 Page 115 Page 116 Page 117 Page 118 Page 119 Page 120 Page 121 Page 122 Page 123 Page 124 Page 125 Page 126 Page 127 Page 128 Page 129 Page 130 Page 131 Page 132 Page 133 Page 134 Page 135 Page 136 Page 137 Page 138 Page 139 Page 140 Page 141 Page 142 Page 143 Page 144 Page 145 Page 146 Page 147 Page 148 Page 149 Page 150 Page 151 Page 152 Page 153 Page 154 Page 155 Page 156 Page 157 Page 158 Page 159 Page 160 Page 161 Page 162 Page 163 Page 164 Page 165 Page 166 Page 167 Page 168 Page 169 Page 170 Page 171 Page 172 Page 173 Page 174 Page 175 Page 176 Page 177 Page 178 Page 179 Page 180 Page 181 Page 182 Page 183 Page 184 Page 185 Page 186 Page 187 Page 188 Page 189 Page 190 Page 191 Page 192 Page 193 Page 194 Page 195 Page 196 Page 197 Page 198 Page 199 Page 200 Page 201 Page 202 Page 203 Page 204 Page 205 Page 206 Page 207 Page 208 Page 209 Page 210 Page 211 Page 212 Page 213 Page 214 Page 215 Page 216 Page 217 Page 218 Page 219 Page 220 Page 221 Page 222 Page 223 Page 224 Page 225 Page 226 Page 227 Page 228 Page 229 Page 230 Page 231 Page 232 Page 233 Page 234 Page 235 Page 236 Page 237 Page 238 Page 239 Page 240 Page 241 Page 242 Page 243 Page 244 Page 245 Page 246 Page 247 Page 248 Page 249 Page 250 Page 251 Page 252 Page 253 Page 254 Page 255 Page 256 Page 257 Page 258 Page 259 Page 260 Page 261 Page 262 Page 263 Page 264 Page 265 Page 266 Page 267 Page 268 Page 269 Page 270 Page 271 Page 272 Page 273 Page 274 Page 275 Page 276 Page 277 Page 278 Page 279 Page 280 Page 281 Page 282 Page 283 Page 284 Page 285 Page 286 Page 287 Page 288 Page 289 Page 290 Page 291 Page 292 Page 293 Page 294 Page 295 Page 296 Page 297 Page 298 Page 299 Page 300 Page 301 Page 302 Page 303 Page 304 Page 305 Page 306 Page 307 Page 308 Page 309 Page 310 Page 311 Page 312 Page 313 Page 314 Page 315 Page 316 Page 317 Page 318 Page 319 Page 320 Page 321 Page 322 Page 323 Page 324 Page 325 Page 326 Page 327 Page 328 Page 329 Page 330 Page 331 Page 332 Page 333 Page 334

Scan: The Lutheran Church—Missouri Synod

⤓ Download page image (full resolution)

Transcription machine transcription, uncorrected

⤓ Download .txt · copy text

SYNOD REPORTS
in dealing with ELCA leadership, whom I have personally heard
confess that there is salvation outside of faith in Christ. The decisions on homosexuality are symptomatic of a fundamental difference
with them on what the Bible is and what the Gospel is. It has been
supremely challenging to kindly but firmly insist on respect for the
LCMS’s biblical positions, and to do as little damage as possible to
agencies that serve so many with mercy. That said, the status quo with
the ELCA cannot hold.
It has been a hard road too, guiding LCMS World Relief and
Human Care through the complexities of a Synod bureaucracy that
is severely strapped for cash. Through many hard decisions, especially over the past year and a half of economic downturn, we have
been able to operate well in the black, and our financial position as
of March 2009 is, frankly, outstanding. Some time ago the LCMS
President’s Blue Ribbon Task Force on Funding the Mission recommended that perhaps LCMS World Relief and Human Care become
a synodwide corporation (like CPH, or the LCMS Foundation or
LCEF) because we are “fully funded” by donors. Some twenty years
ago, the Seventh Day Adventists (a church body smaller than the
LCMS) did this with its mercy arm, which became the “Adventist
Development and Relief Agency” (www.ADRA.org ). ADRA has
grown from revenues similar to LCMS World Relief and Human Care
($10–20 million per year) to $170,000,000, and has vastly increased
the impact and influence of that church body worldwide. We should
do the same with LCMS World Relief and Human Care. We could
vastly increase the work of mercy worldwide and benefit millions.
“Could we have the vision and foresight to do the same? Because of
constant overspending and weakening revenues, the Synod headquarters is deeply dependent on donations to LCMS World Relief and
Human Care for operating cash (from $5–15 million dollars at any
given time over the past triennium). The financial crisis of the Synod
can be quickly addressed. As every businessperson, every farmer (and
even the occasional person in government) knows, expenditures must
not exceed revenues.
For whatever the strengths and weaknesses of the LCMS board
system, thus far the Board for Human Care in the present system of
bylaws has formed a reasonable firewall in the face of a Synod headquarters starving for cash and constantly (understandably!) looking
for ways to ease its condition. I believe the proposed elimination of
our board will erode that firewall further, and decisions about funds
given by donors for mercy will increasingly be made in view of the
Synod’s financial crisis and less in view of the need of people in trouble. (On stewardship and God’s priorities for mercy, see 2 Corinthians
8–9.)
In any case, I am at peace. Our board and staff have given everything they have, even risking their own lives and well-being at times,
for the advance of mercy in the name of Jesus all over the world. The
following report is but a small snapshot of the work done. I am humbled and honored to have had this opportunity to work with such
fabulous staff, to be so humbled by the generosity of so many thousands upon thousands of donors, to be able to mine the depths of
the Scriptures on mercy, and to have had this message resonate so
profoundly all over the Synod and the world. And I am, finally, profoundly optimistic. The Lord has blessed this work so abundantly
through so many difficult times when the road ahead seemed impossible, and He will continue to do so—but always in his way—under
the cross. “Be ye merciful, as your father in heaven is merciful.”
With profound thankfulness, I remain convinced that mercy—the
mercy of Christ to and for us—and our demonstration of that mercy
to those within and outside the Body of Christ is the key to the future

103

of the Church. Mercy is the key to mission and stewardship. It is the
key to living our Christian lives together in love and forgiveness. We
desperately need to learn more deeply of the mercy of Christ so we
may learn how to care for one another in the Church. Mercy is the
key to moving boldly and confidently into the future with courage in
the Gospel—a confidence and courage based on conviction (Christ
Have Mercy: How to Put Your Faith in Action, p. 11).
Matthew C. Harrison
Executive Director
Overture from BHCM to Synod Convention Regarding
BRTFSSG Recommendation 18
Whereas, the LCMS is considering a restructuring of the Synod
and such restructuring has both short- and long-term implications for
ministry, the Board for Human Care Ministries (LCMS World Relief
and Human Care) respectfully requests that careful consideration be
given to the following:
Whereas, in 2010 Haiti experienced an earthquake of overwhelming proportions, and LCMS World Relief and Human Care Ministries
had the expertise, ground resources, and contacts to respond by providing some of the first Mercy Medical Teams to meet the needs of
the Haitians; LCMS World Relief and Human Care was among the
first relief organizations on the ground with a network of volunteer
medical and pastoral personnel. Will the restructuring plan improve
the Synod’s ability to initiate and nurture a sustainable network on
the ground in the United States and around the world that can be as
responsive to an earthquake, tsunami, flood, or hurricane as the current structure has allowed? and
Whereas, a significant portion of the work of LCMS World
Relief and Human Care involves domestic grants to churches, pastors, church workers, and RSOs that experience significant human
care needs, and responding to these needs requires experience and
resources; will the restructuring plan improve the Synod’s ability to
attract, maintain, and foster the expertise and resources that have been
developed over past several years? and
Whereas, domestically the inter-Lutheran collaboration known
as Lutheran Services in America provides nearly $16 billion of service to communities and individuals, with the assistance of leadership
from the LCMS provided to this network; and
Whereas, LCMS recognized service organizations depend upon
this human care network to improve quality and maintain and provide
advocacy and care for the most vulnerable citizens in America; will
the restructuring plan improve the Synod’s ability to strengthen, oversee, encourage, and advance this network and thereby serve increased
needs as an expression of God’s love in Christ? and
Whereas, in a rapidly shrinking world, where global interaction is
increasingly common, long-standing values and cultural perspectives
are being challenged and eroded; LCMS World Relief and Human
Care has been at the forefront of discussions of and advocacy for
life issues; will the restructuring improve the Synod’s ability to lead,
speak and partner in such a way that God’s plan for humankind is
advanced and He is honored? and
Whereas, Human Care Ministries has met external benchmarks
established by the Better Business Bureau, regarding administrative and fund-raising costs, and the best possible rating according
to Charity Navigator for combined administrative/communication
expenses; will the restructuring improve the Synod’s ability to meet
these external benchmarks? and
Whereas, Disaster work, human care, Mercy Medical Teams, Life
Ministries, and many other ministries of mercy are global and interconnected national and international efforts, does splitting whatever
2010 Convention Workbook

2010 Convention.indb 103

4/15/10 2:38 PM