Collection › LCMS Convention Workbook (St. Louis, Missouri) › 2010 · 64th Convention, Houston › Page 323
LCMS Convention Workbook St. Louis, Missouri — 2010, Page 323
front matter 1
front matter 2
front matter 3
front matter 4
front matter 5
front matter 6
front matter 7
front matter 8
front matter 9
front matter 10
front matter 11
front matter 12
front matter 13
front matter 14
front matter 15
front matter 16
front matter 17
front matter 18
front matter 19
front matter 20
Page 1
Page 2
Page 3
Page 4
Page 5
Page 6
Page 7
Page 8
Page 9
Page 10
Page 11
Page 12
Page 13
Page 14
Page 15
Page 16
Page 17
Page 18
Page 19
Page 20
Page 21
Page 22
Page 23
Page 24
Page 25
Page 26
Page 27
Page 28
Page 29
Page 30
Page 31
Page 32
Page 33
Page 34
Page 35
Page 36
Page 37
Page 38
Page 39
Page 40
Page 41
Page 42
Page 43
Page 44
Page 45
Page 46
Page 47
Page 48
Page 49
Page 50
Page 51
Page 52
Page 53
Page 54
Page 55
Page 56
Page 57
Page 58
Page 59
Page 60
Page 61
Page 62
Page 63
Page 64
Page 65
Page 66
Page 67
Page 68
Page 69
Page 70
Page 71
Page 72
Page 73
Page 74
Page 75
Page 76
Page 77
Page 78
Page 79
Page 80
Page 81
Page 82
Page 83
Page 84
Page 85
Page 86
Page 87
Page 88
Page 89
Page 90
Page 91
Page 92
Page 93
Page 94
Page 95
Page 96
Page 97
Page 98
Page 99
Page 100
Page 101
Page 102
Page 103
Page 104
Page 105
Page 106
Page 107
Page 108
Page 109
Page 110
Page 111
Page 112
Page 113
Page 114
Page 115
Page 116
Page 117
Page 118
Page 119
Page 120
Page 121
Page 122
Page 123
Page 124
Page 125
Page 126
Page 127
Page 128
Page 129
Page 130
Page 131
Page 132
Page 133
Page 134
Page 135
Page 136
Page 137
Page 138
Page 139
Page 140
Page 141
Page 142
Page 143
Page 144
Page 145
Page 146
Page 147
Page 148
Page 149
Page 150
Page 151
Page 152
Page 153
Page 154
Page 155
Page 156
Page 157
Page 158
Page 159
Page 160
Page 161
Page 162
Page 163
Page 164
Page 165
Page 166
Page 167
Page 168
Page 169
Page 170
Page 171
Page 172
Page 173
Page 174
Page 175
Page 176
Page 177
Page 178
Page 179
Page 180
Page 181
Page 182
Page 183
Page 184
Page 185
Page 186
Page 187
Page 188
Page 189
Page 190
Page 191
Page 192
Page 193
Page 194
Page 195
Page 196
Page 197
Page 198
Page 199
Page 200
Page 201
Page 202
Page 203
Page 204
Page 205
Page 206
Page 207
Page 208
Page 209
Page 210
Page 211
Page 212
Page 213
Page 214
Page 215
Page 216
Page 217
Page 218
Page 219
Page 220
Page 221
Page 222
Page 223
Page 224
Page 225
Page 226
Page 227
Page 228
Page 229
Page 230
Page 231
Page 232
Page 233
Page 234
Page 235
Page 236
Page 237
Page 238
Page 239
Page 240
Page 241
Page 242
Page 243
Page 244
Page 245
Page 246
Page 247
Page 248
Page 249
Page 250
Page 251
Page 252
Page 253
Page 254
Page 255
Page 256
Page 257
Page 258
Page 259
Page 260
Page 261
Page 262
Page 263
Page 264
Page 265
Page 266
Page 267
Page 268
Page 269
Page 270
Page 271
Page 272
Page 273
Page 274
Page 275
Page 276
Page 277
Page 278
Page 279
Page 280
Page 281
Page 282
Page 283
Page 284
Page 285
Page 286
Page 287
Page 288
Page 289
Page 290
Page 291
Page 292
Page 293
Page 294
Page 295
Page 296
Page 297
Page 298
Page 299
Page 300
Page 301
Page 302
Page 303
Page 304
Page 305
Page 306
Page 307
Page 308
Page 309
Page 310
Page 311
Page 312
Page 313
Page 314
Page 315
Page 316
Page 317
Page 318
Page 319
Page 320
Page 321
Page 322
Page 323
Page 324
Page 325
Page 326
Page 327
Page 328
Page 329
Page 330
Page 331
Page 332
Page 333
Page 334
Scan: The Lutheran Church—Missouri Synod
⤓ Download page image (full resolution)
Transcription machine transcription, uncorrected
323
THEOLOGICAL DOCUMENTS—COMMISSION ON THEOLOGY AND CHURCH RELATIONS
Louis: CPH, 1995), 436–37.
42. Bruce Winter writes, for example: “The adult male inhabitants of
Roman Corinth did not wear their hair long, for to do so indicated their
denial of their masculinity—they were parading as homosexuals” (After
Paul Left Corinth, 132).
43. Woman was taken out of man and was created for man, to answer
his aloneness and be a helper fit for him. She therefore exists as a testimony
that brings “glory” and honor to the man. Paul does not say that woman is
the “image” of the man, since that would not be true. She is not a mirror
image or replica of the man. Neither does Paul deny that woman was also
created in the image of God (see Gen 1:26 and 5:1–2; cf. “God creates man
and woman” above, 8ff.).
44. In 1 Cor 11:10, the ESV translates the Greek word exousia (literally, “authority”) with “symbol of authority.” BDAG (353) points out that
various opinions are held regarding the meaning of the term. Some think
Paul chose the term for the veil because it meant figuratively “means of
exercising power.” Others think that as a term for the veil it conveyed the
sense “symbol of womanly dignity.” Whatever the term’s precise meaning,
the custom of wearing of the veil in that time and culture was an appropriate
way of signifying the created relationship of wife to husband.
45. We have discussed this text in earlier documents; e.g., see Women in
the Church (32–33). See also note 1.
46. Franzmann, 288. Paul’s rhetorical question in v. 36 suggests the
congregation’s excesses contained an element of defiance or thumbing its
nose at the broader church.
47. Concerning “to speak” in 1 Cor 14:34, see Women in the Church,
32–33. Also, Henry P. Hamann states: “Lalein [“to speak”] is not really
contrasted with the idea of order. The contrast in the Greek sentence marked
by the ou gar … alla [“for not … but”] sets in opposition lalein and hypotassesthõsan, speaking and being subordinate. A speaking is involved
which is the opposite of being subordinate, speaking with authority, teaching, preaching with the implicit demand for obedience.” Henry P. Hamann,
“The New Testament and the Ordination of Women,” in Women Pastors?
The Ordination of Women in Biblical Lutheran Perspective, Second Edition, ed. Matthew C. Harrison and John T. Pless (St. Louis: Concordia Publishing House, 2009), 17–18.
48. The verb “to speak,” as Paul uses it here and in many other places,
designates official proclamation to a group (Rom 15:18; 1 Cor 2:6–7; 2 Cor
12:19; Eph 6:20; Phil 1:14; Col 4:3–4; 1 Thess 2:2, 4, 16; Titus 2:1, 15).
As Paul’s counsel elsewhere shows, however, Paul does not command the
absolute silence of women in public worship assemblies (e.g., 1 Cor 11:4–6;
Eph 5:19; Col 3:16). See also 44–46 below and also Women in the Church,
33.
49. For an example of the wrong use of one’s “hands,” see what Paul
says about his former life in 1 Tim 1:12–15.
50. While the (male) pastor exercises the responsibility to teach and
preach the Word of God, a woman is not subject to him as a man (his individual authority), but only to the authority of the Word of God as he rightly
proclaims it. See C. F. W. Walther, Church and Ministry (St. Louis: CPH,
1987), Thesis 9.
51. The Greek word, occurring only here in the NT, is authentein. See
the CTCR’s report on this word at http://www.lcms.org/graphics/assets/
media/CTCR/041505%20AUTHENTEIN%20FULL%20TEXT.doc. Recent research has shown that the most defensible translation of the term is
“to exercise authority over.”
52. See previous CTCR reports, Women in the Church: Scriptural
Principles and Ecclesial Practice (1985), The Service of Women in Congregational and Synodical Offices (1994), The Service of Women in Congregational Offices of Executive Director/President or Assistant Executive
Director/Vice-President (2004), and The Service of Women in Congregational and Synodical Offices with Guidelines for Congregations (2005), all
online at www.lcms.org/ctcr.
53. As some exegetes, ancient and modern, have pointed out, Paul may
also be alluding to Gen 3:15. That is, the woman’s Seed will win salvation
for both men and women.
54. Charles A. Gieschen, “Ordained Proclaimers or Quiet Learners?
Women in Worship in Light of 1 Timothy 2,” in Women Pastors? The Ordination of Women in Biblical Lutheran Perspective, Second Edition, ed.
Matthew C. Harrison and John T. Pless (St. Louis: Concordia Publishing
House, 2009), 86. Paul makes it clear that salvation is through “faith” and
not “child-bearing” by mentioning “faith and love” (1 Tim 2:15).
55. What is said here about a mother’s calling does not imply that childless or unmarried women cannot be saved or occupy a place in life less
pleasing to God. See Human Sexuality regarding the single state, 8–9, and
with regard to childlessness, 18–20.
56. C. S. Lewis, Mere Christianity (New York: Macmillan, 1960), 167,
169.
57. See footnote 10 above. Franz Pieper refers to orthodox theologians
employing a wider and proper sense of the image of God, with the wider
sense continuing after the Fall, although he prefers only a narrow usage.
Christian Dogmatics, Vol. 1 (St. Louis: CPH, 1950), 518. Ep. VI, 2 offers
creation in God’s image as cause for the law written on the human heart,
something that continues after the Fall. Luther also preferred a more constricted use of image, but was unwilling to condemn Augustine’s contention
that the image of God, more broadly conceived, continues after the Fall.
“Lectures on Genesis,” AE 1:60.
58. City of God, Book 12, 27.
59. See also C. S. Lewis, A Grief Observed (London: Faber & Faber,
1966), 40ff., quoted in Gilbert Meilaender, Things That Count (Wilmington, Del.: ISI Books, 1999), 57.
60. Human Sexuality, 7.
61. See “The Breakdown of Community in the Name of Individualism,”
below.
62. Human Sexuality, 7.
63. Human Sexuality, 18–19.
64. This does not suggest that these temptations are exclusive to one sex
and unknown to the other.
65. See 1969 Res. 2-17; 1986 Res. 3-09; 2004 Res. 3-08A and Women
in the Church, 44–47; and The Service of Women in Congregational and
Synodical Offices with Guidelines for Congregations.
66. The circumstance of a Christian woman married to an unbelieving
or unchurched man is similar to that of a single woman with respect to the
concerns of this paragraph.
67. The U.S. divorce rate has been declining modestly in recent years,
yet it remains significant. Despite questions about how to interpret divorce
data, even conservative estimates suggest that at least one third of marriages end in divorce. Moreover, the decline in divorce is misleading, since
a growing number of couples live together apart from marriage. It is much
more likely for such relationships to be dissolved than it is for marriages to
end in divorce. See David Popenoe, “The Future of Marriage in America,”
Rutgers National Marriage Project, http://marriage.rutgers.edu/Publications/
SOOU/TEXTSOOU2007.htm. The percentage of children born to unmarried mothers in the U.S. currently is 39.7%. See the National Center for
Health Statistics, May 2009; at http://www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/databriefs/
db18.htm.
68. See Popenoe.
69. By “homosexual relationship” we are referring to individuals of the
same sex who engage in sexual activity together.
70. There is more to consider concerning a Christian view of homosexual behavior and “marriage.” For example, see Human Sexuality, 32–36.
71. Although, in Rom 1:24, Paul notes that homosexual conduct has a
certain unique seriousness in its “dishonoring” of the body God has created.
72. This same challenge exists for a married person whose spouse is
unable to engage in sexual relations.
73. Eve Tushnet, “Experience and Tradition,” Commonweal, June 15,
2007, 21.
74. In Luke 20:34–36 (also Matt 22:23–33; Mark 12:18–27), Jesus
teaches that marriage and the natural family are only for this present age.
His followers now belong to two families, natural families and the family
of God. In the ages to come that begin with the bodily resurrection there is
only the family of God.
75. As Paul emphasizes in 1 Cor 7:35.
76. “Understanding Intimate Partner Violence Fact Sheet,” 2006 http://
www.cdc.gov/ViolencePrevention/pdf/IPV-FactSheet.pdf.
77. E.g., the popular work by John Gray, Men Are from Mars; Women
Are from Venus (New York: Harper, 1993).
2010 Convention Workbook
2010 Convention.indb 323
4/15/10 2:40 PM