Collection › LCMS Convention Workbook (St. Louis, Missouri) › 2010 · 64th Convention, Houston › Page 214

LCMS Convention Workbook St. Louis, Missouri — 2010, Page 214

front matter 1 front matter 2 front matter 3 front matter 4 front matter 5 front matter 6 front matter 7 front matter 8 front matter 9 front matter 10 front matter 11 front matter 12 front matter 13 front matter 14 front matter 15 front matter 16 front matter 17 front matter 18 front matter 19 front matter 20 Page 1 Page 2 Page 3 Page 4 Page 5 Page 6 Page 7 Page 8 Page 9 Page 10 Page 11 Page 12 Page 13 Page 14 Page 15 Page 16 Page 17 Page 18 Page 19 Page 20 Page 21 Page 22 Page 23 Page 24 Page 25 Page 26 Page 27 Page 28 Page 29 Page 30 Page 31 Page 32 Page 33 Page 34 Page 35 Page 36 Page 37 Page 38 Page 39 Page 40 Page 41 Page 42 Page 43 Page 44 Page 45 Page 46 Page 47 Page 48 Page 49 Page 50 Page 51 Page 52 Page 53 Page 54 Page 55 Page 56 Page 57 Page 58 Page 59 Page 60 Page 61 Page 62 Page 63 Page 64 Page 65 Page 66 Page 67 Page 68 Page 69 Page 70 Page 71 Page 72 Page 73 Page 74 Page 75 Page 76 Page 77 Page 78 Page 79 Page 80 Page 81 Page 82 Page 83 Page 84 Page 85 Page 86 Page 87 Page 88 Page 89 Page 90 Page 91 Page 92 Page 93 Page 94 Page 95 Page 96 Page 97 Page 98 Page 99 Page 100 Page 101 Page 102 Page 103 Page 104 Page 105 Page 106 Page 107 Page 108 Page 109 Page 110 Page 111 Page 112 Page 113 Page 114 Page 115 Page 116 Page 117 Page 118 Page 119 Page 120 Page 121 Page 122 Page 123 Page 124 Page 125 Page 126 Page 127 Page 128 Page 129 Page 130 Page 131 Page 132 Page 133 Page 134 Page 135 Page 136 Page 137 Page 138 Page 139 Page 140 Page 141 Page 142 Page 143 Page 144 Page 145 Page 146 Page 147 Page 148 Page 149 Page 150 Page 151 Page 152 Page 153 Page 154 Page 155 Page 156 Page 157 Page 158 Page 159 Page 160 Page 161 Page 162 Page 163 Page 164 Page 165 Page 166 Page 167 Page 168 Page 169 Page 170 Page 171 Page 172 Page 173 Page 174 Page 175 Page 176 Page 177 Page 178 Page 179 Page 180 Page 181 Page 182 Page 183 Page 184 Page 185 Page 186 Page 187 Page 188 Page 189 Page 190 Page 191 Page 192 Page 193 Page 194 Page 195 Page 196 Page 197 Page 198 Page 199 Page 200 Page 201 Page 202 Page 203 Page 204 Page 205 Page 206 Page 207 Page 208 Page 209 Page 210 Page 211 Page 212 Page 213 Page 214 Page 215 Page 216 Page 217 Page 218 Page 219 Page 220 Page 221 Page 222 Page 223 Page 224 Page 225 Page 226 Page 227 Page 228 Page 229 Page 230 Page 231 Page 232 Page 233 Page 234 Page 235 Page 236 Page 237 Page 238 Page 239 Page 240 Page 241 Page 242 Page 243 Page 244 Page 245 Page 246 Page 247 Page 248 Page 249 Page 250 Page 251 Page 252 Page 253 Page 254 Page 255 Page 256 Page 257 Page 258 Page 259 Page 260 Page 261 Page 262 Page 263 Page 264 Page 265 Page 266 Page 267 Page 268 Page 269 Page 270 Page 271 Page 272 Page 273 Page 274 Page 275 Page 276 Page 277 Page 278 Page 279 Page 280 Page 281 Page 282 Page 283 Page 284 Page 285 Page 286 Page 287 Page 288 Page 289 Page 290 Page 291 Page 292 Page 293 Page 294 Page 295 Page 296 Page 297 Page 298 Page 299 Page 300 Page 301 Page 302 Page 303 Page 304 Page 305 Page 306 Page 307 Page 308 Page 309 Page 310 Page 311 Page 312 Page 313 Page 314 Page 315 Page 316 Page 317 Page 318 Page 319 Page 320 Page 321 Page 322 Page 323 Page 324 Page 325 Page 326 Page 327 Page 328 Page 329 Page 330 Page 331 Page 332 Page 333 Page 334

Scan: The Lutheran Church—Missouri Synod

⤓ Download page image (full resolution)

Transcription machine transcription, uncorrected

⤓ Download .txt · copy text

214

Ecclesial matters

7-10

To Require Consideration of Certain Requests
for Review of CCM Opinions
Whereas, “The Commission on Constitutional Matters [CCM]
exists to interpret the Constitution, Bylaws, and resolutions of the
Synod and ensure that the governing instruments of the Synod and
its agencies are in accord with the Constitution and Bylaws of the
Synod” (Bylaw 3.9.2); and
Whereas, “An opinion rendered by the commission shall be
binding on the question decided unless and until it is overruled by a
convention of the Synod” (Bylaw 3.9.2.2 [c]); and
Whereas, A CCM opinion remains binding if a convention of
Synod does not address it; and
Whereas, The provision to review CCM opinions is available but
rarely happens; and
Whereas, There is currently no requirement that overtures or
resolutions submitted regarding CCM opinions be given time for
consideration by a convention of Synod, thus allowing an opinion to
remain binding without any consideration by a convention of Synod;
and
Whereas, Such opinions in effect end up changing the By-laws,
while amendments to the Bylaws are the responsibility of only the
conventions of the Synod (Bylaws 7.1.1 and 7.1.2); therefore be it
Resolved, That we memorialize the Synod so that any overtures/
resolutions submitted to a convention of the Synod regarding opinions rendered by the CCM must be given time for consideration by
the convention of Synod, and may not be removed from the docket
when such overtures/resolutions are submitted by a circuit forum, an
official district conference of ordained and/or commissioned ministers, the Board of Directors of the Synod, a district board of directors,
or a district convention; and be it further
Resolved, That any contested CCM opinion which receives no
time for consideration by a convention of the Synod be declared
null and void upon the adjournment of that convention of the Synod.
Wyoming District
7-11

To Require Consideration of CCM-Related
Overtures and Resolutions re Theological Matters
Whereas, “The Commission on Constitutional Matters exists to
interpret the Constitution, Bylaws, and resolutions of the Synod and
ensure that the governing instruments of the Synod and its agencies are in accord with the Constitution and Bylaws of the Synod”
(Bylaw 3.9.2); and
Whereas, “An opinion rendered by the [CCM] shall be binding
on the question decided unless and until it is overruled by a convention of the Synod. Overtures to a convention that seek to overrule an
opinion of the commission shall support the proposed action with substantive rationale from the Constitution, Bylaws, and resolutions of
the Synod. All such overtures shall be considered by the floor committee to which they have been assigned and shall be included in a
specific report to the convention with recommendations for appropriate action” (Bylaw 3.9.2.2 [c]); and
Whereas, There is a review procedure when “an opinion pertains
to business, legal, or property matters and the Board of Directors of
the Synod concludes that such opinion of the commission is contrary
to the laws of the State of Missouri” (Bylaw 3.9.2.2 [c]); and

Whereas, The only remedy when an opinion pertains to theological matters is “consideration by the floor committee” (Bylaw 3.9.2.2
[c]), which does not necessarily result in consideration by the convention of Synod, thus allowing an opinion on theological matters to
remain binding without review by the convention; and
Whereas, Amendments to the Bylaws are the responsibility of
ONLY the conventions of the Synod (Bylaws 7.1.1 and 7.1.2); therefore be it
Resolved, That any overtures and resolutions submitted to a convention of Synod regarding theological opinions rendered by the
CCMmust be given time for consideration by the convention of Synod
and may not be removed from the docket; and be it further
Resolved, That any CCM opinion that has been challenged as
outlined above and which receives no time for consideration by the
convention of Synod be declared null and void upon the adjournment
of that convention.
Circuit 3 Forum
North Wisconsin District
7-12

To Overrule CCM Opinion 02-2309
re Ecclesiastical Supervision
Whereas, Commission on Constitutional Matters Opinion
02-2309 states that “the Synod is precluded from taking any action
to terminate the membership of its member who, when performing
his/her official duties, follows the advice and counsel of the ecclesiastical supervisor designated by the Synod”; and
Whereas, This opinion creates the possibility that the Synod could
be precluded from action against a member of the Synod who is, in
fact, acting contrary to conditions of membership outlined in Article
VI of the Synod’s Constitution; and
Whereas, In issuing Opinion 02-2309 the CCM has therefore, in
effect, improperly amended Article XIII of the Constitution of the
Synod; and
Whereas, In issuing this opinion the CCM has granted district
presidents and other ecclesiastical supervisors a new power, that of
granting immunity to those who may violate the Constitution; and
Whereas, Since the Constitution of the Synod states, “The officers
of the Synod must assume only such rights as have been expressly
conferred upon them by the Synod,” (XI A 1) giving ecclesiastical
supervisors the right to grant immunity also amounts to an improper
amendment to the Constitution; and
Whereas, These are substantive constitutional arguments; and
Whereas, Bylaw 3.9.2.2 (c) states, “An opinion rendered by the
commission shall be binding on the question decided unless and until
it is overruled by a convention of the Synod”; therefore be it
Resolved, That the Montana District memorialize the Synod in
convention to overrule Opinion 02-2309 of the CCM.
Montana District
7-13

To Overrule CCM Opinions 02-2296 02-2309,
and 02-2320
Rationale
The Synod’s Commission on Constitutional Matters (CCM)
has opined that “The Constitution and Bylaws of the Synod do not
allow or contemplate the expulsion of a member of the Synod on

2010 Convention Workbook

2010 Convention.indb 214

4/15/10 2:39 PM