Collection › LCMS Convention Workbook (St. Louis, Missouri) › 2010 · 64th Convention, Houston › Page 214
LCMS Convention Workbook St. Louis, Missouri — 2010, Page 214
front matter 1
front matter 2
front matter 3
front matter 4
front matter 5
front matter 6
front matter 7
front matter 8
front matter 9
front matter 10
front matter 11
front matter 12
front matter 13
front matter 14
front matter 15
front matter 16
front matter 17
front matter 18
front matter 19
front matter 20
Page 1
Page 2
Page 3
Page 4
Page 5
Page 6
Page 7
Page 8
Page 9
Page 10
Page 11
Page 12
Page 13
Page 14
Page 15
Page 16
Page 17
Page 18
Page 19
Page 20
Page 21
Page 22
Page 23
Page 24
Page 25
Page 26
Page 27
Page 28
Page 29
Page 30
Page 31
Page 32
Page 33
Page 34
Page 35
Page 36
Page 37
Page 38
Page 39
Page 40
Page 41
Page 42
Page 43
Page 44
Page 45
Page 46
Page 47
Page 48
Page 49
Page 50
Page 51
Page 52
Page 53
Page 54
Page 55
Page 56
Page 57
Page 58
Page 59
Page 60
Page 61
Page 62
Page 63
Page 64
Page 65
Page 66
Page 67
Page 68
Page 69
Page 70
Page 71
Page 72
Page 73
Page 74
Page 75
Page 76
Page 77
Page 78
Page 79
Page 80
Page 81
Page 82
Page 83
Page 84
Page 85
Page 86
Page 87
Page 88
Page 89
Page 90
Page 91
Page 92
Page 93
Page 94
Page 95
Page 96
Page 97
Page 98
Page 99
Page 100
Page 101
Page 102
Page 103
Page 104
Page 105
Page 106
Page 107
Page 108
Page 109
Page 110
Page 111
Page 112
Page 113
Page 114
Page 115
Page 116
Page 117
Page 118
Page 119
Page 120
Page 121
Page 122
Page 123
Page 124
Page 125
Page 126
Page 127
Page 128
Page 129
Page 130
Page 131
Page 132
Page 133
Page 134
Page 135
Page 136
Page 137
Page 138
Page 139
Page 140
Page 141
Page 142
Page 143
Page 144
Page 145
Page 146
Page 147
Page 148
Page 149
Page 150
Page 151
Page 152
Page 153
Page 154
Page 155
Page 156
Page 157
Page 158
Page 159
Page 160
Page 161
Page 162
Page 163
Page 164
Page 165
Page 166
Page 167
Page 168
Page 169
Page 170
Page 171
Page 172
Page 173
Page 174
Page 175
Page 176
Page 177
Page 178
Page 179
Page 180
Page 181
Page 182
Page 183
Page 184
Page 185
Page 186
Page 187
Page 188
Page 189
Page 190
Page 191
Page 192
Page 193
Page 194
Page 195
Page 196
Page 197
Page 198
Page 199
Page 200
Page 201
Page 202
Page 203
Page 204
Page 205
Page 206
Page 207
Page 208
Page 209
Page 210
Page 211
Page 212
Page 213
Page 214
Page 215
Page 216
Page 217
Page 218
Page 219
Page 220
Page 221
Page 222
Page 223
Page 224
Page 225
Page 226
Page 227
Page 228
Page 229
Page 230
Page 231
Page 232
Page 233
Page 234
Page 235
Page 236
Page 237
Page 238
Page 239
Page 240
Page 241
Page 242
Page 243
Page 244
Page 245
Page 246
Page 247
Page 248
Page 249
Page 250
Page 251
Page 252
Page 253
Page 254
Page 255
Page 256
Page 257
Page 258
Page 259
Page 260
Page 261
Page 262
Page 263
Page 264
Page 265
Page 266
Page 267
Page 268
Page 269
Page 270
Page 271
Page 272
Page 273
Page 274
Page 275
Page 276
Page 277
Page 278
Page 279
Page 280
Page 281
Page 282
Page 283
Page 284
Page 285
Page 286
Page 287
Page 288
Page 289
Page 290
Page 291
Page 292
Page 293
Page 294
Page 295
Page 296
Page 297
Page 298
Page 299
Page 300
Page 301
Page 302
Page 303
Page 304
Page 305
Page 306
Page 307
Page 308
Page 309
Page 310
Page 311
Page 312
Page 313
Page 314
Page 315
Page 316
Page 317
Page 318
Page 319
Page 320
Page 321
Page 322
Page 323
Page 324
Page 325
Page 326
Page 327
Page 328
Page 329
Page 330
Page 331
Page 332
Page 333
Page 334
Scan: The Lutheran Church—Missouri Synod
⤓ Download page image (full resolution)
Transcription machine transcription, uncorrected
214
Ecclesial matters
7-10
To Require Consideration of Certain Requests
for Review of CCM Opinions
Whereas, “The Commission on Constitutional Matters [CCM]
exists to interpret the Constitution, Bylaws, and resolutions of the
Synod and ensure that the governing instruments of the Synod and
its agencies are in accord with the Constitution and Bylaws of the
Synod” (Bylaw 3.9.2); and
Whereas, “An opinion rendered by the commission shall be
binding on the question decided unless and until it is overruled by a
convention of the Synod” (Bylaw 3.9.2.2 [c]); and
Whereas, A CCM opinion remains binding if a convention of
Synod does not address it; and
Whereas, The provision to review CCM opinions is available but
rarely happens; and
Whereas, There is currently no requirement that overtures or
resolutions submitted regarding CCM opinions be given time for
consideration by a convention of Synod, thus allowing an opinion to
remain binding without any consideration by a convention of Synod;
and
Whereas, Such opinions in effect end up changing the By-laws,
while amendments to the Bylaws are the responsibility of only the
conventions of the Synod (Bylaws 7.1.1 and 7.1.2); therefore be it
Resolved, That we memorialize the Synod so that any overtures/
resolutions submitted to a convention of the Synod regarding opinions rendered by the CCM must be given time for consideration by
the convention of Synod, and may not be removed from the docket
when such overtures/resolutions are submitted by a circuit forum, an
official district conference of ordained and/or commissioned ministers, the Board of Directors of the Synod, a district board of directors,
or a district convention; and be it further
Resolved, That any contested CCM opinion which receives no
time for consideration by a convention of the Synod be declared
null and void upon the adjournment of that convention of the Synod.
Wyoming District
7-11
To Require Consideration of CCM-Related
Overtures and Resolutions re Theological Matters
Whereas, “The Commission on Constitutional Matters exists to
interpret the Constitution, Bylaws, and resolutions of the Synod and
ensure that the governing instruments of the Synod and its agencies are in accord with the Constitution and Bylaws of the Synod”
(Bylaw 3.9.2); and
Whereas, “An opinion rendered by the [CCM] shall be binding
on the question decided unless and until it is overruled by a convention of the Synod. Overtures to a convention that seek to overrule an
opinion of the commission shall support the proposed action with substantive rationale from the Constitution, Bylaws, and resolutions of
the Synod. All such overtures shall be considered by the floor committee to which they have been assigned and shall be included in a
specific report to the convention with recommendations for appropriate action” (Bylaw 3.9.2.2 [c]); and
Whereas, There is a review procedure when “an opinion pertains
to business, legal, or property matters and the Board of Directors of
the Synod concludes that such opinion of the commission is contrary
to the laws of the State of Missouri” (Bylaw 3.9.2.2 [c]); and
Whereas, The only remedy when an opinion pertains to theological matters is “consideration by the floor committee” (Bylaw 3.9.2.2
[c]), which does not necessarily result in consideration by the convention of Synod, thus allowing an opinion on theological matters to
remain binding without review by the convention; and
Whereas, Amendments to the Bylaws are the responsibility of
ONLY the conventions of the Synod (Bylaws 7.1.1 and 7.1.2); therefore be it
Resolved, That any overtures and resolutions submitted to a convention of Synod regarding theological opinions rendered by the
CCMmust be given time for consideration by the convention of Synod
and may not be removed from the docket; and be it further
Resolved, That any CCM opinion that has been challenged as
outlined above and which receives no time for consideration by the
convention of Synod be declared null and void upon the adjournment
of that convention.
Circuit 3 Forum
North Wisconsin District
7-12
To Overrule CCM Opinion 02-2309
re Ecclesiastical Supervision
Whereas, Commission on Constitutional Matters Opinion
02-2309 states that “the Synod is precluded from taking any action
to terminate the membership of its member who, when performing
his/her official duties, follows the advice and counsel of the ecclesiastical supervisor designated by the Synod”; and
Whereas, This opinion creates the possibility that the Synod could
be precluded from action against a member of the Synod who is, in
fact, acting contrary to conditions of membership outlined in Article
VI of the Synod’s Constitution; and
Whereas, In issuing Opinion 02-2309 the CCM has therefore, in
effect, improperly amended Article XIII of the Constitution of the
Synod; and
Whereas, In issuing this opinion the CCM has granted district
presidents and other ecclesiastical supervisors a new power, that of
granting immunity to those who may violate the Constitution; and
Whereas, Since the Constitution of the Synod states, “The officers
of the Synod must assume only such rights as have been expressly
conferred upon them by the Synod,” (XI A 1) giving ecclesiastical
supervisors the right to grant immunity also amounts to an improper
amendment to the Constitution; and
Whereas, These are substantive constitutional arguments; and
Whereas, Bylaw 3.9.2.2 (c) states, “An opinion rendered by the
commission shall be binding on the question decided unless and until
it is overruled by a convention of the Synod”; therefore be it
Resolved, That the Montana District memorialize the Synod in
convention to overrule Opinion 02-2309 of the CCM.
Montana District
7-13
To Overrule CCM Opinions 02-2296 02-2309,
and 02-2320
Rationale
The Synod’s Commission on Constitutional Matters (CCM)
has opined that “The Constitution and Bylaws of the Synod do not
allow or contemplate the expulsion of a member of the Synod on
2010 Convention Workbook
2010 Convention.indb 214
4/15/10 2:39 PM