Collection › LCMS Convention Workbook (St. Louis, Missouri) › 2010 · 64th Convention, Houston › Page 78
LCMS Convention Workbook St. Louis, Missouri — 2010, Page 78
front matter 1
front matter 2
front matter 3
front matter 4
front matter 5
front matter 6
front matter 7
front matter 8
front matter 9
front matter 10
front matter 11
front matter 12
front matter 13
front matter 14
front matter 15
front matter 16
front matter 17
front matter 18
front matter 19
front matter 20
Page 1
Page 2
Page 3
Page 4
Page 5
Page 6
Page 7
Page 8
Page 9
Page 10
Page 11
Page 12
Page 13
Page 14
Page 15
Page 16
Page 17
Page 18
Page 19
Page 20
Page 21
Page 22
Page 23
Page 24
Page 25
Page 26
Page 27
Page 28
Page 29
Page 30
Page 31
Page 32
Page 33
Page 34
Page 35
Page 36
Page 37
Page 38
Page 39
Page 40
Page 41
Page 42
Page 43
Page 44
Page 45
Page 46
Page 47
Page 48
Page 49
Page 50
Page 51
Page 52
Page 53
Page 54
Page 55
Page 56
Page 57
Page 58
Page 59
Page 60
Page 61
Page 62
Page 63
Page 64
Page 65
Page 66
Page 67
Page 68
Page 69
Page 70
Page 71
Page 72
Page 73
Page 74
Page 75
Page 76
Page 77
Page 78
Page 79
Page 80
Page 81
Page 82
Page 83
Page 84
Page 85
Page 86
Page 87
Page 88
Page 89
Page 90
Page 91
Page 92
Page 93
Page 94
Page 95
Page 96
Page 97
Page 98
Page 99
Page 100
Page 101
Page 102
Page 103
Page 104
Page 105
Page 106
Page 107
Page 108
Page 109
Page 110
Page 111
Page 112
Page 113
Page 114
Page 115
Page 116
Page 117
Page 118
Page 119
Page 120
Page 121
Page 122
Page 123
Page 124
Page 125
Page 126
Page 127
Page 128
Page 129
Page 130
Page 131
Page 132
Page 133
Page 134
Page 135
Page 136
Page 137
Page 138
Page 139
Page 140
Page 141
Page 142
Page 143
Page 144
Page 145
Page 146
Page 147
Page 148
Page 149
Page 150
Page 151
Page 152
Page 153
Page 154
Page 155
Page 156
Page 157
Page 158
Page 159
Page 160
Page 161
Page 162
Page 163
Page 164
Page 165
Page 166
Page 167
Page 168
Page 169
Page 170
Page 171
Page 172
Page 173
Page 174
Page 175
Page 176
Page 177
Page 178
Page 179
Page 180
Page 181
Page 182
Page 183
Page 184
Page 185
Page 186
Page 187
Page 188
Page 189
Page 190
Page 191
Page 192
Page 193
Page 194
Page 195
Page 196
Page 197
Page 198
Page 199
Page 200
Page 201
Page 202
Page 203
Page 204
Page 205
Page 206
Page 207
Page 208
Page 209
Page 210
Page 211
Page 212
Page 213
Page 214
Page 215
Page 216
Page 217
Page 218
Page 219
Page 220
Page 221
Page 222
Page 223
Page 224
Page 225
Page 226
Page 227
Page 228
Page 229
Page 230
Page 231
Page 232
Page 233
Page 234
Page 235
Page 236
Page 237
Page 238
Page 239
Page 240
Page 241
Page 242
Page 243
Page 244
Page 245
Page 246
Page 247
Page 248
Page 249
Page 250
Page 251
Page 252
Page 253
Page 254
Page 255
Page 256
Page 257
Page 258
Page 259
Page 260
Page 261
Page 262
Page 263
Page 264
Page 265
Page 266
Page 267
Page 268
Page 269
Page 270
Page 271
Page 272
Page 273
Page 274
Page 275
Page 276
Page 277
Page 278
Page 279
Page 280
Page 281
Page 282
Page 283
Page 284
Page 285
Page 286
Page 287
Page 288
Page 289
Page 290
Page 291
Page 292
Page 293
Page 294
Page 295
Page 296
Page 297
Page 298
Page 299
Page 300
Page 301
Page 302
Page 303
Page 304
Page 305
Page 306
Page 307
Page 308
Page 309
Page 310
Page 311
Page 312
Page 313
Page 314
Page 315
Page 316
Page 317
Page 318
Page 319
Page 320
Page 321
Page 322
Page 323
Page 324
Page 325
Page 326
Page 327
Page 328
Page 329
Page 330
Page 331
Page 332
Page 333
Page 334
Scan: The Lutheran Church—Missouri Synod
⤓ Download page image (full resolution)
Transcription machine transcription, uncorrected
78
SYNOD REPORTS
ing this period, thus providing more thorough, integrated advice and
assistance.
In 2007, LCEF partnered with several outside funding sources
to find ways to help large schools refinance their mortgage at even
lower rates through tax-exempt bond funding. Partnering with two
state-financing agencies—the Missouri Health and Educational
Facilities Authority and the Colorado Educational and Cultural
Facilities Authority—LCEF was able to provide LCMS schools with
tax-exempt financing, resulting in loan rates at a net savings for our
schools of up to 1.5%. These savings allow the ministries to use those
valuable dollars for mission and ministry outreach.
2007–8
In 2008, LCEF celebrated 30 years of incorporation, a result of
many people dedicating themselves to serving God’s plan for more
than 100 years through church extension and ensuring it will serve
on for eternity.
In 2008, LCEF increased its emphasis on partnerships that expand
ministry opportunities. Though there were many challenges within
the economy, financial and real estate markets, and loan and housing industries, LCEF’s mission statement remained at the heart of all
decisions, allowing God’s light to lead the way. By remaining conservative stewards of the assets entrusted to the mission, LCEF was
able to support His work in many ways, such as
• approving a loan to the Evangelical Lutheran Church of Latvia,
which previously operated for decades under Soviet rule;
• assisting additional Lutheran schools to gain money-saving
tax-exempt financing;
• growing the rostered church worker loan program and loan
options;
• increasing the Capital Funding Services capabilities to meet
the needs of churches; and
• offering new investment options that promote good stewardship and provide needed loan funds at the same time.
New investment opportunities were introduced to expand participation and partnership among LCMS members. The Family
Emergency StewardAccount®, which helps investors set aside funds
for unexpected needs, and the FlexPlus Health Savings Account
(HSA), for use with qualified high-deductible health plans, provides
investors products that address changes in personal finance.
Ministry Services supported the church-planting initiative and
church revitalization efforts of the LCMS by underwriting the
Strategic Ministry Planning process and demographic analysis for
selected Ablaze! Covenant Congregations. These complimentary
services provided vital assistance to the missions as they strove to
establish their ministry vision and reach more people.
Working with the Synod to help Lutheran schools remain healthy,
LCEF introduced LCEF Marketing Resources (www.lcefmarketing.
com) in fiscal 2009, an online source for branded direct-marketing
and communication materials for schools of all levels. This is an
extension of the Neighbor-to-Neighbor Mailing List service offered
by Demographic Services, and it efficiently answers the question
many schools had of what to mail/distribute in recruitment and retention efforts. These materials establish a professional brand image at
a reasonable price.
In spite of the economic downturn, LCEF continued to maintain a
strong capital position to support growth and operations and provide
investor protection. The liquidity position remained robust, with an
investment portfolio in excess of $300 million in marketable securi-
ties and line-of-credit arrangements totaling $100 million. Total assets
at the end of fiscal 2008 were more than $1.8 billion.
Subprime mortgages were a constant source of national news during this period. LCEF, however, was not negatively impacted by direct
investments in these products. LCEF’s loan portfolio—mostly comprised of loans to congregations and other ministries—experienced
a slight rise in the loan delinquency rate, but there were few foreclosures and minimal write-offs. LCEF did experience losses during
fiscal year 2008 due to falling property values on real estate securing certain loans. These losses were fully provided for in year-end
financials, with LCEF’s net income—after the reserves for real estate
collateral were covered—totaling $2.9 million.
LCEF works with outside professional financial advisors to
construct and maintain a diversified, conservative, and prudent investment portfolio. LCEF had no direct investment and minimal indirect
investment in the financial firms that failed late in 2008. LCEF did
hold Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac fixed-income securities, but they
were backed by the federal government and did not expose LCEF to
financial losses. During calendar 2008 and early 2009, the majority of the investment portfolio was in fixed-income investments
with a smaller amount invested in a diversified portfolio of equities.
Since LCEF is required to record its investments at market value on
a month-end basis, LCEF’s financial statements reflect values in both
volatile and stable market conditions.
2008–9
The extended economic recession and downturn in the equity and
real estate markets impacted the financial condition of LCEF in fiscal 2009. However, steps were taken to improve LCEF’s financial
position, reduce risk, and ensure the availability of its services and
loan funds.
LCEF experienced strong operating income in fiscal year 2009
and into the beginning of fiscal 2010, driven by an increase in net
interest income that was the result of falling interest costs on investor
payables. The economic downturn, however, impacted the cash flow
of some of the congregations and schools borrowing from LCEF. As a
result, loan delinquencies increased to 6.4% from 2.7%. In addition,
impaired loans (defined as a loan placed on nonaccrual status or with
restructured terms) increased to $63 million of the $1.5 billion loan
portfolio as of June 30, 2009. To accommodate this impact, LCEF
increased its provision for loan losses to $6.8 million. Consistent
with our mission of being a ministry partner, LCEF works closely
with organizations to assist them in addressing their financial concerns and to keep loans current. At fiscal 2009 year-end, the total
operating income totaled $4.6 million, an increase of $2.6 million
compared to the prior year.
Due to the substantial downturn in the equity markets, LCEF experienced net investment losses totaling $28.9 million, or 10.6% of
LCEF’s average investment balance. With declining real estate values, LCEF recorded net losses resulting from updated real estate
valuations and foreclosed assets totaling $1.4 million. The positive
operating income described above was offset by these losses, resulting in a total net loss for the fiscal year of $24.8 million.
LCEF deemed it prudent to reduce risk in light of these major
economic issues and to accommodate the increasing rate of loan delinquencies. The investment portfolio was reallocated to include only
conservative, fixed-income investments. This change in investment
strategy realized a substantial portion of the 10.6% in investment
losses described above.
Since LCEF’s ability to meet future loan demand is contingent on
its capital strength and liquidity, gifting opportunities were used to
2010 Convention Workbook
2010 Convention.indb 78
4/15/10 2:38 PM