Collection › LCMS Convention Workbook (St. Louis, Missouri) › 2010 · 64th Convention, Houston › Page 78

LCMS Convention Workbook St. Louis, Missouri — 2010, Page 78

front matter 1 front matter 2 front matter 3 front matter 4 front matter 5 front matter 6 front matter 7 front matter 8 front matter 9 front matter 10 front matter 11 front matter 12 front matter 13 front matter 14 front matter 15 front matter 16 front matter 17 front matter 18 front matter 19 front matter 20 Page 1 Page 2 Page 3 Page 4 Page 5 Page 6 Page 7 Page 8 Page 9 Page 10 Page 11 Page 12 Page 13 Page 14 Page 15 Page 16 Page 17 Page 18 Page 19 Page 20 Page 21 Page 22 Page 23 Page 24 Page 25 Page 26 Page 27 Page 28 Page 29 Page 30 Page 31 Page 32 Page 33 Page 34 Page 35 Page 36 Page 37 Page 38 Page 39 Page 40 Page 41 Page 42 Page 43 Page 44 Page 45 Page 46 Page 47 Page 48 Page 49 Page 50 Page 51 Page 52 Page 53 Page 54 Page 55 Page 56 Page 57 Page 58 Page 59 Page 60 Page 61 Page 62 Page 63 Page 64 Page 65 Page 66 Page 67 Page 68 Page 69 Page 70 Page 71 Page 72 Page 73 Page 74 Page 75 Page 76 Page 77 Page 78 Page 79 Page 80 Page 81 Page 82 Page 83 Page 84 Page 85 Page 86 Page 87 Page 88 Page 89 Page 90 Page 91 Page 92 Page 93 Page 94 Page 95 Page 96 Page 97 Page 98 Page 99 Page 100 Page 101 Page 102 Page 103 Page 104 Page 105 Page 106 Page 107 Page 108 Page 109 Page 110 Page 111 Page 112 Page 113 Page 114 Page 115 Page 116 Page 117 Page 118 Page 119 Page 120 Page 121 Page 122 Page 123 Page 124 Page 125 Page 126 Page 127 Page 128 Page 129 Page 130 Page 131 Page 132 Page 133 Page 134 Page 135 Page 136 Page 137 Page 138 Page 139 Page 140 Page 141 Page 142 Page 143 Page 144 Page 145 Page 146 Page 147 Page 148 Page 149 Page 150 Page 151 Page 152 Page 153 Page 154 Page 155 Page 156 Page 157 Page 158 Page 159 Page 160 Page 161 Page 162 Page 163 Page 164 Page 165 Page 166 Page 167 Page 168 Page 169 Page 170 Page 171 Page 172 Page 173 Page 174 Page 175 Page 176 Page 177 Page 178 Page 179 Page 180 Page 181 Page 182 Page 183 Page 184 Page 185 Page 186 Page 187 Page 188 Page 189 Page 190 Page 191 Page 192 Page 193 Page 194 Page 195 Page 196 Page 197 Page 198 Page 199 Page 200 Page 201 Page 202 Page 203 Page 204 Page 205 Page 206 Page 207 Page 208 Page 209 Page 210 Page 211 Page 212 Page 213 Page 214 Page 215 Page 216 Page 217 Page 218 Page 219 Page 220 Page 221 Page 222 Page 223 Page 224 Page 225 Page 226 Page 227 Page 228 Page 229 Page 230 Page 231 Page 232 Page 233 Page 234 Page 235 Page 236 Page 237 Page 238 Page 239 Page 240 Page 241 Page 242 Page 243 Page 244 Page 245 Page 246 Page 247 Page 248 Page 249 Page 250 Page 251 Page 252 Page 253 Page 254 Page 255 Page 256 Page 257 Page 258 Page 259 Page 260 Page 261 Page 262 Page 263 Page 264 Page 265 Page 266 Page 267 Page 268 Page 269 Page 270 Page 271 Page 272 Page 273 Page 274 Page 275 Page 276 Page 277 Page 278 Page 279 Page 280 Page 281 Page 282 Page 283 Page 284 Page 285 Page 286 Page 287 Page 288 Page 289 Page 290 Page 291 Page 292 Page 293 Page 294 Page 295 Page 296 Page 297 Page 298 Page 299 Page 300 Page 301 Page 302 Page 303 Page 304 Page 305 Page 306 Page 307 Page 308 Page 309 Page 310 Page 311 Page 312 Page 313 Page 314 Page 315 Page 316 Page 317 Page 318 Page 319 Page 320 Page 321 Page 322 Page 323 Page 324 Page 325 Page 326 Page 327 Page 328 Page 329 Page 330 Page 331 Page 332 Page 333 Page 334

Scan: The Lutheran Church—Missouri Synod

⤓ Download page image (full resolution)

Transcription machine transcription, uncorrected

⤓ Download .txt · copy text

78

SYNOD REPORTS

ing this period, thus providing more thorough, integrated advice and
assistance.
In 2007, LCEF partnered with several outside funding sources
to find ways to help large schools refinance their mortgage at even
lower rates through tax-exempt bond funding. Partnering with two
state-financing agencies—the Missouri Health and Educational
Facilities Authority and the Colorado Educational and Cultural
Facilities Authority—LCEF was able to provide LCMS schools with
tax-exempt financing, resulting in loan rates at a net savings for our
schools of up to 1.5%. These savings allow the ministries to use those
valuable dollars for mission and ministry outreach.
2007–8

In 2008, LCEF celebrated 30 years of incorporation, a result of
many people dedicating themselves to serving God’s plan for more
than 100 years through church extension and ensuring it will serve
on for eternity.
In 2008, LCEF increased its emphasis on partnerships that expand
ministry opportunities. Though there were many challenges within
the economy, financial and real estate markets, and loan and housing industries, LCEF’s mission statement remained at the heart of all
decisions, allowing God’s light to lead the way. By remaining conservative stewards of the assets entrusted to the mission, LCEF was
able to support His work in many ways, such as
•		approving a loan to the Evangelical Lutheran Church of Latvia,
which previously operated for decades under Soviet rule;
•		assisting additional Lutheran schools to gain money-saving
tax-exempt financing;
•		growing the rostered church worker loan program and loan
options;
•		increasing the Capital Funding Services capabilities to meet
the needs of churches; and
•		offering new investment options that promote good stewardship and provide needed loan funds at the same time.
New investment opportunities were introduced to expand participation and partnership among LCMS members. The Family
Emergency StewardAccount®, which helps investors set aside funds
for unexpected needs, and the FlexPlus Health Savings Account
(HSA), for use with qualified high-deductible health plans, provides
investors products that address changes in personal finance.
Ministry Services supported the church-planting initiative and
church revitalization efforts of the LCMS by underwriting the
Strategic Ministry Planning process and demographic analysis for
selected Ablaze! Covenant Congregations. These complimentary
services provided vital assistance to the missions as they strove to
establish their ministry vision and reach more people.
Working with the Synod to help Lutheran schools remain healthy,
LCEF introduced LCEF Marketing Resources (www.lcefmarketing.
com) in fiscal 2009, an online source for branded direct-marketing
and communication materials for schools of all levels. This is an
extension of the Neighbor-to-Neighbor Mailing List service offered
by Demographic Services, and it efficiently answers the question
many schools had of what to mail/distribute in recruitment and retention efforts. These materials establish a professional brand image at
a reasonable price.
In spite of the economic downturn, LCEF continued to maintain a
strong capital position to support growth and operations and provide
investor protection. The liquidity position remained robust, with an
investment portfolio in excess of $300 million in marketable securi-

ties and line-of-credit arrangements totaling $100 million. Total assets
at the end of fiscal 2008 were more than $1.8 billion.
Subprime mortgages were a constant source of national news during this period. LCEF, however, was not negatively impacted by direct
investments in these products. LCEF’s loan portfolio—mostly comprised of loans to congregations and other ministries—experienced
a slight rise in the loan delinquency rate, but there were few foreclosures and minimal write-offs. LCEF did experience losses during
fiscal year 2008 due to falling property values on real estate securing certain loans. These losses were fully provided for in year-end
financials, with LCEF’s net income—after the reserves for real estate
collateral were covered—totaling $2.9 million.
LCEF works with outside professional financial advisors to
construct and maintain a diversified, conservative, and prudent investment portfolio. LCEF had no direct investment and minimal indirect
investment in the financial firms that failed late in 2008. LCEF did
hold Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac fixed-income securities, but they
were backed by the federal government and did not expose LCEF to
financial losses. During calendar 2008 and early 2009, the majority of the investment portfolio was in fixed-income investments
with a smaller amount invested in a diversified portfolio of equities.
Since LCEF is required to record its investments at market value on
a month-end basis, LCEF’s financial statements reflect values in both
volatile and stable market conditions.
2008–9

The extended economic recession and downturn in the equity and
real estate markets impacted the financial condition of LCEF in fiscal 2009. However, steps were taken to improve LCEF’s financial
position, reduce risk, and ensure the availability of its services and
loan funds.
LCEF experienced strong operating income in fiscal year 2009
and into the beginning of fiscal 2010, driven by an increase in net
interest income that was the result of falling interest costs on investor
payables. The economic downturn, however, impacted the cash flow
of some of the congregations and schools borrowing from LCEF. As a
result, loan delinquencies increased to 6.4% from 2.7%. In addition,
impaired loans (defined as a loan placed on nonaccrual status or with
restructured terms) increased to $63 million of the $1.5 billion loan
portfolio as of June 30, 2009. To accommodate this impact, LCEF
increased its provision for loan losses to $6.8 million. Consistent
with our mission of being a ministry partner, LCEF works closely
with organizations to assist them in addressing their financial concerns and to keep loans current. At fiscal 2009 year-end, the total
operating income totaled $4.6 million, an increase of $2.6 million
compared to the prior year.
Due to the substantial downturn in the equity markets, LCEF experienced net investment losses totaling $28.9 million, or 10.6% of
LCEF’s average investment balance. With declining real estate values, LCEF recorded net losses resulting from updated real estate
valuations and foreclosed assets totaling $1.4 million. The positive
operating income described above was offset by these losses, resulting in a total net loss for the fiscal year of $24.8 million.
LCEF deemed it prudent to reduce risk in light of these major
economic issues and to accommodate the increasing rate of loan delinquencies. The investment portfolio was reallocated to include only
conservative, fixed-income investments. This change in investment
strategy realized a substantial portion of the 10.6% in investment
losses described above.
Since LCEF’s ability to meet future loan demand is contingent on
its capital strength and liquidity, gifting opportunities were used to

2010 Convention Workbook

2010 Convention.indb 78

4/15/10 2:38 PM