Collection › LCMS Convention Workbook (St. Louis, Missouri) › 2010 · 64th Convention, Houston › Page 244
LCMS Convention Workbook St. Louis, Missouri — 2010, Page 244
front matter 1
front matter 2
front matter 3
front matter 4
front matter 5
front matter 6
front matter 7
front matter 8
front matter 9
front matter 10
front matter 11
front matter 12
front matter 13
front matter 14
front matter 15
front matter 16
front matter 17
front matter 18
front matter 19
front matter 20
Page 1
Page 2
Page 3
Page 4
Page 5
Page 6
Page 7
Page 8
Page 9
Page 10
Page 11
Page 12
Page 13
Page 14
Page 15
Page 16
Page 17
Page 18
Page 19
Page 20
Page 21
Page 22
Page 23
Page 24
Page 25
Page 26
Page 27
Page 28
Page 29
Page 30
Page 31
Page 32
Page 33
Page 34
Page 35
Page 36
Page 37
Page 38
Page 39
Page 40
Page 41
Page 42
Page 43
Page 44
Page 45
Page 46
Page 47
Page 48
Page 49
Page 50
Page 51
Page 52
Page 53
Page 54
Page 55
Page 56
Page 57
Page 58
Page 59
Page 60
Page 61
Page 62
Page 63
Page 64
Page 65
Page 66
Page 67
Page 68
Page 69
Page 70
Page 71
Page 72
Page 73
Page 74
Page 75
Page 76
Page 77
Page 78
Page 79
Page 80
Page 81
Page 82
Page 83
Page 84
Page 85
Page 86
Page 87
Page 88
Page 89
Page 90
Page 91
Page 92
Page 93
Page 94
Page 95
Page 96
Page 97
Page 98
Page 99
Page 100
Page 101
Page 102
Page 103
Page 104
Page 105
Page 106
Page 107
Page 108
Page 109
Page 110
Page 111
Page 112
Page 113
Page 114
Page 115
Page 116
Page 117
Page 118
Page 119
Page 120
Page 121
Page 122
Page 123
Page 124
Page 125
Page 126
Page 127
Page 128
Page 129
Page 130
Page 131
Page 132
Page 133
Page 134
Page 135
Page 136
Page 137
Page 138
Page 139
Page 140
Page 141
Page 142
Page 143
Page 144
Page 145
Page 146
Page 147
Page 148
Page 149
Page 150
Page 151
Page 152
Page 153
Page 154
Page 155
Page 156
Page 157
Page 158
Page 159
Page 160
Page 161
Page 162
Page 163
Page 164
Page 165
Page 166
Page 167
Page 168
Page 169
Page 170
Page 171
Page 172
Page 173
Page 174
Page 175
Page 176
Page 177
Page 178
Page 179
Page 180
Page 181
Page 182
Page 183
Page 184
Page 185
Page 186
Page 187
Page 188
Page 189
Page 190
Page 191
Page 192
Page 193
Page 194
Page 195
Page 196
Page 197
Page 198
Page 199
Page 200
Page 201
Page 202
Page 203
Page 204
Page 205
Page 206
Page 207
Page 208
Page 209
Page 210
Page 211
Page 212
Page 213
Page 214
Page 215
Page 216
Page 217
Page 218
Page 219
Page 220
Page 221
Page 222
Page 223
Page 224
Page 225
Page 226
Page 227
Page 228
Page 229
Page 230
Page 231
Page 232
Page 233
Page 234
Page 235
Page 236
Page 237
Page 238
Page 239
Page 240
Page 241
Page 242
Page 243
Page 244
Page 245
Page 246
Page 247
Page 248
Page 249
Page 250
Page 251
Page 252
Page 253
Page 254
Page 255
Page 256
Page 257
Page 258
Page 259
Page 260
Page 261
Page 262
Page 263
Page 264
Page 265
Page 266
Page 267
Page 268
Page 269
Page 270
Page 271
Page 272
Page 273
Page 274
Page 275
Page 276
Page 277
Page 278
Page 279
Page 280
Page 281
Page 282
Page 283
Page 284
Page 285
Page 286
Page 287
Page 288
Page 289
Page 290
Page 291
Page 292
Page 293
Page 294
Page 295
Page 296
Page 297
Page 298
Page 299
Page 300
Page 301
Page 302
Page 303
Page 304
Page 305
Page 306
Page 307
Page 308
Page 309
Page 310
Page 311
Page 312
Page 313
Page 314
Page 315
Page 316
Page 317
Page 318
Page 319
Page 320
Page 321
Page 322
Page 323
Page 324
Page 325
Page 326
Page 327
Page 328
Page 329
Page 330
Page 331
Page 332
Page 333
Page 334
Scan: The Lutheran Church—Missouri Synod
⤓ Download page image (full resolution)
Transcription machine transcription, uncorrected
244
Synod Structure and Governance
meet the needs of the Haitians, and WRHC was among the first relief
organizations on the ground with a network of volunteer medical and
pastoral personnel (Will the restructuring plan improve the Synod’s
ability to initiate and nurture a sustainable network on the ground in
the United States and around the world that can be as responsive to
an earthquake, tsunami, flood, or hurricane as the current structure
has allowed?); and
Whereas, A significant portion of the work of WRHC involves
domestic grants to churches, pastors, church workers, and RSOs that
experience significant human care needs; and
Whereas, Responding to these needs requires experience and
resources (Will the restructuring plan improve the Synod’s ability
to attract, maintain, and foster the expertise and resources that have
been developed over the past several years?); and
Whereas, Domestically, the inter-Lutheran collaboration known
as Lutheran Services in America provides nearly $16 billion of service to communities and individuals with assistance that leadership
from the LCMS provided to this network; and
Whereas, LCMS RSOs depend upon this human care network
to improve quality and maintain and provide advocacy and care for
the most vulnerable citizens in America (Will the restructuring plan
improve the Synod’s ability to strengthen, oversee, encourage, and
advance this network and thereby serve increased needs as an expression of God’s love in Christ?); and
Whereas, In a rapidly shrinking world where global interaction
is increasingly common and long-standing values and cultural perspectives are being challenged and eroded, WRHC has been at the
forefront of discussions of and advocacy for life issues (Will the
restructuring improve the Synod’s ability to lead, speak, and partner in such a way that God’s plan for humankind is advanced and
He is honored?);
Whereas, WRHC has met external benchmarks established by
the Better Business Bureau regarding administrative and fund-raising
costs, receiving the best possible rating for combined administrative/communication expenses according to Charity Navigator (Will
the restructuring improve the Synod’s ability to meet these external
benchmarks?); and
Whereas, Disaster work, human care, mercy medical teams, life
ministries, and many other ministries of mercy are global and interconnected national and international efforts (Does splitting whatever
work of WRHC that remains after the restructuring into domestic mission and international mission advance the global work of mercy of
the church?); therefore be it
Resolved, That the delegates to the 2010 LCMS convention be
encouraged to prayerfully consider these questions when deliberating
upon “Recommendation #18: Realign the National Synod Ministries
around Two Mission Commissions.”
Board for Human Care Ministries
8-68
To Delay Implementation of BRTFSSG
Recommendation re National Office Structure
Whereas, In 2005, President Gerald Kieschnick appointed the
Blue Ribbon Task Force on Synod Structure and Governance; and
Whereas, Experience teaches that maximum attention must be
given to details and wording in making adjustments and/or changes
impinging on structure; and
Whereas, The Synod would do well to proceed with prayerful and
appropriate care in considering any changes; and
Whereas, Recommendation 18 in the task force’s final report of
October 15, 2009, has far-reaching and significant import; and
Whereas, It is not clear what areas of responsibility may/will be
transferred to districts and/or “other entities”; therefore be it
Resolved, That Our Savior Lutheran Church, Muscatine, IA,
memorialize the Synod to delay acting on this recommendation until
at least the 2013 national convention.
Our Savior, Muscatine, IA;
Zion, Wilton, IA
8-69
To Reject Proposal for Advisory Boards
Whereas, The BRTFSSG has proposed that all program boards on
the national level be advisory and function to encourage and support
a ministry rather than have any administrative role; and
Whereas, The BRTFSSG has proposed that all executive staff at
the national level report directly to the President of the Synod; and
Whereas, The BRTFSSG has not indicated how these executive
staff would be chosen, presumably by the President; and
Whereas, This proposal would be a significant centralization of
power; therefore be it
Resolved, That the Southern Illinois District in convention request
the Synod in convention to reject this proposal.
Southern Illinois District
8-70
To Consolidate Current National Boards
and Commissions
Whereas, In his response to the final report of the BRTFSSG,
President Kieschnick has pointed out that the national offices are
difficult to manage, expensive to operate, and programmatically
redundant; and
Whereas, There are several boards and commissions that perform
similar and overlapping functions; and
Whereas, In the interest of good stewardship of the financial
resources God has granted to our Synod, it would be prudent to eliminate such redundancy; therefore be it
Resolved, That the number of boards and commissions be reduced;
and be it further
Resolved, That the current boards and commissions be consolidated according to the following recommendations:
1. A Board for Higher Education, which would include supervision of
the seminaries, pre-sem programs, commissioned church-worker
training programs, universities, distance learning, and continuing
education, including the functions of the current Commission on
Ministerial Growth and Support;
2. A Board for Missions, which would include supervision over international missions, national ethnic missions and ministries, special
needs ministries, campus ministry, and armed forces ministry;
3. A Board for Human Care and Relief, which would include supervision over international and domestic relief, deaconess organizations,
coordination of social ministry organizations and RSOs, and work
with human rights organizations;
4. A Board for Parish Services, which would supervise Synod programs in the areas of evangelism, stewardship, fiscal management,
lay leadership training, parochial schools, youth, singles, worship
(including the current Commission on Worship), and Laborers for
Christ;
5. A Commission on Theology and Church Relations, which would
combine the current functions of the CTCR with the Commission
2010 Convention Workbook
2010 Convention.indb 244
4/15/10 2:40 PM