Collection › LCMS Convention Workbook (St. Louis, Missouri) › 2010 · 64th Convention, Houston › Page 244

LCMS Convention Workbook St. Louis, Missouri — 2010, Page 244

front matter 1 front matter 2 front matter 3 front matter 4 front matter 5 front matter 6 front matter 7 front matter 8 front matter 9 front matter 10 front matter 11 front matter 12 front matter 13 front matter 14 front matter 15 front matter 16 front matter 17 front matter 18 front matter 19 front matter 20 Page 1 Page 2 Page 3 Page 4 Page 5 Page 6 Page 7 Page 8 Page 9 Page 10 Page 11 Page 12 Page 13 Page 14 Page 15 Page 16 Page 17 Page 18 Page 19 Page 20 Page 21 Page 22 Page 23 Page 24 Page 25 Page 26 Page 27 Page 28 Page 29 Page 30 Page 31 Page 32 Page 33 Page 34 Page 35 Page 36 Page 37 Page 38 Page 39 Page 40 Page 41 Page 42 Page 43 Page 44 Page 45 Page 46 Page 47 Page 48 Page 49 Page 50 Page 51 Page 52 Page 53 Page 54 Page 55 Page 56 Page 57 Page 58 Page 59 Page 60 Page 61 Page 62 Page 63 Page 64 Page 65 Page 66 Page 67 Page 68 Page 69 Page 70 Page 71 Page 72 Page 73 Page 74 Page 75 Page 76 Page 77 Page 78 Page 79 Page 80 Page 81 Page 82 Page 83 Page 84 Page 85 Page 86 Page 87 Page 88 Page 89 Page 90 Page 91 Page 92 Page 93 Page 94 Page 95 Page 96 Page 97 Page 98 Page 99 Page 100 Page 101 Page 102 Page 103 Page 104 Page 105 Page 106 Page 107 Page 108 Page 109 Page 110 Page 111 Page 112 Page 113 Page 114 Page 115 Page 116 Page 117 Page 118 Page 119 Page 120 Page 121 Page 122 Page 123 Page 124 Page 125 Page 126 Page 127 Page 128 Page 129 Page 130 Page 131 Page 132 Page 133 Page 134 Page 135 Page 136 Page 137 Page 138 Page 139 Page 140 Page 141 Page 142 Page 143 Page 144 Page 145 Page 146 Page 147 Page 148 Page 149 Page 150 Page 151 Page 152 Page 153 Page 154 Page 155 Page 156 Page 157 Page 158 Page 159 Page 160 Page 161 Page 162 Page 163 Page 164 Page 165 Page 166 Page 167 Page 168 Page 169 Page 170 Page 171 Page 172 Page 173 Page 174 Page 175 Page 176 Page 177 Page 178 Page 179 Page 180 Page 181 Page 182 Page 183 Page 184 Page 185 Page 186 Page 187 Page 188 Page 189 Page 190 Page 191 Page 192 Page 193 Page 194 Page 195 Page 196 Page 197 Page 198 Page 199 Page 200 Page 201 Page 202 Page 203 Page 204 Page 205 Page 206 Page 207 Page 208 Page 209 Page 210 Page 211 Page 212 Page 213 Page 214 Page 215 Page 216 Page 217 Page 218 Page 219 Page 220 Page 221 Page 222 Page 223 Page 224 Page 225 Page 226 Page 227 Page 228 Page 229 Page 230 Page 231 Page 232 Page 233 Page 234 Page 235 Page 236 Page 237 Page 238 Page 239 Page 240 Page 241 Page 242 Page 243 Page 244 Page 245 Page 246 Page 247 Page 248 Page 249 Page 250 Page 251 Page 252 Page 253 Page 254 Page 255 Page 256 Page 257 Page 258 Page 259 Page 260 Page 261 Page 262 Page 263 Page 264 Page 265 Page 266 Page 267 Page 268 Page 269 Page 270 Page 271 Page 272 Page 273 Page 274 Page 275 Page 276 Page 277 Page 278 Page 279 Page 280 Page 281 Page 282 Page 283 Page 284 Page 285 Page 286 Page 287 Page 288 Page 289 Page 290 Page 291 Page 292 Page 293 Page 294 Page 295 Page 296 Page 297 Page 298 Page 299 Page 300 Page 301 Page 302 Page 303 Page 304 Page 305 Page 306 Page 307 Page 308 Page 309 Page 310 Page 311 Page 312 Page 313 Page 314 Page 315 Page 316 Page 317 Page 318 Page 319 Page 320 Page 321 Page 322 Page 323 Page 324 Page 325 Page 326 Page 327 Page 328 Page 329 Page 330 Page 331 Page 332 Page 333 Page 334

Scan: The Lutheran Church—Missouri Synod

⤓ Download page image (full resolution)

Transcription machine transcription, uncorrected

⤓ Download .txt · copy text

244

Synod Structure and Governance

meet the needs of the Haitians, and WRHC was among the first relief
organizations on the ground with a network of volunteer medical and
pastoral personnel (Will the restructuring plan improve the Synod’s
ability to initiate and nurture a sustainable network on the ground in
the United States and around the world that can be as responsive to
an earthquake, tsunami, flood, or hurricane as the current structure
has allowed?); and
Whereas, A significant portion of the work of WRHC involves
domestic grants to churches, pastors, church workers, and RSOs that
experience significant human care needs; and
Whereas, Responding to these needs requires experience and
resources (Will the restructuring plan improve the Synod’s ability
to attract, maintain, and foster the expertise and resources that have
been developed over the past several years?); and
Whereas, Domestically, the inter-Lutheran collaboration known
as Lutheran Services in America provides nearly $16 billion of service to communities and individuals with assistance that leadership
from the LCMS provided to this network; and
Whereas, LCMS RSOs depend upon this human care network
to improve quality and maintain and provide advocacy and care for
the most vulnerable citizens in America (Will the restructuring plan
improve the Synod’s ability to strengthen, oversee, encourage, and
advance this network and thereby serve increased needs as an expression of God’s love in Christ?); and
Whereas, In a rapidly shrinking world where global interaction
is increasingly common and long-standing values and cultural perspectives are being challenged and eroded, WRHC has been at the
forefront of discussions of and advocacy for life issues (Will the
restructuring improve the Synod’s ability to lead, speak, and partner in such a way that God’s plan for humankind is advanced and
He is honored?);
Whereas, WRHC has met external benchmarks established by
the Better Business Bureau regarding administrative and fund-raising
costs, receiving the best possible rating for combined administrative/communication expenses according to Charity Navigator (Will
the restructuring improve the Synod’s ability to meet these external
benchmarks?); and
Whereas, Disaster work, human care, mercy medical teams, life
ministries, and many other ministries of mercy are global and interconnected national and international efforts (Does splitting whatever
work of WRHC that remains after the restructuring into domestic mission and international mission advance the global work of mercy of
the church?); therefore be it
Resolved, That the delegates to the 2010 LCMS convention be
encouraged to prayerfully consider these questions when deliberating
upon “Recommendation #18: Realign the National Synod Ministries
around Two Mission Commissions.”
Board for Human Care Ministries
8-68

To Delay Implementation of BRTFSSG
Recommendation re National Office Structure
Whereas, In 2005, President Gerald Kieschnick appointed the
Blue Ribbon Task Force on Synod Structure and Governance; and
Whereas, Experience teaches that maximum attention must be
given to details and wording in making adjustments and/or changes
impinging on structure; and
Whereas, The Synod would do well to proceed with prayerful and
appropriate care in considering any changes; and

Whereas, Recommendation 18 in the task force’s final report of
October 15, 2009, has far-reaching and significant import; and
Whereas, It is not clear what areas of responsibility may/will be
transferred to districts and/or “other entities”; therefore be it
Resolved, That Our Savior Lutheran Church, Muscatine, IA,
memorialize the Synod to delay acting on this recommendation until
at least the 2013 national convention.
Our Savior, Muscatine, IA;
Zion, Wilton, IA
8-69

To Reject Proposal for Advisory Boards
Whereas, The BRTFSSG has proposed that all program boards on
the national level be advisory and function to encourage and support
a ministry rather than have any administrative role; and
Whereas, The BRTFSSG has proposed that all executive staff at
the national level report directly to the President of the Synod; and
Whereas, The BRTFSSG has not indicated how these executive
staff would be chosen, presumably by the President; and
Whereas, This proposal would be a significant centralization of
power; therefore be it
Resolved, That the Southern Illinois District in convention request
the Synod in convention to reject this proposal.
Southern Illinois District
8-70

To Consolidate Current National Boards
and Commissions
Whereas, In his response to the final report of the BRTFSSG,
President Kieschnick has pointed out that the national offices are
difficult to manage, expensive to operate, and programmatically
redundant; and
Whereas, There are several boards and commissions that perform
similar and overlapping functions; and
Whereas, In the interest of good stewardship of the financial
resources God has granted to our Synod, it would be prudent to eliminate such redundancy; therefore be it
Resolved, That the number of boards and commissions be reduced;
and be it further
Resolved, That the current boards and commissions be consolidated according to the following recommendations:
1. A Board for Higher Education, which would include supervision of
the seminaries, pre-sem programs, commissioned church-worker
training programs, universities, distance learning, and continuing
education, including the functions of the current Commission on
Ministerial Growth and Support;
2. A Board for Missions, which would include supervision over international missions, national ethnic missions and ministries, special
needs ministries, campus ministry, and armed forces ministry;
3. A Board for Human Care and Relief, which would include supervision over international and domestic relief, deaconess organizations,
coordination of social ministry organizations and RSOs, and work
with human rights organizations;
4. A Board for Parish Services, which would supervise Synod programs in the areas of evangelism, stewardship, fiscal management,
lay leadership training, parochial schools, youth, singles, worship
(including the current Commission on Worship), and Laborers for
Christ;
5. A Commission on Theology and Church Relations, which would
combine the current functions of the CTCR with the Commission

2010 Convention Workbook

2010 Convention.indb 244

4/15/10 2:40 PM