Collection › LCMS Convention Workbook (St. Louis, Missouri) › 2010 · 64th Convention, Houston › Page 18
LCMS Convention Workbook St. Louis, Missouri — 2010, Page 18
front matter 1
front matter 2
front matter 3
front matter 4
front matter 5
front matter 6
front matter 7
front matter 8
front matter 9
front matter 10
front matter 11
front matter 12
front matter 13
front matter 14
front matter 15
front matter 16
front matter 17
front matter 18
front matter 19
front matter 20
Page 1
Page 2
Page 3
Page 4
Page 5
Page 6
Page 7
Page 8
Page 9
Page 10
Page 11
Page 12
Page 13
Page 14
Page 15
Page 16
Page 17
Page 18
Page 19
Page 20
Page 21
Page 22
Page 23
Page 24
Page 25
Page 26
Page 27
Page 28
Page 29
Page 30
Page 31
Page 32
Page 33
Page 34
Page 35
Page 36
Page 37
Page 38
Page 39
Page 40
Page 41
Page 42
Page 43
Page 44
Page 45
Page 46
Page 47
Page 48
Page 49
Page 50
Page 51
Page 52
Page 53
Page 54
Page 55
Page 56
Page 57
Page 58
Page 59
Page 60
Page 61
Page 62
Page 63
Page 64
Page 65
Page 66
Page 67
Page 68
Page 69
Page 70
Page 71
Page 72
Page 73
Page 74
Page 75
Page 76
Page 77
Page 78
Page 79
Page 80
Page 81
Page 82
Page 83
Page 84
Page 85
Page 86
Page 87
Page 88
Page 89
Page 90
Page 91
Page 92
Page 93
Page 94
Page 95
Page 96
Page 97
Page 98
Page 99
Page 100
Page 101
Page 102
Page 103
Page 104
Page 105
Page 106
Page 107
Page 108
Page 109
Page 110
Page 111
Page 112
Page 113
Page 114
Page 115
Page 116
Page 117
Page 118
Page 119
Page 120
Page 121
Page 122
Page 123
Page 124
Page 125
Page 126
Page 127
Page 128
Page 129
Page 130
Page 131
Page 132
Page 133
Page 134
Page 135
Page 136
Page 137
Page 138
Page 139
Page 140
Page 141
Page 142
Page 143
Page 144
Page 145
Page 146
Page 147
Page 148
Page 149
Page 150
Page 151
Page 152
Page 153
Page 154
Page 155
Page 156
Page 157
Page 158
Page 159
Page 160
Page 161
Page 162
Page 163
Page 164
Page 165
Page 166
Page 167
Page 168
Page 169
Page 170
Page 171
Page 172
Page 173
Page 174
Page 175
Page 176
Page 177
Page 178
Page 179
Page 180
Page 181
Page 182
Page 183
Page 184
Page 185
Page 186
Page 187
Page 188
Page 189
Page 190
Page 191
Page 192
Page 193
Page 194
Page 195
Page 196
Page 197
Page 198
Page 199
Page 200
Page 201
Page 202
Page 203
Page 204
Page 205
Page 206
Page 207
Page 208
Page 209
Page 210
Page 211
Page 212
Page 213
Page 214
Page 215
Page 216
Page 217
Page 218
Page 219
Page 220
Page 221
Page 222
Page 223
Page 224
Page 225
Page 226
Page 227
Page 228
Page 229
Page 230
Page 231
Page 232
Page 233
Page 234
Page 235
Page 236
Page 237
Page 238
Page 239
Page 240
Page 241
Page 242
Page 243
Page 244
Page 245
Page 246
Page 247
Page 248
Page 249
Page 250
Page 251
Page 252
Page 253
Page 254
Page 255
Page 256
Page 257
Page 258
Page 259
Page 260
Page 261
Page 262
Page 263
Page 264
Page 265
Page 266
Page 267
Page 268
Page 269
Page 270
Page 271
Page 272
Page 273
Page 274
Page 275
Page 276
Page 277
Page 278
Page 279
Page 280
Page 281
Page 282
Page 283
Page 284
Page 285
Page 286
Page 287
Page 288
Page 289
Page 290
Page 291
Page 292
Page 293
Page 294
Page 295
Page 296
Page 297
Page 298
Page 299
Page 300
Page 301
Page 302
Page 303
Page 304
Page 305
Page 306
Page 307
Page 308
Page 309
Page 310
Page 311
Page 312
Page 313
Page 314
Page 315
Page 316
Page 317
Page 318
Page 319
Page 320
Page 321
Page 322
Page 323
Page 324
Page 325
Page 326
Page 327
Page 328
Page 329
Page 330
Page 331
Page 332
Page 333
Page 334
Scan: The Lutheran Church—Missouri Synod
⤓ Download page image (full resolution)
Transcription machine transcription, uncorrected
18
SYNOD REPORTS
4. Report and Recommendation on Ministry Policies, the ELCA,
page 5, available online at http://www.elca.org/ What-We-Believe/
Social-Issues/Social-Statements/JTF-Human-Sexuality/Report-andRecommendation.aspx.
5. Human Sexuality: Gift and Trust, the social statement adopted
by the ELCA Churchwide Assembly, p. 20, for example, states: “On
the basis of conscience-bound belief, some are convinced that the
scriptural witness does not address the context of sexual orientation
and lifelong loving and committed relationships that we experience
today.” http://www.elca.org/What-We-Believe/Social-Issues/SocialStatements/JTF-Human-Sexuality.aspx.
6. For example, Human Sexuality: Gift and Trust, page 19, states:
“We further believe that this church, on the basis of ‘the bound conscience’ will include these different understandings and practices
within its life as it seeks to live out its mission and ministry in the
world.”
7. See A Statement of Scriptural and Confessional Principles,
page 4, online at http://www.lcms.org/graphics/ assets/media/LCMS/
astatement.pdf.
8. Commission on Theology and Church Relations of the LCMS
(CTCR), The Inspiration of Scripture (March 1995), page 18, online at
http://www.lcms.org/graphics/assets/media/CTCR/Inspiration_%20
Scripture1.pdf. The report adds: “Inspiration gives the assurance that
in the Bible we have sound doctrine imparted in Spirit-taught words,
that the Biblical doctrinal formulations express the content of revelation in terms that dare not be discarded even when the range and
function of language in theology is a matter of much discussion as it
is at present” (page 18).
9. The Large Catechism, par. 207. From Robert Kolb and Timothy
Wengert, eds., The Book of Concord: Confessions of the Evangelical Lutheran Church (Minneapolis: Fortress Press, 2000), 414 (KW
hereafter).
10. Human Sexuality: Gift and Trust, p. 15, defines marriage without reference to any procreative intent: “Marriage is a covenant of
mutual promises, commitment, and hope authorized legally by the
state and blessed by God.”
11. See also Apology of the Augsburg Confession, Article XXIII,
par. 7, referring to “natural affection”: “This love of one sex for the
other is truly a divine ordinance” (KW page 249).
12. CTCR, Human Sexuality: A Theological Perspective, page 33,
online at http://www.lcms.org/graphics/assets/media/CTCR/Human_
Sexuality1.pdf.
13. ILC, “Same-Gender Relationships and the Church.”
14. Commission on Theology and Church Relations (CTCR),
The Lutheran Church—Missouri Synod, Gospel and Scripture: The
Interrelationship of the Material and Formal Principles in Lutheran
Theology (November 1972), page 6, online at http://www.lcms.org/
graphics/assets/media/CTCR/gospel_scripture.pdf.
15. A recently adopted CTCR report, Church Relations in the 21st
Century (p. 8), states: “With respect to developing relationships with
individuals, congregations, groups, or entities from other church bodies, it is important to avoid either the actuality or the appearance of
interference in the affairs and relationships of those church bodies.
While the Synod seeks to encourage strong confessional theology
and practice, it should do so in ecclesially responsible ways, without
encouraging internal dissension or purposefully undermining prior
relationships with other church bodies or groups.”
16. The CTCR also addresses the issue of cooperative work in
Faith Active in Love: Human Care in the Church’s Life (1999), p. 27:
“Christians can also organize to work together with Christians in other
traditions and with non-Christians in caring institutions of society.
… Such cooperation with others, either as individuals or in various
social structures, need not compromise the proclamation of the Gospel and the administration of the sacraments. Cooperative endeavors
of this kind, when they do not compromise the proclamation of God’s
Word, can be simply the living out of love that springs from a living faith. However, when other individuals or communities advocate
policies and programs that are contrary to the guidance given in the
Scriptures, great care should be taken by Christians not to cooperate in ways that compromise the proclamation of God’s Word.” See
also Inter-Christian Relationships: An Instrument for Study (1991),
p. 24, www.lcms.org/graphics/assets/media/CTCR/interchrel.pdf.
17. CTCR, Theology of Fellowship (1965), p. 43, online at
www.lcms.org?5136. The Synod, in convention, formally adopted
this report in 1967.
18. Augsburg Confession, Article VII, par 1, KW p. 42.
19. This distinction between communio in sacris (full sharing in
all the sacred things between Christian churches) and cooperatio in
externis (cooperating in external matters of human need) is worthy
of some explanation. We cannot, for example, invite a minister to
preach in our churches when he publicly disagrees with our doctrine.
However, we may indeed work together with him in organizing relief
efforts for people suffering from a tornado’s devastation.
20. See “Placing Adopted Children into Homosexual Contexts,”
a 2006 opinion of the CTCR, online at www.lcms.org/pages/internal.asp?NavID=10096.
21. Debates over sexuality and scriptural authority involve much
of Christendom. Decisions by the Episcopal Church in the United
States, for example, have deeply divided not only that church body,
but also Anglicans worldwide. Similarly, the ELCA’s recent decisions
have raised questions about Lutheran teaching, here and internationally. Not only has the International Lutheran Council felt constrained
to address this, but also many churches of the Lutheran World Federation have publicly disagreed with the ELCA (and similar actions
of the Church of Sweden).
22. The word evangel, from the Greek, simply means “good news”
or “gospel.”
23. “Catholic” also comes from the Greek, literally, “according to
the whole,” referring to the universality or wholeness of the church
and its complete character. The Orthodox churches of the east share
with western Christians a common heritage which includes the authority of Scripture, an appreciation for the early church Fathers, and
affirmation of the teachings of the first seven ecumenical councils.
24. The Athanasian Creed asserts: “This, however, is the catholic faith: that we worship one God in trinity and the Trinity in unity,”
par. 3. See Kolb and Wengert, p. 24.
25. See, for example, “The Manhattan Declaration,” http://www
.manhattandeclaration.org/the-declaration.
26. Human Sexuality: Gift and Trust, p. 1.
2010 Convention Workbook
2010 Convention.indb 18
4/15/10 2:37 PM