Collection › LCMS Convention Workbook (St. Louis, Missouri) › 2010 · 64th Convention, Houston › Page 225
LCMS Convention Workbook St. Louis, Missouri — 2010, Page 225
front matter 1
front matter 2
front matter 3
front matter 4
front matter 5
front matter 6
front matter 7
front matter 8
front matter 9
front matter 10
front matter 11
front matter 12
front matter 13
front matter 14
front matter 15
front matter 16
front matter 17
front matter 18
front matter 19
front matter 20
Page 1
Page 2
Page 3
Page 4
Page 5
Page 6
Page 7
Page 8
Page 9
Page 10
Page 11
Page 12
Page 13
Page 14
Page 15
Page 16
Page 17
Page 18
Page 19
Page 20
Page 21
Page 22
Page 23
Page 24
Page 25
Page 26
Page 27
Page 28
Page 29
Page 30
Page 31
Page 32
Page 33
Page 34
Page 35
Page 36
Page 37
Page 38
Page 39
Page 40
Page 41
Page 42
Page 43
Page 44
Page 45
Page 46
Page 47
Page 48
Page 49
Page 50
Page 51
Page 52
Page 53
Page 54
Page 55
Page 56
Page 57
Page 58
Page 59
Page 60
Page 61
Page 62
Page 63
Page 64
Page 65
Page 66
Page 67
Page 68
Page 69
Page 70
Page 71
Page 72
Page 73
Page 74
Page 75
Page 76
Page 77
Page 78
Page 79
Page 80
Page 81
Page 82
Page 83
Page 84
Page 85
Page 86
Page 87
Page 88
Page 89
Page 90
Page 91
Page 92
Page 93
Page 94
Page 95
Page 96
Page 97
Page 98
Page 99
Page 100
Page 101
Page 102
Page 103
Page 104
Page 105
Page 106
Page 107
Page 108
Page 109
Page 110
Page 111
Page 112
Page 113
Page 114
Page 115
Page 116
Page 117
Page 118
Page 119
Page 120
Page 121
Page 122
Page 123
Page 124
Page 125
Page 126
Page 127
Page 128
Page 129
Page 130
Page 131
Page 132
Page 133
Page 134
Page 135
Page 136
Page 137
Page 138
Page 139
Page 140
Page 141
Page 142
Page 143
Page 144
Page 145
Page 146
Page 147
Page 148
Page 149
Page 150
Page 151
Page 152
Page 153
Page 154
Page 155
Page 156
Page 157
Page 158
Page 159
Page 160
Page 161
Page 162
Page 163
Page 164
Page 165
Page 166
Page 167
Page 168
Page 169
Page 170
Page 171
Page 172
Page 173
Page 174
Page 175
Page 176
Page 177
Page 178
Page 179
Page 180
Page 181
Page 182
Page 183
Page 184
Page 185
Page 186
Page 187
Page 188
Page 189
Page 190
Page 191
Page 192
Page 193
Page 194
Page 195
Page 196
Page 197
Page 198
Page 199
Page 200
Page 201
Page 202
Page 203
Page 204
Page 205
Page 206
Page 207
Page 208
Page 209
Page 210
Page 211
Page 212
Page 213
Page 214
Page 215
Page 216
Page 217
Page 218
Page 219
Page 220
Page 221
Page 222
Page 223
Page 224
Page 225
Page 226
Page 227
Page 228
Page 229
Page 230
Page 231
Page 232
Page 233
Page 234
Page 235
Page 236
Page 237
Page 238
Page 239
Page 240
Page 241
Page 242
Page 243
Page 244
Page 245
Page 246
Page 247
Page 248
Page 249
Page 250
Page 251
Page 252
Page 253
Page 254
Page 255
Page 256
Page 257
Page 258
Page 259
Page 260
Page 261
Page 262
Page 263
Page 264
Page 265
Page 266
Page 267
Page 268
Page 269
Page 270
Page 271
Page 272
Page 273
Page 274
Page 275
Page 276
Page 277
Page 278
Page 279
Page 280
Page 281
Page 282
Page 283
Page 284
Page 285
Page 286
Page 287
Page 288
Page 289
Page 290
Page 291
Page 292
Page 293
Page 294
Page 295
Page 296
Page 297
Page 298
Page 299
Page 300
Page 301
Page 302
Page 303
Page 304
Page 305
Page 306
Page 307
Page 308
Page 309
Page 310
Page 311
Page 312
Page 313
Page 314
Page 315
Page 316
Page 317
Page 318
Page 319
Page 320
Page 321
Page 322
Page 323
Page 324
Page 325
Page 326
Page 327
Page 328
Page 329
Page 330
Page 331
Page 332
Page 333
Page 334
Scan: The Lutheran Church—Missouri Synod
⤓ Download page image (full resolution)
Transcription machine transcription, uncorrected
synod structure and governance
the precise process proposed by the task force. The Committee on
Convention Nominations may attempt to bring to the Synod a regionally based slate of candidates for the Board of Directors. It may also
try to cobble together regionally-based slates for the proposed mission commissions, but it will be doing this work in the absence of
responses to a synod-wide call for nominations for worthy prospective candidates to serve on these commissions. In any case, none of
these slates will be available for 2010 convention delegates to see and
consider until the convention is underway.
Haste makes waste.
Resolved, That the Synod, if it adopts any of the BRTFSSG recommendations in the following areas, do so clearly asserting its will
that any resulting new offices are not to be implemented until Sept. 1
following the next convention of the Synod. The nominations process
preceding the next convention and the elections at that convention
could thus take place with the new offices in view. The areas are
• Elimination of any current boards and commissions (thus, even if
the task force recommendations are adopted, the current boards and
commissions would remain for one more term).
• Creation of new boards and/or commissions involving regional
representation/elections.
• Change in the composition of the Synod’s Board of Directors
involving regional representation/elections.
• Regional vice-presidencies for the Synod.
Carrollton Circuit Forum, Missouri District; Zion, Moberly, MO;
Springfield Circuit Forum, Missouri District
8-12
To Consider Recommendations of BRTFSSG as
Separate Items to Be Voted on Individually
Whereas, The final report of the Blue Ribbon Task Force on
Synod Structure and Governance (BRTFSSG) has been received and
discussed by the Sandia Circuits Forum; and
Whereas, The Sandia Circuits Forum finds some of the recommendations unacceptable but others beneficial; therefore be it
Resolved, That the Sandia Circuits Forum requests the 2010
LCMS convention to allow each recommendation of the BRTFSSG
to be voted on separately and not as a package.
North and South Sandia Circuit Forum
Rocky Mountain District
8-13
To Consider Alternate Restructure Plans and
Proposals and Decline Recommended Changes
to Synod Constitution
Whereas, Concerns about the governance and structure of the
LCMS gave rise to the Synod President’s forming of the Blue Ribbon
Task Force on Synod Structure and Governance (BRTFSSG) to
address areas which might need adjustment or correction; and
W hereas, The proposed changes, as summarized by the
BRTFSSG itself, go to the heart of who and what The Lutheran
Church—Missouri Synod is, to wit:
225
D. Conditions for membership in the Synod;
E. The relation of the Synod to its members; and
F. The process whereby resolutions are made and accepted by Synod in convention;
and
Whereas, These proposals will profoundly impact and alter the
Synod’s theology and practice, as well as its structure, process, and
membership; and
Whereas, The final proposals will not be available until the fall
of 2009 after the district conventions, preventing the districts in convention from considering the final proposals; and
Whereas, The currently proposed changes may well necessitate
further and unforeseen changes, the BRTFSSG itself having stated
that “it is likely that more constitutional paragraphs will require
change depending on the outcome of the task force’s work”; and
Whereas, The number, substance, and impact of these changes is
unknown and impossible to predict; and
Whereas, There has been no clearly demonstrated necessity for
immediate action; and
Whereas, There has been limited opportunity for broad-based
timely analysis and discussion across the congregations and districts
of the Synod; and
Whereas, We in the Montana District would be unable to accept
these proposed changes to the Constitution of the LCMS with a clear
conscience, as has also been stated by the Wyoming district in convention; therefore be it
Resolved, That the Montana District in convention request the
President of the Synod to suspend the current timeline for consideration of the current BRTFSSG proposals, and not to bring a plan for
restructure before the 2010 convention, and to consider alternate proposals for addressing the problems plaguing the Synod, including the
proposals put forward in the document “It’s Time: LCMS Unity and
Mission II” by Rev. Matthew Harrison; and be it further
Resolved, That the Montana District in convention memorialize
the 2010 LCMS convention to consider none of the recommended
changes to the Constitution of the Synod proposed by the BRTFSSG.
Montana District
8-14
To Retain Existing Synod Constitution
Whereas, In 2005, President Gerald Kieschnick appointed the
Blue Ribbon Task Force on Synod Structure and Governance; and
Whereas, The task force’s proposals in its final report of October
15, 2009, are far reaching in scope and significant in import; and
Whereas, Experience teaches that maximum attention must be
given to details and wording in making adjustments and/or changes
impinging on structure; and
Whereas, The Synod would do well to proceed with prayerful and
appropriate care in considering any changes; and
Whereas, The existing Constitution has served the Synod well for
many years; therefore be it
Resolved, That Our Savior Lutheran Church of Muscatine,
IA, memorialize the Synod not to change any part of the Synod’s
Constitution.
Our Savior, Muscatine, IA; Zion, Wilton, IA
A. The Synod’s reason for existence;
B. The Synod’s confession;
C. The Synod’s mission and purpose;
2010 Convention Workbook
2010 Convention.indb 225
4/15/10 2:39 PM