Collection › LCMS Convention Workbook (St. Louis, Missouri) › 2010 · 64th Convention, Houston › Page 303
LCMS Convention Workbook St. Louis, Missouri — 2010, Page 303
front matter 1
front matter 2
front matter 3
front matter 4
front matter 5
front matter 6
front matter 7
front matter 8
front matter 9
front matter 10
front matter 11
front matter 12
front matter 13
front matter 14
front matter 15
front matter 16
front matter 17
front matter 18
front matter 19
front matter 20
Page 1
Page 2
Page 3
Page 4
Page 5
Page 6
Page 7
Page 8
Page 9
Page 10
Page 11
Page 12
Page 13
Page 14
Page 15
Page 16
Page 17
Page 18
Page 19
Page 20
Page 21
Page 22
Page 23
Page 24
Page 25
Page 26
Page 27
Page 28
Page 29
Page 30
Page 31
Page 32
Page 33
Page 34
Page 35
Page 36
Page 37
Page 38
Page 39
Page 40
Page 41
Page 42
Page 43
Page 44
Page 45
Page 46
Page 47
Page 48
Page 49
Page 50
Page 51
Page 52
Page 53
Page 54
Page 55
Page 56
Page 57
Page 58
Page 59
Page 60
Page 61
Page 62
Page 63
Page 64
Page 65
Page 66
Page 67
Page 68
Page 69
Page 70
Page 71
Page 72
Page 73
Page 74
Page 75
Page 76
Page 77
Page 78
Page 79
Page 80
Page 81
Page 82
Page 83
Page 84
Page 85
Page 86
Page 87
Page 88
Page 89
Page 90
Page 91
Page 92
Page 93
Page 94
Page 95
Page 96
Page 97
Page 98
Page 99
Page 100
Page 101
Page 102
Page 103
Page 104
Page 105
Page 106
Page 107
Page 108
Page 109
Page 110
Page 111
Page 112
Page 113
Page 114
Page 115
Page 116
Page 117
Page 118
Page 119
Page 120
Page 121
Page 122
Page 123
Page 124
Page 125
Page 126
Page 127
Page 128
Page 129
Page 130
Page 131
Page 132
Page 133
Page 134
Page 135
Page 136
Page 137
Page 138
Page 139
Page 140
Page 141
Page 142
Page 143
Page 144
Page 145
Page 146
Page 147
Page 148
Page 149
Page 150
Page 151
Page 152
Page 153
Page 154
Page 155
Page 156
Page 157
Page 158
Page 159
Page 160
Page 161
Page 162
Page 163
Page 164
Page 165
Page 166
Page 167
Page 168
Page 169
Page 170
Page 171
Page 172
Page 173
Page 174
Page 175
Page 176
Page 177
Page 178
Page 179
Page 180
Page 181
Page 182
Page 183
Page 184
Page 185
Page 186
Page 187
Page 188
Page 189
Page 190
Page 191
Page 192
Page 193
Page 194
Page 195
Page 196
Page 197
Page 198
Page 199
Page 200
Page 201
Page 202
Page 203
Page 204
Page 205
Page 206
Page 207
Page 208
Page 209
Page 210
Page 211
Page 212
Page 213
Page 214
Page 215
Page 216
Page 217
Page 218
Page 219
Page 220
Page 221
Page 222
Page 223
Page 224
Page 225
Page 226
Page 227
Page 228
Page 229
Page 230
Page 231
Page 232
Page 233
Page 234
Page 235
Page 236
Page 237
Page 238
Page 239
Page 240
Page 241
Page 242
Page 243
Page 244
Page 245
Page 246
Page 247
Page 248
Page 249
Page 250
Page 251
Page 252
Page 253
Page 254
Page 255
Page 256
Page 257
Page 258
Page 259
Page 260
Page 261
Page 262
Page 263
Page 264
Page 265
Page 266
Page 267
Page 268
Page 269
Page 270
Page 271
Page 272
Page 273
Page 274
Page 275
Page 276
Page 277
Page 278
Page 279
Page 280
Page 281
Page 282
Page 283
Page 284
Page 285
Page 286
Page 287
Page 288
Page 289
Page 290
Page 291
Page 292
Page 293
Page 294
Page 295
Page 296
Page 297
Page 298
Page 299
Page 300
Page 301
Page 302
Page 303
Page 304
Page 305
Page 306
Page 307
Page 308
Page 309
Page 310
Page 311
Page 312
Page 313
Page 314
Page 315
Page 316
Page 317
Page 318
Page 319
Page 320
Page 321
Page 322
Page 323
Page 324
Page 325
Page 326
Page 327
Page 328
Page 329
Page 330
Page 331
Page 332
Page 333
Page 334
Scan: The Lutheran Church—Missouri Synod
⤓ Download page image (full resolution)
Transcription machine transcription, uncorrected
THEOLOGICAL DOCUMENTS—COMMISSION ON THEOLOGY AND CHURCH RELATIONS
the International Lutheran Council (ILC) on a regular basis,
or even allowing some form of associate membership in the
ILC (if not full membership), may reap many benefits down
the road as these church bodies continue to develop their
theological and confessional identity.
h. Prior to establishing some form of fellowship agreement
or formal declaration of altar and pulpit fellowship, the
LCMS could encourage and develop a number of avenues of
cooperation including:
i. Regular contacts at the church governing level
ii. Meetings and joint theological work among professors and
clergy
iii. Meetings and exchange of students of theology
iv. Support of and participation in mission projects
5. Dealing with confessional groups within another church body raises
a number of very different and very difficult questions that may or
may not be capable of solution. At the very least, study and discussion needs to take place regarding issues such as the following:
a. The relationship between public confession and public
membership in a church body. This is particularly acute in state
churches where there is no history of independently supported
congregations as in America. But this also is becoming an issue
in the United States where some national church bodies are
functioning (at least in practice) somewhat like European state
churches and within which groups may establish a distinctive
confessional identity that differs from the public position of
the national church body. Such groups often choose to remain
within their church body in difficult and even oppressive
conditions, seeking to be leaven and offering courageous
witness to biblical and confessional truth while protesting
what they believe to be false doctrine or practice. Although
they choose not to leave the structures of the national church
body, they still seek fellowship, encouragement and theological
dialogue and guidance from like-minded confessional
individuals, groups, and church bodies.
b. This situation creates the possibility of two avenues of
relationship. On the one hand, the LCMS has historically dealt
with the official church structures of a given church body
when assessing confessional agreement and establishing altar
and pulpit fellowship. On the other hand, it may have much
in common with the confessional groupings within a national
church body. Which avenue to pursue in such conflicted
circumstances and how to do so with theological and ethical
integrity and sound churchmanship will almost certainly be
303
decided on a case-by-case rather than a policy basis, but we
should realize that such situations are likely only to increase in
the future.
Conclusion
Christians who share a common confession express that confession nowhere more clearly or visibly than when they kneel at the
same altar to receive the body and blood of Christ and when they
share a common pulpit. The process and protocols leading to a formal declaration of church fellowship by the Synod in convention
have served us well when declaring with established church bodies
with whom we have shared something of a common history. As we
move into more fluid situations in the 21st century, we need additional ways to identify and acknowledge agreement in confession
that are appropriate to the history and nature of ecclesial communities that are emerging in various parts of the world but which do not
share the same kind of institutional habits and identities. In these
ways we seek to manifest our agreement and so confess our unity
at the altar and pulpit in a manner that is faithful to our theology of
the church.
Adopted September 23, 2009 (unanimously)
Commission on Theology and Church Relations
The Lutheran Church—Missouri Synod
Notes
1. The LCMS’s procedure in establishing formal altar and pulpit fellowship is described in the Commission on Theology and Church Relations’
document “Policy for The Lutheran Church—Missouri Synod declaring
Altar and Pulpit Fellowship with Another Church Body” (April 30, 2003).
This document is available online at www.lcms.org/ctcr.
2. According to the present way of proceeding, the President’s Office
includes the Church Relations Cabinet.
3. The creeds of the church refer to this unity when they speak of “the
one holy Christian church,” the “communion of saints.” Theologians often
speak of it as the una sancta. In each case, these expressions refer to the
unity of the church that God alone sees.
2010 Convention Workbook
2010 Convention.indb 303
4/15/10 2:40 PM