Collection › LCMS Convention Workbook (St. Louis, Missouri) › 2010 · 64th Convention, Houston › Page 15
LCMS Convention Workbook St. Louis, Missouri — 2010, Page 15
front matter 1
front matter 2
front matter 3
front matter 4
front matter 5
front matter 6
front matter 7
front matter 8
front matter 9
front matter 10
front matter 11
front matter 12
front matter 13
front matter 14
front matter 15
front matter 16
front matter 17
front matter 18
front matter 19
front matter 20
Page 1
Page 2
Page 3
Page 4
Page 5
Page 6
Page 7
Page 8
Page 9
Page 10
Page 11
Page 12
Page 13
Page 14
Page 15
Page 16
Page 17
Page 18
Page 19
Page 20
Page 21
Page 22
Page 23
Page 24
Page 25
Page 26
Page 27
Page 28
Page 29
Page 30
Page 31
Page 32
Page 33
Page 34
Page 35
Page 36
Page 37
Page 38
Page 39
Page 40
Page 41
Page 42
Page 43
Page 44
Page 45
Page 46
Page 47
Page 48
Page 49
Page 50
Page 51
Page 52
Page 53
Page 54
Page 55
Page 56
Page 57
Page 58
Page 59
Page 60
Page 61
Page 62
Page 63
Page 64
Page 65
Page 66
Page 67
Page 68
Page 69
Page 70
Page 71
Page 72
Page 73
Page 74
Page 75
Page 76
Page 77
Page 78
Page 79
Page 80
Page 81
Page 82
Page 83
Page 84
Page 85
Page 86
Page 87
Page 88
Page 89
Page 90
Page 91
Page 92
Page 93
Page 94
Page 95
Page 96
Page 97
Page 98
Page 99
Page 100
Page 101
Page 102
Page 103
Page 104
Page 105
Page 106
Page 107
Page 108
Page 109
Page 110
Page 111
Page 112
Page 113
Page 114
Page 115
Page 116
Page 117
Page 118
Page 119
Page 120
Page 121
Page 122
Page 123
Page 124
Page 125
Page 126
Page 127
Page 128
Page 129
Page 130
Page 131
Page 132
Page 133
Page 134
Page 135
Page 136
Page 137
Page 138
Page 139
Page 140
Page 141
Page 142
Page 143
Page 144
Page 145
Page 146
Page 147
Page 148
Page 149
Page 150
Page 151
Page 152
Page 153
Page 154
Page 155
Page 156
Page 157
Page 158
Page 159
Page 160
Page 161
Page 162
Page 163
Page 164
Page 165
Page 166
Page 167
Page 168
Page 169
Page 170
Page 171
Page 172
Page 173
Page 174
Page 175
Page 176
Page 177
Page 178
Page 179
Page 180
Page 181
Page 182
Page 183
Page 184
Page 185
Page 186
Page 187
Page 188
Page 189
Page 190
Page 191
Page 192
Page 193
Page 194
Page 195
Page 196
Page 197
Page 198
Page 199
Page 200
Page 201
Page 202
Page 203
Page 204
Page 205
Page 206
Page 207
Page 208
Page 209
Page 210
Page 211
Page 212
Page 213
Page 214
Page 215
Page 216
Page 217
Page 218
Page 219
Page 220
Page 221
Page 222
Page 223
Page 224
Page 225
Page 226
Page 227
Page 228
Page 229
Page 230
Page 231
Page 232
Page 233
Page 234
Page 235
Page 236
Page 237
Page 238
Page 239
Page 240
Page 241
Page 242
Page 243
Page 244
Page 245
Page 246
Page 247
Page 248
Page 249
Page 250
Page 251
Page 252
Page 253
Page 254
Page 255
Page 256
Page 257
Page 258
Page 259
Page 260
Page 261
Page 262
Page 263
Page 264
Page 265
Page 266
Page 267
Page 268
Page 269
Page 270
Page 271
Page 272
Page 273
Page 274
Page 275
Page 276
Page 277
Page 278
Page 279
Page 280
Page 281
Page 282
Page 283
Page 284
Page 285
Page 286
Page 287
Page 288
Page 289
Page 290
Page 291
Page 292
Page 293
Page 294
Page 295
Page 296
Page 297
Page 298
Page 299
Page 300
Page 301
Page 302
Page 303
Page 304
Page 305
Page 306
Page 307
Page 308
Page 309
Page 310
Page 311
Page 312
Page 313
Page 314
Page 315
Page 316
Page 317
Page 318
Page 319
Page 320
Page 321
Page 322
Page 323
Page 324
Page 325
Page 326
Page 327
Page 328
Page 329
Page 330
Page 331
Page 332
Page 333
Page 334
Scan: The Lutheran Church—Missouri Synod
⤓ Download page image (full resolution)
Transcription machine transcription, uncorrected
SYNOD REPORTS
condemn “abusive or coercive sexual behavior, or sexual behavior
that expresses a rejection of God’s sovereignty” and not homosexuality per se.4 They maintain that the biblical authors did not understand,
for example, that homosexual behavior stems from a disposition that
people have not chosen, that homosexuality is “natural” to some
individuals, or that homosexual individuals can have a fulfilling, committed sexual relationship with a person of the same gender.5 From
this standpoint, the church’s moral guidance in matters of sexuality
has only to do with couples (same-sex or otherwise) being faithful
to each other. So long as differing moral perspectives on homosexual acts are held in good conscience, other Christians and the church
ought to respect the validity of a variety of perspectives.6
The LCMS cannot and does not share this conclusion or the understanding of Scripture on which it is based. We believe that the Holy
Scriptures of the Old and New Testament are the living Word of God,
through His prophets and apostles. We affirm the infallibility of the
Scriptures because they are “God-breathed” (2 Tim. 3:16 NIV)—that
is, though they are written by men, God is their primary author and
every word of Scripture is His word. Therefore they are not subject
to all the same assumptions which apply to other ancient literature.
We also hold the Scriptures to be understandable and truthful in their
plain or simple meaning and that no other writing, understanding,
or experience may call into question that meaning.7 In other words:
While the Biblical writers used terms current in the everyday parlance of their times, Biblical doctrinal formulations are not on that
account culturally conditioned in the sense that they are provisional or
tentative; in Spirit-taught words they express what God has revealed in
a way that remains permanently valid and is for all times the only normative way of talking about the topic they treat.8
This view of scriptural authority leads us to affirm that where
the Bible speaks clearly regarding matters of human values, conduct, or behavior, such teachings may not be denied or qualified, but
must have continuing relevance in every era of the Church. Teachings
contrary to the Scriptures must not be tolerated in the Church. For
example, while some may debate whether the Bible specifically
addresses the matter of same-sex attraction as it is understood and
experienced today, nevertheless, the Bible plainly and simply forbids
same-sex genital activity as contrary to the will of God. This biblical
prohibition applies to every generation.
Moreover, the way we live out our sexuality must be understood
in the context of what God, our Creator, has revealed in the Scriptures
about marriage. The Bible reminds us that God created man and
woman for one another. United in marriage, the two become one
flesh in the sexual union which, according to God’s blessing, may also
result in the procreation of children (Gen. 1:26–28; Gen. 2:18–25).
Martin Luther calls marriage “the first of all institutions” for which
God created man and woman to be different from one another, in
order “to be true to each other, to be fruitful, to beget children, and to
nurture and bring them up to the glory of God.” 9 Such a view of marital sexuality can only be heterosexual in nature.10 The apostle Paul
makes this very point in his references to “natural relations” as those
between men and women, rather than same-gender sexual relationships (Rom. 1:26–27). It is noteworthy that the apostle’s teaching in
Romans 1 is confirmed by the understandings of marriage and sexuality that are held by virtually all religions and cultures both today
and historically. This affirmation of heterosexuality is indeed written on the human heart (Rom. 2:15).11
In agreement, then, with 2000 years of Christian teaching, with
the consensus of the vast majority of Christians today, and with virtually all cultural traditions and understandings regarding marriage,
the LCMS believes and teaches that same-gender genital sexual
15
activity—in every situation—violates the will of our Creator and
must be recognized as sin. The LCMS not only affirms the biblical
view of marriage as the lifelong union of one man and one woman, it
also teaches that unmarried men and women, regardless of their sexual inclinations, are called to live in sexual chastity and celibacy (see
Matt. 19:10–12; 1 Cor. 7:8–9, 25–35). “The male-female duality as
the created pattern of human fellowship requires of us fidelity to our
sexual identity, a willingness to be male or female.”12 The Bible’s
teaching regarding sexuality and marriage is clear. When societal
opinions change, or even if the social sciences claim contradictory
views, the Scriptures must remain the final and determinative norm
for Christian doctrine and practice.
In discussions regarding homosexuality in church and society,
legitimate concern is raised over the ways homosexual individuals
have often been excluded and even vilified by Christians. Our Lord’s
intentional outreach to those who were marginalized and excluded
during His earthly ministry is a reminder that the Scriptural judgments
against homosexual behavior must not become the cause for hatred,
violence, or an unwillingness to extend the Gospel’s promises of forgiveness and reconciliation to the homosexual or any person caught
in sin’s traps. Homosexual sins, like heterosexual sins of adultery or
promiscuity—or any sins in any area of life—are all atoned by Christ,
who “came to seek and to save the lost” (Luke 19:10 ESV). Loving,
compassionate recognition of the deep pain and personal struggles
that same-sex inclinations produce in many individuals, families, and
congregations may not be neglected in the name of moral purity. To
do so is indeed hypocritical, for all have sinned (Rom. 3:23).
We therefore fully affirm the International Lutheran Council’s
concern for the pastoral care of homosexuals:
[W]e declare our resolve to approach those with homosexual inclinations with the deepest possible Christian love and pastoral concern, in
whatever situation they may be living. Though we affirm the demands
of God’s Law without reservation, we Christians confess that the sins
of the world have been forgiven through Christ´s suffering and death on
the cross. As the redeemed children of God, we lead our lives as “saints
and sinners” at the same time. We hope for full renewal and sanctification, but realize that these hopes are not completely fulfilled in this life.
This applies to countless temptations. Our sinful condition calls for a
lifetime of prayer and struggle.13
This same pastoral concern for those struggling with sin of any
form is rooted in Scripture’s teaching that Jesus came that we might
have life and have it in fullness (John 10:10). Our stance on homosexuality, therefore, is affirmative of human life as God’s gift. The
healing voice of Jesus—Sacred Scripture—seeks to lead us into the
richness of the life God intends for us. Prohibitions against adultery,
homosexuality, and promiscuity of any sort are kind words, warning
us against behavior that would diminish or destroy human wholeness. After all:
The heart, center, and ultimate message of the Bible is that God
wishes to be gracious to sinners for Christ’s sake. Unless one hears
this voice of the Gospel (Ap IV, 257, 274; XII, 39), that is, the voice
from heaven speaking absolution to terrified consciences (AC XXV, 3:
Ap XII, 99), the whole point and purpose of the Scriptures has been
missed.14
Practical Implications of ELCA Decisions
What practical implications do these theological convictions have
for us in the LCMS today? In particular, what do they mean for our
relationships with brothers and sisters who are in the ELCA and with
other Lutheran churches that have authorized ordination for individuals living in same-sex relationships? Most specifically and practically,
2010 Convention Workbook
2010 Convention.indb 15
4/15/10 2:37 PM