Collection › LCMS Convention Workbook (St. Louis, Missouri) › 2010 · 64th Convention, Houston › Page 15

LCMS Convention Workbook St. Louis, Missouri — 2010, Page 15

front matter 1 front matter 2 front matter 3 front matter 4 front matter 5 front matter 6 front matter 7 front matter 8 front matter 9 front matter 10 front matter 11 front matter 12 front matter 13 front matter 14 front matter 15 front matter 16 front matter 17 front matter 18 front matter 19 front matter 20 Page 1 Page 2 Page 3 Page 4 Page 5 Page 6 Page 7 Page 8 Page 9 Page 10 Page 11 Page 12 Page 13 Page 14 Page 15 Page 16 Page 17 Page 18 Page 19 Page 20 Page 21 Page 22 Page 23 Page 24 Page 25 Page 26 Page 27 Page 28 Page 29 Page 30 Page 31 Page 32 Page 33 Page 34 Page 35 Page 36 Page 37 Page 38 Page 39 Page 40 Page 41 Page 42 Page 43 Page 44 Page 45 Page 46 Page 47 Page 48 Page 49 Page 50 Page 51 Page 52 Page 53 Page 54 Page 55 Page 56 Page 57 Page 58 Page 59 Page 60 Page 61 Page 62 Page 63 Page 64 Page 65 Page 66 Page 67 Page 68 Page 69 Page 70 Page 71 Page 72 Page 73 Page 74 Page 75 Page 76 Page 77 Page 78 Page 79 Page 80 Page 81 Page 82 Page 83 Page 84 Page 85 Page 86 Page 87 Page 88 Page 89 Page 90 Page 91 Page 92 Page 93 Page 94 Page 95 Page 96 Page 97 Page 98 Page 99 Page 100 Page 101 Page 102 Page 103 Page 104 Page 105 Page 106 Page 107 Page 108 Page 109 Page 110 Page 111 Page 112 Page 113 Page 114 Page 115 Page 116 Page 117 Page 118 Page 119 Page 120 Page 121 Page 122 Page 123 Page 124 Page 125 Page 126 Page 127 Page 128 Page 129 Page 130 Page 131 Page 132 Page 133 Page 134 Page 135 Page 136 Page 137 Page 138 Page 139 Page 140 Page 141 Page 142 Page 143 Page 144 Page 145 Page 146 Page 147 Page 148 Page 149 Page 150 Page 151 Page 152 Page 153 Page 154 Page 155 Page 156 Page 157 Page 158 Page 159 Page 160 Page 161 Page 162 Page 163 Page 164 Page 165 Page 166 Page 167 Page 168 Page 169 Page 170 Page 171 Page 172 Page 173 Page 174 Page 175 Page 176 Page 177 Page 178 Page 179 Page 180 Page 181 Page 182 Page 183 Page 184 Page 185 Page 186 Page 187 Page 188 Page 189 Page 190 Page 191 Page 192 Page 193 Page 194 Page 195 Page 196 Page 197 Page 198 Page 199 Page 200 Page 201 Page 202 Page 203 Page 204 Page 205 Page 206 Page 207 Page 208 Page 209 Page 210 Page 211 Page 212 Page 213 Page 214 Page 215 Page 216 Page 217 Page 218 Page 219 Page 220 Page 221 Page 222 Page 223 Page 224 Page 225 Page 226 Page 227 Page 228 Page 229 Page 230 Page 231 Page 232 Page 233 Page 234 Page 235 Page 236 Page 237 Page 238 Page 239 Page 240 Page 241 Page 242 Page 243 Page 244 Page 245 Page 246 Page 247 Page 248 Page 249 Page 250 Page 251 Page 252 Page 253 Page 254 Page 255 Page 256 Page 257 Page 258 Page 259 Page 260 Page 261 Page 262 Page 263 Page 264 Page 265 Page 266 Page 267 Page 268 Page 269 Page 270 Page 271 Page 272 Page 273 Page 274 Page 275 Page 276 Page 277 Page 278 Page 279 Page 280 Page 281 Page 282 Page 283 Page 284 Page 285 Page 286 Page 287 Page 288 Page 289 Page 290 Page 291 Page 292 Page 293 Page 294 Page 295 Page 296 Page 297 Page 298 Page 299 Page 300 Page 301 Page 302 Page 303 Page 304 Page 305 Page 306 Page 307 Page 308 Page 309 Page 310 Page 311 Page 312 Page 313 Page 314 Page 315 Page 316 Page 317 Page 318 Page 319 Page 320 Page 321 Page 322 Page 323 Page 324 Page 325 Page 326 Page 327 Page 328 Page 329 Page 330 Page 331 Page 332 Page 333 Page 334

Scan: The Lutheran Church—Missouri Synod

⤓ Download page image (full resolution)

Transcription machine transcription, uncorrected

⤓ Download .txt · copy text

SYNOD REPORTS
condemn “abusive or coercive sexual behavior, or sexual behavior
that expresses a rejection of God’s sovereignty” and not homosexuality per se.4 They maintain that the biblical authors did not understand,
for example, that homosexual behavior stems from a disposition that
people have not chosen, that homosexuality is “natural” to some
individuals, or that homosexual individuals can have a fulfilling, committed sexual relationship with a person of the same gender.5 From
this standpoint, the church’s moral guidance in matters of sexuality
has only to do with couples (same-sex or otherwise) being faithful
to each other. So long as differing moral perspectives on homosexual acts are held in good conscience, other Christians and the church
ought to respect the validity of a variety of perspectives.6
The LCMS cannot and does not share this conclusion or the understanding of Scripture on which it is based. We believe that the Holy
Scriptures of the Old and New Testament are the living Word of God,
through His prophets and apostles. We affirm the infallibility of the
Scriptures because they are “God-breathed” (2 Tim. 3:16 NIV)—that
is, though they are written by men, God is their primary author and
every word of Scripture is His word. Therefore they are not subject
to all the same assumptions which apply to other ancient literature.
We also hold the Scriptures to be understandable and truthful in their
plain or simple meaning and that no other writing, understanding,
or experience may call into question that meaning.7 In other words:
While the Biblical writers used terms current in the everyday parlance of their times, Biblical doctrinal formulations are not on that
account culturally conditioned in the sense that they are provisional or
tentative; in Spirit-taught words they express what God has revealed in
a way that remains permanently valid and is for all times the only normative way of talking about the topic they treat.8

This view of scriptural authority leads us to affirm that where
the Bible speaks clearly regarding matters of human values, conduct, or behavior, such teachings may not be denied or qualified, but
must have continuing relevance in every era of the Church. Teachings
contrary to the Scriptures must not be tolerated in the Church. For
example, while some may debate whether the Bible specifically
addresses the matter of same-sex attraction as it is understood and
experienced today, nevertheless, the Bible plainly and simply forbids
same-sex genital activity as contrary to the will of God. This biblical
prohibition applies to every generation.
Moreover, the way we live out our sexuality must be understood
in the context of what God, our Creator, has revealed in the Scriptures
about marriage. The Bible reminds us that God created man and
woman for one another. United in marriage, the two become one
flesh in the sexual union which, according to God’s blessing, may also
result in the procreation of children (Gen. 1:26–28; Gen. 2:18–25).
Martin Luther calls marriage “the first of all institutions” for which
God created man and woman to be different from one another, in
order “to be true to each other, to be fruitful, to beget children, and to
nurture and bring them up to the glory of God.” 9 Such a view of marital sexuality can only be heterosexual in nature.10 The apostle Paul
makes this very point in his references to “natural relations” as those
between men and women, rather than same-gender sexual relationships (Rom. 1:26–27). It is noteworthy that the apostle’s teaching in
Romans 1 is confirmed by the understandings of marriage and sexuality that are held by virtually all religions and cultures both today
and historically. This affirmation of heterosexuality is indeed written on the human heart (Rom. 2:15).11
In agreement, then, with 2000 years of Christian teaching, with
the consensus of the vast majority of Christians today, and with virtually all cultural traditions and understandings regarding marriage,
the LCMS believes and teaches that same-gender genital sexual

15

activity—in every situation—violates the will of our Creator and
must be recognized as sin. The LCMS not only affirms the biblical
view of marriage as the lifelong union of one man and one woman, it
also teaches that unmarried men and women, regardless of their sexual inclinations, are called to live in sexual chastity and celibacy (see
Matt. 19:10–12; 1 Cor. 7:8–9, 25–35). “The male-female duality as
the created pattern of human fellowship requires of us fidelity to our
sexual identity, a willingness to be male or female.”12 The Bible’s
teaching regarding sexuality and marriage is clear. When societal
opinions change, or even if the social sciences claim contradictory
views, the Scriptures must remain the final and determinative norm
for Christian doctrine and practice.
In discussions regarding homosexuality in church and society,
legitimate concern is raised over the ways homosexual individuals
have often been excluded and even vilified by Christians. Our Lord’s
intentional outreach to those who were marginalized and excluded
during His earthly ministry is a reminder that the Scriptural judgments
against homosexual behavior must not become the cause for hatred,
violence, or an unwillingness to extend the Gospel’s promises of forgiveness and reconciliation to the homosexual or any person caught
in sin’s traps. Homosexual sins, like heterosexual sins of adultery or
promiscuity—or any sins in any area of life—are all atoned by Christ,
who “came to seek and to save the lost” (Luke 19:10 ESV). Loving,
compassionate recognition of the deep pain and personal struggles
that same-sex inclinations produce in many individuals, families, and
congregations may not be neglected in the name of moral purity. To
do so is indeed hypocritical, for all have sinned (Rom. 3:23).
We therefore fully affirm the International Lutheran Council’s
concern for the pastoral care of homosexuals:
[W]e declare our resolve to approach those with homosexual inclinations with the deepest possible Christian love and pastoral concern, in
whatever situation they may be living. Though we affirm the demands
of God’s Law without reservation, we Christians confess that the sins
of the world have been forgiven through Christ´s suffering and death on
the cross. As the redeemed children of God, we lead our lives as “saints
and sinners” at the same time. We hope for full renewal and sanctification, but realize that these hopes are not completely fulfilled in this life.
This applies to countless temptations. Our sinful condition calls for a
lifetime of prayer and struggle.13

This same pastoral concern for those struggling with sin of any
form is rooted in Scripture’s teaching that Jesus came that we might
have life and have it in fullness (John 10:10). Our stance on homosexuality, therefore, is affirmative of human life as God’s gift. The
healing voice of Jesus—Sacred Scripture—seeks to lead us into the
richness of the life God intends for us. Prohibitions against adultery,
homosexuality, and promiscuity of any sort are kind words, warning
us against behavior that would diminish or destroy human wholeness. After all:
The heart, center, and ultimate message of the Bible is that God
wishes to be gracious to sinners for Christ’s sake. Unless one hears
this voice of the Gospel (Ap IV, 257, 274; XII, 39), that is, the voice
from heaven speaking absolution to terrified consciences (AC XXV, 3:
Ap XII, 99), the whole point and purpose of the Scriptures has been
missed.14
Practical Implications of ELCA Decisions

What practical implications do these theological convictions have
for us in the LCMS today? In particular, what do they mean for our
relationships with brothers and sisters who are in the ELCA and with
other Lutheran churches that have authorized ordination for individuals living in same-sex relationships? Most specifically and practically,
2010 Convention Workbook

2010 Convention.indb 15

4/15/10 2:37 PM