Collection › LCMS Convention Workbook (St. Louis, Missouri) › 2010 · 64th Convention, Houston › Page 224

LCMS Convention Workbook St. Louis, Missouri — 2010, Page 224

front matter 1 front matter 2 front matter 3 front matter 4 front matter 5 front matter 6 front matter 7 front matter 8 front matter 9 front matter 10 front matter 11 front matter 12 front matter 13 front matter 14 front matter 15 front matter 16 front matter 17 front matter 18 front matter 19 front matter 20 Page 1 Page 2 Page 3 Page 4 Page 5 Page 6 Page 7 Page 8 Page 9 Page 10 Page 11 Page 12 Page 13 Page 14 Page 15 Page 16 Page 17 Page 18 Page 19 Page 20 Page 21 Page 22 Page 23 Page 24 Page 25 Page 26 Page 27 Page 28 Page 29 Page 30 Page 31 Page 32 Page 33 Page 34 Page 35 Page 36 Page 37 Page 38 Page 39 Page 40 Page 41 Page 42 Page 43 Page 44 Page 45 Page 46 Page 47 Page 48 Page 49 Page 50 Page 51 Page 52 Page 53 Page 54 Page 55 Page 56 Page 57 Page 58 Page 59 Page 60 Page 61 Page 62 Page 63 Page 64 Page 65 Page 66 Page 67 Page 68 Page 69 Page 70 Page 71 Page 72 Page 73 Page 74 Page 75 Page 76 Page 77 Page 78 Page 79 Page 80 Page 81 Page 82 Page 83 Page 84 Page 85 Page 86 Page 87 Page 88 Page 89 Page 90 Page 91 Page 92 Page 93 Page 94 Page 95 Page 96 Page 97 Page 98 Page 99 Page 100 Page 101 Page 102 Page 103 Page 104 Page 105 Page 106 Page 107 Page 108 Page 109 Page 110 Page 111 Page 112 Page 113 Page 114 Page 115 Page 116 Page 117 Page 118 Page 119 Page 120 Page 121 Page 122 Page 123 Page 124 Page 125 Page 126 Page 127 Page 128 Page 129 Page 130 Page 131 Page 132 Page 133 Page 134 Page 135 Page 136 Page 137 Page 138 Page 139 Page 140 Page 141 Page 142 Page 143 Page 144 Page 145 Page 146 Page 147 Page 148 Page 149 Page 150 Page 151 Page 152 Page 153 Page 154 Page 155 Page 156 Page 157 Page 158 Page 159 Page 160 Page 161 Page 162 Page 163 Page 164 Page 165 Page 166 Page 167 Page 168 Page 169 Page 170 Page 171 Page 172 Page 173 Page 174 Page 175 Page 176 Page 177 Page 178 Page 179 Page 180 Page 181 Page 182 Page 183 Page 184 Page 185 Page 186 Page 187 Page 188 Page 189 Page 190 Page 191 Page 192 Page 193 Page 194 Page 195 Page 196 Page 197 Page 198 Page 199 Page 200 Page 201 Page 202 Page 203 Page 204 Page 205 Page 206 Page 207 Page 208 Page 209 Page 210 Page 211 Page 212 Page 213 Page 214 Page 215 Page 216 Page 217 Page 218 Page 219 Page 220 Page 221 Page 222 Page 223 Page 224 Page 225 Page 226 Page 227 Page 228 Page 229 Page 230 Page 231 Page 232 Page 233 Page 234 Page 235 Page 236 Page 237 Page 238 Page 239 Page 240 Page 241 Page 242 Page 243 Page 244 Page 245 Page 246 Page 247 Page 248 Page 249 Page 250 Page 251 Page 252 Page 253 Page 254 Page 255 Page 256 Page 257 Page 258 Page 259 Page 260 Page 261 Page 262 Page 263 Page 264 Page 265 Page 266 Page 267 Page 268 Page 269 Page 270 Page 271 Page 272 Page 273 Page 274 Page 275 Page 276 Page 277 Page 278 Page 279 Page 280 Page 281 Page 282 Page 283 Page 284 Page 285 Page 286 Page 287 Page 288 Page 289 Page 290 Page 291 Page 292 Page 293 Page 294 Page 295 Page 296 Page 297 Page 298 Page 299 Page 300 Page 301 Page 302 Page 303 Page 304 Page 305 Page 306 Page 307 Page 308 Page 309 Page 310 Page 311 Page 312 Page 313 Page 314 Page 315 Page 316 Page 317 Page 318 Page 319 Page 320 Page 321 Page 322 Page 323 Page 324 Page 325 Page 326 Page 327 Page 328 Page 329 Page 330 Page 331 Page 332 Page 333 Page 334

Scan: The Lutheran Church—Missouri Synod

⤓ Download page image (full resolution)

Transcription machine transcription, uncorrected

⤓ Download .txt · copy text

224

Synod Structure and Governance

wording in making revisions to the Synod’s Constitution or Bylaws;
therefore be it
Resolved, That the Minnesota North District respectfully request
that by January 15, 2010 , the BRTFSSG make publicly available specific wording for all proposed revisions to the Synod’s Constitution
or Bylaws, including the complete text of any enabling convention
resolutions to implement such revisions, as well as its rationale for
such revisions; and be it further
Resolved, That the Minnesota North District memorialize the
Synod that at its 2010 convention it consider the BRTFSSG’s proposed revisions to Synod Constitution or Bylaws only under the
condition that this aforementioned request for information be fulfilled by the date specified; and be it further
Resolved, That the Minnesota North District respectfully request
that the BRTFSSG’s full and final report be immediately posted on
the Synod’s Web site upon its submission for inclusion in the 2010
Convention Workbook; and be it finally
Resolved, That within one week of the completion of this 2009
Minnesota North District Convention, its district president contact the
head of the BRTFSSG and request that the summary that was passed
out to the convention yesterday (April 28), the PowerPoint rationale
report, and the accompanying survey be sent to all other district presidents so that they may provide hard copies to their delegates before
their conventions meet.
Minnesota North District
8-09

To Reject Blue Ribbon Task Force
Recommendations
Whereas, We are in agreement with the historical position of the
LCMS that the Synod is not a church, and we wholeheartedly endorse
the desires of the Blue Ribbon Task Force on Synod Structure and
Governance (BRTFSSG) to advance Christ’s mission and keep our
confessional basis unchanged (LCMS Constitution, Art. II); and
Whereas, We recognize and affirm the entirety of the objectives
of the Synod (LCMS Constitution, Art. III) for the purposes of growing disciples in Christ; and
Whereas, We agree that congregations are the primary mission
centers for reaching our communities and the world, and that the
districts are the closest source of resources to the congregation; and
Whereas, We make this resolution in harmony with the same
spirit that the task force offered its recommendations (Php. 1:27;
2:1–4); and
Whereas, President Kieschnick appointed the BRTFSSG in 2005;
and
Whereas, The preliminary recommendations of the task force
were disseminated in 2008; and
Whereas, Said recommendations are significant changes from
past policies in governance, including but not limited to the number and size of districts, congregational voting and representation,
convention frequency, number and voting of advisory delegates,
changing the name of The Lutheran Church—Missouri Synod, voting
procedures for doctrinal resolutions and statements, the seminaries
as sole certification bodies of pastoral candidates, election of vicepresidents, priority and consideration of overtures; therefore be it
Resolved, That the LCMS affirm its present Constitution and
Handbook and maintain its current structure of governance; and be
it further

Resolved, That the Indiana District memorialize the Synod to
reject the presented proposals of the BRTFSSG.
Indiana District
8-10

To Defer Proposed Restructure/Reorganization
to 2013 Convention
Whereas, The best and clearest attempt to date to articulate the
proposals for the restructuring of the Synod took place at the district
conventions held in 2009; and
Whereas, Little or no time for discussion or debate was provided
in these conventions for this important matter; and
Whereas, There are many members of the Synod, both clergy and
congregations, who have strong objections to significant parts of the
proposals; therefore be it
Resolved, That the decision to reorganize or restructure the Synod
be deferred to the 2013 LCMS convention to allow time for discussion and debate to take place at the district convention level before
the matter is brought before the Synod.
Circuit 14 Forum
Pacific Southwest District
8-11

To Delay Implementation of Certain BRTFSSG
Proposals
Rationale
The Blue Ribbon Task Force on Synod Structure and Governance
(BRTFSSG) appointed by President Kieschnick has made several
recommendations that will prove to be difficult if not impossible to
implement quickly. It has proposed the elimination of the Synod’s
program boards, the creation of partially elected mission commissions, a change in the nominations process for some members of the
Synod’s Board of Directors, and the nomination and election of the
Synod’s vice-presidents on a regional basis.
The BRTFSSG issued its final report after the October 10, 2009
bylaw deadline for providing names of potential board and commission nominees to the Committee for Convention Nominations. No
call for nominations has been issued to the Synod concerning the
new mission commissions.
Bylaw 3.12.3.7 (f) advocates that, whenever possible, the
Committee for Convention Nominations should be ready with a slate
of candidates for a new board or commission likely to be established
at a Synod convention. In this case, however, it should be noted that
the task force is recommending that more than half of the members
of the proposed mission commissions as well as some members of
the LCMS Board of Directors are to be elected from among regional
nominees who have been nominated at district conventions. These
regions have not yet been officially determined, since the task force’s
proposed bylaws regarding regionalization cannot be adopted prior to
the 2010 LCMS convention. Nor have such nominations been made
at the district level as the task force proposal envisions.
One other point should be added. The districts also have not made
nominations for proposed regional vice-presidencies.
At the LCMS 2010 convention, it will therefore be impossible
to elect regional vice-presidents, LCMS Board of Directors members, or members for each of the mission commissions according to

2010 Convention Workbook

2010 Convention.indb 224

4/15/10 2:39 PM