Collection › LCMS Convention Workbook (St. Louis, Missouri) › 2010 · 64th Convention, Houston › Page 22
LCMS Convention Workbook St. Louis, Missouri — 2010, Page 22
front matter 1
front matter 2
front matter 3
front matter 4
front matter 5
front matter 6
front matter 7
front matter 8
front matter 9
front matter 10
front matter 11
front matter 12
front matter 13
front matter 14
front matter 15
front matter 16
front matter 17
front matter 18
front matter 19
front matter 20
Page 1
Page 2
Page 3
Page 4
Page 5
Page 6
Page 7
Page 8
Page 9
Page 10
Page 11
Page 12
Page 13
Page 14
Page 15
Page 16
Page 17
Page 18
Page 19
Page 20
Page 21
Page 22
Page 23
Page 24
Page 25
Page 26
Page 27
Page 28
Page 29
Page 30
Page 31
Page 32
Page 33
Page 34
Page 35
Page 36
Page 37
Page 38
Page 39
Page 40
Page 41
Page 42
Page 43
Page 44
Page 45
Page 46
Page 47
Page 48
Page 49
Page 50
Page 51
Page 52
Page 53
Page 54
Page 55
Page 56
Page 57
Page 58
Page 59
Page 60
Page 61
Page 62
Page 63
Page 64
Page 65
Page 66
Page 67
Page 68
Page 69
Page 70
Page 71
Page 72
Page 73
Page 74
Page 75
Page 76
Page 77
Page 78
Page 79
Page 80
Page 81
Page 82
Page 83
Page 84
Page 85
Page 86
Page 87
Page 88
Page 89
Page 90
Page 91
Page 92
Page 93
Page 94
Page 95
Page 96
Page 97
Page 98
Page 99
Page 100
Page 101
Page 102
Page 103
Page 104
Page 105
Page 106
Page 107
Page 108
Page 109
Page 110
Page 111
Page 112
Page 113
Page 114
Page 115
Page 116
Page 117
Page 118
Page 119
Page 120
Page 121
Page 122
Page 123
Page 124
Page 125
Page 126
Page 127
Page 128
Page 129
Page 130
Page 131
Page 132
Page 133
Page 134
Page 135
Page 136
Page 137
Page 138
Page 139
Page 140
Page 141
Page 142
Page 143
Page 144
Page 145
Page 146
Page 147
Page 148
Page 149
Page 150
Page 151
Page 152
Page 153
Page 154
Page 155
Page 156
Page 157
Page 158
Page 159
Page 160
Page 161
Page 162
Page 163
Page 164
Page 165
Page 166
Page 167
Page 168
Page 169
Page 170
Page 171
Page 172
Page 173
Page 174
Page 175
Page 176
Page 177
Page 178
Page 179
Page 180
Page 181
Page 182
Page 183
Page 184
Page 185
Page 186
Page 187
Page 188
Page 189
Page 190
Page 191
Page 192
Page 193
Page 194
Page 195
Page 196
Page 197
Page 198
Page 199
Page 200
Page 201
Page 202
Page 203
Page 204
Page 205
Page 206
Page 207
Page 208
Page 209
Page 210
Page 211
Page 212
Page 213
Page 214
Page 215
Page 216
Page 217
Page 218
Page 219
Page 220
Page 221
Page 222
Page 223
Page 224
Page 225
Page 226
Page 227
Page 228
Page 229
Page 230
Page 231
Page 232
Page 233
Page 234
Page 235
Page 236
Page 237
Page 238
Page 239
Page 240
Page 241
Page 242
Page 243
Page 244
Page 245
Page 246
Page 247
Page 248
Page 249
Page 250
Page 251
Page 252
Page 253
Page 254
Page 255
Page 256
Page 257
Page 258
Page 259
Page 260
Page 261
Page 262
Page 263
Page 264
Page 265
Page 266
Page 267
Page 268
Page 269
Page 270
Page 271
Page 272
Page 273
Page 274
Page 275
Page 276
Page 277
Page 278
Page 279
Page 280
Page 281
Page 282
Page 283
Page 284
Page 285
Page 286
Page 287
Page 288
Page 289
Page 290
Page 291
Page 292
Page 293
Page 294
Page 295
Page 296
Page 297
Page 298
Page 299
Page 300
Page 301
Page 302
Page 303
Page 304
Page 305
Page 306
Page 307
Page 308
Page 309
Page 310
Page 311
Page 312
Page 313
Page 314
Page 315
Page 316
Page 317
Page 318
Page 319
Page 320
Page 321
Page 322
Page 323
Page 324
Page 325
Page 326
Page 327
Page 328
Page 329
Page 330
Page 331
Page 332
Page 333
Page 334
Scan: The Lutheran Church—Missouri Synod
⤓ Download page image (full resolution)
Transcription machine transcription, uncorrected
22
SYNOD REPORTS
R1-8 Sup
The Lutheran Church—Missouri Synod
Blue Ribbon Task Force on Synod Structure and Governance
Response of the President of the Synod
December 1, 2009
is not cumbersome or excessively complex. It should facilitate maximum operating efficiency on behalf of and in support of the members
and congregations of our Synod in accomplishing the mission of our
Lord and His church.”
As mentioned in my March 1, 2005, Pastoral Letter:
“Under Christ, our mission together must not be diminished by lack
of understanding or agreement regarding our walking together in love
as a Synod. The way we carry out our mission, which is God’s mission,
must be enhanced and supported by organizing and governing principles
that are in harmony with the Scriptures and the Lutheran Confessions.”
With this brief introduction, I again express my sincere appreciation to the members of the task force for their diligent work and offer
the following response.
Response of the President of the Synod to The Report of the Blue
Ribbon Task Force on Synod Structure and Governance
Introduction
The work of the Blue Ribbon Task Force on Synod Structure and
Governance is now complete. Its recommendations are in a document
posted on the Web site of The Lutheran Church—Missouri Synod. It
will also be available in printed format. The task force has been dismissed, with my heartfelt thanks for its faithful and extensive work
over the past four and one-half years.
The next step in the process of considering the task force’s recommendations is the convening of nine regional gatherings across the
Synod. Two will be held in December, four in January, and three in
February. Invited to these gatherings are the voting delegates to the
2010 Synod convention, district presidents, district vice-presidents,
five members of each district board of directors, and two commissioned minister advisory delegates to the Synod convention from each
district. These elected leaders will have opportunity to ask questions
regarding the task force report, offer suggestions about its content,
and provide written responses for consideration by the convention
floor committee chairman and vice chairman, who will be present at
all nine regional gatherings.
These gatherings are being held instead of a special convention in
2009, which the 2007 Synod convention resolved the Synod president
should consider. After seeking the counsel mentioned in that resolution and deciding not to ask for the special convention, I announced
widely the plan to hold these regional gatherings, feedback from
which will provide guidance for the floor committee as they begin
their task of crafting resolutions for convention consideration.
This Response of the President of the Synod will be posted on the
Synod’s Web site and distributed to leaders throughout the Synod.
Hard copies will be distributed to each attendee at the regional gatherings. I believe the Synod has a right to hear my thoughts, affirmations,
concerns, and recommendations regarding the task force report, and
I have a duty to share them in this response. These comments and
observations about recommendations of the task force are presented
in the order in which they appear in the six sections of the report.
The following excerpt from my March 1, 2005, Pastoral Letter
to The Lutheran Church—Missouri Synod is helpful in providing a
rationale for the work of this task force:
“There is a great need for a thorough and fundamental review of
what our Synod is, how it is organized, and how it functions. What was
first created as an organizational system for a Synod made up of a small
number of congregations (14) now struggles to serve more than 6,150
congregations.”
The task force was asked to suggest a philosophy and form of
structure and governance for the decades ahead that is “appropriately representative, incorporates sufficient checks and balances, and
SECTION ONE: The Confessional Mission and Purpose
Included in this section are proposals to amend the Synod’s
Constitution and Bylaws. Approval of these recommendations would
be very helpful, especially the inclusion of:
1. A statement in the Constitution regarding the truth of
salvation alone by God’s grace, through faith in Jesus
Christ.
2. The Synod’s Mission Statement—a wonderful, Gospelbased expression of why we exist.
3. Words in the Constitution that clarify and strengthen the
Synod’s confessional position.
SECTION TWO: The Local Congregation in Mission
This recommendation seeks to broaden and amplify the participation, voice, and support of congregations under the authoritative
and powerful Word of God. It distinguishes between congregational
(voting) and individual (associate) members of the Synod. It also
removes the category of advisory members and grants voting privileges to commissioned ministers of religion. I am supportive of the
recommendations in this section.
SECTION THREE: Congregations and Circuits
Of particular importance in this section are recommendations concerning restoration of circuits to the purpose for which they were
originally intended, namely, “small ecclesial clusters of congregations for care, support, advice, ecclesiastical encouragement, service,
coordination, and counsel toward the congregation’s participation in
God’s mission.” (BRTFSSG Report)
Because our circuits are so important for the health and wellbeing
of congregations and ministers of the Gospel, I support the recommendations in this section. This includes support for amendment
of the process of selecting circuit counselors, who are very helpful
extensions of the office of district president in the important duty of
providing evangelical ecclesiastical supervision, counsel, and care to
the members of the Synod in each of its 35 districts.
SECTION FOUR: Congregations and Districts
Recommendations in this section include convening “a special
task force to work in consultation with the Council of Presidents
and the Synod’s Board of Directors to submit to the next Synod
convention a recommendation with respect to the function, number, and configuration of districts, including the impact on funding
the national Synod.” Current district configurations vary from 53
to 372 congregations, from 11,000 to 166,000 confirmed members,
district budgets from $570,000 to more than $7,000,000, and annual
2010 Convention Workbook
2010 Convention.indb 22
4/15/10 2:37 PM