Collection › LCMS Convention Workbook (St. Louis, Missouri) › 2010 · 64th Convention, Houston › Page 22

LCMS Convention Workbook St. Louis, Missouri — 2010, Page 22

front matter 1 front matter 2 front matter 3 front matter 4 front matter 5 front matter 6 front matter 7 front matter 8 front matter 9 front matter 10 front matter 11 front matter 12 front matter 13 front matter 14 front matter 15 front matter 16 front matter 17 front matter 18 front matter 19 front matter 20 Page 1 Page 2 Page 3 Page 4 Page 5 Page 6 Page 7 Page 8 Page 9 Page 10 Page 11 Page 12 Page 13 Page 14 Page 15 Page 16 Page 17 Page 18 Page 19 Page 20 Page 21 Page 22 Page 23 Page 24 Page 25 Page 26 Page 27 Page 28 Page 29 Page 30 Page 31 Page 32 Page 33 Page 34 Page 35 Page 36 Page 37 Page 38 Page 39 Page 40 Page 41 Page 42 Page 43 Page 44 Page 45 Page 46 Page 47 Page 48 Page 49 Page 50 Page 51 Page 52 Page 53 Page 54 Page 55 Page 56 Page 57 Page 58 Page 59 Page 60 Page 61 Page 62 Page 63 Page 64 Page 65 Page 66 Page 67 Page 68 Page 69 Page 70 Page 71 Page 72 Page 73 Page 74 Page 75 Page 76 Page 77 Page 78 Page 79 Page 80 Page 81 Page 82 Page 83 Page 84 Page 85 Page 86 Page 87 Page 88 Page 89 Page 90 Page 91 Page 92 Page 93 Page 94 Page 95 Page 96 Page 97 Page 98 Page 99 Page 100 Page 101 Page 102 Page 103 Page 104 Page 105 Page 106 Page 107 Page 108 Page 109 Page 110 Page 111 Page 112 Page 113 Page 114 Page 115 Page 116 Page 117 Page 118 Page 119 Page 120 Page 121 Page 122 Page 123 Page 124 Page 125 Page 126 Page 127 Page 128 Page 129 Page 130 Page 131 Page 132 Page 133 Page 134 Page 135 Page 136 Page 137 Page 138 Page 139 Page 140 Page 141 Page 142 Page 143 Page 144 Page 145 Page 146 Page 147 Page 148 Page 149 Page 150 Page 151 Page 152 Page 153 Page 154 Page 155 Page 156 Page 157 Page 158 Page 159 Page 160 Page 161 Page 162 Page 163 Page 164 Page 165 Page 166 Page 167 Page 168 Page 169 Page 170 Page 171 Page 172 Page 173 Page 174 Page 175 Page 176 Page 177 Page 178 Page 179 Page 180 Page 181 Page 182 Page 183 Page 184 Page 185 Page 186 Page 187 Page 188 Page 189 Page 190 Page 191 Page 192 Page 193 Page 194 Page 195 Page 196 Page 197 Page 198 Page 199 Page 200 Page 201 Page 202 Page 203 Page 204 Page 205 Page 206 Page 207 Page 208 Page 209 Page 210 Page 211 Page 212 Page 213 Page 214 Page 215 Page 216 Page 217 Page 218 Page 219 Page 220 Page 221 Page 222 Page 223 Page 224 Page 225 Page 226 Page 227 Page 228 Page 229 Page 230 Page 231 Page 232 Page 233 Page 234 Page 235 Page 236 Page 237 Page 238 Page 239 Page 240 Page 241 Page 242 Page 243 Page 244 Page 245 Page 246 Page 247 Page 248 Page 249 Page 250 Page 251 Page 252 Page 253 Page 254 Page 255 Page 256 Page 257 Page 258 Page 259 Page 260 Page 261 Page 262 Page 263 Page 264 Page 265 Page 266 Page 267 Page 268 Page 269 Page 270 Page 271 Page 272 Page 273 Page 274 Page 275 Page 276 Page 277 Page 278 Page 279 Page 280 Page 281 Page 282 Page 283 Page 284 Page 285 Page 286 Page 287 Page 288 Page 289 Page 290 Page 291 Page 292 Page 293 Page 294 Page 295 Page 296 Page 297 Page 298 Page 299 Page 300 Page 301 Page 302 Page 303 Page 304 Page 305 Page 306 Page 307 Page 308 Page 309 Page 310 Page 311 Page 312 Page 313 Page 314 Page 315 Page 316 Page 317 Page 318 Page 319 Page 320 Page 321 Page 322 Page 323 Page 324 Page 325 Page 326 Page 327 Page 328 Page 329 Page 330 Page 331 Page 332 Page 333 Page 334

Scan: The Lutheran Church—Missouri Synod

⤓ Download page image (full resolution)

Transcription machine transcription, uncorrected

⤓ Download .txt · copy text

22

SYNOD REPORTS

R1-8 Sup

The Lutheran Church—Missouri Synod
Blue Ribbon Task Force on Synod Structure and Governance
Response of the President of the Synod
December 1, 2009

is not cumbersome or excessively complex. It should facilitate maximum operating efficiency on behalf of and in support of the members
and congregations of our Synod in accomplishing the mission of our
Lord and His church.”
As mentioned in my March 1, 2005, Pastoral Letter:

“Under Christ, our mission together must not be diminished by lack
of understanding or agreement regarding our walking together in love
as a Synod. The way we carry out our mission, which is God’s mission,
must be enhanced and supported by organizing and governing principles
that are in harmony with the Scriptures and the Lutheran Confessions.”

With this brief introduction, I again express my sincere appreciation to the members of the task force for their diligent work and offer
the following response.
Response of the President of the Synod to The Report of the Blue
Ribbon Task Force on Synod Structure and Governance

Introduction
The work of the Blue Ribbon Task Force on Synod Structure and
Governance is now complete. Its recommendations are in a document
posted on the Web site of The Lutheran Church—Missouri Synod. It
will also be available in printed format. The task force has been dismissed, with my heartfelt thanks for its faithful and extensive work
over the past four and one-half years.
The next step in the process of considering the task force’s recommendations is the convening of nine regional gatherings across the
Synod. Two will be held in December, four in January, and three in
February. Invited to these gatherings are the voting delegates to the
2010 Synod convention, district presidents, district vice-presidents,
five members of each district board of directors, and two commissioned minister advisory delegates to the Synod convention from each
district. These elected leaders will have opportunity to ask questions
regarding the task force report, offer suggestions about its content,
and provide written responses for consideration by the convention
floor committee chairman and vice chairman, who will be present at
all nine regional gatherings.
These gatherings are being held instead of a special convention in
2009, which the 2007 Synod convention resolved the Synod president
should consider. After seeking the counsel mentioned in that resolution and deciding not to ask for the special convention, I announced
widely the plan to hold these regional gatherings, feedback from
which will provide guidance for the floor committee as they begin
their task of crafting resolutions for convention consideration.
This Response of the President of the Synod will be posted on the
Synod’s Web site and distributed to leaders throughout the Synod.
Hard copies will be distributed to each attendee at the regional gatherings. I believe the Synod has a right to hear my thoughts, affirmations,
concerns, and recommendations regarding the task force report, and
I have a duty to share them in this response. These comments and
observations about recommendations of the task force are presented
in the order in which they appear in the six sections of the report.
The following excerpt from my March 1, 2005, Pastoral Letter
to The Lutheran Church—Missouri Synod is helpful in providing a
rationale for the work of this task force:
“There is a great need for a thorough and fundamental review of
what our Synod is, how it is organized, and how it functions. What was
first created as an organizational system for a Synod made up of a small
number of congregations (14) now struggles to serve more than 6,150
congregations.”

The task force was asked to suggest a philosophy and form of
structure and governance for the decades ahead that is “appropriately representative, incorporates sufficient checks and balances, and

SECTION ONE: The Confessional Mission and Purpose

Included in this section are proposals to amend the Synod’s
Constitution and Bylaws. Approval of these recommendations would
be very helpful, especially the inclusion of:
1. A statement in the Constitution regarding the truth of
salvation alone by God’s grace, through faith in Jesus
Christ.
2. The Synod’s Mission Statement—a wonderful, Gospelbased expression of why we exist.
3. Words in the Constitution that clarify and strengthen the
Synod’s confessional position.
SECTION TWO: The Local Congregation in Mission

This recommendation seeks to broaden and amplify the participation, voice, and support of congregations under the authoritative
and powerful Word of God. It distinguishes between congregational
(voting) and individual (associate) members of the Synod. It also
removes the category of advisory members and grants voting privileges to commissioned ministers of religion. I am supportive of the
recommendations in this section.
SECTION THREE: Congregations and Circuits

Of particular importance in this section are recommendations concerning restoration of circuits to the purpose for which they were
originally intended, namely, “small ecclesial clusters of congregations for care, support, advice, ecclesiastical encouragement, service,
coordination, and counsel toward the congregation’s participation in
God’s mission.” (BRTFSSG Report)
Because our circuits are so important for the health and wellbeing
of congregations and ministers of the Gospel, I support the recommendations in this section. This includes support for amendment
of the process of selecting circuit counselors, who are very helpful
extensions of the office of district president in the important duty of
providing evangelical ecclesiastical supervision, counsel, and care to
the members of the Synod in each of its 35 districts.
SECTION FOUR: Congregations and Districts

Recommendations in this section include convening “a special
task force to work in consultation with the Council of Presidents
and the Synod’s Board of Directors to submit to the next Synod
convention a recommendation with respect to the function, number, and configuration of districts, including the impact on funding
the national Synod.” Current district configurations vary from 53
to 372 congregations, from 11,000 to 166,000 confirmed members,
district budgets from $570,000 to more than $7,000,000, and annual

2010 Convention Workbook

2010 Convention.indb 22

4/15/10 2:37 PM