Collection › LCMS Convention Proceedings (St. Louis, Missouri) › 1975 · 51st Convention › Sheet 122
LCMS Convention Proceedings St. Louis, Missouri — 1975, Sheet 122
front matter 1
Page 1
Page 2
Page 3
Page 4
Page 5
Page 6
Page 7
Page 8
Page 9
Page 10
Page 11
Page 12
Page 13
Page 14
Page 15
Page 16
Page 17
Page 18
Page 19
Page 21
Page 22
Page 23
Page 24
Page 25
Page 26
Page 27
Page 28
Page 29
Page 30
Page 31
Page 32
Page 33
Page 33
Page 34
Sheet 36
Page 36
Page 37
Page 38
Sheet 40
Page 40
Page 41
Page 42
Page 43
Page 44
Page 45
Page 46
Page 47
Page 48
Sheet 50
Page 50
Sheet 52
Page 53
Sheet 54
Sheet 55
Page 57
Sheet 57
Page 4
Sheet 59
Sheet 60
Sheet 61
Page 5
Sheet 63
Page 7
Sheet 65
Sheet 66
Sheet 67
Sheet 68
Page 71
Page 7
Sheet 71
Sheet 72
Sheet 73
Sheet 74
Sheet 75
Sheet 76
Sheet 77
Sheet 78
Page 80
Sheet 80
Page 82
Page 83
Sheet 83
Page 86
Page 87
Page 88
Page 89
Page 90
Page 91
Page 92
Page 93
Page 94
Page 95
Page 96
Page 97
Page 98
Page 99
Page 100
Page 102
Page 103
Page 104
Page 105
Page 106
Page 107
Page 108
Page 108
Page 109
Page 110
Page 111
Page 112
Page 113
Page 114
Sheet 113
Sheet 114
Page 117
Page 118
Page 119
Page 120
Page 121
Page 122
Page 123
Sheet 122
Sheet 123
Page 126
Page 127
Page 128
Page 129
Page 130
Sheet 129
Page 132
Page 133
Page 134
Page 135
Page 136
Sheet 135
Page 138
Page 139
Page 141
Page 142
Sheet 140
Page 146
Page 147
Page 148
Page 149
Page 150
Page 151
Page 152
Page 155
Page 156
Page 157
Page 158
Page 159
Page 160
Page 161
Page 162
Page 163
Page 164
Page 165
Page 166
Page 167
Page 169
Page 170
Page 171
Page 172
Page 173
Page 174
Page 175
Page 176
Page 177
Page 178
Page 179
Page 180
Page 181
Page 182
Page 183
Page 184
Page 185
Page 186
Page 187
Page 188
Page 189
Scan: The Lutheran Church—Missouri Synod
⤓ Download page image (full resolution)
Transcription machine transcription, uncorrected
Emit Jaech after addressing the assembly
Action: Adopted (8).
(The committee replaced its tentative Res. 5-02 with Res. 5-
02A. When this resolution was introduced in Session 3, the chair
granted permission for a privileged motion objecting to consider-
ation of this resolution by the convention. However, by a vote of
602 to 444 the delegates agreed to consider the resolution. The
convention did accede to the request to postpone consideration so
that the Council of Presidents could address itself once more to
this matter, with the stated understanding that the resolution
would be brought forward for consideration in Session 7. At that
time all eight District Presidents were given an opportunity to
speak. The President, several Vice-Presidents, and other District
Presidents were also given the privilege to speak. See the
Minutes of that Session.
In Session 8 discussion was resumed. See Minutes. After
another 30 minutes of floor discussion, when the automatic call
of the question was placed before the assembly, it decided by a
District informed the convention that the position of the eight
District presidents had not changed. A request for a ballot vote
was declined as was a motion to divide the question. Resolution
5.02A was then adopted, 626-466. President Emil Jaech was
granted the privilege of reading a statement to the convention.
The delegates declined to have either negative or positive votes
recorded in the Proceedings but asked that the statement of
President Jaech be included.)
To Clarify the Relationship of
the President of the Synod
and the Council of Presidents
RESOLUTION 5-03
Report 5-01, II, F; 5-02, I, 10, 18; Overtures §-140—5-
146B, 5-148—5-150D, 5-153A—5-154 (CW, pp. 209—
210, 258—262) and N.O. Res. 5-05, 5-21, 5-37 (CW, pp.
440, 442, 443)
Wuereas, Overtures concerning the relationship of
the President of the Synod and the Council of Presidents
were given careful consideration by the floor committee
of the New Orleans convention and a recommendation
was presented in the form of Resolution 5-21, but not
acted upon because of lack of time; and
WHEREAS, ihe fheorganization ana Constitution
Committee has reviewed Resolution 5-21 and recom-
mends that it be adopted (Workbook, 1975, p. 209);
therefore be it
Resolved, That the proposals of New Orleans Resolu-
tion 5-21 be adopted, which state:
Wuereas, The District Presidents are historically the
arms of the synodical President and responsible to him
(Handbook 3.41); and
Wuereas, The role of the Council of Presidents, as
historically carried out in our church, would be one in which
the Council exists in an advisory capacity to the synodical
President, that the Council of Presidents would have the
prerogative to offer suggestions to the President, would
assist the President in carrying out his duties, and would
perform those duties which the Synod would prescribe from
time to time and allocate to it; and
Wuereas, Such functions of the Council of Presidents
should be enumerated in the Bylaws; therefore be it
Resolved, That the last sentence of Bylaw 3.41 be dele-
ted, which reads: “The District Presidents, together with the
President and Vice-Presidents of the Synod, shall form the
Council of Presidents”; and be it also
Resolved, That a new Bylaw Section 3.53 be adopted as
follows:
3.53 Council of Presidents
The President and Vice-Presidents of the Synod
and the District Presidents shall form the Council of
Presidents. The council shall meet three times each
year and in addition at the call of the President or at
the request of one third of the Council of Presidents:
_ a. To enable the President to advise and counsel
his representatives in the Districts;
b. To enable the District Presidents in turn to give
counsel to the President;
c. To counsel with one another on matters re ard-
ing the doctrine and administration of the Synod and
its Districts;
d. To edify and support one another in the work
they share;
e. To carry out such assignments as the Synod
may give to the council from time to time.
Action: Adopted as amended (6).
(The words “three times each year and in addition” were
added by the committee and “or at the request of one third of the
Council of Presidents” by amendment. The assembly declined an
amendment to change “his representatives in the Districts” to
“the District Presidents.”)
To Deal with Former
“Faculty Majority” Pastorally
RESOLUTION 5-04
Overtures 5-170—5-174 (CW, pp. 266—267)
Wuereas, It is a matter of great urgency for the
welfare of individuals involved and our whole Synod that
a determination be made as to which members, if any, of
the former “faculty majority” of Concordia Seminary, St.
Louis, are guilty of the doctrinal positions condemned in
New Orleans Resolution 3-09; and
Wuereas, The withdrawal of the former “faculty
majority” from the seminary and from the supervision of
the Board of Control has made it impossible for the
Board of Control to deal with them; and
Wuereas, The number of persons involved makes it
impossible for the District President who has immediate
responsibility for the members of the former “faculty