Collection › LCMS Convention Proceedings (St. Louis, Missouri) › 1975 · 51st Convention › Page 106
LCMS Convention Proceedings St. Louis, Missouri — 1975, Page 106
front matter 1
Page 1
Page 2
Page 3
Page 4
Page 5
Page 6
Page 7
Page 8
Page 9
Page 10
Page 11
Page 12
Page 13
Page 14
Page 15
Page 16
Page 17
Page 18
Page 19
Page 21
Page 22
Page 23
Page 24
Page 25
Page 26
Page 27
Page 28
Page 29
Page 30
Page 31
Page 32
Page 33
Page 33
Page 34
Sheet 36
Page 36
Page 37
Page 38
Sheet 40
Page 40
Page 41
Page 42
Page 43
Page 44
Page 45
Page 46
Page 47
Page 48
Sheet 50
Page 50
Sheet 52
Page 53
Sheet 54
Sheet 55
Page 57
Sheet 57
Page 4
Sheet 59
Sheet 60
Sheet 61
Page 5
Sheet 63
Page 7
Sheet 65
Sheet 66
Sheet 67
Sheet 68
Page 71
Page 7
Sheet 71
Sheet 72
Sheet 73
Sheet 74
Sheet 75
Sheet 76
Sheet 77
Sheet 78
Page 80
Sheet 80
Page 82
Page 83
Sheet 83
Page 86
Page 87
Page 88
Page 89
Page 90
Page 91
Page 92
Page 93
Page 94
Page 95
Page 96
Page 97
Page 98
Page 99
Page 100
Page 102
Page 103
Page 104
Page 105
Page 106
Page 107
Page 108
Page 108
Page 109
Page 110
Page 111
Page 112
Page 113
Page 114
Sheet 113
Sheet 114
Page 117
Page 118
Page 119
Page 120
Page 121
Page 122
Page 123
Sheet 122
Sheet 123
Page 126
Page 127
Page 128
Page 129
Page 130
Sheet 129
Page 132
Page 133
Page 134
Page 135
Page 136
Sheet 135
Page 138
Page 139
Page 141
Page 142
Sheet 140
Page 146
Page 147
Page 148
Page 149
Page 150
Page 151
Page 152
Page 155
Page 156
Page 157
Page 158
Page 159
Page 160
Page 161
Page 162
Page 163
Page 164
Page 165
Page 166
Page 167
Page 169
Page 170
Page 171
Page 172
Page 173
Page 174
Page 175
Page 176
Page 177
Page 178
Page 179
Page 180
Page 181
Page 182
Page 183
Page 184
Page 185
Page 186
Page 187
Page 188
Page 189
Scan: The Lutheran Church—Missouri Synod
⤓ Download page image (full resolution)
Transcription machine transcription, uncorrected
asst sang wists amber
106 RESOLUTIONS
To Review Social
Ministry Affirmations
RESOLUTION 3-28A
(Replacing Resolution 3-28)
Overture 3-154 (CW, p. 109)
Wuereas, Concerns have been expressed about the
Social Ministry Affirmations; therefore be it
Resolved, That the Commission on Theology and
Church Relations be requested to prepare a review of the
Social Ministry Affirmations.
Action: This resolution died since it failed to receive
action before adjournment.
The committee replaced tentative Res. 3-28 with Res. 3-
To Commend the Document
“The Inspiration of Scripture”
RESOLUTION 3-29
Report 3-01, I, 6; Overtures 3-125A—3-127 (CW, pp.
40, 100—101)
Wuereas, The canonical text of Scripture is the au-
_ thoritative Word of God for the church; and
Wuereas, There is confusion and misunderstanding
in the Synod concerning the terms such as canonical,
canon, inspiration, inerrancy, authority, and revelation;
and
WHEREAS, The document “The Inspiration of Scrip-
ture” prepared by the Commission on Theology and
Church Relations correctly explains the above-mentioned
terms; therefore be it
Resolved, That the Synod commend the position paper
entitled “The Inspiration of Scripture” to its members for
study and response.
Action: This resolution died since it failed to receive
action before adjournment.
(The committee changed “reference, study, and guidance” to
“study and response” and filed this change with the Secretary.)
To Commend the Document
“Gospel and Scripture”
. RESOLUTION 3-30
Report 3-01, I, Rec. 7 (CW, p. 40)
Wuereas, The Gospel is the center of Scripture and
the object of saving faith and the Scriptures are the
source and norm of all theology; and
Wuereas, The question of the relationship between
Gospel and Scripture is a subject that has come under
extensive discussion and debate within Lutheranism;
and
Wuereas, The document “Gospel and Scripture,” pre-
pared by the Commission on Theology and Church Rela-
tions, enunciates the proper relationship, purpose, and
use of Gospel and Scripture as confessed in the Lutheran
Symbols; therefore be it
Resolved, That the Synod commend the position paper
entitled “Gospel and Scripture” to its members for refer-
ence and guidance.
Action: This resolution died since it failed to receive
action before adjournment.
(The committee eliminated “study” from the resolved and
filed this change with the Secretary.)
To Decline Certain Overtures
Regarding the Council of Presidents
RESOLUTION 3-31A
(Replacing Part of 3-31)
Overtures 3-27A—3-29 (CW, p. 71)
WHEREAS, The implementation of Overtures 3-27A—
3-29 would be impractical and cumbersome; therefore be
it
Resolved, That we respectfully decline these over-
tures.
Action: This resolution died since it failed to receive
action before adjournment.
(The committee replaced tentative Res. 3-31 with Res. 3-31A
and Res. 3-37.)
To Indicate the Understanding
of the Word Doctrine in The
Lutheran Church— Missouri Synod
RESOLUTION 3-32
Report 3-01, I, A, Rec. 14; Overture 3-133 (CW, pp. 41,
103)
Resolved, That the Synod commend to its members for
reference and guidance the statement of the Commission
on Theology and Church Relations concerning the docu-
ment titled “A Review of the Question ‘What Is a
Doctrine?’,” the conclusion of which reads:
Conclusion
The Commission on Theology and Church Relations
holds that the document entitled “A Review of the Question
‘What Is a Doctrine?’” does not maintain that matters
pertaining to the authorship of Biblical books and the histor-
icity of certain Biblical accounts are outside the scope of
“doctrine.” Teachings and judgments on such matters ordi-
narily are not considered “doctrine” or “doctrines” in them-
selves. However, any teaching or judgment which denies or
contradicts what the Scriptures teach must be considered
“false doctrine.” For such a denial or contradiction is in
conflict with the doctrine of the authority of Holy Scripture,
the only infallible source and norm of all doctrine. Moreover,
the doctrine of the person of Jesus Christ is also involved in
the consideration of any of His statements, including those
which deal with isagogical or historical matters. In short,
the commission holds that it is a doctrinal matter to contra-
dict or deny whatever the Bible teaches on any subject.”
Adopted by the CTCR, May 24, 1971.
Action: This resolution died since it failed to receive
action before adjournment.
(The Committee removed “study” from the resolved after
“reference” and filed this change with the Secretary.)