Collection › LCMS Convention Workbook (St. Louis, Missouri) › 2026 · 69th Convention, Phoenix › Page 467
LCMS Convention Workbook St. Louis, Missouri — 2026, Page 467
front matter 1
front matter 2
front matter 3
front matter 4
front matter 5
front matter 6
front matter 7
front matter 8
front matter 9
front matter 10
front matter 11
front matter 12
front matter 13
front matter 14
front matter 15
front matter 16
front matter 17
front matter 18
front matter 19
front matter 20
front matter 21
front matter 22
front matter 23
front matter 24
front matter 25
front matter 26
front matter 27
front matter 28
front matter 29
front matter 30
front matter 31
front matter 32
front matter 33
front matter 34
front matter 35
Page 1
Page 2
Page 3
Page 4
Page 5
Page 6
Page 7
Page 8
Page 9
Page 10
Page 11
Page 12
Page 13
Page 14
Page 15
Page 16
Page 17
Page 18
Page 19
Page 20
Page 21
Page 22
Page 23
Page 24
Page 25
Page 26
Page 27
Page 28
Page 29
Page 30
Page 31
Page 32
Page 33
Page 34
Page 35
Page 36
Page 37
Page 38
Page 39
Page 40
Page 41
Page 42
Page 43
Page 44
Page 45
Page 46
Page 47
Page 48
Page 49
Page 50
Page 51
Page 52
Page 53
Page 54
Page 55
Page 56
Page 57
Page 58
Page 59
Page 60
Page 61
Page 62
Page 63
Page 64
Page 65
Page 66
Page 67
Page 68
Page 69
Page 70
Page 71
Page 72
Page 73
Page 74
Page 75
Page 76
Page 77
Page 78
Page 79
Page 80
Page 81
Page 82
Page 83
Page 84
Page 85
Page 86
Page 87
Page 88
Page 89
Page 90
Page 91
Page 92
Page 93
Page 94
Page 95
Page 96
Page 97
Page 98
Page 99
Page 100
Page 101
Page 102
Page 103
Page 104
Page 105
Page 106
Page 107
Page 108
Page 109
Page 110
Page 111
Page 112
Page 113
Page 114
Page 115
Page 116
Page 117
Page 118
Page 119
Page 120
Page 121
Page 122
Page 123
Page 124
Page 125
Page 126
Page 127
Page 128
Page 129
Page 130
Page 131
Page 132
Page 133
Page 134
Page 135
Page 136
Page 137
Page 138
Page 139
Page 140
Page 141
Page 142
Page 143
Page 144
Page 145
Page 146
Page 147
Page 148
Page 149
Page 150
Page 151
Page 152
Page 153
Page 154
Page 155
Page 156
Page 157
Page 158
Page 159
Page 160
Page 161
Page 162
Page 163
Page 164
Page 165
Page 166
Page 167
Page 168
Page 169
Page 170
Page 171
Page 172
Page 173
Page 174
Page 175
Page 176
Page 177
Page 178
Page 179
Page 180
Page 181
Page 182
Page 183
Page 184
Page 185
Page 186
Page 187
Page 188
Page 189
Page 190
Page 191
Page 192
Page 193
Page 194
Page 195
Page 196
Page 197
Page 198
Page 199
Page 200
Page 201
Page 202
Page 203
Page 204
Page 205
Page 206
Page 207
Page 208
Page 209
Page 210
Page 211
Page 212
Page 213
Page 214
Page 215
Page 216
Page 217
Page 218
Page 219
Page 220
Page 221
Page 222
Page 223
Page 224
Page 225
Page 226
Page 227
Page 228
Page 229
Page 230
Page 231
Page 232
Page 233
Page 234
Page 235
Page 236
Page 237
Page 238
Page 239
Page 240
Page 241
Page 242
Page 243
Page 244
Page 245
Page 246
Page 247
Page 248
Page 249
Page 250
Page 251
Page 252
Page 253
Page 254
Page 255
Page 256
Page 257
Page 258
Page 259
Page 260
Page 261
Page 262
Page 263
Page 264
Page 265
Page 266
Page 267
Page 268
Page 269
Page 270
Page 271
Page 272
Page 273
Page 274
Page 275
Page 276
Page 277
Page 278
Page 279
Page 280
Page 281
Page 282
Page 283
Page 284
Page 285
Page 286
Page 287
Page 288
Page 289
Page 290
Page 291
Page 292
Page 293
Page 294
Page 295
Page 296
Page 297
Page 298
Page 299
Page 300
Page 301
Page 302
Page 303
Page 304
Page 305
Page 306
Page 307
Page 308
Page 309
Page 310
Page 311
Page 312
Page 313
Page 314
Page 315
Page 316
Page 317
Page 318
Page 319
Page 320
Page 321
Page 322
Page 323
Page 324
Page 325
Page 326
Page 327
Page 328
Page 329
Page 330
Page 331
Page 332
Page 333
Page 334
Page 335
Page 336
Page 337
Page 338
Page 339
Page 340
Page 341
Page 342
Page 343
Page 344
Page 345
Page 346
Page 347
Page 348
Page 349
Page 350
Page 351
Page 352
Page 353
Page 354
Page 355
Page 356
Page 357
Page 358
Page 359
Page 360
Page 361
Page 362
Page 363
Page 364
Page 365
Page 366
Page 367
Page 368
Page 369
Page 370
Page 371
Page 372
Page 373
Page 374
Page 375
Page 376
Page 377
Page 378
Page 379
Page 380
Page 381
Page 382
Page 383
Page 384
Page 385
Page 386
Page 387
Page 388
Page 389
Page 390
Page 391
Page 392
Page 393
Page 394
Page 395
Page 396
Page 397
Page 398
Page 399
Page 400
Page 401
Page 402
Page 403
Page 404
Page 405
Page 406
Page 407
Page 408
Page 409
Page 410
Page 411
Page 412
Page 413
Page 414
Page 415
Page 416
Page 417
Page 418
Page 419
Page 420
Page 421
Page 422
Page 423
Page 424
Page 425
Page 426
Page 427
Page 428
Page 429
Page 430
Page 431
Page 432
Page 433
Page 434
Page 435
Page 436
Page 437
Page 438
Page 439
Page 440
Page 441
Page 442
Page 443
Page 444
Page 445
Page 446
Page 447
Page 448
Page 449
Page 450
Page 451
Page 452
Page 453
Page 454
Page 455
Page 456
Page 457
Page 458
Page 459
Page 460
Page 461
Page 462
Page 463
Page 464
Page 465
Page 466
Page 467
Page 468
Page 469
Page 470
Page 471
Page 472
Page 473
Page 474
Page 475
Page 476
Page 477
Page 478
Page 479
Page 480
Page 481
Page 482
Page 483
Page 484
Page 485
Page 486
Page 487
Page 488
Page 489
Page 490
Page 491
Page 492
Page 493
Page 494
Page 495
Page 496
Page 497
Page 498
Page 499
Page 500
Page 501
Page 502
Page 503
Page 504
Page 505
Page 506
Page 507
Page 508
Page 509
Page 510
Page 511
Page 512
Page 513
Page 514
Page 515
Page 516
Page 517
Page 518
Page 519
Page 520
Page 521
Page 522
Page 523
Page 524
Scan: The Lutheran Church—Missouri Synod
⤓ Download page image (full resolution)
Transcription machine transcription, uncorrected
STRUCTURE AND ADMINISTRATION
and are carefully managed and overseen to ensure security and legal
compliance.
But, when the Church strays too far into the left-hand kingdom
through unrelated business ventures, it goes outside its vocation and
may be assuming undue risk.
The Alberta-British Columbia District of Lutheran Church—
Canada, unrelated to LCEF, was forced into bankruptcy due to its
local church extension fund’s failed investment in an ambitious real
estate development project, with serious repercussions across the
entire church body. Concordia University, Portland (CUP) entered
into a significant outsourcing contract with HotChalk, a marketing
and enrollment company, with negative financial impact on CUP,
and ultimately, a lengthy lawsuit after its closure.
Some within the Synod believe that the Synod and its agencies (e.g.,
colleges and seminaries) can benefit by creating new types of legal
entities, such as holding companies, and are considering adding
complex new bylaws, policies, and procedures to allow Synod
agencies to create multiple new types of entities (e.g., to engage in
real estate development activities). Yet, experience teaches that the
more numerous and complex the entities, the greater the difficulty
to oversee them, and thus, the greater the risk.
Some have even proposed allowing property of our colleges and
seminaries—which is currently property of the Synod—to be
transferred to new entities, with varying levels of control and
accountability, with the result that such property would no longer
be property of the Synod.
Proposals also include placing the Synod Board of Directors (BOD)
as the authorizer and primary overseer of new entities, with the
responsibility to perform detailed legal and policy reviews. This
would impose significant new powers and duties on the BOD,
requiring additional time, effort, and potential expense for outside
attorneys’ bills and other professional fees.
WHEREAS, The foregoing matters suggest that major changes to
the Synod’s Bylaws to allow creation of potentially numerous new
legal entities may be ill-advised; therefore be it
Resolved, That the Synod recommit itself and its agencies to their
existing defined roles, focusing on the things of God without
distraction for secular business ventures; and be it further
Resolved, That where the Synod or its agencies no longer need
property or assets, those assets be appropriately sold or disposed of,
with the proceeds used for the furtherance of their original intended
purpose and the work of the church at large, rather than as the object
of speculation, usury, real estate development, or other projects that
distract time and attention from the core objectives of the Synod and
its agencies; and be it further
Resolved, That if there is a legitimate need for any new entity to
be formed, that any such entity be carefully, deliberately, and
separately established, in a manner that does not risk or alienate the
property of the Synod that was funded by God’s grace through the
gifts of individuals and congregations over generations; and be it
finally
Resolved, That the Synod give thanks for the many temporal
blessings God has bestowed upon us, as well as for those individuals
and entities such as LCEF and CPS that have faithfully managed the
same and pray for wisdom in the continued administration thereof.
St. Paul
Brookfield, IL
467
Ov. 9-08
To Amend Bylaws Exclusive to Lutheran Church
Extension Fund to Clarify That It May Provide
Real Estate Evaluation and Redevelopment
Services in Support of Synod Mission and Ministry
Rationale
Most congregations and ministries within the Synod are owners of
real estate. Many of these ministries need assistance evaluating their
property so they can steward their assets wisely. In some cases, they
may not have need for some or all of their real estate. In many cases,
sale of the real estate is the best option to raise funds for future
operations or to wind up affairs in an orderly way. In other cases,
ministries want to keep some of the real estate to continue
operations and divest of other portions. Such divestiture may entail
a sale or lease of the property to either raise funds for continued
operations, maintain ministry activity in the divested property, or
both. Redevelopment of the real estate may occur with retained or
divested property.
In most cases, ministries do not possess expertise in the evaluation,
redevelopment, or re-purposing of real estate. Lutheran Church
Extension Fund (LCEF) has decades of experience in assisting
ministries in evaluating, acquiring, developing, and selling real
estate through its church extension activities. LCEF has expanded
this expertise in the last few years by hiring a team of individuals
with extensive real estate consulting and redevelopment experience.
LCEF can provide expanded real estate services that are of great
value to the ministries of the Synod.
The requested bylaw changes are exclusive to LCEF and are
necessary to clarify that it is within LCEF’s purposes to provide
such real estate services to ministries within the Synod.
Therefore be it
Resolved, That Bylaw 3.6.4 be amended as follows:
PRESENT/PROPOSED WORDING
The Lutheran Church Extension Fund—Missouri Synod
3.6.4
The Lutheran Church Extension Fund—Missouri Synod,
as established on June 15, 1978, as a corporate entity under the laws
of the State of Missouri, is operated by its members and Board of
Directors, in accordance with its Articles of Incorporation and
corporate Bylaws, to further the objectives and duties of the church
extension fund by providing provide financial, real estate, and other
related resources and related services for ministry, witness, and
outreach within the Synod and, as approved by the Synod Board of
Directors, beyond the Synod: (1) to and within partner churches with
which the Synod is in altar and pulpit fellowship; or (2) upon the
recommendation of the President of Synod, to Lutheran entities
formed and operating outside of the United States that assist in
fulfilling the Synod’s ministry and mission objectives in foreign
countries.
and be it further
Resolved, That Bylaw 3.6.4.4.1 be amended as follows:
PRESENT/PROPOSED WORDING
3.6.4.4.1
The assets of the Lutheran Church Extension Fund—
Missouri Synod shall be used exclusively to provide financing and
services for the acquisition of sites, for the construction of facilities,
for the purchase of buildings and equipment, for operating expenses,
for professional church worker education, for the residential housing
needs of professional church workers, for promoting strategic
ministry planning and assisting in capital campaigns, for the
evaluation and redevelopment of real estate; and for other purposes
2026 Convention Workbook