Collection › LCMS Convention Workbook (St. Louis, Missouri) › 2026 · 69th Convention, Phoenix › Page 202
LCMS Convention Workbook St. Louis, Missouri — 2026, Page 202
front matter 1
front matter 2
front matter 3
front matter 4
front matter 5
front matter 6
front matter 7
front matter 8
front matter 9
front matter 10
front matter 11
front matter 12
front matter 13
front matter 14
front matter 15
front matter 16
front matter 17
front matter 18
front matter 19
front matter 20
front matter 21
front matter 22
front matter 23
front matter 24
front matter 25
front matter 26
front matter 27
front matter 28
front matter 29
front matter 30
front matter 31
front matter 32
front matter 33
front matter 34
front matter 35
Page 1
Page 2
Page 3
Page 4
Page 5
Page 6
Page 7
Page 8
Page 9
Page 10
Page 11
Page 12
Page 13
Page 14
Page 15
Page 16
Page 17
Page 18
Page 19
Page 20
Page 21
Page 22
Page 23
Page 24
Page 25
Page 26
Page 27
Page 28
Page 29
Page 30
Page 31
Page 32
Page 33
Page 34
Page 35
Page 36
Page 37
Page 38
Page 39
Page 40
Page 41
Page 42
Page 43
Page 44
Page 45
Page 46
Page 47
Page 48
Page 49
Page 50
Page 51
Page 52
Page 53
Page 54
Page 55
Page 56
Page 57
Page 58
Page 59
Page 60
Page 61
Page 62
Page 63
Page 64
Page 65
Page 66
Page 67
Page 68
Page 69
Page 70
Page 71
Page 72
Page 73
Page 74
Page 75
Page 76
Page 77
Page 78
Page 79
Page 80
Page 81
Page 82
Page 83
Page 84
Page 85
Page 86
Page 87
Page 88
Page 89
Page 90
Page 91
Page 92
Page 93
Page 94
Page 95
Page 96
Page 97
Page 98
Page 99
Page 100
Page 101
Page 102
Page 103
Page 104
Page 105
Page 106
Page 107
Page 108
Page 109
Page 110
Page 111
Page 112
Page 113
Page 114
Page 115
Page 116
Page 117
Page 118
Page 119
Page 120
Page 121
Page 122
Page 123
Page 124
Page 125
Page 126
Page 127
Page 128
Page 129
Page 130
Page 131
Page 132
Page 133
Page 134
Page 135
Page 136
Page 137
Page 138
Page 139
Page 140
Page 141
Page 142
Page 143
Page 144
Page 145
Page 146
Page 147
Page 148
Page 149
Page 150
Page 151
Page 152
Page 153
Page 154
Page 155
Page 156
Page 157
Page 158
Page 159
Page 160
Page 161
Page 162
Page 163
Page 164
Page 165
Page 166
Page 167
Page 168
Page 169
Page 170
Page 171
Page 172
Page 173
Page 174
Page 175
Page 176
Page 177
Page 178
Page 179
Page 180
Page 181
Page 182
Page 183
Page 184
Page 185
Page 186
Page 187
Page 188
Page 189
Page 190
Page 191
Page 192
Page 193
Page 194
Page 195
Page 196
Page 197
Page 198
Page 199
Page 200
Page 201
Page 202
Page 203
Page 204
Page 205
Page 206
Page 207
Page 208
Page 209
Page 210
Page 211
Page 212
Page 213
Page 214
Page 215
Page 216
Page 217
Page 218
Page 219
Page 220
Page 221
Page 222
Page 223
Page 224
Page 225
Page 226
Page 227
Page 228
Page 229
Page 230
Page 231
Page 232
Page 233
Page 234
Page 235
Page 236
Page 237
Page 238
Page 239
Page 240
Page 241
Page 242
Page 243
Page 244
Page 245
Page 246
Page 247
Page 248
Page 249
Page 250
Page 251
Page 252
Page 253
Page 254
Page 255
Page 256
Page 257
Page 258
Page 259
Page 260
Page 261
Page 262
Page 263
Page 264
Page 265
Page 266
Page 267
Page 268
Page 269
Page 270
Page 271
Page 272
Page 273
Page 274
Page 275
Page 276
Page 277
Page 278
Page 279
Page 280
Page 281
Page 282
Page 283
Page 284
Page 285
Page 286
Page 287
Page 288
Page 289
Page 290
Page 291
Page 292
Page 293
Page 294
Page 295
Page 296
Page 297
Page 298
Page 299
Page 300
Page 301
Page 302
Page 303
Page 304
Page 305
Page 306
Page 307
Page 308
Page 309
Page 310
Page 311
Page 312
Page 313
Page 314
Page 315
Page 316
Page 317
Page 318
Page 319
Page 320
Page 321
Page 322
Page 323
Page 324
Page 325
Page 326
Page 327
Page 328
Page 329
Page 330
Page 331
Page 332
Page 333
Page 334
Page 335
Page 336
Page 337
Page 338
Page 339
Page 340
Page 341
Page 342
Page 343
Page 344
Page 345
Page 346
Page 347
Page 348
Page 349
Page 350
Page 351
Page 352
Page 353
Page 354
Page 355
Page 356
Page 357
Page 358
Page 359
Page 360
Page 361
Page 362
Page 363
Page 364
Page 365
Page 366
Page 367
Page 368
Page 369
Page 370
Page 371
Page 372
Page 373
Page 374
Page 375
Page 376
Page 377
Page 378
Page 379
Page 380
Page 381
Page 382
Page 383
Page 384
Page 385
Page 386
Page 387
Page 388
Page 389
Page 390
Page 391
Page 392
Page 393
Page 394
Page 395
Page 396
Page 397
Page 398
Page 399
Page 400
Page 401
Page 402
Page 403
Page 404
Page 405
Page 406
Page 407
Page 408
Page 409
Page 410
Page 411
Page 412
Page 413
Page 414
Page 415
Page 416
Page 417
Page 418
Page 419
Page 420
Page 421
Page 422
Page 423
Page 424
Page 425
Page 426
Page 427
Page 428
Page 429
Page 430
Page 431
Page 432
Page 433
Page 434
Page 435
Page 436
Page 437
Page 438
Page 439
Page 440
Page 441
Page 442
Page 443
Page 444
Page 445
Page 446
Page 447
Page 448
Page 449
Page 450
Page 451
Page 452
Page 453
Page 454
Page 455
Page 456
Page 457
Page 458
Page 459
Page 460
Page 461
Page 462
Page 463
Page 464
Page 465
Page 466
Page 467
Page 468
Page 469
Page 470
Page 471
Page 472
Page 473
Page 474
Page 475
Page 476
Page 477
Page 478
Page 479
Page 480
Page 481
Page 482
Page 483
Page 484
Page 485
Page 486
Page 487
Page 488
Page 489
Page 490
Page 491
Page 492
Page 493
Page 494
Page 495
Page 496
Page 497
Page 498
Page 499
Page 500
Page 501
Page 502
Page 503
Page 504
Page 505
Page 506
Page 507
Page 508
Page 509
Page 510
Page 511
Page 512
Page 513
Page 514
Page 515
Page 516
Page 517
Page 518
Page 519
Page 520
Page 521
Page 522
Page 523
Page 524
Scan: The Lutheran Church—Missouri Synod
⤓ Download page image (full resolution)
Transcription machine transcription, uncorrected
202
THEOLOGICAL DOCUMENTS—COMMISSION ON THEOLOGY AND CHURCH RELATIONS
M E D I C A L - E T H I C A L C O N S I D E R AT I O N S
M E D I C A L - E T H I C A L C O N S I D E R AT I O N S
7. “Vegetable” vs. “Persistent Vegetative State”
Lay use of the term “vegetable” for a person in a coma or a vegetative state represents a horrible misinterpretation of the
meaning of the medical term “persistent vegetative state” (PVS). While the word may be acceptable within the scope of its
clinical use, the casual use of it may mislead people greatly. The term “coma” refers to the lack of both awareness and wakefulness, whether in an open-eyed or closed-eyed coma state. Patients in a vegetative state may have regained consciousness
from a coma, but still have not regained awareness. PVS represents a disorder of consciousness in which patients with
severe brain damage are in a state of partial arousal rather than true awareness. Typically the classification of “vegetative
state” (VS) gets applied to such persons in the first weeks with the classification “persistent vegetative state” coming after
four weeks. While some commonly describe those in a persistent vegetative state as brain dead, that misunderstands the
injury. Patients with PVS have a healthy and functioning lower brain stem.
United States, the term “hospice” often denotes facilities and institutions. Usage in the United States applies to both in-patient and out-patient (home-based) programs that began to spring up and proliferate in the early 1970s. In 2017, almost 1.5
million patients took part in hospice in the United States.
Although very rare, PVS patients may sometimes regain full consciousness. One man, Conley Holbrook, was classified as “comatose” for eight years. On Feb. 25, 1991, he awakened. According to Bartlett and Rehder, 26-year-old Holbrook
was not only able to call each of his relatives by name, but he was even able to identify the small children who had been
born while he was unconscious.140 Another person, Patti White Bull, emerged from her unconscious state on Christmas
Eve in 1999 after 16 years.141
8. What Do/Did They Want? vs. What Is Best for Them?
As Christians, the question “What did he/she want?” should not be primary in our thinking. A better question for
Christian surrogates at the bedside of a dying loved one should be, “What is best for this person?”142
H. Hospice Care
Hospice care, in-patient or at home, can become a valuable partner to both the family and the dying person. Unlike health
restorative therapies and procedures common in hospitals, hospice aims at palliative relief of pain and symptoms of a terminally ill patient.143 Hospice programs also incorporate attending to the emotional and spiritual needs of the patient. Note
that the spiritual support provided by a secular organization that conceives of the idea of “spiritual” in the most generic and
ecumenical way will be something quite different from pastoral care offered by a Lutheran clergyman.144 Lutheran pastors
will want to provide Word and Sacrament ministry to a terminally ill person on a regular basis. They will typically want to
prepare the dying saint and his or her family for impending death with the use of the “Commendation of the Dying,” found
in the Pastoral Care Companion.145
Because of the focus on palliation of a terminally ill patient’s pain and symptoms, the priority falls on comfort and
quality of life through the reduction of pain and suffering. Hospice provides an alternative to therapies aimed at prolonging life through means of therapies and procedures. Current treatments for cancer, for instance, carry with them potential
unwanted side effects and additional symptoms that may prove extremely burdensome to an elderly patient. Outside the
At present, the United States Medicare program only covers hospice care if the hospice provider is Medicareapproved. One can determine if the hospice provider qualifies as Medicare-approved by inquiring with your physician,
the hospice provider, the state hospice organization or the state health department.146 If the hospice has been Medicareapproved, “once your hospice benefit starts, Original Medicare will cover everything you need related to your terminal
illness.”147 Current law permits two 90-day benefit periods, followed by an unlimited number of 60-day benefit periods.
This includes the right to change hospice providers once during each benefit period.
Depending on the specific needs of the terminally ill person, the number and quality of hospice programs in the
area, and one’s own ability to assist in the care of the dying loved one, a person may prefer to opt for receiving hospice in
a nursing home or long-term care facility where hospice services are added onto the regular nursing, housekeeping and
dietary services. Most people profess to prefer dying in “my own bed” rather than in a hospital, nursing home or other
institutional setting. However, if the spouse may be too frail or impaired to assist the hospice team actively, an in-home
program may not be practical. At times, the decision whether or not to use home-based hospice will hinge on the availability of family members (and/or hired help) to support the terminally ill person. A frail, elderly spouse suffering from
early stages of dementia, for instance, would not be a suitable person to attend to an obese patient with uncontrolled
incontinence.
Increasingly, patients are encouraged to become intelligent consumers of their usage of medical science and its myriad
benefits. In the area of hospice, differences of practical pain and symptom management exist. For instance, some hospices
may not perform glucose monitoring for diabetics as they see it as “treatment toward a cure,” even though not monitoring
glucose could cause hypoglycemia (critically low levels where a patient goes into coma and death) or hyperglycemia (critically high levels). Both are considered clinical emergencies. Other hospices recognize glucose monitoring is not curative,
but that it prevents harm in maintaining acceptable levels and waiting for death from another condition (e.g., cancer, heart
failure). Asking questions of the staff before entering into an agreement may assist patients and their families in making
a wise selection. And while the Medicare website declares that “Original Medicare will cover everything you need related
to your terminal illness,” that should not be understood to mean that nothing is expected of the family. Different hospice
providers carry out their duties in myriad ways, some handling most of the care needs, others expecting family members
or the hospital or senior facility to shoulder some of the responsibilities. Again, asking enough questions in advance and
probing to ensure a full understanding of how a particular organization operates will increase the likelihood of having a
satisfying relationship with their services and support in a time of need. Note that a person is not obligated to accept the
leads and recommendations from hospital discharge planners. While they may be invaluable in a search for a provider,
their information should not substitute for one’s own efforts to secure the hospice that will meet the family’s expectations.
140
Bartlett and Rehder, “Ventilators, Feeding Tubes, and Other End-of-Life Questions,” 5. Conley Holbrook identified his cousin as his attacker following awakening from his semi-comatose
state, resulting in the man facing trial for attempted murder. “Brain-Damaged Man’s ‘Miracle’ Recovery Lands a Cousin in Jail: Tragedy: The Two Boyhood Chums Grew up to Be Drinking
Buddies. A Head Injury Left One of Them Speechless for Eight Years. Was It Assault or Just Another Family Fight?” Los Angeles Times, April 21, 1991, latimes.com/archives/la-xpm-1991-04-21mn-846-story.html.
141
“Awakening from 16 Years in near-Coma.” Los Angeles Times, Feb. 3, 2000, latimes.com/archives/la-xpm-2000-feb-03-me-60571-story.html.
142
This point is discussed in more detail under the section on advance directives, particularly as related to the durable power for health care proxy (see pages 17–21).
The very notion of hospice care stands against the ideology of suicide and euthanasia. As Dyck notes, “Hospice was founded to provide comfort-only care that would help prevent suicide and
euthanasia. Hospice physicians repeatedly report that once they provide comfort-only care, patients who expressed a desire to end their lives, or have it ended, change their minds, or no longer
pursue ending their lives as an option,” Life’s Worth: The Case Against Assisted Suicide (Grand Rapids: Eerdmans, 2002), 47.
143
144
Hospice organizations may assume that they will be responsible for the spiritual care of the dying person. It may be necessary for the family to request that their pastor rather than the hospice
chaplain provide spiritual care and counsel for the dying.
145
“Commendation of the Dying,” in Lutheran Service Book: Pastoral Prayer Companion (St. Louis: Concordia Publishing House, 2007), 81–94.
146
Because Medicare Advantage programs must offer the same benefits as traditional Medicare, one may also take advantage of hospice through a Medicare Advantage program. However, the list
of providers will be limited to those approved by the Advantage program. “How Hospice Works,” Medicare, medicare.gov/what-medicare-covers/what-part-a-covers/how-hospice-works.
147
Coverage may not be as complete as some expect. For more information about what Medicare considers “everything you need related to your terminal illness,” see “How Hospice Works,”
above.
29
30
M E D I C A L - E T H I C A L C O N S I D E R AT I O N S
PA S T O R A L A N D S P I R I T UA L D I M E N S I O N S
Medicare suggests that the following questions may aid families in the selection of a hospice provider:
• Is the hospice provider certified and licensed by the state or federal government?
• Does the hospice provider train caregivers to care for you at home?
• How will your doctor work with the doctor from the hospice provider?
• How many other patients are assigned to each member of the hospice care staff?
• Will the hospice staff meet regularly with you and your family to discuss care?
• How does the hospice staff respond to after-hour emergencies?
IV. Pastoral and Spiritual Dimensions
• What measures are in place to ensure hospice care quality?
• What services do hospice volunteers offer? Are they trained?148
A. Dealing with Our Uncertainty and Sinfulness
The discussion of end-of-life decision-making must also take account of the ambiguity inherent in all human experience.
As fallible creatures with circumscribed consciousness, we must admit that we may not always know clearly what the
“right thing to do” might be in a particular situation. More than one disciple of Christ has felt the force of St. Paul’s phrase
“we see in a mirror dimly” (1 COR. 13:12) when confronted with the uncertainties attending to bedside decision-making for
a dying loved one. After opining that the unbroken tradition from “Genesis to Heidegger” differentiates animal life from
human life by the presence of “human consciousness of self,” Thielicke admits that there are no casuistic rules to offer us
infallible direction on how to handle the bedside choices families and physicians must render. He resorts to the notion that
“one must simply run the risk of making the decision — and be prepared in so doing to err, and thereby to incur guilt. As
a Christian, I would say that whoever hopes to come through it all without illusions or repressions will have to live in the
name of forgiveness.”149
The 1993 document of the CTCR reminded us that “any decisions made in this highly complex area, and any actions
taken that may later appear to have been wrong, have been redeemed by that forgiveness which is available to all who put
their trust in the work and merits of mankind’s Savior and Redeemer.”150 To sinners burdened in conscience by the guilt of
the Law, our final word must always be one of Gospel and forgiving grace in Jesus Christ. Whether hindsight reveals the
inadequacy of our calculations here or not, we dare not stop with the penultimate word of Law but press on to the ultimate
word of Gospel. As Luther wisely observed, “Are we to rate the price of his blood so low as to say that it has redeemed only
what is lowest in man, and that what is most excellent in man can take care of itself and has no need of Christ?151
At one level, such counsel should reassure those who confess that all human efforts carry the taint of sin and that
motives can never be 100% pure. We all live by faith and in light of the forgiveness of God, after all. For faithful loved ones
carrying a burden of guilt over the death of a loved one and torturing themselves over whether they could have “done
more” or done it differently, this message may be an important part of sensitive pastoral care.
One can hardly gainsay the liberating promise of divine forgiveness and the blessed state of absolution. However, we
are never permitted to substitute divine pardon for legitimate human agency. We dare not adopt a cavalier attitude that it
does not really matter what we decide to do since we know that God will forgive us in the end anyway. Neither are families
exempt from the difficult prayerful conversations that attend to living in Christ through faith as we serve our neighbor
through love.152
148
“How Hospice Works,” medicare.gov/what-medicare-covers/what-part-a-covers/how-hospice-works.
31
2026 Convention Workbook
149
Thielicke, The Doctor as Judge, 21. See the entire section, 16–21, for his argument.
150
CTCR, Christian Care at Life’s End, 21.
151
LW 33:227.
In Luther’s “The Freedom of the Christian,” he writes: “We conclude, therefore, that a Christian lives not in himself, but in Christ and in his neighbor. Otherwise he is not a Christian. He lives
in Christ through faith, in his neighbor through love,” LW 31:371.
152
32