Collection › LCMS Convention Workbook (St. Louis, Missouri) › 2026 · 69th Convention, Phoenix › Page 255
LCMS Convention Workbook St. Louis, Missouri — 2026, Page 255
front matter 1
front matter 2
front matter 3
front matter 4
front matter 5
front matter 6
front matter 7
front matter 8
front matter 9
front matter 10
front matter 11
front matter 12
front matter 13
front matter 14
front matter 15
front matter 16
front matter 17
front matter 18
front matter 19
front matter 20
front matter 21
front matter 22
front matter 23
front matter 24
front matter 25
front matter 26
front matter 27
front matter 28
front matter 29
front matter 30
front matter 31
front matter 32
front matter 33
front matter 34
front matter 35
Page 1
Page 2
Page 3
Page 4
Page 5
Page 6
Page 7
Page 8
Page 9
Page 10
Page 11
Page 12
Page 13
Page 14
Page 15
Page 16
Page 17
Page 18
Page 19
Page 20
Page 21
Page 22
Page 23
Page 24
Page 25
Page 26
Page 27
Page 28
Page 29
Page 30
Page 31
Page 32
Page 33
Page 34
Page 35
Page 36
Page 37
Page 38
Page 39
Page 40
Page 41
Page 42
Page 43
Page 44
Page 45
Page 46
Page 47
Page 48
Page 49
Page 50
Page 51
Page 52
Page 53
Page 54
Page 55
Page 56
Page 57
Page 58
Page 59
Page 60
Page 61
Page 62
Page 63
Page 64
Page 65
Page 66
Page 67
Page 68
Page 69
Page 70
Page 71
Page 72
Page 73
Page 74
Page 75
Page 76
Page 77
Page 78
Page 79
Page 80
Page 81
Page 82
Page 83
Page 84
Page 85
Page 86
Page 87
Page 88
Page 89
Page 90
Page 91
Page 92
Page 93
Page 94
Page 95
Page 96
Page 97
Page 98
Page 99
Page 100
Page 101
Page 102
Page 103
Page 104
Page 105
Page 106
Page 107
Page 108
Page 109
Page 110
Page 111
Page 112
Page 113
Page 114
Page 115
Page 116
Page 117
Page 118
Page 119
Page 120
Page 121
Page 122
Page 123
Page 124
Page 125
Page 126
Page 127
Page 128
Page 129
Page 130
Page 131
Page 132
Page 133
Page 134
Page 135
Page 136
Page 137
Page 138
Page 139
Page 140
Page 141
Page 142
Page 143
Page 144
Page 145
Page 146
Page 147
Page 148
Page 149
Page 150
Page 151
Page 152
Page 153
Page 154
Page 155
Page 156
Page 157
Page 158
Page 159
Page 160
Page 161
Page 162
Page 163
Page 164
Page 165
Page 166
Page 167
Page 168
Page 169
Page 170
Page 171
Page 172
Page 173
Page 174
Page 175
Page 176
Page 177
Page 178
Page 179
Page 180
Page 181
Page 182
Page 183
Page 184
Page 185
Page 186
Page 187
Page 188
Page 189
Page 190
Page 191
Page 192
Page 193
Page 194
Page 195
Page 196
Page 197
Page 198
Page 199
Page 200
Page 201
Page 202
Page 203
Page 204
Page 205
Page 206
Page 207
Page 208
Page 209
Page 210
Page 211
Page 212
Page 213
Page 214
Page 215
Page 216
Page 217
Page 218
Page 219
Page 220
Page 221
Page 222
Page 223
Page 224
Page 225
Page 226
Page 227
Page 228
Page 229
Page 230
Page 231
Page 232
Page 233
Page 234
Page 235
Page 236
Page 237
Page 238
Page 239
Page 240
Page 241
Page 242
Page 243
Page 244
Page 245
Page 246
Page 247
Page 248
Page 249
Page 250
Page 251
Page 252
Page 253
Page 254
Page 255
Page 256
Page 257
Page 258
Page 259
Page 260
Page 261
Page 262
Page 263
Page 264
Page 265
Page 266
Page 267
Page 268
Page 269
Page 270
Page 271
Page 272
Page 273
Page 274
Page 275
Page 276
Page 277
Page 278
Page 279
Page 280
Page 281
Page 282
Page 283
Page 284
Page 285
Page 286
Page 287
Page 288
Page 289
Page 290
Page 291
Page 292
Page 293
Page 294
Page 295
Page 296
Page 297
Page 298
Page 299
Page 300
Page 301
Page 302
Page 303
Page 304
Page 305
Page 306
Page 307
Page 308
Page 309
Page 310
Page 311
Page 312
Page 313
Page 314
Page 315
Page 316
Page 317
Page 318
Page 319
Page 320
Page 321
Page 322
Page 323
Page 324
Page 325
Page 326
Page 327
Page 328
Page 329
Page 330
Page 331
Page 332
Page 333
Page 334
Page 335
Page 336
Page 337
Page 338
Page 339
Page 340
Page 341
Page 342
Page 343
Page 344
Page 345
Page 346
Page 347
Page 348
Page 349
Page 350
Page 351
Page 352
Page 353
Page 354
Page 355
Page 356
Page 357
Page 358
Page 359
Page 360
Page 361
Page 362
Page 363
Page 364
Page 365
Page 366
Page 367
Page 368
Page 369
Page 370
Page 371
Page 372
Page 373
Page 374
Page 375
Page 376
Page 377
Page 378
Page 379
Page 380
Page 381
Page 382
Page 383
Page 384
Page 385
Page 386
Page 387
Page 388
Page 389
Page 390
Page 391
Page 392
Page 393
Page 394
Page 395
Page 396
Page 397
Page 398
Page 399
Page 400
Page 401
Page 402
Page 403
Page 404
Page 405
Page 406
Page 407
Page 408
Page 409
Page 410
Page 411
Page 412
Page 413
Page 414
Page 415
Page 416
Page 417
Page 418
Page 419
Page 420
Page 421
Page 422
Page 423
Page 424
Page 425
Page 426
Page 427
Page 428
Page 429
Page 430
Page 431
Page 432
Page 433
Page 434
Page 435
Page 436
Page 437
Page 438
Page 439
Page 440
Page 441
Page 442
Page 443
Page 444
Page 445
Page 446
Page 447
Page 448
Page 449
Page 450
Page 451
Page 452
Page 453
Page 454
Page 455
Page 456
Page 457
Page 458
Page 459
Page 460
Page 461
Page 462
Page 463
Page 464
Page 465
Page 466
Page 467
Page 468
Page 469
Page 470
Page 471
Page 472
Page 473
Page 474
Page 475
Page 476
Page 477
Page 478
Page 479
Page 480
Page 481
Page 482
Page 483
Page 484
Page 485
Page 486
Page 487
Page 488
Page 489
Page 490
Page 491
Page 492
Page 493
Page 494
Page 495
Page 496
Page 497
Page 498
Page 499
Page 500
Page 501
Page 502
Page 503
Page 504
Page 505
Page 506
Page 507
Page 508
Page 509
Page 510
Page 511
Page 512
Page 513
Page 514
Page 515
Page 516
Page 517
Page 518
Page 519
Page 520
Page 521
Page 522
Page 523
Page 524
Scan: The Lutheran Church—Missouri Synod
⤓ Download page image (full resolution)
Transcription machine transcription, uncorrected
THEOLOGICAL DOCUMENTS—COMMISSION ON THEOLOGY AND CHURCH RELATIONS
The Lutheran Church—Missouri Synod
255
Proper Administration of the Lord’s Supper
of pre-packaged elements invites confusion and can encourage bad practices. As
noted above, such usage seems to invite some churches to adopt specific practices
that undermine or prevent the practice of closed Communion and may also create
SUBSTITUTION
OF NON-WHEAT BREAD
FOR WHEAT BREAD
questions about what has or has not been consecrated. Consequently, such a practice may under some circumstances create doubts that may cause communicants
to be unsure that they are receiving Christ’s body and blood and therefore to refrain from reception. For these reasons, we believe the Synod should discourage
their future use.
This judgment does not in any way seek to condemn those pastors and congregations that, according to their best judgment during the confusion of the COVID-19
pandemic, made use of the packets. Nevertheless, we believe that the potential for
Biblical and Historical Background
confusion and bad practice outweighs any potential benefit. The great treasure
The question of the propriety of using bread made from grains other than wheat is
that is Christ’s Holy Supper should not be discounted in place of uncertain at-
largely a result of requests by individuals who suffer from celiac disease or another
tempts to avoid disease. Moreover, if we emphasize worries about the potential for
form of gluten intolerance. Although celiac disease was diagnosed as early as the
disease transmission, public worship itself would be viewed as a possible threat to
second century AD, it was given little study or medical treatment until the 1800s.27
physical well-being because of the constant presence of influenza, continuing out-
Both celiac disease (CD) and non-celiac gluten intolerance (NCGS) have garnered
breaks of COVID-19, and other contagions. Our deepest concern as Christians is
increasing attention in recent years. The World Journal of Gastroenterology (WJG)
not threats to the body, but threats to our soul. Jesus rightly admonishes us about
says that “currently, 1% of the United States population holds a diagnosis for celiac
the danger of living in fear of this world’s threats and ignoring God (Matt. 10:28).
disease (CD), however, a more recently recognized and possibly related condition,
A risk to the spiritual well-being of those who would be uncertain of the Sacrament
‘non-celiac gluten sensitivity’ (NCGS) has been suggested to affect up to 6% of the
should rank above the unlikelihood that Communion will endanger us physically.
United States public.”28 In addition to those with such diagnoses, a significantly
higher number of Americans—about 20% of the population—have chosen to
adopt a gluten-free diet without either a CD or NCGS diagnosis.29 This has led to
concerns about the Sacrament, since wheat hosts or bread have been used almost
exclusively for generations. By the late twentieth century non-gluten hosts were
offered to churches as an alternative to wheat hosts for use in cases of CD or other
gluten intolerance. Significant numbers of LCMS churches offer non-gluten hosts
21
The Lutheran Church—Missouri Synod
27
See “History of Celiac Disease,” Beyond Celiac, https://www.beyondceliac.org/celiac-disease/
celiac-history/ (accessed September 17, 2024). The death rate for untreated celiac children is about
30 percent. Because of high rates of child mortality, the fact that celiac victims tended to be children
may have prevented scientific attention until more recent times.
28
Samuel O. Igbinedion et al., “Non-Celiac Gluten Sensitivity: All Wheat Attack Is Not Celiac,” WJG 23,
no. 40 (2017): 7201–10, https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/29142467/.
29
Igbinedion, et al.
22
Proper Administration of the Lord’s Supper
to those who request them. Hence the question of their propriety has been raised
usage of a word in the ancient world during both the period of Classical Greek literature and later, more common (Koine) biblical and early church literature. The
definitions for artos vary somewhat in the dictionaries but can be summarized: In
Classical Greek when artos appears without a modifier it seems to have referred to
wheat bread almost exclusively; however, the definition broadened to become the
general term for all bread in the Koine period.30
in 2023 Res. 5-15.
Regarding the bread of the Lord’s Supper, this is what we have been given
in Scripture:
Matthew 26:26 – “Now as they were eating, Jesus took bread, and after
blessing it broke it and gave it to the disciples, and said, ‘Take, eat; this is
The Bible knows different grains and breads. Wheat and wheat bread are most frequently mentioned (over fifty times), but barley and bread made from barley are
also mentioned frequently (more than thirty times). As for other types of grain,
the only certain reference of bread made from them is the passage in Ezekiel 4:9,
where the Lord commands the prophet to make bread from a mixed flour containing wheat, barley, beans, lentil, millet, and emmer. The term “bread” (lehem in
Hebrew, artos in Greek) is far more common than specific terms such as “wheat
bread” or “barley bread.” It is used over two hundred times in the Old Testament
and nearly one hundred times in the New Testament. “Bread” can mean a loaf, a
cake, or a wafer—although when the wafer is unleavened bread in the Old Testament the term matzah rather than lehem is typical.
My body.’”
Mark 14:22 – “And as they were eating, He took bread, and after blessing
it broke it and gave it to them, and said, ‘Take; this is My body.’”
Luke 22:19 – “And He took bread, and when He had given thanks, He
broke it and gave it to them, saying, ‘This is My body, which is given for
you. Do this in remembrance of Me.’”
1 Corinthians 11:23–24 – “For I received from the Lord what I also delivered to you, that the Lord Jesus on the night when He was betrayed took
bread, and when He had given thanks, He broke it, and said, ‘This is My
Bread is further used in ways that go beyond the literal. Since bread was the staple
in the diet of the biblical world, the Bible also can use “bread” as shorthand for
food or nourishment (e.g., Prov. 6:8; Lam. 1:11; Ezek. 18:16; Matt. 6:11; Luke 14:15;
15:17; 2 Thess. 3:12). Reference to bread being broken is connected with the blessing of the meal by the head of the household and the subsequent distribution of
food. This is also, of course, the sense in the four Lord’s Supper narratives. The
combination of breaking and bread in Luke and Acts seems to indicate partaking
of a meal in some cases (Luke 24:35; Acts 2:46; 20:11), but it may refer to the Lord’s
Supper (Acts 20:7). Certainly “the bread that we break” in 1 Corinthians 10:16 refers to the Supper.
body, which is for you. Do this in remembrance of Me.’”
In each of the passages, the text shows that Jesus took “bread” with a blessing or
thanksgiving, and distributed it to the disciples with the words “This is My body.”
The concern the CTCR has here been asked to address is whether it is consistent
with our Lord’s “Do this” for congregations to use “non-wheat hosts” in the Lord’s
Supper. That is, since the Lord took “bread” as one of the elements of the Lord’s
Supper, is bread made from something other than wheat a valid earthly element?
The Confessions simply describe Christ’s instruction: “For Christ gives this command at the table and at supper. There is certainly no doubt that He speaks of real,
There is further usage of the term “bread” beyond any reference to normal grain
bread. Note the connection with manna, “bread from heaven” (Ex. 16:4, 8; Psalm
natural bread and of natural wine. Also, He speaks of oral eating and drinking” (FC
SD VII 48). Therefore, consistent with our response in the matter of substituting
grape juice for wine, we should state at the outset that using something other than
30
“natural bread” would not be in keeping with our Lord’s words.
The Greek word translated as “bread” in the four passages cited is artos. For biblical studies, Greek lexicons (dictionaries) provide definitions by summarizing the
23
Several dictionaries can be consulted: Henry George Liddell et al., eds., A Greek-English Lexicon, 9th
rev. ed. (Oxford University Press, 1996); James Diggle et al., eds., The Cambridge Greek Lexicon, vol.
1 (Cambridge University Press, 2021); Johannes Behm, “artos,” in Theological Dictionary of the New
Testament, eds. Gerhard Kittel and Gerhard Friedrich, trans. Geoffrey W. Bromiley (Eerdmans, 1964);
Walter Bauer et al., eds., A Greek-English Lexicon of the New Testament and Other Early Christian
Literature, 3rd ed. (University of Chicago Press, 2000).
24
2026 Convention Workbook