Collection › LCMS Convention Workbook (St. Louis, Missouri) › 2026 · 69th Convention, Phoenix › Page 273

LCMS Convention Workbook St. Louis, Missouri — 2026, Page 273

front matter 1 front matter 2 front matter 3 front matter 4 front matter 5 front matter 6 front matter 7 front matter 8 front matter 9 front matter 10 front matter 11 front matter 12 front matter 13 front matter 14 front matter 15 front matter 16 front matter 17 front matter 18 front matter 19 front matter 20 front matter 21 front matter 22 front matter 23 front matter 24 front matter 25 front matter 26 front matter 27 front matter 28 front matter 29 front matter 30 front matter 31 front matter 32 front matter 33 front matter 34 front matter 35 Page 1 Page 2 Page 3 Page 4 Page 5 Page 6 Page 7 Page 8 Page 9 Page 10 Page 11 Page 12 Page 13 Page 14 Page 15 Page 16 Page 17 Page 18 Page 19 Page 20 Page 21 Page 22 Page 23 Page 24 Page 25 Page 26 Page 27 Page 28 Page 29 Page 30 Page 31 Page 32 Page 33 Page 34 Page 35 Page 36 Page 37 Page 38 Page 39 Page 40 Page 41 Page 42 Page 43 Page 44 Page 45 Page 46 Page 47 Page 48 Page 49 Page 50 Page 51 Page 52 Page 53 Page 54 Page 55 Page 56 Page 57 Page 58 Page 59 Page 60 Page 61 Page 62 Page 63 Page 64 Page 65 Page 66 Page 67 Page 68 Page 69 Page 70 Page 71 Page 72 Page 73 Page 74 Page 75 Page 76 Page 77 Page 78 Page 79 Page 80 Page 81 Page 82 Page 83 Page 84 Page 85 Page 86 Page 87 Page 88 Page 89 Page 90 Page 91 Page 92 Page 93 Page 94 Page 95 Page 96 Page 97 Page 98 Page 99 Page 100 Page 101 Page 102 Page 103 Page 104 Page 105 Page 106 Page 107 Page 108 Page 109 Page 110 Page 111 Page 112 Page 113 Page 114 Page 115 Page 116 Page 117 Page 118 Page 119 Page 120 Page 121 Page 122 Page 123 Page 124 Page 125 Page 126 Page 127 Page 128 Page 129 Page 130 Page 131 Page 132 Page 133 Page 134 Page 135 Page 136 Page 137 Page 138 Page 139 Page 140 Page 141 Page 142 Page 143 Page 144 Page 145 Page 146 Page 147 Page 148 Page 149 Page 150 Page 151 Page 152 Page 153 Page 154 Page 155 Page 156 Page 157 Page 158 Page 159 Page 160 Page 161 Page 162 Page 163 Page 164 Page 165 Page 166 Page 167 Page 168 Page 169 Page 170 Page 171 Page 172 Page 173 Page 174 Page 175 Page 176 Page 177 Page 178 Page 179 Page 180 Page 181 Page 182 Page 183 Page 184 Page 185 Page 186 Page 187 Page 188 Page 189 Page 190 Page 191 Page 192 Page 193 Page 194 Page 195 Page 196 Page 197 Page 198 Page 199 Page 200 Page 201 Page 202 Page 203 Page 204 Page 205 Page 206 Page 207 Page 208 Page 209 Page 210 Page 211 Page 212 Page 213 Page 214 Page 215 Page 216 Page 217 Page 218 Page 219 Page 220 Page 221 Page 222 Page 223 Page 224 Page 225 Page 226 Page 227 Page 228 Page 229 Page 230 Page 231 Page 232 Page 233 Page 234 Page 235 Page 236 Page 237 Page 238 Page 239 Page 240 Page 241 Page 242 Page 243 Page 244 Page 245 Page 246 Page 247 Page 248 Page 249 Page 250 Page 251 Page 252 Page 253 Page 254 Page 255 Page 256 Page 257 Page 258 Page 259 Page 260 Page 261 Page 262 Page 263 Page 264 Page 265 Page 266 Page 267 Page 268 Page 269 Page 270 Page 271 Page 272 Page 273 Page 274 Page 275 Page 276 Page 277 Page 278 Page 279 Page 280 Page 281 Page 282 Page 283 Page 284 Page 285 Page 286 Page 287 Page 288 Page 289 Page 290 Page 291 Page 292 Page 293 Page 294 Page 295 Page 296 Page 297 Page 298 Page 299 Page 300 Page 301 Page 302 Page 303 Page 304 Page 305 Page 306 Page 307 Page 308 Page 309 Page 310 Page 311 Page 312 Page 313 Page 314 Page 315 Page 316 Page 317 Page 318 Page 319 Page 320 Page 321 Page 322 Page 323 Page 324 Page 325 Page 326 Page 327 Page 328 Page 329 Page 330 Page 331 Page 332 Page 333 Page 334 Page 335 Page 336 Page 337 Page 338 Page 339 Page 340 Page 341 Page 342 Page 343 Page 344 Page 345 Page 346 Page 347 Page 348 Page 349 Page 350 Page 351 Page 352 Page 353 Page 354 Page 355 Page 356 Page 357 Page 358 Page 359 Page 360 Page 361 Page 362 Page 363 Page 364 Page 365 Page 366 Page 367 Page 368 Page 369 Page 370 Page 371 Page 372 Page 373 Page 374 Page 375 Page 376 Page 377 Page 378 Page 379 Page 380 Page 381 Page 382 Page 383 Page 384 Page 385 Page 386 Page 387 Page 388 Page 389 Page 390 Page 391 Page 392 Page 393 Page 394 Page 395 Page 396 Page 397 Page 398 Page 399 Page 400 Page 401 Page 402 Page 403 Page 404 Page 405 Page 406 Page 407 Page 408 Page 409 Page 410 Page 411 Page 412 Page 413 Page 414 Page 415 Page 416 Page 417 Page 418 Page 419 Page 420 Page 421 Page 422 Page 423 Page 424 Page 425 Page 426 Page 427 Page 428 Page 429 Page 430 Page 431 Page 432 Page 433 Page 434 Page 435 Page 436 Page 437 Page 438 Page 439 Page 440 Page 441 Page 442 Page 443 Page 444 Page 445 Page 446 Page 447 Page 448 Page 449 Page 450 Page 451 Page 452 Page 453 Page 454 Page 455 Page 456 Page 457 Page 458 Page 459 Page 460 Page 461 Page 462 Page 463 Page 464 Page 465 Page 466 Page 467 Page 468 Page 469 Page 470 Page 471 Page 472 Page 473 Page 474 Page 475 Page 476 Page 477 Page 478 Page 479 Page 480 Page 481 Page 482 Page 483 Page 484 Page 485 Page 486 Page 487 Page 488 Page 489 Page 490 Page 491 Page 492 Page 493 Page 494 Page 495 Page 496 Page 497 Page 498 Page 499 Page 500 Page 501 Page 502 Page 503 Page 504 Page 505 Page 506 Page 507 Page 508 Page 509 Page 510 Page 511 Page 512 Page 513 Page 514 Page 515 Page 516 Page 517 Page 518 Page 519 Page 520 Page 521 Page 522 Page 523 Page 524

Scan: The Lutheran Church—Missouri Synod

⤓ Download page image (full resolution)

Transcription machine transcription, uncorrected

⤓ Download .txt · copy text

THEOLOGICAL DOCUMENTS­­—COMMISSION ON THEOLOGY AND CHURCH RELATIONS

273

R62.13
CTCR Opinion on Admission to Seminary for Divorced Men
The Rev. Dr. Brian Saunders, Chairman of the Commission on Theology and Church Relations
(CTCR), received correspondence dated November 11, 2024 from Mr. Mark O. Stern on behalf
of the Boards of Regents of Concordia Seminary and Concordia Theological Seminary. The
correspondence concerned The Lutheran Church—Missouri Synod (LCMS) 2023 Convention
Omnibus Resolution A, Overture 6-34 (Ov. 6-34), titled “To Prevent Admission, Reinstatement,
or Colloquization of a Divorced Man into the Office of the Public Ministry Who Has Married
Another Woman.” Omnibus A referred Ov. 6-34 to the two seminary boards as well as to the
Council of Presidents and to the Colloquy Committee for the Pastoral Ministry.

There is no ambiguity in the Bible about the goodness and value of marriage. As God creates
humans to be male or female (Gen. 1:26-27) he also creates marriage (2:15-25). The marriage of
man and woman is instituted by God for the well-being of both individual spouses and for
humanity as a whole. Because it is not good for man to be alone (Gen. 2:18), the married couple
is given a profound unity of unique “mutual companionship, help, and support.” 4 And, by means
of marital fruitfulness, God intends the multiplication of the entire human family (Gen. 1:18).
After sin enters the world, a further blessing of marriage is understood: as it channels sexual
desire for good it also restrains sinful lust (1 Cor. 7:2-5). Having thus united the husband and
wife, God intends them to remain married as long as both are alive (Gen. 2:24; Matt. 19:6).

Overture 6-34 asserts that a man who is to serve in the office of the ministry must be “above
reproach” (1 Tim 3:2; Titus 1:6) and explains the phrase to mean the man is “to be the husband
of no more than one wife.” The overture concludes that, “Divorce and remarriage disqualifies a
man from the Office of the Public Ministry (1 Tim. 3:2; Titus 1:6)”. 1

Given such a foundation, divorce is flatly contrary to the good and gracious will of God. Malachi
bluntly reminds us that the Lord says, “I hate divorce” (Mal. 2:16). In Matthew 19:1-9 Jesus
forbids the believer from divorcing his or her spouse, except for the case of one whose spouse is
guilty of sexual immorality (ἐπὶ πορνείᾳ) or the case of one who suffers the de facto divorce of
desertion by one’s spouse (1 Cor 7:15; cp. Matt 5:31-32; Mark 10:2-12; Luke 16:18.)

The overture does not specifically refer to seminary admission policies. However, the seminary
boards consider it to be pertinent because the seminaries are largely responsible for admission to
seminary programs and for recommendation of their students to the Council of Presidents as
qualified for admission to the office of public ministry in the LCMS. On behalf of the two
Boards of Regents, Mr. Stern requested “such guidance as the CTCR may wish to provide on this
topic.” 2

Divorce is an awful reality in a sinful world. God anticipates this and, as much as possible,
ameliorates the effects of divorce. The law given through Moses stipulates divorce procedures
that somewhat minimize its devastation (see Lev. 22:13; Deut. 22:13-21; 23:28-29; 24:1-4). But
when regulation of divorce is thought to be approval of it, Jesus explains that such stipulations
are never more than evidence of recalcitrant sinful hearts (Matt. 19:8; cp. Mal. 2:14b-16).

I.

Divorce and Pastors—the questions

Two questions must be considered in order to provide guidance regarding the assertions of
Overture 6:34. First, does divorce disqualify a man to serve in the office of public ministry?
Second, does the remarriage of a divorced man make him unsuitable for the office of public
ministry? 3 These two questions address matters that are foundational for Ov. 6-34.
II.

Divorce and Pastors—a brief theological overview
a. Scripture on divorce

Scripture and the Confessions provide explicit teaching about marriage and divorce. However,
neither Scripture nor the Confessions explicitly address the divorce or remarriage of a pastor,
although Scripture does implicitly address the matter.

See the third and fourth Whereas statements of Overture 6-34 in The Lutheran Church—Missouri Synod, 2023
Convention Workbook: Reports and Overtures (1333 S Kirkwood Road, St. Louis, Missouri), page 340.
See the letter from Mr. Stern in the Appendix.
3
We are considering in this statement of guidance only the matter of divorce and clergy—pastors—and not the men
and women who serve in Synod’s auxiliary offices of public ministry. This should not be interpreted to mean that
those who serve in auxiliary offices are exempt from the matters considered here.

Scripture’s teachings on marriage and divorce hold for every Christian, but are of particular
significance for those entrusted with the high office of public ministry. The pastor’s life and
conduct are always factors in how the church is viewed by the world. His public manner and
behavior must therefore be blameless (ανεγέγκλητοϛ, cf. 1 Tim. 3:10; Titus 1:6a) and
irreproachable (ανεπίλημπτον 1 Tim. 3:2a). Public sin inevitably invites blame and reproach. For
such reasons the divorce of a pastor presents a twofold challenge. First, on the personal level, a
genuine acknowledgment of any failures on his part together with a confession of sin and a
sincere desire to amend his life is required. Second, as to the office that he holds, the real and
potential damage to the proclamation of the Gospel of Christ must be recognized and diminished
as much as possible (see 1 Tim. 5:19-20).
b. The Confessions
The Confessions speak of marriage largely in the context of objection to enforced celibacy for
priests. Divorce in general is addressed only in passing and the divorce of clergy is not discussed.

1
2

The Augustana (AC) and its Apology (Ap) defend the marriage of priests. 5 Citing Scripture (1
Cor. 7:2, 9b; Matt. 19:11; Gen. 1:28), the AC rejects compulsory clerical celibacy as an abuse
that fostered widespread sexual scandal and immorality. The Confutation’s defense of celibacy
led to a vigorous rejoinder. The confessors held firm to their view that Rome’s insistence on
celibacy “conflicts with divine and natural law.” 6 Rome’s insistence on the rigor of clerical
celibacy is rejected since God himself “instituted marriage to help human frailty and to prevent
sexual immorality. The old canons also state that sometimes severity and rigor must be alleviated
and relaxed for the sake of human weakness and to prevent and avoid greater scandal.” 7
Luther’s Smalcald Articles (SA) holds to the same view of priestly marriage as stated at
Augsburg. He bluntly declares that “we are unwilling to consent to their miserable celibacy, nor
will we tolerate it.” 8 Similarly, in the Treatise (Tr) Melanchthon mentions marriage, but only as
an example of the unjust actions of bishops, specifically objecting to “the tradition that prohibits
remarriage of an innocent party after divorce.” 9
The catechisms provide a more general confessional understanding of marriage. Luther’s Small
Catechism (SC), while not explicitly using the term “marriage,” summarizes godly marriage as a
life of sexual purity and decency wherein “husband and wife love and honor each other.” 10 In the
SC’s Table of Duties Luther quotes 1 Peter 3:7 and Col. 3:19 for husbands and Eph. 5:22 and 1
Peter 3:5-6 for wives. 11 In Luther’s “A Marriage Booklet for Simple Pastors” (often appended to
the SC in his day and to at least one printing of the 1580 Book of Concord), his introduction
urges that the “godly estate of marriage” be honored and esteemed highly. He also speaks of the
great need for prayer in light of “how much unhappiness the devil causes in the married estate
through adultery, unfaithfulness, discord, and all kinds of misery.” 12
The Large Catechism (LC) reveals both a similarly high view of marriage together with sober
attention to its practical necessity for sinful people in its extended discussion of the
commandment against adultery. One’s nearest neighbor is his or her spouse, who is “one flesh
and blood with them.” 13 Marriage is “the first of all institutions” wherein male and female differ

AC XXIII, Concerning the Marriage of Priests, pages 62-65, and Ap XXIII, 247—57, in Robert Kolb, Timothy J.
Wengert, and Charles P. Arand, The Book of Concord: The Confessions of the Evangelical Lutheran Church
(Minneapolis, MN: Fortress Press, 2000). Abbreviated as KW in further references.
6
Ap XXIII par 5, KW 62.
7
AC XXIII par 15-16, KW 66. The same rejection of compulsory celibacy is central in the argument against
monastic vows of chastity and in favor of releasing individuals from such vows when they wish to marry. See AC
XXVII, KW 80-91 and Ap XXVII, KW 277-89.
8
SA III [11:] Concerning the Marriage of Priests, KW 324.
9
Tr par 78, KW 342.
10
Luther’s Small Catechism (© 1986 CPH) in Luther’s Catechism with Explanation (St. Louis: Concordia
Publishing House, 2017), 14.
11
Ibid., 35.
12
KW 369.
13
LC I par 200, KW 413.
5

4

“Holy Matrimony,” Lutheran Service Book (CPH: St. Louis, 2006), 275.

for the sake of marital fidelity and fruitfulness. 14 It has practical necessity as a provision against
sexual sin, which is rightly addressed within marital love. “Wherever marital chastity is to be
maintained, above all it is essential that husband and wife live together in love and harmony,
cherishing each other wholeheartedly and with perfect fidelity. 15
c. Synodical consideration of the question
i. Commission on Theology and Church Relations (CTCR)
The CTCR has twice addressed the matter of clergy divorce and remarriage. In a consideration of
the grave seriousness of all divorce, Human Sexuality: A Theological Perspective (1981) adds:
The divorce of Christian pastors must be taken with utmost seriousness. It is difficult to
see how the church can maintain the integrity of its witness—especially in an age where
divorce is prevalent—if it permits pastors who have divorced their wives for less than
Biblical reasons to continue in the office of the public ministry. Generally a pastor who
has been divorced, except in cases of unchastity or desertion on the part of his wife,
ought not to remain in office nor be reinstated in the office of pastor. However, it is
possible that under very exceptional circumstances a former pastor may by the grace of
God come to the point of being in a position to be reconsidered as a person qualified to
be entrusted once more with the powers of the pastoral office. 16
In Divorce and Remarriage: An Exegetical Study (1987), the CTCR included an excursus on
clergy divorce. 17 The Commission shows that the pastor is called to “a pattern of life that is
exemplary of the Gospel at work, and worthy of emulation.” Moral failure by a pastor presents
an obstacle and offense that may turn others from the truth of the Gospel (citing 2 Cor. 6:3). 18
This does not deny that pastors remain sinful men ever in need of forgiveness, but it requires
recognition that the public behavior of a pastor is of great importance because of the risk to “the
credibility of his office and his message.” 19 For this reason, “[f]idelity to one's spouse in
marriage is of particular importance in the life and conduct of the Christian pastor.” 20
The Commission then explains the phrase, “the husband of one wife” (1 Tim. 3:2; Titus 1:6). “St.
Paul is here establishing the general principle that any transgression of God's will for marriage as
a monogamous union is ruled out, whether it should take the form of concubinage or polygamy
or marital unfaithfulness, including the “virtual polygamy of illicit divorce.’” 21 Divorce and
Remarriage also reaffirms the previous quotation from 1981, but emphasizes that only “under
LC I par 207, KW 414.
LC I par 221, KW415-16.
CTCR, Human Sexuality (LCMS 1981), 27-28, emphasis in the original. Available online at www.lcms.org/ctcr.
17
CTCR, Divorce and Remarriage: An Exegetical Study (LCMS 1987), 42-45. Available online at
www.lcms.org/ctcr.
18
Ibid., 42.
19
Ibid., 43.
20
Ibid.
21
Ibid.
14
15
16

2026 Convention Workbook