Collection › LCMS Convention Workbook (St. Louis, Missouri) › 2026 · 69th Convention, Phoenix › Page 273
LCMS Convention Workbook St. Louis, Missouri — 2026, Page 273
front matter 1
front matter 2
front matter 3
front matter 4
front matter 5
front matter 6
front matter 7
front matter 8
front matter 9
front matter 10
front matter 11
front matter 12
front matter 13
front matter 14
front matter 15
front matter 16
front matter 17
front matter 18
front matter 19
front matter 20
front matter 21
front matter 22
front matter 23
front matter 24
front matter 25
front matter 26
front matter 27
front matter 28
front matter 29
front matter 30
front matter 31
front matter 32
front matter 33
front matter 34
front matter 35
Page 1
Page 2
Page 3
Page 4
Page 5
Page 6
Page 7
Page 8
Page 9
Page 10
Page 11
Page 12
Page 13
Page 14
Page 15
Page 16
Page 17
Page 18
Page 19
Page 20
Page 21
Page 22
Page 23
Page 24
Page 25
Page 26
Page 27
Page 28
Page 29
Page 30
Page 31
Page 32
Page 33
Page 34
Page 35
Page 36
Page 37
Page 38
Page 39
Page 40
Page 41
Page 42
Page 43
Page 44
Page 45
Page 46
Page 47
Page 48
Page 49
Page 50
Page 51
Page 52
Page 53
Page 54
Page 55
Page 56
Page 57
Page 58
Page 59
Page 60
Page 61
Page 62
Page 63
Page 64
Page 65
Page 66
Page 67
Page 68
Page 69
Page 70
Page 71
Page 72
Page 73
Page 74
Page 75
Page 76
Page 77
Page 78
Page 79
Page 80
Page 81
Page 82
Page 83
Page 84
Page 85
Page 86
Page 87
Page 88
Page 89
Page 90
Page 91
Page 92
Page 93
Page 94
Page 95
Page 96
Page 97
Page 98
Page 99
Page 100
Page 101
Page 102
Page 103
Page 104
Page 105
Page 106
Page 107
Page 108
Page 109
Page 110
Page 111
Page 112
Page 113
Page 114
Page 115
Page 116
Page 117
Page 118
Page 119
Page 120
Page 121
Page 122
Page 123
Page 124
Page 125
Page 126
Page 127
Page 128
Page 129
Page 130
Page 131
Page 132
Page 133
Page 134
Page 135
Page 136
Page 137
Page 138
Page 139
Page 140
Page 141
Page 142
Page 143
Page 144
Page 145
Page 146
Page 147
Page 148
Page 149
Page 150
Page 151
Page 152
Page 153
Page 154
Page 155
Page 156
Page 157
Page 158
Page 159
Page 160
Page 161
Page 162
Page 163
Page 164
Page 165
Page 166
Page 167
Page 168
Page 169
Page 170
Page 171
Page 172
Page 173
Page 174
Page 175
Page 176
Page 177
Page 178
Page 179
Page 180
Page 181
Page 182
Page 183
Page 184
Page 185
Page 186
Page 187
Page 188
Page 189
Page 190
Page 191
Page 192
Page 193
Page 194
Page 195
Page 196
Page 197
Page 198
Page 199
Page 200
Page 201
Page 202
Page 203
Page 204
Page 205
Page 206
Page 207
Page 208
Page 209
Page 210
Page 211
Page 212
Page 213
Page 214
Page 215
Page 216
Page 217
Page 218
Page 219
Page 220
Page 221
Page 222
Page 223
Page 224
Page 225
Page 226
Page 227
Page 228
Page 229
Page 230
Page 231
Page 232
Page 233
Page 234
Page 235
Page 236
Page 237
Page 238
Page 239
Page 240
Page 241
Page 242
Page 243
Page 244
Page 245
Page 246
Page 247
Page 248
Page 249
Page 250
Page 251
Page 252
Page 253
Page 254
Page 255
Page 256
Page 257
Page 258
Page 259
Page 260
Page 261
Page 262
Page 263
Page 264
Page 265
Page 266
Page 267
Page 268
Page 269
Page 270
Page 271
Page 272
Page 273
Page 274
Page 275
Page 276
Page 277
Page 278
Page 279
Page 280
Page 281
Page 282
Page 283
Page 284
Page 285
Page 286
Page 287
Page 288
Page 289
Page 290
Page 291
Page 292
Page 293
Page 294
Page 295
Page 296
Page 297
Page 298
Page 299
Page 300
Page 301
Page 302
Page 303
Page 304
Page 305
Page 306
Page 307
Page 308
Page 309
Page 310
Page 311
Page 312
Page 313
Page 314
Page 315
Page 316
Page 317
Page 318
Page 319
Page 320
Page 321
Page 322
Page 323
Page 324
Page 325
Page 326
Page 327
Page 328
Page 329
Page 330
Page 331
Page 332
Page 333
Page 334
Page 335
Page 336
Page 337
Page 338
Page 339
Page 340
Page 341
Page 342
Page 343
Page 344
Page 345
Page 346
Page 347
Page 348
Page 349
Page 350
Page 351
Page 352
Page 353
Page 354
Page 355
Page 356
Page 357
Page 358
Page 359
Page 360
Page 361
Page 362
Page 363
Page 364
Page 365
Page 366
Page 367
Page 368
Page 369
Page 370
Page 371
Page 372
Page 373
Page 374
Page 375
Page 376
Page 377
Page 378
Page 379
Page 380
Page 381
Page 382
Page 383
Page 384
Page 385
Page 386
Page 387
Page 388
Page 389
Page 390
Page 391
Page 392
Page 393
Page 394
Page 395
Page 396
Page 397
Page 398
Page 399
Page 400
Page 401
Page 402
Page 403
Page 404
Page 405
Page 406
Page 407
Page 408
Page 409
Page 410
Page 411
Page 412
Page 413
Page 414
Page 415
Page 416
Page 417
Page 418
Page 419
Page 420
Page 421
Page 422
Page 423
Page 424
Page 425
Page 426
Page 427
Page 428
Page 429
Page 430
Page 431
Page 432
Page 433
Page 434
Page 435
Page 436
Page 437
Page 438
Page 439
Page 440
Page 441
Page 442
Page 443
Page 444
Page 445
Page 446
Page 447
Page 448
Page 449
Page 450
Page 451
Page 452
Page 453
Page 454
Page 455
Page 456
Page 457
Page 458
Page 459
Page 460
Page 461
Page 462
Page 463
Page 464
Page 465
Page 466
Page 467
Page 468
Page 469
Page 470
Page 471
Page 472
Page 473
Page 474
Page 475
Page 476
Page 477
Page 478
Page 479
Page 480
Page 481
Page 482
Page 483
Page 484
Page 485
Page 486
Page 487
Page 488
Page 489
Page 490
Page 491
Page 492
Page 493
Page 494
Page 495
Page 496
Page 497
Page 498
Page 499
Page 500
Page 501
Page 502
Page 503
Page 504
Page 505
Page 506
Page 507
Page 508
Page 509
Page 510
Page 511
Page 512
Page 513
Page 514
Page 515
Page 516
Page 517
Page 518
Page 519
Page 520
Page 521
Page 522
Page 523
Page 524
Scan: The Lutheran Church—Missouri Synod
⤓ Download page image (full resolution)
Transcription machine transcription, uncorrected
THEOLOGICAL DOCUMENTS—COMMISSION ON THEOLOGY AND CHURCH RELATIONS
273
R62.13
CTCR Opinion on Admission to Seminary for Divorced Men
The Rev. Dr. Brian Saunders, Chairman of the Commission on Theology and Church Relations
(CTCR), received correspondence dated November 11, 2024 from Mr. Mark O. Stern on behalf
of the Boards of Regents of Concordia Seminary and Concordia Theological Seminary. The
correspondence concerned The Lutheran Church—Missouri Synod (LCMS) 2023 Convention
Omnibus Resolution A, Overture 6-34 (Ov. 6-34), titled “To Prevent Admission, Reinstatement,
or Colloquization of a Divorced Man into the Office of the Public Ministry Who Has Married
Another Woman.” Omnibus A referred Ov. 6-34 to the two seminary boards as well as to the
Council of Presidents and to the Colloquy Committee for the Pastoral Ministry.
There is no ambiguity in the Bible about the goodness and value of marriage. As God creates
humans to be male or female (Gen. 1:26-27) he also creates marriage (2:15-25). The marriage of
man and woman is instituted by God for the well-being of both individual spouses and for
humanity as a whole. Because it is not good for man to be alone (Gen. 2:18), the married couple
is given a profound unity of unique “mutual companionship, help, and support.” 4 And, by means
of marital fruitfulness, God intends the multiplication of the entire human family (Gen. 1:18).
After sin enters the world, a further blessing of marriage is understood: as it channels sexual
desire for good it also restrains sinful lust (1 Cor. 7:2-5). Having thus united the husband and
wife, God intends them to remain married as long as both are alive (Gen. 2:24; Matt. 19:6).
Overture 6-34 asserts that a man who is to serve in the office of the ministry must be “above
reproach” (1 Tim 3:2; Titus 1:6) and explains the phrase to mean the man is “to be the husband
of no more than one wife.” The overture concludes that, “Divorce and remarriage disqualifies a
man from the Office of the Public Ministry (1 Tim. 3:2; Titus 1:6)”. 1
Given such a foundation, divorce is flatly contrary to the good and gracious will of God. Malachi
bluntly reminds us that the Lord says, “I hate divorce” (Mal. 2:16). In Matthew 19:1-9 Jesus
forbids the believer from divorcing his or her spouse, except for the case of one whose spouse is
guilty of sexual immorality (ἐπὶ πορνείᾳ) or the case of one who suffers the de facto divorce of
desertion by one’s spouse (1 Cor 7:15; cp. Matt 5:31-32; Mark 10:2-12; Luke 16:18.)
The overture does not specifically refer to seminary admission policies. However, the seminary
boards consider it to be pertinent because the seminaries are largely responsible for admission to
seminary programs and for recommendation of their students to the Council of Presidents as
qualified for admission to the office of public ministry in the LCMS. On behalf of the two
Boards of Regents, Mr. Stern requested “such guidance as the CTCR may wish to provide on this
topic.” 2
Divorce is an awful reality in a sinful world. God anticipates this and, as much as possible,
ameliorates the effects of divorce. The law given through Moses stipulates divorce procedures
that somewhat minimize its devastation (see Lev. 22:13; Deut. 22:13-21; 23:28-29; 24:1-4). But
when regulation of divorce is thought to be approval of it, Jesus explains that such stipulations
are never more than evidence of recalcitrant sinful hearts (Matt. 19:8; cp. Mal. 2:14b-16).
I.
Divorce and Pastors—the questions
Two questions must be considered in order to provide guidance regarding the assertions of
Overture 6:34. First, does divorce disqualify a man to serve in the office of public ministry?
Second, does the remarriage of a divorced man make him unsuitable for the office of public
ministry? 3 These two questions address matters that are foundational for Ov. 6-34.
II.
Divorce and Pastors—a brief theological overview
a. Scripture on divorce
Scripture and the Confessions provide explicit teaching about marriage and divorce. However,
neither Scripture nor the Confessions explicitly address the divorce or remarriage of a pastor,
although Scripture does implicitly address the matter.
See the third and fourth Whereas statements of Overture 6-34 in The Lutheran Church—Missouri Synod, 2023
Convention Workbook: Reports and Overtures (1333 S Kirkwood Road, St. Louis, Missouri), page 340.
See the letter from Mr. Stern in the Appendix.
3
We are considering in this statement of guidance only the matter of divorce and clergy—pastors—and not the men
and women who serve in Synod’s auxiliary offices of public ministry. This should not be interpreted to mean that
those who serve in auxiliary offices are exempt from the matters considered here.
Scripture’s teachings on marriage and divorce hold for every Christian, but are of particular
significance for those entrusted with the high office of public ministry. The pastor’s life and
conduct are always factors in how the church is viewed by the world. His public manner and
behavior must therefore be blameless (ανεγέγκλητοϛ, cf. 1 Tim. 3:10; Titus 1:6a) and
irreproachable (ανεπίλημπτον 1 Tim. 3:2a). Public sin inevitably invites blame and reproach. For
such reasons the divorce of a pastor presents a twofold challenge. First, on the personal level, a
genuine acknowledgment of any failures on his part together with a confession of sin and a
sincere desire to amend his life is required. Second, as to the office that he holds, the real and
potential damage to the proclamation of the Gospel of Christ must be recognized and diminished
as much as possible (see 1 Tim. 5:19-20).
b. The Confessions
The Confessions speak of marriage largely in the context of objection to enforced celibacy for
priests. Divorce in general is addressed only in passing and the divorce of clergy is not discussed.
1
2
The Augustana (AC) and its Apology (Ap) defend the marriage of priests. 5 Citing Scripture (1
Cor. 7:2, 9b; Matt. 19:11; Gen. 1:28), the AC rejects compulsory clerical celibacy as an abuse
that fostered widespread sexual scandal and immorality. The Confutation’s defense of celibacy
led to a vigorous rejoinder. The confessors held firm to their view that Rome’s insistence on
celibacy “conflicts with divine and natural law.” 6 Rome’s insistence on the rigor of clerical
celibacy is rejected since God himself “instituted marriage to help human frailty and to prevent
sexual immorality. The old canons also state that sometimes severity and rigor must be alleviated
and relaxed for the sake of human weakness and to prevent and avoid greater scandal.” 7
Luther’s Smalcald Articles (SA) holds to the same view of priestly marriage as stated at
Augsburg. He bluntly declares that “we are unwilling to consent to their miserable celibacy, nor
will we tolerate it.” 8 Similarly, in the Treatise (Tr) Melanchthon mentions marriage, but only as
an example of the unjust actions of bishops, specifically objecting to “the tradition that prohibits
remarriage of an innocent party after divorce.” 9
The catechisms provide a more general confessional understanding of marriage. Luther’s Small
Catechism (SC), while not explicitly using the term “marriage,” summarizes godly marriage as a
life of sexual purity and decency wherein “husband and wife love and honor each other.” 10 In the
SC’s Table of Duties Luther quotes 1 Peter 3:7 and Col. 3:19 for husbands and Eph. 5:22 and 1
Peter 3:5-6 for wives. 11 In Luther’s “A Marriage Booklet for Simple Pastors” (often appended to
the SC in his day and to at least one printing of the 1580 Book of Concord), his introduction
urges that the “godly estate of marriage” be honored and esteemed highly. He also speaks of the
great need for prayer in light of “how much unhappiness the devil causes in the married estate
through adultery, unfaithfulness, discord, and all kinds of misery.” 12
The Large Catechism (LC) reveals both a similarly high view of marriage together with sober
attention to its practical necessity for sinful people in its extended discussion of the
commandment against adultery. One’s nearest neighbor is his or her spouse, who is “one flesh
and blood with them.” 13 Marriage is “the first of all institutions” wherein male and female differ
AC XXIII, Concerning the Marriage of Priests, pages 62-65, and Ap XXIII, 247—57, in Robert Kolb, Timothy J.
Wengert, and Charles P. Arand, The Book of Concord: The Confessions of the Evangelical Lutheran Church
(Minneapolis, MN: Fortress Press, 2000). Abbreviated as KW in further references.
6
Ap XXIII par 5, KW 62.
7
AC XXIII par 15-16, KW 66. The same rejection of compulsory celibacy is central in the argument against
monastic vows of chastity and in favor of releasing individuals from such vows when they wish to marry. See AC
XXVII, KW 80-91 and Ap XXVII, KW 277-89.
8
SA III [11:] Concerning the Marriage of Priests, KW 324.
9
Tr par 78, KW 342.
10
Luther’s Small Catechism (© 1986 CPH) in Luther’s Catechism with Explanation (St. Louis: Concordia
Publishing House, 2017), 14.
11
Ibid., 35.
12
KW 369.
13
LC I par 200, KW 413.
5
4
“Holy Matrimony,” Lutheran Service Book (CPH: St. Louis, 2006), 275.
for the sake of marital fidelity and fruitfulness. 14 It has practical necessity as a provision against
sexual sin, which is rightly addressed within marital love. “Wherever marital chastity is to be
maintained, above all it is essential that husband and wife live together in love and harmony,
cherishing each other wholeheartedly and with perfect fidelity. 15
c. Synodical consideration of the question
i. Commission on Theology and Church Relations (CTCR)
The CTCR has twice addressed the matter of clergy divorce and remarriage. In a consideration of
the grave seriousness of all divorce, Human Sexuality: A Theological Perspective (1981) adds:
The divorce of Christian pastors must be taken with utmost seriousness. It is difficult to
see how the church can maintain the integrity of its witness—especially in an age where
divorce is prevalent—if it permits pastors who have divorced their wives for less than
Biblical reasons to continue in the office of the public ministry. Generally a pastor who
has been divorced, except in cases of unchastity or desertion on the part of his wife,
ought not to remain in office nor be reinstated in the office of pastor. However, it is
possible that under very exceptional circumstances a former pastor may by the grace of
God come to the point of being in a position to be reconsidered as a person qualified to
be entrusted once more with the powers of the pastoral office. 16
In Divorce and Remarriage: An Exegetical Study (1987), the CTCR included an excursus on
clergy divorce. 17 The Commission shows that the pastor is called to “a pattern of life that is
exemplary of the Gospel at work, and worthy of emulation.” Moral failure by a pastor presents
an obstacle and offense that may turn others from the truth of the Gospel (citing 2 Cor. 6:3). 18
This does not deny that pastors remain sinful men ever in need of forgiveness, but it requires
recognition that the public behavior of a pastor is of great importance because of the risk to “the
credibility of his office and his message.” 19 For this reason, “[f]idelity to one's spouse in
marriage is of particular importance in the life and conduct of the Christian pastor.” 20
The Commission then explains the phrase, “the husband of one wife” (1 Tim. 3:2; Titus 1:6). “St.
Paul is here establishing the general principle that any transgression of God's will for marriage as
a monogamous union is ruled out, whether it should take the form of concubinage or polygamy
or marital unfaithfulness, including the “virtual polygamy of illicit divorce.’” 21 Divorce and
Remarriage also reaffirms the previous quotation from 1981, but emphasizes that only “under
LC I par 207, KW 414.
LC I par 221, KW415-16.
CTCR, Human Sexuality (LCMS 1981), 27-28, emphasis in the original. Available online at www.lcms.org/ctcr.
17
CTCR, Divorce and Remarriage: An Exegetical Study (LCMS 1987), 42-45. Available online at
www.lcms.org/ctcr.
18
Ibid., 42.
19
Ibid., 43.
20
Ibid.
21
Ibid.
14
15
16
2026 Convention Workbook