Collection › LCMS Convention Workbook (St. Louis, Missouri) › 2026 · 69th Convention, Phoenix › Page 221
LCMS Convention Workbook St. Louis, Missouri — 2026, Page 221
front matter 1
front matter 2
front matter 3
front matter 4
front matter 5
front matter 6
front matter 7
front matter 8
front matter 9
front matter 10
front matter 11
front matter 12
front matter 13
front matter 14
front matter 15
front matter 16
front matter 17
front matter 18
front matter 19
front matter 20
front matter 21
front matter 22
front matter 23
front matter 24
front matter 25
front matter 26
front matter 27
front matter 28
front matter 29
front matter 30
front matter 31
front matter 32
front matter 33
front matter 34
front matter 35
Page 1
Page 2
Page 3
Page 4
Page 5
Page 6
Page 7
Page 8
Page 9
Page 10
Page 11
Page 12
Page 13
Page 14
Page 15
Page 16
Page 17
Page 18
Page 19
Page 20
Page 21
Page 22
Page 23
Page 24
Page 25
Page 26
Page 27
Page 28
Page 29
Page 30
Page 31
Page 32
Page 33
Page 34
Page 35
Page 36
Page 37
Page 38
Page 39
Page 40
Page 41
Page 42
Page 43
Page 44
Page 45
Page 46
Page 47
Page 48
Page 49
Page 50
Page 51
Page 52
Page 53
Page 54
Page 55
Page 56
Page 57
Page 58
Page 59
Page 60
Page 61
Page 62
Page 63
Page 64
Page 65
Page 66
Page 67
Page 68
Page 69
Page 70
Page 71
Page 72
Page 73
Page 74
Page 75
Page 76
Page 77
Page 78
Page 79
Page 80
Page 81
Page 82
Page 83
Page 84
Page 85
Page 86
Page 87
Page 88
Page 89
Page 90
Page 91
Page 92
Page 93
Page 94
Page 95
Page 96
Page 97
Page 98
Page 99
Page 100
Page 101
Page 102
Page 103
Page 104
Page 105
Page 106
Page 107
Page 108
Page 109
Page 110
Page 111
Page 112
Page 113
Page 114
Page 115
Page 116
Page 117
Page 118
Page 119
Page 120
Page 121
Page 122
Page 123
Page 124
Page 125
Page 126
Page 127
Page 128
Page 129
Page 130
Page 131
Page 132
Page 133
Page 134
Page 135
Page 136
Page 137
Page 138
Page 139
Page 140
Page 141
Page 142
Page 143
Page 144
Page 145
Page 146
Page 147
Page 148
Page 149
Page 150
Page 151
Page 152
Page 153
Page 154
Page 155
Page 156
Page 157
Page 158
Page 159
Page 160
Page 161
Page 162
Page 163
Page 164
Page 165
Page 166
Page 167
Page 168
Page 169
Page 170
Page 171
Page 172
Page 173
Page 174
Page 175
Page 176
Page 177
Page 178
Page 179
Page 180
Page 181
Page 182
Page 183
Page 184
Page 185
Page 186
Page 187
Page 188
Page 189
Page 190
Page 191
Page 192
Page 193
Page 194
Page 195
Page 196
Page 197
Page 198
Page 199
Page 200
Page 201
Page 202
Page 203
Page 204
Page 205
Page 206
Page 207
Page 208
Page 209
Page 210
Page 211
Page 212
Page 213
Page 214
Page 215
Page 216
Page 217
Page 218
Page 219
Page 220
Page 221
Page 222
Page 223
Page 224
Page 225
Page 226
Page 227
Page 228
Page 229
Page 230
Page 231
Page 232
Page 233
Page 234
Page 235
Page 236
Page 237
Page 238
Page 239
Page 240
Page 241
Page 242
Page 243
Page 244
Page 245
Page 246
Page 247
Page 248
Page 249
Page 250
Page 251
Page 252
Page 253
Page 254
Page 255
Page 256
Page 257
Page 258
Page 259
Page 260
Page 261
Page 262
Page 263
Page 264
Page 265
Page 266
Page 267
Page 268
Page 269
Page 270
Page 271
Page 272
Page 273
Page 274
Page 275
Page 276
Page 277
Page 278
Page 279
Page 280
Page 281
Page 282
Page 283
Page 284
Page 285
Page 286
Page 287
Page 288
Page 289
Page 290
Page 291
Page 292
Page 293
Page 294
Page 295
Page 296
Page 297
Page 298
Page 299
Page 300
Page 301
Page 302
Page 303
Page 304
Page 305
Page 306
Page 307
Page 308
Page 309
Page 310
Page 311
Page 312
Page 313
Page 314
Page 315
Page 316
Page 317
Page 318
Page 319
Page 320
Page 321
Page 322
Page 323
Page 324
Page 325
Page 326
Page 327
Page 328
Page 329
Page 330
Page 331
Page 332
Page 333
Page 334
Page 335
Page 336
Page 337
Page 338
Page 339
Page 340
Page 341
Page 342
Page 343
Page 344
Page 345
Page 346
Page 347
Page 348
Page 349
Page 350
Page 351
Page 352
Page 353
Page 354
Page 355
Page 356
Page 357
Page 358
Page 359
Page 360
Page 361
Page 362
Page 363
Page 364
Page 365
Page 366
Page 367
Page 368
Page 369
Page 370
Page 371
Page 372
Page 373
Page 374
Page 375
Page 376
Page 377
Page 378
Page 379
Page 380
Page 381
Page 382
Page 383
Page 384
Page 385
Page 386
Page 387
Page 388
Page 389
Page 390
Page 391
Page 392
Page 393
Page 394
Page 395
Page 396
Page 397
Page 398
Page 399
Page 400
Page 401
Page 402
Page 403
Page 404
Page 405
Page 406
Page 407
Page 408
Page 409
Page 410
Page 411
Page 412
Page 413
Page 414
Page 415
Page 416
Page 417
Page 418
Page 419
Page 420
Page 421
Page 422
Page 423
Page 424
Page 425
Page 426
Page 427
Page 428
Page 429
Page 430
Page 431
Page 432
Page 433
Page 434
Page 435
Page 436
Page 437
Page 438
Page 439
Page 440
Page 441
Page 442
Page 443
Page 444
Page 445
Page 446
Page 447
Page 448
Page 449
Page 450
Page 451
Page 452
Page 453
Page 454
Page 455
Page 456
Page 457
Page 458
Page 459
Page 460
Page 461
Page 462
Page 463
Page 464
Page 465
Page 466
Page 467
Page 468
Page 469
Page 470
Page 471
Page 472
Page 473
Page 474
Page 475
Page 476
Page 477
Page 478
Page 479
Page 480
Page 481
Page 482
Page 483
Page 484
Page 485
Page 486
Page 487
Page 488
Page 489
Page 490
Page 491
Page 492
Page 493
Page 494
Page 495
Page 496
Page 497
Page 498
Page 499
Page 500
Page 501
Page 502
Page 503
Page 504
Page 505
Page 506
Page 507
Page 508
Page 509
Page 510
Page 511
Page 512
Page 513
Page 514
Page 515
Page 516
Page 517
Page 518
Page 519
Page 520
Page 521
Page 522
Page 523
Page 524
Scan: The Lutheran Church—Missouri Synod
⤓ Download page image (full resolution)
Transcription machine transcription, uncorrected
THEOLOGICAL DOCUMENTS—COMMISSION ON THEOLOGY AND CHURCH RELATIONS
Way Forward
Way Forward
Detailed Framework
Detailed Framework
6. Framework Part B: Changing the teaching to allow for
ordination of women and men
6.3 One church – two practices
The question of the ordination of women to the office of the public ministry has been
regarded as a doctrinal matter in the life of the LCA. It is a doctrinal issue for the LCA
because our public teaching on ordination claims to clearly represent the position of
Scripture and the Confessions. Therefore, all arguments either to maintain the teaching
of the Church or to change it, need to work within the LCA’s own attitude towards the
Theses of Agreement and the process outlined for changing the public teaching of the
church (The Status of the Theses of Agreement [1975] and The Permanent Status of the
Theses of Agreement [1976]).
The Church in Synod changes its public teaching, amending the wording of TA VI:11 to
allow both men and women to be ordained, acknowledging the change under Clause
3 of the Document of Union and continuing as one church with one teaching on
ordination.
The Framework acknowledges the different theological positions on the gender (male
and female) of pastors in the Church but considers them non-divisive of church
fellowship, enabling the LCA to remain as one Church.
The LCA doctrinal statement on the Status of the Theses of Agreement and other
Doctrinal Statements, adopted by General Synod (1975) affirms as follows: ‘It is clearly
the right and the duty of the Church, in the face of current challenges, to define how it
understands the Scriptures and the Confessions. Therefore, explanations and
amendments of the Theses, as well as any other statements of a doctrinal nature,
submitted to the entire Church after thorough theological examination and discussion
and adopted by it, must be accorded the same authority in the Church as the Theses
themselves.’
6.1 Proposed amendment to TAVI:11
A baptised person who is duly called (Luke 10:16; AC Apology 7 and 8,28; TA VI:7,8)
thereby enters the office of the public ministry for the proclamation of the Word and
administration of the Sacraments. Scripture that underpins the Church’s teaching on the
office of the ministry and the rite of ordination (John 20:21-23; Matt 28:18-20;
1 Cor 11:23-26) applies to duly qualified called baptised persons although some
understand that 1 Corinthians 14:34,35 and 1 Timothy 2:11–14 prohibit baptised women
from being called into the office of the public ministry.
The current public teaching of the LCA does not permit two practices of ordination
(TA VI:11). In carrying out the resolution of General Synod (2021-23) to develop a
framework for the LCA to ‘operate as one church with two different practices of
ordination’, the Convention of General Synod is advised that any proposal put forward
to meet this synodical resolution requires a change to the teaching of the Church with
regards to male-only ordination.
6.2 Background to the proposed amendment to TAVI:11
1.
2.
3.
2
The resolution of General Synod (2021-23) directed the GCB-CoB to develop a
framework for the LCA to ‘operate as one church with two different practices of
ordination’. Subsequently, the Way Forward Theological Working Group 2 consulted
the CTICR to examine and either confirm or amend guidance to be given to the
Way Forward project on some key theological matters. Included in this consultation
was the question: ‘How would the Church properly proceed with changing its
teaching with respect to TA VI:11 in the light of the Church’s statements on “The
status of the Theses of Agreement and other doctrinal statements” (1975), and
“The permanent status of Theses of Agreement” (1976)?’
A change to public teaching in the LCA regarding ordination will require more than a
simple rescinding or removal of TA VI:11. Any such decision would result in the Church
having no clear public teaching on the eligibility of duly qualified women to be regularly
called by a congregation or the Church, and publicly acknowledged through the rite of
ordination (TA VI:7,8). On the other hand, if a proposed amendment of TA VI:11 to permit
the ordination of women and men were to meet the necessary constitutional
requirement to change the public doctrine of the church, then it would become the
credible teaching of the LCA and would be afforded the same authority as any other
part of the Theses of Agreement 3.
This document and selected attachments provide theological and procedural
advice relating to proposed changes to the Theses of Agreement and LCA public
teaching on ordination as outlined in the Framework. This advice includes
information about both the necessity for these changes and how discussion on
change to the Church’s teaching might be treated in an orderly manner by the
LCA.
What could follow from such a scenario is that TA 1:4e might then be applied to the Way
Forward Framework proposal to operate as one church with divergent views on the
practice of ordination. Some congregations, bishops, pastors, and Individual members
may still feel conscience bound to uphold an interpretation of the scriptural texts
currently cited in TA VI.11, and regularly call qualified men to serve as pastors. According
to the Theses of Agreement (I:4e), such divergent views and practices arising from
differences of interpretation are not divisive of church fellowship, providing that:
Selected documents have been identified by the Theological Working Group to be
included with this advice. This material serves as a summary and evidence of long,
thorough theological discussion and debate in the LCA, including controverted
matters of the Church’s teaching on ordination (see Section 3.4 above)
The Theological Working Group, appointed by GCB-CoB, consisted of seven members. Five of these members were
current members of CTICR, including the Churchwide bishop, who was appointed as chair.
(i)
(ii)
3
there be the readiness in principle to submit to the authority of the Word of God
thereby no clear Word of Scripture is denied, contradicted, or ignored
DSTO 1A: Status of the Theses of Agreement and other doctrinal statements A25
Page 10 of 50
Page 11 of 50
Way Forward
Way Forward
Detailed Framework
(iii)
(iv)
(v)
such divergent views in no wise impair, infringe upon, or violate the central
doctrine of Holy Scripture, justification by grace through faith in Jesus Christ
nothing be taught contrary to the publica doctrina of the Lutheran Church as laid
down in its Confessions
such divergent views are not propagated as the publica doctrina of the Church
and in no wise impair the doctrine of Holy Writ.
The Way Forward Framework proposal to amend TA VI:11 that then would permit the
ordination of women and men, cites both scripture and confession — including
‘Principles governing church fellowship’ detailed in the Document of Union and Theses of
Agreement (DU 1-7; TA 1:1-7) — in support of its conclusion that divergent views on the
practice of ordination, arising from differences of interpretation regarding scriptural texts,
such as 1 Cor 14:33b-38 and 1 Tim 2:11-15, can be held in the LCA without dividing the
whole Church (TA 1:4c; 1:4e).
Following a General Synod 2024 vote on the Way Forward Framework proposal to
amend TA VI:11, that meets the constitutional requirements to change the teaching of
the church, those who in good conscience wish to uphold an interpretation of the
scriptural texts currently cited in TA VI:11, and maintain the option for congregations to
call and ordain only men into the office of the public ministry, would be free to remain in
fellowship with those who practice the call and ordination of both women and men.
Detailed Framework
1.
Divergent views should not affect a foundational teaching of the Christian
faith, such as the teaching of the Trinity, the person and work of Christ, or
justification by grace through faith in Christ, as these teachings are
articulated in the Book of Concord. Division may occur only when teachings
that contradict such foundational teachings are held and openly taught.
2.
The ongoing disagreement about the interpretation and application of the
two texts that have been at the centre of the LCA debate (1 Cor 14:33b–36;
1 Tim 2:11–15) is a matter of exegetical opinion, does not affect such a key
church teaching and is therefore not church divisive.
3.
The Lutheran doctrine of the ministry, clearly spelt out in Augsburg Confession
5 and 14, contains nothing that excludes women from entering the ranks of
the ministry. On the contrary, the Lutheran teaching on the ministry
undergirds and reaffirms the central teaching of the Scriptures, that we are
justified by God’s grace for Christ’s sake by faith alone, the very teaching by
which the Church lives and breathes.
4.
The Theses of Agreement themselves make it clear that, as new issues and
new questions arise, the Church has the liberty to examine its teachings
afresh in the light of the Scriptures and the Confessions, ‘and accordingly
confirm them, or amend or repudiate them when further study of God’s
Word shows them to be inadequate or in error’.
5.
Pastors and lay members uphold the official teachings and practices of the
LCA as a matter of good order and church discipline, including those
teachings with which they disagree. Their consciences are not bound to
confess those teachings that they believe are at variance with the biblical
witness.
6.
There are implications in a church which practises the ordination of ‘both
women and men’ and the ordination of ‘men only’ for church polity and for
people's reception of the means of grace within the worship life of the
Church. The Church has a responsibility to engage in the ongoing task of
addressing this in such a way that the ministry of the gospel is not hindered,
Christian love is upheld, and every effort is made ‘to maintain the unity of the
Sprit in the bond of peace’ (Eph 4:3).
6.4 Church fellowship
6.4.1 Theses of Agreement 1.4E
At its February 2024 meeting the CTICR considered the application of Theses of
Agreement TA1.4e to any proposed amending of TA VI:11. The meeting
determined that one part of the Theses of Agreement (TA) cannot be used to
amend another part of the TA.
In the same way, an amendment of TA VI:11 adopted by the Church, will become
the credible teaching of the LCA and is afforded the same authority as any other
part 4. TA 1.4e cannot be applied to refute a newly introduced amendment of
TA VI:11.
The principles of church fellowship articulated in the Theses, guide the approach to
determining doctrinal matters in the Church. These principles have guided the
Church’s consideration of this matter of ordination in the same way that they have
guided previous considerations in the Church (for example, the debate on
Scripture and Inerrancy at the 1984 Convention of General Synod).
221
6.4.2 Church-divisive?
In 2018, the Convention of General Synod received a report from the CTICR which
gave a theological basis for why the ordination of both women and men need not
be divisive. The rationale included the following:
4 See Appendix
for DSTO Vol 1 A30 ‘The status of the Theses of Agreement and other doctrinal statements’
Page 12 of 50
Page 13 of 50
2026 Convention Workbook