Collection › LCMS Convention Workbook (St. Louis, Missouri) › 2026 · 69th Convention, Phoenix › Page 221

LCMS Convention Workbook St. Louis, Missouri — 2026, Page 221

front matter 1 front matter 2 front matter 3 front matter 4 front matter 5 front matter 6 front matter 7 front matter 8 front matter 9 front matter 10 front matter 11 front matter 12 front matter 13 front matter 14 front matter 15 front matter 16 front matter 17 front matter 18 front matter 19 front matter 20 front matter 21 front matter 22 front matter 23 front matter 24 front matter 25 front matter 26 front matter 27 front matter 28 front matter 29 front matter 30 front matter 31 front matter 32 front matter 33 front matter 34 front matter 35 Page 1 Page 2 Page 3 Page 4 Page 5 Page 6 Page 7 Page 8 Page 9 Page 10 Page 11 Page 12 Page 13 Page 14 Page 15 Page 16 Page 17 Page 18 Page 19 Page 20 Page 21 Page 22 Page 23 Page 24 Page 25 Page 26 Page 27 Page 28 Page 29 Page 30 Page 31 Page 32 Page 33 Page 34 Page 35 Page 36 Page 37 Page 38 Page 39 Page 40 Page 41 Page 42 Page 43 Page 44 Page 45 Page 46 Page 47 Page 48 Page 49 Page 50 Page 51 Page 52 Page 53 Page 54 Page 55 Page 56 Page 57 Page 58 Page 59 Page 60 Page 61 Page 62 Page 63 Page 64 Page 65 Page 66 Page 67 Page 68 Page 69 Page 70 Page 71 Page 72 Page 73 Page 74 Page 75 Page 76 Page 77 Page 78 Page 79 Page 80 Page 81 Page 82 Page 83 Page 84 Page 85 Page 86 Page 87 Page 88 Page 89 Page 90 Page 91 Page 92 Page 93 Page 94 Page 95 Page 96 Page 97 Page 98 Page 99 Page 100 Page 101 Page 102 Page 103 Page 104 Page 105 Page 106 Page 107 Page 108 Page 109 Page 110 Page 111 Page 112 Page 113 Page 114 Page 115 Page 116 Page 117 Page 118 Page 119 Page 120 Page 121 Page 122 Page 123 Page 124 Page 125 Page 126 Page 127 Page 128 Page 129 Page 130 Page 131 Page 132 Page 133 Page 134 Page 135 Page 136 Page 137 Page 138 Page 139 Page 140 Page 141 Page 142 Page 143 Page 144 Page 145 Page 146 Page 147 Page 148 Page 149 Page 150 Page 151 Page 152 Page 153 Page 154 Page 155 Page 156 Page 157 Page 158 Page 159 Page 160 Page 161 Page 162 Page 163 Page 164 Page 165 Page 166 Page 167 Page 168 Page 169 Page 170 Page 171 Page 172 Page 173 Page 174 Page 175 Page 176 Page 177 Page 178 Page 179 Page 180 Page 181 Page 182 Page 183 Page 184 Page 185 Page 186 Page 187 Page 188 Page 189 Page 190 Page 191 Page 192 Page 193 Page 194 Page 195 Page 196 Page 197 Page 198 Page 199 Page 200 Page 201 Page 202 Page 203 Page 204 Page 205 Page 206 Page 207 Page 208 Page 209 Page 210 Page 211 Page 212 Page 213 Page 214 Page 215 Page 216 Page 217 Page 218 Page 219 Page 220 Page 221 Page 222 Page 223 Page 224 Page 225 Page 226 Page 227 Page 228 Page 229 Page 230 Page 231 Page 232 Page 233 Page 234 Page 235 Page 236 Page 237 Page 238 Page 239 Page 240 Page 241 Page 242 Page 243 Page 244 Page 245 Page 246 Page 247 Page 248 Page 249 Page 250 Page 251 Page 252 Page 253 Page 254 Page 255 Page 256 Page 257 Page 258 Page 259 Page 260 Page 261 Page 262 Page 263 Page 264 Page 265 Page 266 Page 267 Page 268 Page 269 Page 270 Page 271 Page 272 Page 273 Page 274 Page 275 Page 276 Page 277 Page 278 Page 279 Page 280 Page 281 Page 282 Page 283 Page 284 Page 285 Page 286 Page 287 Page 288 Page 289 Page 290 Page 291 Page 292 Page 293 Page 294 Page 295 Page 296 Page 297 Page 298 Page 299 Page 300 Page 301 Page 302 Page 303 Page 304 Page 305 Page 306 Page 307 Page 308 Page 309 Page 310 Page 311 Page 312 Page 313 Page 314 Page 315 Page 316 Page 317 Page 318 Page 319 Page 320 Page 321 Page 322 Page 323 Page 324 Page 325 Page 326 Page 327 Page 328 Page 329 Page 330 Page 331 Page 332 Page 333 Page 334 Page 335 Page 336 Page 337 Page 338 Page 339 Page 340 Page 341 Page 342 Page 343 Page 344 Page 345 Page 346 Page 347 Page 348 Page 349 Page 350 Page 351 Page 352 Page 353 Page 354 Page 355 Page 356 Page 357 Page 358 Page 359 Page 360 Page 361 Page 362 Page 363 Page 364 Page 365 Page 366 Page 367 Page 368 Page 369 Page 370 Page 371 Page 372 Page 373 Page 374 Page 375 Page 376 Page 377 Page 378 Page 379 Page 380 Page 381 Page 382 Page 383 Page 384 Page 385 Page 386 Page 387 Page 388 Page 389 Page 390 Page 391 Page 392 Page 393 Page 394 Page 395 Page 396 Page 397 Page 398 Page 399 Page 400 Page 401 Page 402 Page 403 Page 404 Page 405 Page 406 Page 407 Page 408 Page 409 Page 410 Page 411 Page 412 Page 413 Page 414 Page 415 Page 416 Page 417 Page 418 Page 419 Page 420 Page 421 Page 422 Page 423 Page 424 Page 425 Page 426 Page 427 Page 428 Page 429 Page 430 Page 431 Page 432 Page 433 Page 434 Page 435 Page 436 Page 437 Page 438 Page 439 Page 440 Page 441 Page 442 Page 443 Page 444 Page 445 Page 446 Page 447 Page 448 Page 449 Page 450 Page 451 Page 452 Page 453 Page 454 Page 455 Page 456 Page 457 Page 458 Page 459 Page 460 Page 461 Page 462 Page 463 Page 464 Page 465 Page 466 Page 467 Page 468 Page 469 Page 470 Page 471 Page 472 Page 473 Page 474 Page 475 Page 476 Page 477 Page 478 Page 479 Page 480 Page 481 Page 482 Page 483 Page 484 Page 485 Page 486 Page 487 Page 488 Page 489 Page 490 Page 491 Page 492 Page 493 Page 494 Page 495 Page 496 Page 497 Page 498 Page 499 Page 500 Page 501 Page 502 Page 503 Page 504 Page 505 Page 506 Page 507 Page 508 Page 509 Page 510 Page 511 Page 512 Page 513 Page 514 Page 515 Page 516 Page 517 Page 518 Page 519 Page 520 Page 521 Page 522 Page 523 Page 524

Scan: The Lutheran Church—Missouri Synod

⤓ Download page image (full resolution)

Transcription machine transcription, uncorrected

⤓ Download .txt · copy text

THEOLOGICAL DOCUMENTS­­—COMMISSION ON THEOLOGY AND CHURCH RELATIONS
Way Forward

Way Forward

Detailed Framework

Detailed Framework

6. Framework Part B: Changing the teaching to allow for
ordination of women and men

6.3 One church – two practices
The question of the ordination of women to the office of the public ministry has been
regarded as a doctrinal matter in the life of the LCA. It is a doctrinal issue for the LCA
because our public teaching on ordination claims to clearly represent the position of
Scripture and the Confessions. Therefore, all arguments either to maintain the teaching
of the Church or to change it, need to work within the LCA’s own attitude towards the
Theses of Agreement and the process outlined for changing the public teaching of the
church (The Status of the Theses of Agreement [1975] and The Permanent Status of the
Theses of Agreement [1976]).

The Church in Synod changes its public teaching, amending the wording of TA VI:11 to
allow both men and women to be ordained, acknowledging the change under Clause
3 of the Document of Union and continuing as one church with one teaching on
ordination.
The Framework acknowledges the different theological positions on the gender (male
and female) of pastors in the Church but considers them non-divisive of church
fellowship, enabling the LCA to remain as one Church.

The LCA doctrinal statement on the Status of the Theses of Agreement and other
Doctrinal Statements, adopted by General Synod (1975) affirms as follows: ‘It is clearly
the right and the duty of the Church, in the face of current challenges, to define how it
understands the Scriptures and the Confessions. Therefore, explanations and
amendments of the Theses, as well as any other statements of a doctrinal nature,
submitted to the entire Church after thorough theological examination and discussion
and adopted by it, must be accorded the same authority in the Church as the Theses
themselves.’

6.1 Proposed amendment to TAVI:11
A baptised person who is duly called (Luke 10:16; AC Apology 7 and 8,28; TA VI:7,8)
thereby enters the office of the public ministry for the proclamation of the Word and
administration of the Sacraments. Scripture that underpins the Church’s teaching on the
office of the ministry and the rite of ordination (John 20:21-23; Matt 28:18-20;
1 Cor 11:23-26) applies to duly qualified called baptised persons although some
understand that 1 Corinthians 14:34,35 and 1 Timothy 2:11–14 prohibit baptised women
from being called into the office of the public ministry.

The current public teaching of the LCA does not permit two practices of ordination
(TA VI:11). In carrying out the resolution of General Synod (2021-23) to develop a
framework for the LCA to ‘operate as one church with two different practices of
ordination’, the Convention of General Synod is advised that any proposal put forward
to meet this synodical resolution requires a change to the teaching of the Church with
regards to male-only ordination.

6.2 Background to the proposed amendment to TAVI:11

1.

2.

3.

2

The resolution of General Synod (2021-23) directed the GCB-CoB to develop a
framework for the LCA to ‘operate as one church with two different practices of
ordination’. Subsequently, the Way Forward Theological Working Group 2 consulted
the CTICR to examine and either confirm or amend guidance to be given to the
Way Forward project on some key theological matters. Included in this consultation
was the question: ‘How would the Church properly proceed with changing its
teaching with respect to TA VI:11 in the light of the Church’s statements on “The
status of the Theses of Agreement and other doctrinal statements” (1975), and
“The permanent status of Theses of Agreement” (1976)?’

A change to public teaching in the LCA regarding ordination will require more than a
simple rescinding or removal of TA VI:11. Any such decision would result in the Church
having no clear public teaching on the eligibility of duly qualified women to be regularly
called by a congregation or the Church, and publicly acknowledged through the rite of
ordination (TA VI:7,8). On the other hand, if a proposed amendment of TA VI:11 to permit
the ordination of women and men were to meet the necessary constitutional
requirement to change the public doctrine of the church, then it would become the
credible teaching of the LCA and would be afforded the same authority as any other
part of the Theses of Agreement 3.

This document and selected attachments provide theological and procedural
advice relating to proposed changes to the Theses of Agreement and LCA public
teaching on ordination as outlined in the Framework. This advice includes
information about both the necessity for these changes and how discussion on
change to the Church’s teaching might be treated in an orderly manner by the
LCA.

What could follow from such a scenario is that TA 1:4e might then be applied to the Way
Forward Framework proposal to operate as one church with divergent views on the
practice of ordination. Some congregations, bishops, pastors, and Individual members
may still feel conscience bound to uphold an interpretation of the scriptural texts
currently cited in TA VI.11, and regularly call qualified men to serve as pastors. According
to the Theses of Agreement (I:4e), such divergent views and practices arising from
differences of interpretation are not divisive of church fellowship, providing that:

Selected documents have been identified by the Theological Working Group to be
included with this advice. This material serves as a summary and evidence of long,
thorough theological discussion and debate in the LCA, including controverted
matters of the Church’s teaching on ordination (see Section 3.4 above)

The Theological Working Group, appointed by GCB-CoB, consisted of seven members. Five of these members were
current members of CTICR, including the Churchwide bishop, who was appointed as chair.

(i)
(ii)
3

there be the readiness in principle to submit to the authority of the Word of God
thereby no clear Word of Scripture is denied, contradicted, or ignored

DSTO 1A: Status of the Theses of Agreement and other doctrinal statements A25

Page 10 of 50

Page 11 of 50

Way Forward

Way Forward

Detailed Framework
(iii)
(iv)
(v)

such divergent views in no wise impair, infringe upon, or violate the central
doctrine of Holy Scripture, justification by grace through faith in Jesus Christ
nothing be taught contrary to the publica doctrina of the Lutheran Church as laid
down in its Confessions
such divergent views are not propagated as the publica doctrina of the Church
and in no wise impair the doctrine of Holy Writ.

The Way Forward Framework proposal to amend TA VI:11 that then would permit the
ordination of women and men, cites both scripture and confession — including
‘Principles governing church fellowship’ detailed in the Document of Union and Theses of
Agreement (DU 1-7; TA 1:1-7) — in support of its conclusion that divergent views on the
practice of ordination, arising from differences of interpretation regarding scriptural texts,
such as 1 Cor 14:33b-38 and 1 Tim 2:11-15, can be held in the LCA without dividing the
whole Church (TA 1:4c; 1:4e).
Following a General Synod 2024 vote on the Way Forward Framework proposal to
amend TA VI:11, that meets the constitutional requirements to change the teaching of
the church, those who in good conscience wish to uphold an interpretation of the
scriptural texts currently cited in TA VI:11, and maintain the option for congregations to
call and ordain only men into the office of the public ministry, would be free to remain in
fellowship with those who practice the call and ordination of both women and men.

Detailed Framework
1.

Divergent views should not affect a foundational teaching of the Christian
faith, such as the teaching of the Trinity, the person and work of Christ, or
justification by grace through faith in Christ, as these teachings are
articulated in the Book of Concord. Division may occur only when teachings
that contradict such foundational teachings are held and openly taught.

2.

The ongoing disagreement about the interpretation and application of the
two texts that have been at the centre of the LCA debate (1 Cor 14:33b–36;
1 Tim 2:11–15) is a matter of exegetical opinion, does not affect such a key
church teaching and is therefore not church divisive.

3.

The Lutheran doctrine of the ministry, clearly spelt out in Augsburg Confession
5 and 14, contains nothing that excludes women from entering the ranks of
the ministry. On the contrary, the Lutheran teaching on the ministry
undergirds and reaffirms the central teaching of the Scriptures, that we are
justified by God’s grace for Christ’s sake by faith alone, the very teaching by
which the Church lives and breathes.

4.

The Theses of Agreement themselves make it clear that, as new issues and
new questions arise, the Church has the liberty to examine its teachings
afresh in the light of the Scriptures and the Confessions, ‘and accordingly
confirm them, or amend or repudiate them when further study of God’s
Word shows them to be inadequate or in error’.

5.

Pastors and lay members uphold the official teachings and practices of the
LCA as a matter of good order and church discipline, including those
teachings with which they disagree. Their consciences are not bound to
confess those teachings that they believe are at variance with the biblical
witness.

6.

There are implications in a church which practises the ordination of ‘both
women and men’ and the ordination of ‘men only’ for church polity and for
people's reception of the means of grace within the worship life of the
Church. The Church has a responsibility to engage in the ongoing task of
addressing this in such a way that the ministry of the gospel is not hindered,
Christian love is upheld, and every effort is made ‘to maintain the unity of the
Sprit in the bond of peace’ (Eph 4:3).

6.4 Church fellowship
6.4.1 Theses of Agreement 1.4E
At its February 2024 meeting the CTICR considered the application of Theses of
Agreement TA1.4e to any proposed amending of TA VI:11. The meeting
determined that one part of the Theses of Agreement (TA) cannot be used to
amend another part of the TA.
In the same way, an amendment of TA VI:11 adopted by the Church, will become
the credible teaching of the LCA and is afforded the same authority as any other
part 4. TA 1.4e cannot be applied to refute a newly introduced amendment of
TA VI:11.
The principles of church fellowship articulated in the Theses, guide the approach to
determining doctrinal matters in the Church. These principles have guided the
Church’s consideration of this matter of ordination in the same way that they have
guided previous considerations in the Church (for example, the debate on
Scripture and Inerrancy at the 1984 Convention of General Synod).

221

6.4.2 Church-divisive?
In 2018, the Convention of General Synod received a report from the CTICR which
gave a theological basis for why the ordination of both women and men need not
be divisive. The rationale included the following:

4 See Appendix

for DSTO Vol 1 A30 ‘The status of the Theses of Agreement and other doctrinal statements’

Page 12 of 50

Page 13 of 50

2026 Convention Workbook