Collection › LCMS Convention Workbook (St. Louis, Missouri) › 2026 · 69th Convention, Phoenix › Page 55

LCMS Convention Workbook St. Louis, Missouri — 2026, Page 55

front matter 1 front matter 2 front matter 3 front matter 4 front matter 5 front matter 6 front matter 7 front matter 8 front matter 9 front matter 10 front matter 11 front matter 12 front matter 13 front matter 14 front matter 15 front matter 16 front matter 17 front matter 18 front matter 19 front matter 20 front matter 21 front matter 22 front matter 23 front matter 24 front matter 25 front matter 26 front matter 27 front matter 28 front matter 29 front matter 30 front matter 31 front matter 32 front matter 33 front matter 34 front matter 35 Page 1 Page 2 Page 3 Page 4 Page 5 Page 6 Page 7 Page 8 Page 9 Page 10 Page 11 Page 12 Page 13 Page 14 Page 15 Page 16 Page 17 Page 18 Page 19 Page 20 Page 21 Page 22 Page 23 Page 24 Page 25 Page 26 Page 27 Page 28 Page 29 Page 30 Page 31 Page 32 Page 33 Page 34 Page 35 Page 36 Page 37 Page 38 Page 39 Page 40 Page 41 Page 42 Page 43 Page 44 Page 45 Page 46 Page 47 Page 48 Page 49 Page 50 Page 51 Page 52 Page 53 Page 54 Page 55 Page 56 Page 57 Page 58 Page 59 Page 60 Page 61 Page 62 Page 63 Page 64 Page 65 Page 66 Page 67 Page 68 Page 69 Page 70 Page 71 Page 72 Page 73 Page 74 Page 75 Page 76 Page 77 Page 78 Page 79 Page 80 Page 81 Page 82 Page 83 Page 84 Page 85 Page 86 Page 87 Page 88 Page 89 Page 90 Page 91 Page 92 Page 93 Page 94 Page 95 Page 96 Page 97 Page 98 Page 99 Page 100 Page 101 Page 102 Page 103 Page 104 Page 105 Page 106 Page 107 Page 108 Page 109 Page 110 Page 111 Page 112 Page 113 Page 114 Page 115 Page 116 Page 117 Page 118 Page 119 Page 120 Page 121 Page 122 Page 123 Page 124 Page 125 Page 126 Page 127 Page 128 Page 129 Page 130 Page 131 Page 132 Page 133 Page 134 Page 135 Page 136 Page 137 Page 138 Page 139 Page 140 Page 141 Page 142 Page 143 Page 144 Page 145 Page 146 Page 147 Page 148 Page 149 Page 150 Page 151 Page 152 Page 153 Page 154 Page 155 Page 156 Page 157 Page 158 Page 159 Page 160 Page 161 Page 162 Page 163 Page 164 Page 165 Page 166 Page 167 Page 168 Page 169 Page 170 Page 171 Page 172 Page 173 Page 174 Page 175 Page 176 Page 177 Page 178 Page 179 Page 180 Page 181 Page 182 Page 183 Page 184 Page 185 Page 186 Page 187 Page 188 Page 189 Page 190 Page 191 Page 192 Page 193 Page 194 Page 195 Page 196 Page 197 Page 198 Page 199 Page 200 Page 201 Page 202 Page 203 Page 204 Page 205 Page 206 Page 207 Page 208 Page 209 Page 210 Page 211 Page 212 Page 213 Page 214 Page 215 Page 216 Page 217 Page 218 Page 219 Page 220 Page 221 Page 222 Page 223 Page 224 Page 225 Page 226 Page 227 Page 228 Page 229 Page 230 Page 231 Page 232 Page 233 Page 234 Page 235 Page 236 Page 237 Page 238 Page 239 Page 240 Page 241 Page 242 Page 243 Page 244 Page 245 Page 246 Page 247 Page 248 Page 249 Page 250 Page 251 Page 252 Page 253 Page 254 Page 255 Page 256 Page 257 Page 258 Page 259 Page 260 Page 261 Page 262 Page 263 Page 264 Page 265 Page 266 Page 267 Page 268 Page 269 Page 270 Page 271 Page 272 Page 273 Page 274 Page 275 Page 276 Page 277 Page 278 Page 279 Page 280 Page 281 Page 282 Page 283 Page 284 Page 285 Page 286 Page 287 Page 288 Page 289 Page 290 Page 291 Page 292 Page 293 Page 294 Page 295 Page 296 Page 297 Page 298 Page 299 Page 300 Page 301 Page 302 Page 303 Page 304 Page 305 Page 306 Page 307 Page 308 Page 309 Page 310 Page 311 Page 312 Page 313 Page 314 Page 315 Page 316 Page 317 Page 318 Page 319 Page 320 Page 321 Page 322 Page 323 Page 324 Page 325 Page 326 Page 327 Page 328 Page 329 Page 330 Page 331 Page 332 Page 333 Page 334 Page 335 Page 336 Page 337 Page 338 Page 339 Page 340 Page 341 Page 342 Page 343 Page 344 Page 345 Page 346 Page 347 Page 348 Page 349 Page 350 Page 351 Page 352 Page 353 Page 354 Page 355 Page 356 Page 357 Page 358 Page 359 Page 360 Page 361 Page 362 Page 363 Page 364 Page 365 Page 366 Page 367 Page 368 Page 369 Page 370 Page 371 Page 372 Page 373 Page 374 Page 375 Page 376 Page 377 Page 378 Page 379 Page 380 Page 381 Page 382 Page 383 Page 384 Page 385 Page 386 Page 387 Page 388 Page 389 Page 390 Page 391 Page 392 Page 393 Page 394 Page 395 Page 396 Page 397 Page 398 Page 399 Page 400 Page 401 Page 402 Page 403 Page 404 Page 405 Page 406 Page 407 Page 408 Page 409 Page 410 Page 411 Page 412 Page 413 Page 414 Page 415 Page 416 Page 417 Page 418 Page 419 Page 420 Page 421 Page 422 Page 423 Page 424 Page 425 Page 426 Page 427 Page 428 Page 429 Page 430 Page 431 Page 432 Page 433 Page 434 Page 435 Page 436 Page 437 Page 438 Page 439 Page 440 Page 441 Page 442 Page 443 Page 444 Page 445 Page 446 Page 447 Page 448 Page 449 Page 450 Page 451 Page 452 Page 453 Page 454 Page 455 Page 456 Page 457 Page 458 Page 459 Page 460 Page 461 Page 462 Page 463 Page 464 Page 465 Page 466 Page 467 Page 468 Page 469 Page 470 Page 471 Page 472 Page 473 Page 474 Page 475 Page 476 Page 477 Page 478 Page 479 Page 480 Page 481 Page 482 Page 483 Page 484 Page 485 Page 486 Page 487 Page 488 Page 489 Page 490 Page 491 Page 492 Page 493 Page 494 Page 495 Page 496 Page 497 Page 498 Page 499 Page 500 Page 501 Page 502 Page 503 Page 504 Page 505 Page 506 Page 507 Page 508 Page 509 Page 510 Page 511 Page 512 Page 513 Page 514 Page 515 Page 516 Page 517 Page 518 Page 519 Page 520 Page 521 Page 522 Page 523 Page 524

Scan: The Lutheran Church—Missouri Synod

⤓ Download page image (full resolution)

Transcription machine transcription, uncorrected

⤓ Download .txt · copy text

OFFICER, BOARD, AND COMMISSION REPORTS

C. BIM Policy Development
The BIM established policies addressing multiple mission and
ministry areas in its initial years of existence (2010–13) and has
regularly updated these policies in support of programs carried out
by the OIM. In 2023 the BIM approved a complete rewrite of its
policies to focus on monitoring the strategic plan of the OIM and
the supporting budget. The policies allow the BIM to monitor the
OIM strategic plan to assure that OIM staffing and programs support Articles II and III of the Synod Constitution and the mission
and ministry emphasis established by the Synod in convention.

D. Assessment of Mission and Ministry
The Board for National Mission and BIM under Bylaws 3.8.2.2
and 3.8.3.2 are, during each triennium between national conventions, to gather sufficient information from Synod members to
facilitate the boards’ assessment of the effectiveness of the Synod’s mission and ministry. See Report R8 of the Joint Mission Assessment Committee. Based on this assessment, the boards jointly
submitted two overtures for the 2026 convention’s consideration
regarding the mission and ministry emphasis for the next triennium
and proposed changes to the process for developing the same in
the future.

E. International Schools
The LCMS schools in Hong Kong, Shanghai, and Hanoi continue to be exemplary academic college preparatory schools. These
schools primarily serve children K–12 of expatriate families. Due
to religious freedom restrictions in effect in China and Vietnam
the ability to maintain a Lutheran identity and to proclaim the pure
Gospel is constrained for Shanghai and Hanoi. In order to address
these concerns, the Synod Board of Directors and the BIM working
with the Chief Mission Officer and the OIM have established an
International Schools Task Force that is researching options and developing plans for the Synod’s international schools going forward.
The task force is comprised of representatives from the BIM, Board
of Directors, and officers of the Synod.
The Hanoi and Shanghai schools are accredited by the National
Lutheran School Accreditation Commission (NLSA) and the Western Association of Schools and Colleges. During 2026, the Hanoi
and Shanghai schools will commence the process of re-accreditation with NLSA.
While there are fewer restrictions in Hong Kong on religious
freedom, the local school leadership in Hong Kong has not been
supportive of the operating agreement provisions regarding the
LCMS religious doctrine and education as well as governance matters. Therefore, in the fall of 2025, the Synod filed a lawsuit against
the local management group, Hong Kong International School Association, Limited.
John W. Edson, Chairman

ing committee of the Synod’s two mission boards, the Board for
National Mission (BNM) and the Board for International Mission
(BIM). It is composed of two members from each mission board.
Its primary task is to facilitate and oversee the execution of Bylaws
3.8.2.2 and 3.8.3.2, which task the BNM and BIM to work together
for the “assessment and evaluation of the effectiveness of the Synod’s triennial mission and ministry emphases.” The JMAC assists
the BNM and BIM in providing ideas and guidance to the Synod’s
district conventions in order to fulfill their duty in accordance with
Bylaw 4.2.1 (d) to “forward to the national convention a list of two
or three triennial mission and ministry emphases for consideration
by the national convention.” In addition to this responsibility, the
BNM and BIM were tasked by the 2023 Synod convention (Resolution 4-02) to “to continue to assess, clarify, and further refine the
process whereby a recommendation for the triennial mission and
ministry emphasis is brought before the Synod in convention for
consideration and adoption,” and to “recommend a new mission
and ministry emphasis for consideration at the 2026 Synod convention.” The mission boards were also given the task (2023 Res.
4-03) to “recommend possible revisions to the mission priorities
and possible bylaw revisions that would articulate both the process
for developing mission priorities and how those priorities would
function in the mission and ministry of the Synod.”

B. Assessment and Conclusions from
Conversations with District Leaders
The JMAC first facilitated members of the two mission boards
into conversation with all 35 districts to assess how the current
mission and ministry emphasis (Making Disciples for Life) and the
Synod’s seven mission priorities were perceived and being used in
their district and among their congregations. Next, a survey was
taken of a random sampling of pastors, church workers, and congregations throughout the Synod to gather more grassroots feedback as to the awareness, visibility, applicability, and relevance of
the current mission and ministry emphasis and mission priorities.
As a result of these conversations and feedback, it was determined
that: (1) many districts were coming up with and using their own
mission and ministry emphasis in place of the Synod’s; (2) the Synod’s mission priorities, while good, were too many and too wordy
to be easily remembered and employed; (3) the mission and ministry emphasis and mission priorities were often confused, not clearly
defined, and not coordinated; and (4) the process for developing
and adopting a new Synod mission and ministry emphasis was too
cumbersome, unworkable, and not being carried out.

C. Recommendations
The JMAC recommended to the BNM and the BIM that three
overtures be offered at the Synod convention:
1.

A new and streamlined process for assessing, evaluating, and
proposing a mission and ministry emphasis;

2.

To sunset the mission priorities of the Synod and in their
place recommend attention to and use of the 10 objectives of
Synod as listed in Article III of the Synod Constitution; and

3.

To recommend to the Synod that Tell the Next Generation be
adopted as the mission and ministry emphasis for the next
triennium.

R8

Report of the Joint Mission Assessment
Committee of the Boards for National
and International Mission
A. Committee Responsibilities
The Joint Mission Assessment Committee (JMAC) is a stand-

55

The new process being proposed for assessing, evaluating, and
proposing a mission and ministry emphasis will give the mission
boards a more direct role in guiding the mission emphasis of the
Synod in collaboration with the President of Synod and in fraternal
2026 Convention Workbook